IBM ProtectTIER vs Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery comparison

IBM and Infrascale are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. IBM is ranked #65, while Infrascale is ranked #24 with an average rating of 9.0. IBM holds a 0.7% mindshare in BRS, compared to Infrascale’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 60% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Infrascale users who would recommend it.

IBM ProtectTIER

Read 7 IBM ProtectTIER reviews

1,825 Views
1,442 Comparison Views

60% willing to recommend

Infrascale Backup & Disaste...

Read 19 Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery reviews

4,436 Views
2,395 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

IBM ProtectTIER

Infrascale Backup & Disaste...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 11, 2024

IBM ProtectTIER and Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery are prominent solutions in the data protection market. In many aspects, Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery appears to offer superior capabilities and higher satisfaction levels among users.

Features: IBM ProtectTIER offers robust deduplication technology, efficient data storage, and high performance in backup and restore operations. Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery features comprehensive disaster recovery solutions, fast backup speeds, and seamless cloud integration. Users value Infrascale's advanced recovery options and intuitive interface.

Room for Improvement: IBM ProtectTIER needs better integration with other platforms, enhanced support for diverse environments, and more user-friendly management tools. Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery requires improved documentation, more intuitive configuration options, and enhanced scalability. Infrascale's areas for improvement appear more manageable to address.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM ProtectTIER users find the deployment process complex and time-consuming, though its customer service is rated positively. Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery is praised for straightforward deployment and responsive customer support, giving it an advantage in ease of use and service.

Pricing and ROI: IBM ProtectTIER faces criticism for high setup costs and longer ROI periods. Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery offers competitive pricing and faster ROI, with users noting its cost-effectiveness and quicker returns on investment.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM ProtectTIER vs. Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

IBM ProtectTIER vs. Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 896,034 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM ProtectTIER

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

65th

Average Rating

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Deduplication Software (13th)

Infrascale Backup & Disaste...

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

24th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Backup (22nd), Disaster Recovery as a Service (5th), Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (16th), SaaS Backup (11th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of IBM ProtectTIER is 0.7%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery is 0.9%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Backup and Recovery Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery	0.9%
IBM ProtectTIER	0.7%
Other	98.4%

Backup and Recovery

Featured Reviews

Avdhesh Garg

Technical Lead at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Provides a short-term backup, archive, and cataloging for 20,000 people in our organization

The backup for a large amount of data is slow. When there's a large amount of data, sometimes the backup isn't completed in time. I have a 24 hour cycle, so it doesn't get completed in 24 hours with the large amount of data. With Veritas NetBackup, I can take 20 terabytes of backup in a day.

Read full review

Vivek_Jaiswal

Security Engineer at LTI Mindtree

Cloud backups have strengthened ransomware recovery and now protect critical business data

I see several areas where Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery could be improved. First is the architectural design and configuration, along with operational maturity, as well as security integration. The performance of support can definitely be improved with easier on-call support features for P1 and P2 incidents. Getting quick support from the vendor during major recoveries or disasters would be greatly appreciated. Additionally, improving the strength of ransomware protections, addressing critical gaps in deployments, enforcing backup immutability policies, and making disaster recovery testing routine instead of an ad hoc process are important. Validating that I can quickly recover data should be a priority, and improved runbooks or operational maturity platforms would be beneficial for data recovery from critical incidents.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the incremental backup."

"Overall IBM ProtectTIER is a great solution."

"I will highly recommend this product for excellent and quick backup solution in small and large IBM I Series environment."

"In terms of stability, I've found it to be very stable. I've walked into the server room when it was at 60 degrees Celcius, and it was still running fine."

"The solution is highly stable."

"The most valuable features are the Self-Service, and the ability to search the data."

"The most valuable features are the self-service features and the ability to search the data."

"In terms of stability, I've found it to be very stable."

More IBM ProtectTIER pros

"The overall ease of use and management of the solution using the Infrascale Dashboard is very good. We haven't had any issues. It is easy to learn. Most of our techs who deal with backups are usually up and running with the dashboard within a day or so. They don't have a lot of buried features where you have to dig through things to get to the resolution. It is pretty self-explanatory."

"There is a great return on investment with Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery, as I have saved a significant amount of time and money. I need fewer employees to support maintenance requirements, alerts monitoring, and recovery requests."

"What I like the most about it is that backups and restores are simple, straightforward, and clean. It does not require six people to get involved in order to do a restore or perform a backup."

"The Infrascale Dashboard is very easy to understand, has a good overview, and gives me access to all my appliances without having to have a local VPN connection to the individual clients. It makes it very easy to find my way around."

"Given that we are in the hurricane belt, the spin-up of replicated servers in the cloud is among the most valuable features. If our site goes down we can just connect to the cloud appliance, spin up the servers, and we are good to go."

"Get Infrascale and talk to their team. They will support you, and they will make you the happiest customer out there."

"The experience that we have had with this product is generally good."

"From a backup and disaster recovery perspective, it has been a night and day difference."

More Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery pros

Cons

"I would like the possibility to back up the infrastructure and then replicate it upon on restart, without having to orchestrate the starting of the VM."

"The backup for a large amount of data is slow. When there's a large amount of data, sometimes the backup isn't completed in time."

"Setting up the system to work with legacy equipment is a bit complex at times."

"My advice to anybody who is considering this solution is to conduct a proof of concept first because everybody's needs are different, and this product is not suitable for every kind of backup."

"The configuration wizards are still complex and hard to navigate."

"IBM ProtectTIER could improve by being more user-friendly."

"It is unmanageable. Support would be good."

"The configuration wizards are still complex and hard to navigate. These should be easier to manage."

More IBM ProtectTIER cons

"Having options to replicate between their data centers, once the data is offsite, would be an improvement that they could make."

"When you are ordering hardware appliances, they have to be delivered from America. In the past, hard drives on the appliance have been simple SSD drives that are installed. However, they don't have a local supply for the SSD drives in the UK. They have to be exported from the US, arrive, and then I have to go and install them. Then, they will rebuild it from their side of things. However, I could order that same SSD drive online and get it the next day. So, I have to wait days for things to come when I could get the exact same drive the next day in the UK, if I wanted to. That causes a bit of a problem. I don't know how many businesses they have in the UK, but I do think that having to import stuff from the US is a time-consuming problem. If there was a holding in the UK, then we wouldn't have that delay in time."

"There could be some room for improvement in the on-premises hardware selection."

"I think they could increase security. I would like to see more features for the section on the viruses and maybe another in reference to two-factor authentication."

"I would like to be able to limit the bandwidth in cases, for example, where we are uploading the backup."

"The pricing model that they recently changed to is a little bit complicated, and the biggest area for improvement is a better way of figuring out how to price it."

"The customer was probably down for about three days; this was a very difficult situation for us to be in."

"The only thing I would suggest, and I have talked to my manager about it already, is that they should have a direct backup-to-cloud solution. It should be something that does not require me to do an image backup, and then individual file and folder backups, to be able to restore individual files."

More Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We have a capacity-based license, which is managed centrally for all the sites of my company."

"IBM ProtectTIER is an expensive solution."

"The customer can decide how they want to purchase a license. However, the price of the solution is expensive."

"This solution is very expensive."

"Our licensing fees are billed every four months."

"They are incredibly fair and willing to work with their partners to make their pricing work for both partners and the end users."

"The appliances have different prices because of storage, size, and memory. For example, the older machines support more virtual machines, whereas the new one only supports one virtual machine. As we have purchased the later appliances, they have probably been a little bit more expensive because they have to be good enough to keep the business running if the physical server goes down. We learned our lesson from the one that went down when we tried to run products and it wasn't quick enough."

"The licensing is based on how much data you have plus what appliances you need."

"You get unlimited clients and buy a bucket of space. In addition to the standard fees there were setup fees."

"The licensing structure was changed some time ago and it's a lot more efficient and the price points are a lot better. They're improving and heading in the right direction."

"It is super competitive. It is worth taking a look at it from a licensing and pricing perspective."

"Infrascale's pricing, to me, was outstanding and was one of the major factors in my decision to go with Infrascale... My customer had a different solution before and his monthly payment was three times as much as the payment he now has with Infrascale."

More Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

896,034 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Healthcare Company

13%

Construction Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	3

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	20
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Infrascale Platform?

The pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery have been handled by the account manager and leadership. The discussions regarding the pricing and licensing cos...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Infrascale Platform?

I see several areas where Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery could be improved. First is the architectural design and configuration, along with operational maturity, as well as security inte...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Infrascale Platform?

Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery serves as my primary disaster recovery management platform, with a focus on ransomware protections and ransomware recovery. I have used Infrascale Backup &...

See all answers

Comparisons

Dell PowerProtect Data Domain vs IBM ProtectTIER

Compared 10% of the time

HPE StoreOnce vs IBM ProtectTIER

Compared 8% of the time

CMIT Data Backup vs IBM ProtectTIER

Compared 7% of the time

Rubrik vs IBM ProtectTIER

Compared 6% of the time

IBM Spectrum Protect Plus vs IBM ProtectTIER

Compared 6% of the time

More IBM ProtectTIER Competitors

Veeam Data Platform vs Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery

Compared 5% of the time

Veeam Data Cloud for Microsoft 365 vs Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery

Compared 5% of the time

Datto SIRIS vs Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery

Compared 4% of the time

SEP Software vs Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery

Compared 4% of the time

HPE Zerto Software vs Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery

Compared 3% of the time

More Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Deduplication Software

May 2026

Download IBM ProtectTIER product report

Buyer's Guide

Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery

May 2026

Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery report

Download Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery product report

Also Known As

No data available

Infrascale Platform

Overview

IBM ProtectTIER is designed for backup and recovery, providing efficient data management for IBM I Series environments. It offers valuable features like self-service, high adaptability, and data search capabilities.

IBM ProtectTIER stands out in environments requiring robust backup and recovery solutions, particularly suited for IBM I Series. Known for its efficiency in managing large volumes of data, it integrates a command-line interface, automatic workload distribution, and a virtual tape library. While highly functional, improvements in redundancy management, interface complexity, and user-friendliness are needed. It also faces challenges in integrating with legacy systems and ensuring fast backup speeds for substantial data loads.

What are the key features of IBM ProtectTIER?

Self-service: Empowers users to manage backups with ease.
Data Search: Facilitates quick retrieval of required data.
High Adaptability: Adjusts efficiently to data shrinkage needs.
Command-line Interface: Provides effective control over operations.
Incremental Backup: Ensures efficient data storage and saving resources.
Workload Movement: Automatically distributes tasks across storage tiers.
Virtual Tape Library: Configurable for multiple drives, enhancing capacity.

What benefits should users look for?

High Efficiency: Processes and catalogs millions of frames quickly.
Risk Reduction: Uses impressive raw capacity ratios to minimize risk.
Ease of Use: Offers capabilities that simplify backup and recovery tasks.

Organizations use IBM ProtectTIER to manage backup and recovery successfully, deploying it in physical and hybrid infrastructures. It supports short-term backup and archiving for internal IT within diverse deployment methods, accommodating thousands of users and multiple clients while securing database backups effectively.

IBM

Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery enables quick disaster recovery with features like centralized management, fast recovery, and Critical Server Insurance. Its platform ensures data security and operational resilience, appealing to businesses needing reliable disaster recovery.

Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery offers an efficient, transparent backup process with a robust platform that provides data security through deduplication, compression, and encryption. It supports easy deployment, manages backups under a unified dashboard, and allows businesses to spin up VMs locally or in the cloud without additional fees. While it provides a user-friendly interface, opportunities exist for modernizing interfaces and enhancing reporting. Users desire scalable analytics, better alerts, simplified pricing, diverse replication, and improved tech support.

What are the most important features of Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery?

Centralized Management: Streamlines monitoring and control of backup operations through a unified dashboard.
Fast Recovery: Enables rapid restoration of data to minimize downtime and impact on operations.
Flexible Deployment: Supports deployment across cloud and on-premises environments.
Critical Server Insurance: Ensures quick disaster recovery of essential servers.
Data Security: Utilizes deduplication, compression, and encryption to protect data.
VM Spin-Up: Allows virtual machines to be spun up locally or in the cloud without extra fees.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Operational Resilience: Enhances business continuity through reliable recovery options.
Cost Efficiency: Minimizes costs while maximizing efficiency with advanced data protection technologies.
Transparent Processes: Provides clear and efficient backup processes.
Scalability: Adapts to growing data needs with scalable deployment options.
Customer Support: Offers responsive technical support and comprehensive documentation.

Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery is employed by businesses to protect critical data, including file servers and cloud environments. Managed service providers leverage its capabilities for virtual server protection, ensuring no service disruption and fast recovery from accidental deletions or ransomware. Industries such as publishing and healthcare rely on its rapid recovery capabilities to maintain critical operations and manage sensitive data effectively.

Infrascale

Sample Customers

Durham Police Department, Re-Store LLC, CenterGrid, pixx.io GmbH, Australian Government Department of Defence, QD, Refresco Gerber

MSPs servicing small and mid-size companies VARs servicing mid-sized companies Direct SMB or mid-sized companies

Buyer's Guide

IBM ProtectTIER vs. Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery

April 2026

Free Report: IBM ProtectTIER vs. Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM ProtectTIER vs. Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

896,034 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM ProtectTIER vs. Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery report.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors, best Disaster Recovery (DR) Software vendors, and best SaaS Backup vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.