Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM B2B Integrator vs Mule ESB comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
5.6
IBM B2B Integrator offers good value and quick ROI despite maintenance overhead, as users appreciate its efficient data handling.
Sentiment score
5.6
Calculating ROI from Mule ESB varies, influenced by design strategies, licensing costs, and varying perceptions of its value.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.5
IBM B2B Integrator support is praised for critical issues but varies by region and personnel accessibility.
Sentiment score
6.6
Mule ESB support varies by subscription, offering quick responses but sometimes lacks depth; forums provide additional insights.
They are reachable and provide immediate answers.
We have a good relationship with our vendor, and they are ready to help us with any technical issues.
The technical support of Mule ESB can be rated from nine to ten.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.6
IBM B2B Integrator is praised for scalability, ease of implementation, and reliability in managing growing transaction volumes.
Sentiment score
7.5
Mule ESB scales efficiently for diverse enterprises, supporting seamless cloud deployments and handling extensive data through flexible integration.
If it's properly configured and installed with the right infrastructure, it's the best product for scalability.
Mule ESB is a scalable solution.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.2
IBM B2B Integrator is praised for stability and reliability, despite some database issues and calls for better scalability.
Sentiment score
7.1
Mule ESB is stable and reliable, despite minor issues with older versions, large files, and clustering.
 

Room For Improvement

IBM B2B Integrator users desire better API integration, modern interfaces, simplified processes, cloud automation, and improved multilingual support.
Mule ESB users report challenges with documentation, stability, performance, licensing costs, support, and integration, requiring significant improvements.
Compared to other applications such as MuleSoft or Boomi, they have many cloud connectors and multiple connectors for integrating with Salesforce or other CRM or ERP applications, whereas here you may have to develop them, which is not native.
More information is needed from MuleSoft.
From my perspective, Mule ESB is lightweight, but it can be improved when it comes to the agility of the system.
 

Setup Cost

IBM B2B Integrator is costly but offers flexible pricing with options for licenses and subscriptions based on usage.
Mule ESB is seen as expensive with flexible pricing and offers support only in the paid Enterprise version.
It tends to be very expensive because the IBM license model is oriented toward paying for the power of the machine where you install the platform.
 

Valuable Features

IBM B2B Integrator provides secure, flexible integration with various protocols, supporting EDI standards and customization for seamless application integration.
Mule ESB provides flexible, high-performance integration with extensive connectivity, DataWeave, API-led architecture, cloud capabilities, and strong support.
The security features of IBM B2B Integrator are secure enough as it updates and supports all compliances, whether it is HIPAA, financial institution standards, or retail and logistics industry standards.
They have their own language called DataWeave, which helps transform data and is efficient enough to handle any kind of transformation.
The best features of Mule ESB are that it's very robust and solid; I find that even our legacy systems go well with ESB.
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM B2B Integrator
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
47
Ranking in other categories
Business-to-Business Middleware (7th)
Mule ESB
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
52
Ranking in other categories
Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Application Integration solutions, they serve different purposes. IBM B2B Integrator is designed for Business-to-Business Middleware and holds a mindshare of 7.0%, up 5.6% compared to last year.
Mule ESB, on the other hand, focuses on Enterprise Service Bus (ESB), holds 18.0% mindshare, down 22.6% since last year.
Business-to-Business Middleware Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
IBM B2B Integrator7.0%
IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services15.4%
webMethods.io11.7%
Other65.9%
Business-to-Business Middleware
Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Mule ESB18.0%
IBM Integration Bus21.0%
webMethods.io11.1%
Other49.9%
Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)
 

Featured Reviews

Sathyan K - PeerSpot reviewer
Banks achieve seamless data transformation and integration with enhanced security and scalability
From the automation perspective, IBM B2B Integrator has its own powerful workflow, but compared to other applications such as MuleSoft or Boomi, they have many cloud connectors and multiple connectors for integrating with Salesforce or other CRM or ERP applications, whereas here you may have to develop them, which is not native. There is room for improvement in IBM B2B Integrator, particularly in the automation parts, and from a UI perspective. They are making some changes to make it more intuitive. The current UI is not aesthetically pleasing, but features-wise, it is rich enough to provide all the valuable information required.
Maharsh-Kapadia - PeerSpot reviewer
Transforms enterprise integration with comprehensive platform and excellent support
The best features of this solution are that everything we get into a single platform, whether it's integration, API, or data modeling; everything is available in one platform. It's a hybrid, including cloud and on-premise solutions with good connectivity and good connectors. From the benefits of using Mule ESB, we could reduce the manual tasks to 50% in one to two years. The cost is still something we are trying to make lower because we see some advantages when we move from point-to-point integration to API-led connectivity. We have seen a lot of reusable assets, so the cost is reduced. Ultimately, we want to see how it's transformed into business revenue; that's what we are still looking into.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business-to-Business Middleware solutions are best for your needs.
867,497 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Computer Software Company
10%
Healthcare Company
6%
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Comms Service Provider
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business9
Midsize Enterprise8
Large Enterprise32
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business23
Midsize Enterprise6
Large Enterprise36
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM B2B Integrator?
IBM B2B Integrator is a great tool, robust, reliable, low-maintenance, and ideal solution.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM B2B Integrator?
Regarding pricing, IBM B2B Integrator rates in the middle range. This integrator has embedded all the functionality needed to handle files and messages. It tends to be very expensive because the IB...
What needs improvement with IBM B2B Integrator?
From the automation perspective, IBM B2B Integrator has its own powerful workflow, but compared to other applications such as MuleSoft or Boomi, they have many cloud connectors and multiple connect...
Migration from IBM Integration Bus to Mulesoft ESB for a large enterprise tech services company
I was previously part of the Oracle SOA/OSB development team. In my current capacity I architected solutions using MuleSoft Anypoint Platform on cloud / on-premises and hybrid modes and on PCE/RTF ...
IBM Integration Bus vs Mule ESB - which to choose?
Our team ran a comparison of IBM’s Integration Bus vs. Mule ESB in order to determine what sort of ESB software was the best fit for our organization. Ultimately we decided to choose IBM Integratio...
What do you like most about Mule ESB?
The solution's drag-and-drop interface and data viewer helped us quite a lot.
 

Also Known As

IBM Sterling B2B Integrator, Sterling Gentran Integration Suite
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Bonnie Plants, Toshiba Europe, Florida Hospital
Ube, PacificComp, University of Witwatersrand, Justice Systems, Camelot
Find out what your peers are saying about Salesforce, IBM, SAP and others in Business-to-Business Middleware. Updated: August 2025.
867,497 professionals have used our research since 2012.