We performed a comparison between Mule ESB and Oracle Service Bus based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The connectivity the solution provides is excellent. There are often too many systems that we have to integrate and this helps with that."
"Once it is started, we don't see any problems on a day to day basis."
"The most valuable features of Mule ESB are its ease of use, documentation, ease to adapt to newer security and vulnerabilities, and a lot of help available. Additionally, there is a lot of flexibility, many patches available, and they provide APIs. They are a market standard."
"The most valuable feature is the Salesforce integration."
"The solution has a good graphical interface."
"I'm not using ESB directly. It is the integration layer, so it's running under the hood. However, the conversion and transformation performance is excellent. Anypoint Enterprise Security is also solid."
"It is easily deployable and manageable. It has microservices-based architecture, which means that you can deploy the solution based on your needs, and you can manage the solution very easily."
"Everything runs in Java, which is a useful feature."
"Overall it is a pretty good solution."
"With Oracle Service Bus, we can connect with different types of systems. Another feature I like the most is the security feature."
"Monitoring feature that allows tracking of the web's UI development."
"The solution is quite stable overall. We haven't witnessed any performance issues so far."
"It is stable."
"Supports multiple protocol technologies and web services."
"We've been pleased with the level of technical support."
"Service Bus is good at routing the transformation."
"Mule ESB isn't as secure as IBM. Financial companies go with IBM for that reason."
"Community editions need more attention."
"We would like the ability to use our own code. This would allow us to develop customizations with ease. Additionally, it would be nice to have more analytics or insights on the exchanged information between databases."
"It should have some amount of logging."
"The current version will not be supported for much longer."
"Mule ESB is more into the latest REST APIs, not much into the SOAP web services. Developing is all about web services and not easy with Mule."
"The Anypoint platform consumes a lot of memory, and it would be great for developers if it were more lightweight."
"It needs more samples. Also, the dependency on Maven should be removed."
"There is significant room for improvement in the monitoring capabilities."
"The weak point of OSB is the single point of failure."
"This solution should work better with RESTful services."
"Security needs to be more integrated."
"This solution would benefit from having more cloud-based adapters."
"It would be ideal if they could optimize it a bit."
"It needs to support more adapters, because the integration points keep changing and new things keep coming up. It also needs to be more scalable."
"What needs improvement in Oracle Service Bus is the connectivity between adapters such as the Salesforce adapter and database adapters. The limited number of adapters compatible with Oracle Service Bus makes you want to switch to a different solution."
Mule ESB is ranked 2nd in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 45 reviews while Oracle Service Bus is ranked 5th in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 25 reviews. Mule ESB is rated 8.0, while Oracle Service Bus is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Mule ESB writes "Plenty of documentation, flexible, and reliable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Service Bus writes "Enables us to do a lot of aggregation and routing, but API response can be a problem if the payload is heavy". Mule ESB is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, Oracle SOA Suite, webMethods Integration Server, Red Hat Fuse and IBM DataPower Gateway, whereas Oracle Service Bus is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, webMethods Integration Server, Red Hat Fuse, WSO2 Enterprise Integrator and TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus. See our Mule ESB vs. Oracle Service Bus report.
See our list of best Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
