We performed a comparison between Cleo Integration Cloud Platform and IBM B2B Integrator based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, MuleSoft, IBM and others in Business-to-Business Middleware."The most valuable feature of the solution is the ease of use it provides. Cleo Integration Cloud Platform is a straightforward and simple product."
"The most valuable features assist with understanding data formats and transforming data."
"Out-of-box process orchestration yields quick implementations."
"It's highly stable, and the redundancy is amazing. B2B Integrator also has a high availability option to work in a cluster environment. You rarely have issues operating it because of the HA."
"The technical support on offer through the portal is very helpful and responsive."
"Very flexible product; it allows implementing different flows on the same infrastructure."
"The most valuable features are the flexibility and the range of EDI standards that IBM Sterling can handle."
"I find the codeless communications, SFTP or FTP, valuable."
"It is easy of use and it's easy to maintain. It's also faster to on-board partners."
"Currently, the solution fails to provide users with additional protocol assistance and API integrations, so the aforementioned areas need to be considered for improvement."
"There are also some features in the solution that are not user-friendly, like code lists with no search options. So, we must navigate hundreds of pages to check for one entry."
"The user interface is outdated. B2B Integrator was developed in the United States in the nineties, and the graphical user interface hasn't improved since. It's tough because you have to program the software in XML. Nowadays, other methods are easier to work with."
"IBM B2B Integrator could improve the business process itself, there is no resignation of duties and in terms of the console should be changed in a way that is more user-friendly."
"The mapping, visibility, deployment, and the dashboard could be improved and updated. The communication logs are very poor. They are not easily understood, and we need to navigate to many places for many reasons. You can't just pull the information; it's very tough."
"The tool requires you to write a lot of code in Java and XSLT, which makes development tough."
"There is no related transaction stored in the database because it's an OLTP application."
"The initial setup is complex."
"The dashboard is not integrated and should be bundled by the product vendor."
More Cleo Integration Cloud Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cleo Integration Cloud Platform is ranked 13th in Business-to-Business Middleware with 1 review while IBM B2B Integrator is ranked 4th in Business-to-Business Middleware with 42 reviews. Cleo Integration Cloud Platform is rated 7.0, while IBM B2B Integrator is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Cleo Integration Cloud Platform writes "Though the tool reduces the internal hosting cost for businesses, it needs to provide more API integrations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM B2B Integrator writes "A widely-used, on-premises solution with tons of peer support". Cleo Integration Cloud Platform is most compared with SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite, whereas IBM B2B Integrator is most compared with Mule ESB, IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services, SAP Process Orchestration, SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite and IBM Transformation Extender.
See our list of best Business-to-Business Middleware vendors.
We monitor all Business-to-Business Middleware reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
