No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Hyland RPA vs Nintex RPA vs UiPath Platform comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Robotic Process Automation (RPA) category, the mindshare of Hyland RPA is 0.8%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nintex RPA is 2.2%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of UiPath Platform is 12.5%, down from 23.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
UiPath Platform12.5%
Nintex RPA2.2%
Hyland RPA0.8%
Other84.5%
Robotic Process Automation (RPA)
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer1638135 - PeerSpot reviewer
Works at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
A scalable solution which is easy to install and use
I do not use the solution personally as I am not the end-user. It is merely one of the solutions that we offer to our customers. We act as consultants, solution providers. We have around 60 customers who are using the solution. I would, for sure, recommend the solution to others. I consider the profile of the project to be quite good at the moment. I rate Another Monday as a nine out of ten.
reviewer1213773 - PeerSpot reviewer
Founder & CEO at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Looks that Nintex is out of the market . No clear strategy, no roadmap. Last version is 2 years old
Improvement areas and additional features for Nintex RPA should include: 1. AI Integration: Integration of more advanced AI capabilities for improved data recognition, natural language processing, and decision-making within automation workflows. 2. Expanded Library of Connectors: Continuously adding connectors to popular applications and systems ensures broader compatibility and facilitates smoother integration with a variety of platforms. 3. Collaboration Tools: Introducing features for collaborative development and version control can enhance automation developers' teamwork and streamline automation project management. 4. Mobile Accessibility: Improving mobile accessibility for monitoring and managing automation workflows on-the-go can be beneficial for users who require flexibility in their work environment. 5. Low-Code Enhancements: Further simplifying the low-code development process can attract a broader user base by making automation accessible to those with minimal technical skills. 6. Machine Learning Integration: Integrating machine learning capabilities directly into the platform could enable more intelligent and adaptive automation, allowing processes to evolve based on patterns and insights. 7. Community-Driven Content: Encouraging and facilitating a community-driven platform where users can share custom components, templates, and best practices could enhance the overall user experience.
reviewer2761431 - PeerSpot reviewer
Manager Rpa at a retailer with 10,001+ employees
Significantly reduces manual effort and improves team workflows through automated ticketing
We've used Agent Builder, IXP, and Maestro for orchestration. We have created context-grounded searches or chatbots using context grounding, and we also use context grounding within an Agentic flow where a bot or agent reads ServiceNow tickets to determine whether it has been assigned to the right work group. If it has not been assigned correctly due to human error, it automatically reassigns it to the right group. I would assess Agentic AI's ability to extract data points as effective. We created an agent for the purpose of extracting data, though not in a document. We created what we call an email conversation agent that engages with a customer, vendor, or someone in an email conversation with a set goal of extracting specific data points for an action to be performed subsequently. The one automation we have deployed in production involves the agent interacting with team members to collect data points and create a ServiceNow ticket. We appreciate almost all features of UiPath Platform, with one of the most successful ones being the use of Coms Mining. Most of the new features related to AI have all been good, and we use Agentic. We have already created a few agents and have started to use Maestro for a few flows, though we are not yet there to orchestrate an end-to-end workflow. We have good ROI from the automations we have developed with UiPath Platform, which far exceeds the investment in the platform. It has saved us tens of thousands of hours in manual effort, making the team members happy to pursue other things of value.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The initial setup is very quick."
"The solution is very easy to use."
"It has improved our organizational process in inbound and outbound tourism; the previous process was very complex and took at least a day for the users, now it is fully automated and saving a lot of hours for our back office."
"Once I decide a process is suitable as a Kryon solution, the cycle of automation is quite quick. I learn about the manual process and I'm one of the two guys who program the Kryon environment. It's relatively simple. There are many details, but once you understand the concept it is quite easy."
"Since then, we've been able to close numerous claims and therefore reduce our reserves by literally millions of dollars."
"This rate system has allowed us to be more responsive and competitive with our rates with less human involvement."
"The friendliness of the software is good because people without any technical background can start off on it. This solution makes it easy for us to use it, as there is no learning curve. With no learning curve, the development time turnaround decreases."
"We use Kryon Studio to develop new wizards and we use the features to capture elements from the screen and automate processes... The screen capture allows us to interface with systems which don't have an API, or where the API is very expensive, and it allows us to do on-screen integration."
"All our users have no technical background. But Kryon is really simple and intuitive. Our business adapted very quickly and easily. This is the main thing and it's why we love the system so much. It's why we are always trying to put more processes into the system and make more use cases: because of the simplicity and the intuitive nature of the system."
"Kryon RPA is very stable - we've not had many disruptions, and the product is updated regularly."
"UiPath enables us to implement end-to-end automation, starting with process analysis, then robot building, and finally monitoring of automations."
"It is as simple as dirt."
"I have interacted with the community a whole lot, and if the amount of responses that they give in the community is any indication about how fast they would be with the enterprise technical support, then I can only imagine that it would be top-notch."
"It's a complete ecosystem. It has everything you need."
"Maestro enables business teams to wireframe their process ahead of the development teams, which cuts down on the overall speed to develop because our longest part of our process is our discovery process, which takes six weeks sometimes."
"With the creation of the project mentioned above, we were able to reduce the cost of our client to acquire materials, besides the agility of being able to do everything very fast."
"I love it for the deep artificial intelligence that it has. It has the AI to recognize the processes, analyze all the workflows through user interactions, and discover automation opportunities. It is very intelligent in these aspects."
"The most valuable feature is its screen recording capability, where you tell it what the workflow should do, and it then automatically creates Activities for you."
 

Cons

"The solution should come with language customization, which would simplify its use for our customers."
"The solution should come with language customization, which would simplify its use for our customers."
"Kryon RPA's integration with other solutions could be more seamless."
"Kryon could be easier to use, especially in comparison to UiPath."
"The product requires some more time in development. It still has some bugs and some things to work out. They're constantly releasing. They need to continue working out the general issues of using the product at scale, first and foremost."
"From our experience, the product is not suitable for end users."
"I would expect that in the first year there is no ROI. It has to be measured over three or five years."
"Kryon could be easier to use, especially in comparison to UiPath."
"When a project is very big, a lot of memory is taken up."
"I would expect that in the first year there is no ROI."
"When it comes to document processing, they could work on more accurately identifying objects from PDF files."
"To improve UiPath Platform, I definitely suggest including more integration services; the more customers they can connect with, the better, as there are a couple of major names missing, such as SAP connections and NetSuite."
"I would like to see more machine learning features and capabilities for more accurate OCR."
"UiPath could gain a lot more customers if they lowered the price a little and improved the license model with some more affordable tiers."
"I would say a better layout or interface between the Studio and Orchestrator tools would be nice."
"UiPath has to run on some infrastructure, and that infrastructure and security is not scalable yet."
"UiPath Platform is really great already with the automation stuff, however, comprehensive training is lacking as the products constantly change, especially crucial for our partner focusing on RPA."
"Some of the transitions from the forum to submitting a ticket are a little clunky."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There is no licensing fee for our customers."
"For an unattended robot it's $6000 a month."
"It is very cheap. I would rate the pricing a three out of ten, with ten being expensive."
"We're paying in the neighborhood of about $66,000 a year. The cost is fairly similar to its competitors' costs. It might have been a little bit more reasonable than the others, and that cost was with Process Discovery in addition."
"The product has reasonable pricing."
"In addition to the standard licensing costs, there are manpower costs."
"Compared to its competitors, Kryon RPA's pricing is very competitive."
"Can't beat the price... There are different pricing levels for every bot or unattended bot. You can buy however many you want. You'll need an additional virtual machine for it to work on."
"We have a yearly license. It's about $5,000 per year."
"Currently our clients are looking for cost optimization post-pandemic and UiPath comes at a high price point."
"This solution is not cheap but the price is worth it because by following the documentation and using the support, you get good robotic processes that are stable."
"UiPath is a costly solution. Many of the clients choose another solution after hearing the price."
"I think the pricing is reasonable. I don't think it's too much of a stretch, and I think it's where it should be."
"I am using the free community version. The enterprise version is obviously a little expensive."
"The price for UiPath is on the higher end."
"I like that there is one license for all basic needs, but it is still expensive. Sometimes, we don't need all the tools or capabilities. We only need basic automation and processing for certain clients, but we're required to get the full license. They can improve its licensing and provide more flexibility. They can create more plans or packages, or they can let the users choose the capabilities they need and base its pricing on that."
"We only use the technical support when we were renewing our license. The process could be easier, as there are a lot of steps."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions are best for your needs.
885,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Media Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Construction Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Computer Software Company
8%
Real Estate/Law Firm
8%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Computer Software Company
8%
Construction Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
Midsize Enterprise7
Large Enterprise18
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business250
Midsize Enterprise143
Large Enterprise669
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
Best RPA tools for IBM iSeries
We have found that Foxtrot (Now NintexRPA) is a very solid solution for IBM iSeries integration using the IBM ACS 525...
What do you like most about Nintex RPA?
Nintex RPA often includes security features, including encryption and user access controls, which ensure the protecti...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nintex RPA?
Although Nintex RPA is expensive, it is somewhat affordable considering its features. I would rate the cost aspect as...
Best RPA tools for IBM iSeries
I can only speak to UiPath since that is the only RPA solution that I have used. I know that there are specific packa...
RPA that Bots can run without centralized control?
Yes, Attended Bots which can run without centralized control Module. RPA Tools like Automation Anywhere, uiPath ,Pow...
How do I choose between UiPath and Microsoft Power Automate?
Microsoft‌ ‌Power‌ ‌Automate‌ ‌is‌ ‌intuitive‌ ‌and‌ ‌easy‌ ‌to‌ ‌integrate‌ ‌and‌ ‌use.‌ ‌I‌ ‌like‌ ‌that‌ ‌there‌ ‌...
 

Also Known As

Another Monday
Kryon RPA
UiPath Maestro, UiPath Apps, UiPath Agent Builder
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

ING, Vodafone, T-Mobile, Billbox
Amazon, Audi, Chevron, Toyota, Uber, Walmart
1. Accenture 2. Deloitte 3. PwC 4. IBM 5. Capgemini 6. KPMG 7. Ernst & Young 8. Infosys 9. Cognizant 10. Wipro 11. Tata Consultancy Services 12. HCL Technologies 13. Genpact 14. Tech Mahindra 15. DXC Technology 16. Atos 17. NTT Data 18. CGI 19. L&T Infotech 20. Hexaware Technologies 21. Mindtree 22. Mphasis 23. Virtusa 24. Syntel 25. Zensar Technologies 26. WNS Global Services 27. Hexaware Technologies 28. Larsen & Toubro Infotech 29. Persistent Systems 30. QuEST Global 31. Sonata Software 32. Zensar Technologies
Find out what your peers are saying about UiPath, Automation Anywhere, Microsoft and others in Robotic Process Automation (RPA). Updated: March 2026.
885,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.