We performed a comparison between Flowmon and ManageEngine OpManager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in Network Monitoring Software."We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points."
"It is an open platform, so in terms of integration, we are quite happy. We can integrate it with other SNMP solutions. We can also integrate it with security solutions, such as a SIEM solution."
"The artificial intelligence and automatic detection system in Flowmon Solution are perfect for every, type of customer, such as government and commerce."
"The solution is stable."
"Flexibility in the two view dashboard helps viewers and admins get the information they need about the fetwork in a flash."
"I like being able to push configurations to multiple devices. If you have the same configurations for all the branches, it's easier to use ManageEngine OpManager and push configurations at once rather than individually pushing them to each device."
"We have found the solution to be stable."
"The features we found most valuable in ManageEngine OpManager are the probe server and reporting because they're pretty good features."
"The solution is scalable."
"The application monitoring is the solution's most valuable feature."
"I liked Network Configuration Manager. They had some pretty decent features there, and they also had pretty good monitoring and alerts."
"Some of the most valuable features are the accessibility of the solution and the fact that it is simpler than other products. For example, discovering devices in the network is very simple, making it user-friendly."
"The Wi-Fi side needs improvement."
"The licensing price could be better."
"If there was better visualization in Flowmon Solution it would be good."
"It would be helpful to have more details about the monitoring of the infrastructure. It should have support for SNMP. This is something that is currently not there in the product."
"We had some stability issues at the outset that have since been resolved."
"We get a lot of false alerts."
"They should add more features to URL monitoring."
"There are certain things that are not possible to do with Op Manager. It's a solution that still needs time to develop."
"The licensing model is confusing."
"I would like to see more enhancements made to the product."
"We would like link monitoring included. At times we need to monitor those specific links closely."
"This product is little bit slow sometimes. It may be that we need to change the configuration to improve performance."
Flowmon is ranked 70th in Network Monitoring Software while ManageEngine OpManager is ranked 15th in Network Monitoring Software with 44 reviews. Flowmon is rated 8.0, while ManageEngine OpManager is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Flowmon writes "A stable and scalable solution allowing for the visibility of and the blocking of threats". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ManageEngine OpManager writes "Helps us monitor all the infrastructure in our company but UI monitoring is not practical". Flowmon is most compared with Darktrace, SolarWinds NetFlow Traffic Analyzer, Cisco Secure Network Analytics, WhatsUp Gold and Meraki Dashboard, whereas ManageEngine OpManager is most compared with SolarWinds NPM, Zabbix, PRTG Network Monitor, SCOM and NETSCOUT nGeniusONE.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.