Flowmon vs NETSCOUT nGeniusONE comparison

The compared Progress Software and NETSCOUT solutions aren't in the same category. Progress Software is ranked #14 in NDaR , with an average rating of 9.0, and holds a 1.9% mindshare in the category. NETSCOUT is ranked #29 in NMS , with an average rating of 8.5, and holds a 1.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Progress Software users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of NETSCOUT users who would recommend it.

Flowmon

Read 4 Flowmon reviews

1,500 Views
480 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE

Read 50 NETSCOUT nGeniusONE reviews

3,346 Views
2,309 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Flowmon

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE and Flowmon compete in network performance management and security optimization. NETSCOUT nGeniusONE stands out for robust historical data analytics, whereas Flowmon is superior in real-time monitoring and threat detection.

Features: NETSCOUT nGeniusONE offers comprehensive application performance monitoring, high-capacity data retention, and extensive historical data analytics. Flowmon brings real-time network analysis, exceptional threat intelligence, and advanced threat detection.

Room for Improvement: NETSCOUT nGeniusONE could enhance its real-time threat detection, simplify its user interface, and improve integration with third-party security systems. Flowmon may benefit from expanding its data analytics capabilities, enhancing historical data storage, and increasing scalability for larger enterprises.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: NETSCOUT nGeniusONE offers flexible deployment for large enterprise networks with a broad support framework, appealing for scalable deployments. Flowmon provides straightforward deployment for hybrid environments and effective technical support, advantageous for rapid integration.

Pricing and ROI: NETSCOUT nGeniusONE typically requires a higher upfront investment, justified by advanced analytics and large-scale network management, offering long-term ROI. Flowmon presents a competitive price structure with immediate ROI through security insights and real-time capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Flowmon vs. NETSCOUT nGeniusONE Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Flowmon vs. NETSCOUT nGeniusONE

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 867,349 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Flowmon

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Detection and Response (NDR) (14th)

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (29th)

Mindshare comparison

Flowmon and NETSCOUT nGeniusONE aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Flowmon is designed for Network Detection and Response (NDR) and holds a mindshare of 1.9%, up 1.5% compared to last year.
NETSCOUT nGeniusONE, on the other hand, focuses on Network Monitoring Software, holds 1.5% mindshare, down 1.6% since last year.

Network Detection and Response (NDR) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Flowmon	1.9%
Darktrace	22.7%
Vectra AI	15.6%
Other	59.800000000000004%

Network Detection and Response (NDR)

Network Monitoring Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
NETSCOUT nGeniusONE	1.5%
Zabbix	11.7%
LibreNMS	4.6%
Other	82.2%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Pifu Lin

Senior System Engineer at DYNASAFE TECHNOLOGIES PTE. LTD.

Quick identification of network issues enhances performance monitoring

We will try to Proof of Concept (POC) to a client in Taiwan. We just use the features for the Network Performance Monitor (NPM) Flowmon is more easy to understand and helps find network issues more quickly. We need this solution to monitor the network performance. We started using it three…

Read full review

Ruslan Melnyk

Business Unit Manager at BAKOTECH

Useful for network performance monitoring

My manager can explain the use cases attached to the product. I am a unit leader in my company, and I don't sell the product directly to our partners or customers. In my company, I manage certain processes and a team while building, developing, and providing them with a direction for the market. NETSCOUT nGeniusONE is a good solution for network performance monitoring since it is not cloud-based. My company sells NETSCOUT nGeniusONE in eight to ten countries. I think the solution is not good for capacity planning, but it is better to help find problems in applications because not every infrastructure is good at managing working applications. I think it is a solution meant for applications. The tool is useful for solving problems attached to applications. The tool's real-time network monitoring capability was used when the product was more reactive. In our company, if we use real-time monitoring, then we need to deal with raw traffic. In our company, if we don't see any problem in the real-time systems, we have the possibility to rely on the tool since it acts like a time machine for us, which can allow us to get back to the areas of problem and solve them. I recommend the product to those who plan to use it. For many users, it can be a good monitoring system that can be scaled up in the future. I think it is a good product to start with when working systems in an environment. NETSCOUT nGeniusONE is another tool used to manage raw traffic, and I find it to integrate well into our customers' network. I am not using it actively on the system. I use the tool for network packet brokers. I rate the tool a ten out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The artificial intelligence and automatic detection system in Flowmon Solution are perfect for every, type of customer, such as government and commerce."

"Flowmon is more easy to understand and helps find network issues more quickly."

"The solution is stable."

"It is an open platform, so in terms of integration, we are quite happy. We can integrate it with other SNMP solutions. We can also integrate it with security solutions, such as a SIEM solution."

"Flowmon is more easy to understand and helps find network issues more quickly."

"The system's ability to prevent downtime represents a significant return on investment, but I do not have specific numerical data."

"The details it provides are among the most valuable features; the ability to drill down and get to the packet level."

"Deep packet inspection is a very useful tool as it works in real time and uses serial packet-level analysis."

"The biggest benefit is the ability to do low-level packet inspection. When I say packet inspection, I don't mean looking at payload, but just looking at your communication handshakes and the like. It reduces troubleshooting time because you can get a much better view into the communications path between servers, database servers, web servers, and understand what's going on."

"Network faults are easily and quickly identified through dashboards and drill down."

"The product is very good. We have very few problems."

"It gives me the MOS, latency, and jitter."

"The packet-based searching capability of NETSCOUT is highly valued as it allows us to better analyze the network."

More NETSCOUT nGeniusONE pros

Cons

"I do not know the detailed pricing."

"The licensing price could be better."

"It would be helpful to have more details about the monitoring of the infrastructure. It should have support for SNMP. This is something that is currently not there in the product."

"If there was better visualization in Flowmon Solution it would be good."

"Its initial setup process is complicated."

"Initially, we were having a lot of issues with bugs when using version 6.1.1. There were a lot of problems with the dashboard causing confusion. We worked with our SE and the NETSCOUT engineering team to fix the visibility with the data. There should be a patch release to fix this issue. However, this seems to be working fine for us right now after the 6.2.2 upgrade."

"There are so many features that it makes it hard to know it all. You end up paying for things that you don't use and probably don't even need. It might be better if Netscout came up with a modular way to pay for what you're going to use and not pay for all of this "white elephant" without being able to take advantage of all of it."

"It's not intuitive, it's not simple to use. It is probably the only monitoring tool, out of all the ones that I have, that I really need an expert on, an expert from nGenius, a contractor that I have to pay, to manage the tool. And that's because it's simply not easy to use. Netscout needs to focus on making it easier to use."

"The dependency mapping is good, but I am hopeful that they will build some type of partnership and relationship with ServiceNow. I want to see NETSCOUT partner with ServiceNow so they can leverage Service Now Discovery and Service Mapping to automate the build of the service dependency mappings inside of nGeniusONE."

"The current solution is not easy to scale, because it is an appliance-based solution. So, you have to swap everything out."

"Trying to set up dashboards is hard to figure out at times, if you don't do it every day. It's not really intuitive to set them all up... If there were a wizard to take us through, step-by-step, creating dashboards and the like, that would be really helpful."

"I would recommend enhancing the APM capabilities."

More NETSCOUT nGeniusONE cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It works with a permanent license, and then you can pay for the support. For the gold support, you need to pay yearly."

"The licensing fee accrues only once, but that of support is annual."

"The price of the solution could be better."

"If you are able and you are willing to use everything that Netscout provides to you, it's probably a relatively fair price. The problem is that it's such a large and such a complex tool that I'm not sure that many companies would be able to use it entirely, the way it's expected to be used."

"The scalability becomes very expensive quickly."

"The license becomes cost prohibitive very quickly."

"Their pricing is very competitive with other solutions... But what I like about NETSCOUT's licensing is that it's shared across all their platforms. They don't create a new licensing scheme for every one of their products. So for nGeniusONE, you buy a certain license level, and it works on all of their products."

"Make sure you get the low down on your licensing and understand the licensing requirements before making a purchase, especially when it comes to an upgrade. Make sure that it suits your needs before you commit to it. For example, we purchased ATA at version 6.2.1. At that time, the licensing covered everything we need. NETSCOUT comes out with 6.2.2, stating that in order to upgrade, you had to purchase CyberStream licensing. Now that requires some additional funding from both a capital investment and a maintenance cost. That's something that should have been said, "Well, if you want these additional features, you will need to purchase these CyberStreams." Otherwise, we should be allowed to continue on the basic operations as it is now through the newer releases without being stuck."

"It is a little overall pricey and expensive, but you get what you pay for."

"The platform is expensive."

"It can be expensive, but if you have a good configuration, based on what you are looking for, it's okay, it's manageable."

More NETSCOUT nGeniusONE pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Detection and Response (NDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

867,349 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

Performing Arts

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	37

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Flowmon Anomaly Detection System?

I don't understand the price. I am in deployment, so I do not know the detailed pricing.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Flowmon Anomaly Detection System?

We will try to Proof of Concept (POC) to a client in Taiwan. We just use the features for the Network Performance Monitor (NPM).

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Flowmon Anomaly Detection System?

I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.

See all answers

Which is the best DDoS protection solution for a big ISP for monitoring and mitigating?

I would say if it’s an ISP that will build a scrubbing center, Netscout/Arbor is a good solution. In all other solutions, Imperva is a great choice.

See all answers

What do you like most about NETSCOUT nGeniusONE?

Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NETSCOUT nGeniusONE?

The pricing is a bit high yet not overly expensive. The cost depends on the size of the customer, as sizing controls the pricing.

See all answers

Comparisons

Darktrace vs Flowmon

Compared 13% of the time

Vectra AI vs Flowmon

Compared 10% of the time

ThousandEyes vs Flowmon

Compared 8% of the time

Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs Flowmon

Compared 8% of the time

ExtraHop Reveal(x) vs Flowmon

Compared 7% of the time

More Flowmon Competitors

Dynatrace vs NETSCOUT nGeniusONE

Compared 10% of the time

Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline vs NETSCOUT nGeniusONE

Compared 10% of the time

ThousandEyes vs NETSCOUT nGeniusONE

Compared 9% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs NETSCOUT nGeniusONE

Compared 8% of the time

Ixia Network Packet Brokers vs NETSCOUT nGeniusONE

Compared 5% of the time

More NETSCOUT nGeniusONE Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Network Detection and Response (NDR)

August 2025

Download Flowmon product report

Buyer's Guide

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE

August 2025

Download NETSCOUT nGeniusONE product report

Also Known As

Flowmon Anomaly Detection System

NETSCOUT nGenius, nGeniusONE

Overview

Flowmon is a professional tool for effective network troubleshooting, performance monitoring, capacity planning, encrypted traffic analysis and cloud monitoring. Instead of just the red/green infrastructure status, it helps NetOps teams to understand user experience while keeping the amount of data noise and analytical work to a minimum. Flowmon is a part of the Kemp product portfolio.

Progress Software

The nGenius Real-Time Monitor software provides you with tools to monitor and display information about your network both historically and in real time. The nGenius Real-Time Monitor software allows you to understand your current network usage and to plan for future needs. It also allows you to proactively troubleshoot problem areas in your network.

NETSCOUT

Sample Customers

SEGA

Cerner Corporation

Buyer's Guide

Flowmon vs. NETSCOUT nGeniusONE

July 2025

Free Report: Flowmon vs. NETSCOUT nGeniusONE

Find out what your peers are saying about Flowmon vs. NETSCOUT nGeniusONE and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

867,349 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Flowmon vs. NETSCOUT nGeniusONE report.

We monitor all Network Detection and Response (NDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.