Entuity vs Kaseya Traverse comparison

Park Place Technologies and Kaseya are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Park Place Technologies is ranked #67, while Kaseya is ranked #78. Park Place Technologies holds a 0.7% mindshare in NMS, compared to Kaseya’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Park Place Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Kaseya users who would recommend it.

Entuity

Read 11 Entuity reviews

1,747 Views
1,625 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Kaseya Traverse

Read 8 Kaseya Traverse reviews

1,258 Views
1,044 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Entuity

Kaseya Traverse

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

Entuity and Kaseya Traverse are network management solutions. Entuity appears advantageous in areas such as pricing, support, and ease of integration, while Kaseya Traverse offers a broader range of functionalities with a comprehensive network monitoring approach.

Features: Entuity offers real-time analytics, automated network discovery tools, and custom dashboards and reports. Kaseya Traverse provides advanced cloud monitoring, scalability features, and predictive analytics capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Entuity could enhance its scalability, depth in analytics, and support for complex environments. Kaseya Traverse may benefit from simplifying its setup process, improving cost-effectiveness, and offering easier integration.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Entuity supports a straightforward deployment process with accessible customer service, facilitating a shorter implementation timeline. Kaseya Traverse offers cloud-based deployment with extensive customer support but involves a more complex setup.

Pricing and ROI: Entuity attracts organizations with its cost-effective approach, attractive setup costs, and positive ROI feedback. Kaseya Traverse involves a higher initial investment but offers long-term value with its detailed network visibility and feature-rich suite.

To learn more, read our detailed Entuity vs. Kaseya Traverse Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Entuity vs. Kaseya Traverse

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,376 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Entuity

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

67th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Kaseya Traverse

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

78th

Average Rating

6.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Monitoring Software (49th)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Entuity is 0.7%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kaseya Traverse is 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Entuity	0.7%
Kaseya Traverse	0.5%
Other	98.8%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Ahmed Salman

Performance & Monitoring Supervisor at Saudi Telecom Company

A good solution for network monitoring and support management, but there is no centralized database

There is no centralized database. It is an issue if you use a local database and have multiple borders. However, if you have an external database, you can keep the same old data from an old border up to 100 borders. In addition, if we want to create an ABI or use an ABI to connect data, there is no competition when we ask for support. If we want to modify the calculation matrix or equation, we have to raise a professional service. Other competitors like Micro Focus, a network management system, have a new supportability matrix in the market every quarter.

Read full review

AMMAR HUMAIDY HUSIN

Technical Consultant at a university with 11-50 employees

Automation increases efficiency, but pricing needs to be more competitive

Improvement is needed in making it cheaper, of course. I am not emphasizing making it cheaper, however, it should be more competitive with other products. The product itself is very good and helpful for me as a customer. The issue always is the price, as we cannot beat most of our competitors on pricing alone. If a product is just nice to have, not essential like an antivirus, if it's not really competitive with pricing, we cannot sell it.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Event management and the geographical Google API-based network topology are the most valuable features of Entuity."

"I would encourage others to use Entuity, as it's powerful and user-friendly."

"We are able to receive a visualized monitoring of the network infrastructure which is very helpful."

"This is a product that is easy to deploy and maintain with a positive end-user experience."

"We find the SurePath component of this solution to be very valuable, as it gives us the path to whatever we are configuring."

"The most valuable feature of Entuity is network mapping and information. When clicking on a particular location it can automatically survey the connectivity diagram for us. We can arrange this icon in any kind of formats, such as ring or mesh. The networking mapping can show the components and interconnectivity with the help of IP addresses and NetFlow."

"The setup was very simple and took about an hour."

"My clients have received a good return on investment."

More Entuity pros

"The remote support and data collection features are great."

"If I want to automate the management and maintenance of my server automatically, this product is a good use case for that."

"Everything is running seamlessly on the solution, to the point where you don't see any gap."

"We have found the solution to be very flexible to our requirements. We have been able to configure it on-premise effectively when we were using less of the cloud."

"Kaseya Traverse is a very stable solution and very sustainable in terms of what the market wants, what is out there, price-wise and functionality features. They're quite competitive and they are always innovating."

"Automating processes is crucial for me, so the automation part stands out."

"It is a pretty stable solution...It is a pretty stable solution."

"We have found the solution to be very flexible to our requirements."

More Kaseya Traverse pros

Cons

"It should support IPAM or IP Address Management. When it comes to the network, IP Address Management is a feature for which we have to use a different solution. When we are managing networks, if IPAM also becomes a part of this, we do not have to look for a separate solution."

"What might be improved for the user may be the depth of insight into the events that do happen and the ease of integration."

"In the most recent versions, Entuity has removed the Explorer navigation feature. This was very useful, and Entuity would be improved by restoring it."

"Entuity could improve by having more integration because now network management is not a standalone solution. You have to integrate it with your network, applications, and everything else. We have to collect that information from those solutions or relevant managers. Additionally, the SLA dashboard should be improved."

"The configuration of the logging could be improved because if someone deleted any note or inventory, or some change to the inventory, we are not able to identify which user or which administrator modifies these details. For example, there should be read-only locks on maps to prevent their deletion. This way people can only read and cannot delete that particular map."

"It should support IPAM or IP Address Management. When we are managing networks, if IPAM also becomes a part of this, we do not have to look for a separate solution."

"We would like the backup element of this solution to be improved as, at present, it is very limited and does not have much scope for customization."

"Entuity currently has APIs, but they are not straightforward. They are not flexible if an external system wants to communicate with Entuity or create an integration that is not available out of the box. Its APIs can be flexible so that they can be utilized for external integrations that are not available out of the box."

More Entuity cons

"I think the software is still a little bit too new to actually fully assess what it has."

"Improvement is needed in making it cheaper."

"Reporting is a bit difficult."

"Kaseya Traverse can improve by adding a Service Map to help us create a configuration management database (CMDB), this would be helpful for us."

"In terms of what could be improved, we are innovating all the time, as well as having a look at different avenues so that the strategy follows the structure. I think the software is still a little bit too new to actually fully asses what it has."

"We've noticed a few bugs as of late. However, this seems to only be in the reporting part of the product."

"Dashboards and Central Protection were an issue. Also, database monitoring was not there. Even though they said that it was there at an additional cost, that tool was very basic. We couldn't have device configuration backup also."

"The tool needs to have some AI capabilities, which it lacks currently."

More Kaseya Traverse cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It can be comparatively expensive but that is because it is comprehensive."

"Entuity's licensing is very highly-priced."

"Entuity is not an expensive solution."

"It varies and depends on the quantity. It's worth the cost."

"We have 400 licenses and we are only using 150 licenses."

"The price depends on whether you are monitoring different applications, especially in bulk, and depends on what you're doing. If you're monitoring one endpoint, it will cost you 150 ZAR."

"The solution is not cheap, but it is not too expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,376 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

22%

University

Government

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

10%

Healthcare Company

Wholesaler/Distributor

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	3

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What needs improvement with Kaseya Traverse?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Kaseya Traverse?

If I want to automate the management and maintenance of my server automatically, this product is a good use case for that.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Kaseya Traverse?

I'd rate the solution seven out of ten. As Kaseya sellers, we always promote Kaseya first. If the price is more competitive, then I think it will be better. It's a main pain point for us as a resel...

See all answers

Comparisons

SolarWinds NPM vs Entuity

Compared 27% of the time

LogicMonitor vs Entuity

Compared 20% of the time

SolarWinds Network Device Monitor vs Entuity

Compared 9% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Entuity

Compared 6% of the time

SolarWinds NetFlow Traffic Analyzer vs Entuity

Compared 5% of the time

More Entuity Competitors

SolarWinds NPM vs Kaseya Traverse

Compared 8% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Kaseya Traverse

Compared 8% of the time

Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs Kaseya Traverse

Compared 7% of the time

Meraki Dashboard vs Kaseya Traverse

Compared 6% of the time

Zabbix vs Kaseya Traverse

Compared 6% of the time

More Kaseya Traverse Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Entuity

March 2026

Download Entuity product report

Buyer's Guide

Kaseya Traverse

March 2026

Download Kaseya Traverse product report

Overview

Entuity network management software continually monitors network bandwidth, network error rate and network congestion, which are all factors that impact overall network throughput. Events can be raised in response to abnormal traffic to allow remedial action before users are impacted. The Entuity network monitor continually evaluates network latency and network jitter to calculate MOS and ICPIF scores. Events can be raised when these scores are unacceptable for business application, voice and video performance. Key Features include: Root Cause Analysis, Event Management, Flow Monitoring & Analysis, Application Path Monitoring and Network Performance Monitoring.

Park Place Technologies

Immediately identify impacted IT services using insights based on rich data analytics of events such as SNMP traps, Windows events and Syslogs. Resolve faults quickly via NetFlow enabled root cause analysis across cloud, on-premise, hybrid cloud and virtualized IT environments.

Kaseya

Sample Customers

Tait Communications, Vattenfall, Discovery, University of Minnesota, Pernod Ricard, Electric Car

UltiSat, Clear Concepts, nVidia, United States Postal Service, Cisco, Redbox, Spark Digital, People's Bank & Trust

Buyer's Guide

Entuity vs. Kaseya Traverse

March 2026

Free Report: Entuity vs. Kaseya Traverse

Find out what your peers are saying about Entuity vs. Kaseya Traverse and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,376 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Entuity vs. Kaseya Traverse report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.