Entuity vs Kaseya Traverse comparison

Park Place Technologies and Kaseya are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Park Place Technologies is ranked #41 with an average rating of 9.0, while Kaseya is ranked #59 with an average rating of 8.0. Park Place Technologies holds a 0.6% mindshare in NMS, compared to Kaseya’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Park Place Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Kaseya users who would recommend it.

Entuity

Read 11 Entuity reviews

1,069 Views
973 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Kaseya Traverse

Read 8 Kaseya Traverse reviews

617 Views
506 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Entuity

Kaseya Traverse

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

Entuity and Kaseya Traverse are network management solutions. Entuity appears advantageous in areas such as pricing, support, and ease of integration, while Kaseya Traverse offers a broader range of functionalities with a comprehensive network monitoring approach.

Features: Entuity offers real-time analytics, automated network discovery tools, and custom dashboards and reports. Kaseya Traverse provides advanced cloud monitoring, scalability features, and predictive analytics capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Entuity could enhance its scalability, depth in analytics, and support for complex environments. Kaseya Traverse may benefit from simplifying its setup process, improving cost-effectiveness, and offering easier integration.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Entuity supports a straightforward deployment process with accessible customer service, facilitating a shorter implementation timeline. Kaseya Traverse offers cloud-based deployment with extensive customer support but involves a more complex setup.

Pricing and ROI: Entuity attracts organizations with its cost-effective approach, attractive setup costs, and positive ROI feedback. Kaseya Traverse involves a higher initial investment but offers long-term value with its detailed network visibility and feature-rich suite.

To learn more, read our detailed Entuity vs. Kaseya Traverse Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Entuity vs. Kaseya Traverse

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,760 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Entuity

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

41st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Kaseya Traverse

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

59th

Average Rating

6.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Monitoring Software (32nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Entuity is 0.6%, down from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kaseya Traverse is 0.3%, down from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Entuity	0.6%
Kaseya Traverse	0.3%
Other	99.1%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Ahmed Salman

Performance & Monitoring Supervisor at Saudi Telecom Company

A good solution for network monitoring and support management, but there is no centralized database

There is no centralized database. It is an issue if you use a local database and have multiple borders. However, if you have an external database, you can keep the same old data from an old border up to 100 borders. In addition, if we want to create an ABI or use an ABI to connect data, there is no competition when we ask for support. If we want to modify the calculation matrix or equation, we have to raise a professional service. Other competitors like Micro Focus, a network management system, have a new supportability matrix in the market every quarter.

Read full review

AMMAR HUMAIDY HUSIN

Technical Consultant at a university with 11-50 employees

Automation increases efficiency, but pricing needs to be more competitive

Improvement is needed in making it cheaper, of course. I am not emphasizing making it cheaper, however, it should be more competitive with other products. The product itself is very good and helpful for me as a customer. The issue always is the price, as we cannot beat most of our competitors on pricing alone. If a product is just nice to have, not essential like an antivirus, if it's not really competitive with pricing, we cannot sell it.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I particularly like the theme and the dashboard that they have brought in this version. In the previous version, there was only a simple screen. There wasn't any dashboard. It was a simple view, but now, they have brought in a dashboard that gives the fields for the ops as well. They can get the data they want to see in a single place."

"The setup was very simple and took about an hour."

"The best thing about Entuity is that it's easy to use. It's user-friendly. It's intuitive and easy to customize as per your needs."

"The initial setup of Entuity is easy and the full process took approximately 30 minutes."

"This is a product that is easy to deploy and maintain with a positive end-user experience."

"Event management and the geographical Google API-based network topology are the most valuable features of Entuity."

"We find the SurePath component of this solution to be very valuable, as it gives us the path to whatever we are configuring."

"The most valuable feature of Entuity is network mapping and information. When clicking on a particular location it can automatically survey the connectivity diagram for us. We can arrange this icon in any kind of formats, such as ring or mesh. The networking mapping can show the components and interconnectivity with the help of IP addresses and NetFlow."

More Entuity pros

"Most of the features are pretty good and the solution is user friendly."

"It is a pretty stable solution...It is a pretty stable solution."

"The remote support and data collection features are great."

"Everything is running seamlessly on the solution, to the point where you don't see any gap."

"Automating processes is crucial for me, so the automation part stands out."

"If I want to automate the management and maintenance of my server automatically, this product is a good use case for that."

"We have found the solution to be very flexible to our requirements. We have been able to configure it on-premise effectively when we were using less of the cloud."

"It's a simple and humble tool."

More Kaseya Traverse pros

Cons

"We would like the backup element of this solution to be improved as, at present, it is very limited and does not have much scope for customization."

"If we want to modify the calculation matrix or equation, we have to raise a professional service."

"Entuity can expand its coverage on monitoring VoIP solutions a little bit more."

"Entuity could improve by having more integration because now network management is not a standalone solution. You have to integrate it with your network, applications, and everything else. We have to collect that information from those solutions or relevant managers. Additionally, the SLA dashboard should be improved."

"The configuration of the logging could be improved because if someone deleted any note or inventory, or some change to the inventory, we are not able to identify which user or which administrator modifies these details. For example, there should be read-only locks on maps to prevent their deletion. This way people can only read and cannot delete that particular map."

"A typical user might want to see even more depth to the standard reporting and ease of integration."

"Entuity currently has APIs, but they are not straightforward. They are not flexible if an external system wants to communicate with Entuity or create an integration that is not available out of the box. Its APIs can be flexible so that they can be utilized for external integrations that are not available out of the box."

"Entuity can improve the fetching of device configuration. The solution uses scripts and I could not understand them or find any recourses on the internet to learn about the language that is used in the script. It could be more user-friendly and the device configuration management could be enhanced."

More Entuity cons

"The tool needs to have some AI capabilities, which it lacks currently."

"Improvement is needed in making it cheaper."

"Dashboards and Central Protection were an issue. Also, database monitoring was not there. Even though they said that it was there at an additional cost, that tool was very basic. We couldn't have device configuration backup also."

"Kaseya Traverse can improve by adding a Service Map to help us create a configuration management database (CMDB), this would be helpful for us."

"We've noticed a few bugs as of late. However, this seems to only be in the reporting part of the product."

"Reporting is tedious and not organized in the way customers expect."

"However, the issue lies in the adequacy of the responses to my questions, which are usually not up to par."

"Reporting is a bit difficult."

More Kaseya Traverse cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It varies and depends on the quantity. It's worth the cost."

"Entuity's licensing is very highly-priced."

"We have 400 licenses and we are only using 150 licenses."

"It can be comparatively expensive but that is because it is comprehensive."

"Entuity is not an expensive solution."

"The price depends on whether you are monitoring different applications, especially in bulk, and depends on what you're doing. If you're monitoring one endpoint, it will cost you 150 ZAR."

"The solution is not cheap, but it is not too expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

21%

Computer Software Company

Energy/Utilities Company

Government

Computer Software Company

26%

Wholesaler/Distributor

10%

Government

Non Profit

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	3

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Entuity?

Event management and the geographical Google API-based network topology are the most valuable features of Entuity.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Entuity?

We work with other solutions. We have a very good relationship with Entuity Commercial. You can negotiate discounts and provide better proposals to our customers. The pricing is very competitive. T...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Entuity?

Entuity could integrate with other solutions and collect more information from IoT devices.

See all answers

What do you like most about Kaseya Traverse?

The remote support and data collection features are great.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kaseya Traverse?

The solution is not cheap, but it is not too expensive. We pay an annual license fee. There are no additional fees associated with the product.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Kaseya Traverse?

See all answers

Comparisons

SolarWinds NPM vs Entuity

Compared 58% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Entuity

Compared 18% of the time

ThousandEyes vs Entuity

Compared 13% of the time

Motadata Network Management System vs Entuity

Compared 12% of the time

More Entuity Competitors

PRTG Network Monitor vs Kaseya Traverse

Compared 58% of the time

Pico Corvil Analytics vs Kaseya Traverse

Compared 42% of the time

More Kaseya Traverse Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Entuity

October 2025

Download Entuity product report

Buyer's Guide

Kaseya Traverse

October 2025

Download Kaseya Traverse product report

Overview

Entuity network management software continually monitors network bandwidth, network error rate and network congestion, which are all factors that impact overall network throughput. Events can be raised in response to abnormal traffic to allow remedial action before users are impacted. The Entuity network monitor continually evaluates network latency and network jitter to calculate MOS and ICPIF scores. Events can be raised when these scores are unacceptable for business application, voice and video performance. Key Features include: Root Cause Analysis, Event Management, Flow Monitoring & Analysis, Application Path Monitoring and Network Performance Monitoring.

Park Place Technologies

Immediately identify impacted IT services using insights based on rich data analytics of events such as SNMP traps, Windows events and Syslogs. Resolve faults quickly via NetFlow enabled root cause analysis across cloud, on-premise, hybrid cloud and virtualized IT environments.

Kaseya

Sample Customers

Tait Communications, Vattenfall, Discovery, University of Minnesota, Pernod Ricard, Electric Car

UltiSat, Clear Concepts, nVidia, United States Postal Service, Cisco, Redbox, Spark Digital, People's Bank & Trust

Buyer's Guide

Entuity vs. Kaseya Traverse

September 2025

Free Report: Entuity vs. Kaseya Traverse

Find out what your peers are saying about Entuity vs. Kaseya Traverse and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Entuity vs. Kaseya Traverse report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.