Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs StableNet comparison

Broadcom and Infosim are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Broadcom is ranked #75, while Infosim is ranked #65 with an average rating of 7.5. Broadcom holds a 0.4% mindshare in NMS, compared to Infosim’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Infosim users who would recommend it.
DX Unified Infrastructure M...
Read 120 DX Unified Infrastructure Management reviews
  • 743 Views
  • 454 Comparison Views
92% willing to recommend
StableNet
Read 3 StableNet reviews
  • 402 Views
  • 225 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

DX Unified Infrastructure Management and StableNet are in the infrastructure management category. StableNet seems to have the upper hand with its versatile feature set, justifying its higher pricing compared to DX's competitive pricing and reliable support.

Features: DX Unified Infrastructure Management offers comprehensive infrastructure monitoring, automated alerts, and performance insights. StableNet provides scalable network management, advanced analytics, and integrated automation tools.

Room for Improvement: DX could enhance its network analysis capabilities, integrate more advanced automation tools, and offer greater feature versatility. StableNet might improve its pricing structure, simplify its deployment process, and offer more streamlined training resources.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: StableNet has a modular approach for gradual implementation and customization, supported by strong customer service. DX Unified Infrastructure Management focuses on quick installation and extensive training resources, providing efficient service for standard environments.

Pricing and ROI: DX Unified Infrastructure Management has a lower upfront cost, appealing to budget-conscious businesses with a quicker ROI due to lower investment. StableNet requires higher initial investment but users report achieving significant ROI from enhanced network efficiencies and performance improvements.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. StableNet Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. StableNet
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 851,042 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

DX Unified Infrastructure M...
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
75th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
120
Ranking in other categories
Server Monitoring (24th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (55th), Cloud Monitoring Software (41st), AIOps (21st)
StableNet
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
65th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of DX Unified Infrastructure Management is 0.4%, down from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of StableNet is 0.2%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Network Monitoring Software
 

Featured Reviews

Arunpandiyan M - PeerSpot reviewer
Easy to set up, simple to use, and offers great technical support
There are quite a few manual processes. We've had issues with pulling reports. Sometimes we have trouble or get errors. The reporting process should be easier. If you have a hub, you should be able to have an unlimited number of servers. For example, if you have 500 servers, and the limit is ten, you have to pull 50 reports. We'd like to just pull one report for all servers. This also increases the time to pull reports. If we have to pull more reports, it takes that much longer than just pulling one. The product can be expensive. Right now, they are updating and consolidating the dashboard. I'm expecting an update that will resolve a few glitches in the server.
Read full review
ShahzadAziz - PeerSpot reviewer
A highly scalable and stable solution that provides excellent features and can be integrated with any product
The support team is more into R&D. They're not focused on support. The vendor lets the partners provide support for the solution. Partners must have StableNet-certified engineers. Complex problems arise for complex installations. When a problem is deep, it takes a lot of time to resolve it. It goes to the R&D and development teams. They do solve it, but the time taken could be reduced.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Monitors the infrastructure asset and also monitors as an IT service."
"It gives an alarm when there's something going on, not just when there's an expected spike that happens every night on a server."
"DX Unified Infrastructure Management offers visibility into network activities, integration capacity, and enhances monitoring at the core and application levels."
"I can use the Drag and Drop feature to build dashboards within minutes."
"This solution allows us to have an overview of the infrastructure and identify areas where the performance isn't optimal, or where upgrades could be carried out."
"We are able to go in and actually leverage the thick client for a nice easy drag and drop solution."
"Latest version of tool comes integrated with Jaspersoft reporting solution, giving excellent reports."
"I recall the initial setup being straightforward."
More DX Unified Infrastructure Management pros
"The solution is stable."
"The best features are the reporting, utilization, and network graph."
"We can integrate any tool with StableNet."
 

Cons

"Stability."
"Currently lacks a mobile application which would be helpful."
"We've had issues with pulling reports."
"I'm very happy with DX Unified Infrastructure Management, but what could be improved is its user interface because currently, it has many wide spaces. All the information you need is in DX Unified Infrastructure Management, and it's a reliable tool, and though that's more important than the gaps in the user interface being smaller or wider, those gaps still need some improvement. I know the team is working on it. My company had some backend problems with DX Unified Infrastructure Management in the past that have now been solved. The setup for the tool also needs improvement because it's complex. Another room for improvement in DX Unified Infrastructure Management is its technical support because it's sometimes not as knowledgeable or responsive. What I'm suggesting to be added to the tool is an open-standard ELK Elastic-based database where you can put in all data, so that you can use the data in other systems as well."
"We have experienced challenges with finding a mechanism to deploy the agents, but it's only on the first deployment so it's not a big issue."
"Better support and more accessible resources are crucial. Customers have expressed that support is not as flexible, and it is difficult to obtain necessary information quickly."
"I think it can be improved by a greater provision of specialized technical support, as there are very few trained personnel there."
"The dashboards need to be improved."
More DX Unified Infrastructure Management cons
"The dashboard has a lot of room for improvement."
"The solution is expensive."
"The existing dashboard capability is there, but it is not user-friendly."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"CAD $400,000 annually."
"Pricing for DX Unified Infrastructure Management isn't cheap at all. It's a complex tool, so you have to pay more. No one is happy with a large bill to pay, but if it's a complex product and you designed a complex solution to be monitored, it'll be your fault that you need to buy an expensive product, and that would be implicit in the design of DX Unified Infrastructure Management. Monitoring is just a small part of it. Sometimes you have to pay a significant amount of money for a complex yet very good solution."
"Reasonable setup cost and licensing prices."
"This product is expensive compared to other vendors (SolarWinds, ManageEngine)."
"The license cost depends on the number of probes and robots."
"The product-price ratio is better than other brands such as Fortinet or SonicWall."
Information not available
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
851,042 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
16%
Manufacturing Company
15%
Computer Software Company
13%
Real Estate/Law Firm
6%
Government
21%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Manufacturing Company
15%
Computer Software Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your primary use case for DX Infrastructure Manager?
We are an integrating company that offers DX Unified Infrastructure Management to customers. We help them set it up, do the integration, and provide support. Our end customers include financial ins...
See all answers
What advice do you have for others considering DX Infrastructure Manager?
I would recommend DX Unified Infrastructure Management to others as it is a good and reliable solution. I would rate it nine out of ten due to its robust functionality and capability to support inf...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for DX Infrastructure Manager?
The pricing of DX Unified Infrastructure Management is high and often a concern for customers. The cost is higher compared to other Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs), which is feedback we hav...
See all answers
What is the best network monitoring software for large enterprises?
In my opinion Infosim, StableNet Enterprise is the best as it is a third-generation highly automated network management system. It enables IT departments to unify the management requirements of the...
See all answers
What do you like most about StableNet?
We can integrate any tool with StableNet.
See all answers
What needs improvement with StableNet?
The dashboard has a lot of room for improvement. The product must have the plug-ins ready for standard integrations.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Datadog vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management Logo
Datadog vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management
Compared 24% of the time
Zabbix vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management Logo
Zabbix vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management
Compared 20% of the time
SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management Logo
SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management
Compared 16% of the time
Dynatrace vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management Logo
Dynatrace vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management
Compared 14% of the time
Microsoft Configuration Manager vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management Logo
Microsoft Configuration Manager vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management
Compared 13% of the time
More DX Unified Infrastructure Management Competitors
SolarWinds NPM vs StableNet Logo
SolarWinds NPM vs StableNet
Compared 100% of the time
More StableNet Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
DX Unified Infrastructure Management
May 2025
DX Unified Infrastructure Management reportDownload DX Unified Infrastructure Management product report
Buyer's Guide
Network Monitoring Software
April 2025
StableNet reportDownload StableNet product report
 

Also Known As

DX Infrastructure Manager, DX Infrastructure Manager for Z Systems and CA UIM for zSystems, CA UIM (DX Infrastructure Manager), CA Nimsoft Monitor, CA UIM, DX Infrastructure Manager
No data available
 

Overview

DX Unified Infrastructure Management is the only solution that provides an open architecture, full-stack observability and zero-touch configuration for monitoring traditional data center, public cloud, and hybrid infrastructure environments.

Designed to ensure an optimal end-user experience, this solution provides a modern HTML5 operations console that makes it easy and fast for today’s IT teams to implement, use, and scale – leading to faster time to value.

Broadcom

StableNet provides Fault, Performance, Configuration, and Services Management on a single platform.
It is a vendor agnostic solution, built upon a single, consistent code base. The solution is easy to integrate and provides high performance while keeping low hardware requirements.

The unified network & services management approach has been proven with a large number of installations in key industry sectors like energy, finance, manufacturing, retail, telecommunications, and many more.

With this all-in-one NMS approach, Infosim revolutionizes the management of large heterogeneous network infrastructures.

Infosim
 

Sample Customers

CBNCloud, IIJ Global Singapore, AT&S, AXSOS, Aozora Bank, HCL Technologies, IntelliNet, Securex
Athenahealth, Barratt, Nocsult, Nucleus Connect, SCC
Buyer's Guide
DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. StableNet
April 2025
Free Report: DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. StableNet
Find out what your peers are saying about DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. StableNet and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
851,042 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. StableNet report.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.