We performed a comparison between SolarWinds NPM and StableNet based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Network Monitoring Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points."
"The biggest thing for me is that it provided enough information for me to monitor. It alerts and provides you with the information you need."
"All the features are very good. The monitoring of the equipment, the configuration manager, and the IP address monitoring are great."
"We can proactively fix historical issues, so we won't face those problems in future."
"We found that it was easy to operate, and it was simple if anyone has entry-level working experience or even if someone is not experienced."
"The most valuable features of the solution are its graphical interface and reports."
"You can monitor performance counters effortlessly."
"The solution is extremely stable. We haven't had any issues in that regard. We haven't had issues with bugs, glitches, or crashes."
"The most important feature is reporting. The reports that are generated are useful and they save a lot of time with respect to monitoring."
"We can integrate any tool with StableNet."
"The best features are the reporting, utilization, and network graph."
"The solution is stable."
"The Wi-Fi side needs improvement."
"The scalability can be better."
"It is not that stable. As a Windows software, I have seen issues with SolarWinds. The performance is slow."
"Technical support can be slow to respond."
"The reporting is good, but I want it to be a little easier when creating custom reports. The reports are all on the website now, but it takes some know how to get some to display the way you would like."
"Having more technical and support resources available in Saudi Arabia would be helpful."
"I would like to have a Syslog server module for this product. That would make the solution better."
"The product is scalable, but at a cost. Extra modules have to be purchased for each extra server. The initial set up isn't complex, but will require someone who is experienced with the network monitoring system"
"Better offline license management. I’ve had to get in touch with customer support several times simply to remove an expired license from our NPM servers."
"The dashboard has a lot of room for improvement."
"The solution is expensive."
"The existing dashboard capability is there, but it is not user-friendly."
SolarWinds NPM is ranked 4th in Network Monitoring Software with 147 reviews while StableNet is ranked 66th in Network Monitoring Software with 3 reviews. SolarWinds NPM is rated 8.2, while StableNet is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of SolarWinds NPM writes "High-level, comprehensive, and proactive monitoring in a user-friendly interface". On the other hand, the top reviewer of StableNet writes "A highly scalable and stable solution that provides excellent features and can be integrated with any product". SolarWinds NPM is most compared with Zabbix, PRTG Network Monitor, ManageEngine OpManager, ThousandEyes and LogicMonitor, whereas StableNet is most compared with . See our SolarWinds NPM vs. StableNet report.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.