Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 20, 2025
Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention and Digital Guardian compete in the data security space. Forcepoint appears to have an upper hand with its extensive integration capabilities, while Digital Guardian excels in specific industry applications and security analytics.
Features: Forcepoint DLP stands out with its comprehensive security across endpoint, network, and server levels, optical character recognition, and custom encryption features. The product is appreciated for policy customization and predefined templates. Digital Guardian offers robust data protection with built-in data classification and detection mechanisms, forensic analysis tools, and adaptive data control.
Room for Improvement: Forcepoint DLP would benefit from enhanced language support, better training materials, and simplified policy configuration. Its database update processes require optimization for easier integration. Digital Guardian needs to improve its Linux support, enhance agent stability, and expand its cloud integration capabilities.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both products provide deployment flexibility across various environments. However, Forcepoint's predominantly on-premises solution offers a complex deployment process requiring extensive resources. Its customer service has mixed reviews due to regional challenges, while Digital Guardian is praised for experienced technical support.
Pricing and ROI: Forcepoint is considered expensive but justified by its capabilities, offering significant returns on investment in compliance and security. Digital Guardian is priced between competitors like Symantec and McAfee, recognized for cost-efficiency in large projects. Both solutions show positive ROI, enhancing data security and compliance.
