We performed a comparison between Datadog and OpenText Business Process Monitoring based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability."The installation step is pretty straightforward."
"Straightforward to integrate and automate."
"We've been able to glean from the monitors what servers are down, and can alert the team in Slack."
"Flame graphs are pretty useful for understanding how GraphQL resolves our federated queries when it comes to identifying slow points in our requests. In our microservice environment with 170 services."
"The most valuable feature of Datadog is its logs."
"The CCM, Workflows, Logs, APM, and RUM are all useful aspects of the solution."
"Datadog has a lot of features to be able to drill down deep into the swath of logs that our platforms generate."
"The solution has offered increased visibility via logging APM, metrics, RUM, etc."
"Automates processes and allows reports and statistics to improve the speed at which changes and assets are managed."
"The stability has been very good over the years."
"The error traceability is an area that can be improved."
"The menu on the left is pretty dense (and I know it has to be). I never knew about the cmd+k functionality until recently. It would be helpful to offer more tips/cheat sheets to see handy shortcuts like that."
"The correlation between the logs and the metrics needs improvement as most cases, we might use another logging tool (that is cheaper in cost) which we then have to link together."
"The ease of implementation needs improvement."
"Datadog could be improved if it could detect other software in a container or server."
"Billing should be more transparent."
"There are things about it that we would like to be fixed, such as it is taking averages of average. This results in data that we don't expect."
"Could be a little more user friendly."
"Product documentation is lacking, and sometimes, incorrect. Having better documentation will allow business analysts and data center personnel to rely on the Micro Focus help desk less."
"The solution should offer better integration with other tools from a service management perspective."
Datadog is ranked 1st in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 137 reviews while OpenText Business Process Monitoring is ranked 57th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Datadog is rated 8.6, while OpenText Business Process Monitoring is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Datadog writes "Very good RUM, synthetics, and infrastructure host maps". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Business Process Monitoring writes "Stable with good performance visibility but is a discontinued product". Datadog is most compared with Dynatrace, Azure Monitor, New Relic, AWS X-Ray and AppDynamics, whereas OpenText Business Process Monitoring is most compared with Dynatrace and AppDynamics.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.