We performed a comparison between Datadog and NNT Log Tracker Enterprise based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Log Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The integration into AWS is key as well as our software is currently bound to AWS."
"The initial setup is very straightforward."
"The solution's SaaS model is easy to manage and works well in single- or multi-cloud environments."
"The most valuable aspect of the solution is the APM."
"The solution has improved the organization by providing good insights into app performance and offering good dashboards."
"The solution has offered increased visibility via logging APM, metrics, RUM, etc."
"I really enjoy the RUM monitoring features of Datadog. It allows us to monitor user behavior in a way we couldn't before."
"Even if we don't end up using Datadog, it revealed problems and optimizations to us that weren't obvious before."
"File integrity monitoring is a very important function."
"The most valuable feature is the predefined reports for PCI compliance."
"The FIM features in the Change Tracker and the Log Tracker are the most valuable."
"This is a very easy-to-use interface with a quick ramp-up time."
"Datadog isn't as mature as some of the established players like Dynatrace or Splunk. It's a new product, so they are constantly releasing new features, and I don't have much to complain about."
"It can have an artificial intelligence component. Even though I can seamlessly look at end-to-end security, it would be better to have alerts and notifications powered by an AI engine. I am not sure if they have an AI component. We have not reached out to them or looked at it, but this is something that I keep on talking about within our company in terms of features. Such a feature would be good to have, and it would further optimize my Security Ops team's abilities."
"Lately, chat support has a longer waiting time."
"We'd like Datadog to make the log storage cheaper."
"Since the Datadog platform has so many separate features, solving so many use cases, there are often inconsistencies in feature availability and interoperability between products."
"The correlation between the logs and the metrics needs improvement as most cases, we might use another logging tool (that is cheaper in cost) which we then have to link together."
"We want to reduce having to go to different screens to obtain all the information."
"Federated views for Datadog dashboards are critical as large companies utilize multiple instances of the product and cannot link the metrics or correlate the metrics together. This stunts the usage of Datadog."
"I would like to see the integration of AI technology, so rather than manually monitoring the logs, the tool will understand it and take care of it."
"Only one minor deployment issue came up and it was resolved quickly. No other areas of improvement come to mind yet."
"The correlation suite needs to be improved."
"It is able to identify the vulnerability, however, they need an option to auto-mitigate."
Datadog is ranked 3rd in Log Management with 137 reviews while NNT Log Tracker Enterprise is ranked 47th in Log Management with 4 reviews. Datadog is rated 8.6, while NNT Log Tracker Enterprise is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Datadog writes "Very good RUM, synthetics, and infrastructure host maps". On the other hand, the top reviewer of NNT Log Tracker Enterprise writes "Great for PCI compliance but issues with stability and large amounts of data". Datadog is most compared with Dynatrace, Azure Monitor, New Relic, AWS X-Ray and Elastic Observability, whereas NNT Log Tracker Enterprise is most compared with . See our Datadog vs. NNT Log Tracker Enterprise report.
See our list of best Log Management vendors.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.