Devo vs NNT Log Tracker Enterprise comparison

Devo and Netwrix are both solutions in the Log Management category. Devo is ranked #18 with an average rating of 8.3, while Netwrix is ranked #55. Devo holds a 1.4% mindshare in Log Management, compared to Netwrix’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Devo users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Netwrix users who would recommend it.

Devo

Read 26 Devo reviews

6,972 Views
3,625 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

NNT Log Tracker Enterprise

Read 4 NNT Log Tracker Enterprise reviews

2,712 Views
1,709 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Devo

NNT Log Tracker Enterprise

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

NNT Log Tracker Enterprise and Devo compete in the log management solutions category, each with distinct highlights. Devo tends to have the upper hand due to its advanced analytics and scalability, while NNT is preferred for its strong security features.

Features: NNT Log Tracker Enterprise focuses on robust security, regulatory compliance, and operational efficiency. Devo emphasizes real-time data analytics, scalability, and advanced user insights.

Room for Improvement: NNT Log Tracker Enterprise could improve in reporting capabilities, integration flexibility, and user interface. Devo needs enhancements in documentation, search functionality, and user experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: NNT Log Tracker Enterprise deployment is complex but is supported by responsive customer service. Devo offers a smoother deployment process, though its customer service is considered less proactive.

Pricing and ROI: NNT Log Tracker Enterprise is viewed as cost-effective with a good return on investment in security contexts. Devo, though more expensive, is seen as justifying the higher cost with its powerful features and data analytics ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Devo vs. NNT Log Tracker Enterprise Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Devo vs. NNT Log Tracker Enterprise

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,834 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Devo

Ranking in Log Management

18th

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

18th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Operations Analytics (7th), AIOps (13th)

NNT Log Tracker Enterprise

Ranking in Log Management

55th

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

53rd

Average Rating

8.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Log Management category, the mindshare of Devo is 1.4%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NNT Log Tracker Enterprise is 0.9%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Log Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Devo	1.4%
NNT Log Tracker Enterprise	0.9%
Other	97.7%

Log Management

Featured Reviews

Usama Khan

Team Lead SOC at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Advanced threat hunting has improved SOC visibility and now supports faster incident response

Devo can improve in how its connectors enhance integration with third-party tools. Devo's architecture works by having you deploy a relay server in the data center of the client side and Devo SIEM is basically on the AWS cloud. There are specific ports which are enabled on the relay server, which are 514 and 13000, 13151, 152. However, when we talk about databases and custom integrations, there are not default ports in the relay server. No default ports are defined. For JDBC drivers, the port number is 1433, but it is not in the relay server. You have to add it manually. For Oracle RDBMS, the port is 1521, and it is also not there by default. I would appreciate more third-party integrations including Fortinet and others. Machine learning models can also be improved. Playbooks in the SOAR can also be improved. Regarding playbooks for automation, we utilize playbooks for automation in SOAR for automated IOC blocking on a firewall, on a web application firewall, on DNS security, etc. The only option for us to run the playbook is to schedule the job for it. However, if I want to manually run the playbook, there is no option for doing so. This needs improvement.

Read full review

Jagganath Tendle

Senior Infra Manager at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Great for PCI compliance but issues with stability and large amounts of data

I mainly use this solution to meet PCI compliance The automation of compliance reports and the correlation of the log have been major improvements. The most valuable feature is the predefined reports for PCI compliance. The correlation suite needs to be improved. I also think they need to…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Being able to build and modify dashboards on the fly with Activeboards streamlines my analyst time because my analysts aren't doing it across spreadsheets or five different tools to try to build a timeline out themselves. They can just ingest it all, build a timeline out across all the logging, and all the different information sources in one dashboard. So, it's a huge time saver. It also has the accuracy of being able to look at all those data sources in one view. The log analysis, which would take 40 hours, we can probably get through it in about five to eight hours using Devo."

"The user experience [is] well thought out and the workflows are logical. The dashboards are intuitive and highly customizable."

"The ROI has been great as we could launch it in a few months instead of a couple of years, and when you put all the costs together, it is less to have done it than with the open source approach."

"We can ingest virtually any log source, which is much better than our previous solution."

"One of the biggest features of the UI is that you see the actual code of what you're doing in the graphical user interface, in a little window on the side. Whatever you're doing, you see the code, what's happening. And you can really quickly switch between using the GUI and using the code. That's really useful."

"Devo provides good value and, given the quality of the product, I would expect to pay more."

"The most powerful feature is the way the data is stored and extracted. The data is always stored in its original format and you can normalize the data after it has been stored."

"But from a SaaS standpoint, if not best-in-breed, Devo is certainly in the top-two or top-three."

More Devo pros

"This is a very easy-to-use interface with a quick ramp-up time."

"Customer Service: The service we've seen from NNT to date has been extraordinarily good."

"The automation of compliance reports and the correlation of the log have been major improvements."

"The FIM features in the Change Tracker and the Log Tracker are the most valuable."

"The Change Tracker tool is very good and will reduce your overall workload."

"The most valuable feature is the predefined reports for PCI compliance."

"If you want to deploy a SIEM and you want it to be simple, and not deal with much maintenance or help from the OEM, then I would say that NNT is the one."

"File integrity monitoring is a very important function."

Cons

"They can improve their AI capabilities"

"The biggest area with room for improvement in Devo is the Security Operations module that just isn't there yet. That goes back to building out how they're going to do content and larger correlation and aggregation of data across multiple things, as well as natively ingesting CTI to create rule sets."

"Some basic reporting mechanisms have room for improvement. Customers can do analysis by building Activeboards, Devo’s name for interactive dashboards. This capability is quite nice, but it is not a reporting engine. Devo does provide mechanisms to allow third-party tools to query data via their API, which is great. However, a lot of folks like or want a reporting engine, per se, and Devo simply doesn't have that. This may or may not be by design."

"An admin who is trying to audit user activity usually cannot go beyond a day in the UI. I would like to have access to pages and pages of that data, going back as far as the storage we have, so I could look at every command or search or deletion or anything that a user has run. As an admin, that would really help. Going back just a day in the UI is not going to help, and that means I have to find a different way to do that."

"Technical support could be better."

"I would like to have the ability to create more complex dashboards."

"The price is one problem with Devo."

"We only use the core functionality and one of the reasons for this is that their security operation center needs improvement."

More Devo cons

"For the NNT Log Tracker and Change Tracker, they have to make their knowledge base available online because there is very little information available on the internet."

"The correlation suite needs to be improved."

"I would like to see the integration of AI technology, so rather than manually monitoring the logs, the tool will understand it and take care of it."

"It is able to identify the vulnerability, however, they need an option to auto-mitigate."

"There are some issues with the stability - the correlation engine has failed multiple times, and the reports sometimes take too long, so we have to involve the tech team to get them."

"Only one minor deployment issue came up and it was resolved quickly. No other areas of improvement come to mind yet."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Devo is a hosted or subscription-based solution, whereas before, we purchased QRadar, so we owned it and just had to pay a maintenance fee. We've encountered this with some other products, too, where we went over to subscription-based. Our thought process is that with subscription based, the provider hosts and maintains the tool, and it's offsite. That comes with some additional fees, but we were able to convince our upper management it was worth the price. We used to pay under 10k a year for maintenance, and now we're paying ten times that. It was a relatively tough sell to our management, but I wonder if we have a choice anymore; this is where the market is."

"Be cautious of metadata inclusion for log types in pricing, as there are some "gotchas" with that."

"The way Devo prices things is based on the amount of data, and I wish the tiers had more granularity. Maybe at this point they do, but when we first negotiated with them, there were only three or four tiers."

"I'm not involved in the financial aspect, but I think the licensing costs are similar to other solutions. If all the solutions have a similar cost, Devo provides more for the money."

"We have an OEM agreement with Devo. It is very similar to the standard licensing agreement because we are charged in the same way as any other customer, e.g., we use the backroom."

"Devo is definitely cheaper than Splunk. There's no doubt about that. The value from Devo is good. It's definitely more valuable to me than QRadar or LogRhythm or any of the old, traditional SIEMs."

"[Devo was] in the ballpark with at least a couple of the other front-runners that we were looking at. Devo is a good value and, given the quality of the product, I would expect to pay more."

"Our licensing fees are billed annually and per terabyte."

More Devo pricing and cost advice

"Consider both their on-premises solution and their hosted solution. Both are reasonably priced."

"We have selected a perpetual license along with support."

"NNT's pricing is moderate - I would rate their pricing two-and-a-half out of ten."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Construction Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

22%

Manufacturing Company

Outsourcing Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	12

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Devo?

The pricing of the product is reasonable if we compare it with other Gartner leading products like Splunk, LogRhythm, Microsoft Sentinel, Google SecOps. Its licensing model is basically on per-day ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Devo?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Devo?

I am using Devo myself. Basically, I work at an MSSP, and we provide services to the organization for Security Operation Centers. In our Security Operation Center, we provide the service of SIEM vi...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Devo

Compared 8% of the time

LogRhythm SIEM vs Devo

Compared 7% of the time

New Relic vs Devo

Compared 4% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs Devo

Compared 3% of the time

Trellix Helix Connect vs Devo

Compared 2% of the time

More Devo Competitors

IBM Security QRadar vs NNT Log Tracker Enterprise

Compared 14% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs NNT Log Tracker Enterprise

Compared 13% of the time

BMC AMI Command Center for Security vs NNT Log Tracker Enterprise

Compared 6% of the time

SIEMStorm vs NNT Log Tracker Enterprise

Compared 5% of the time

NetWitness Platform vs NNT Log Tracker Enterprise

Compared 3% of the time

More NNT Log Tracker Enterprise Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Devo

August 2026

Download Devo product report

Buyer's Guide

Log Management

July 2026

Download NNT Log Tracker Enterprise product report

Overview

Devo offers powerful visual analytics, real-time data querying, and log integration capabilities within a cloud-native, multi-tenant architecture, supporting extended data retention ideal for long-term analysis and compliance.

Devo is recognized for its Activeboards, which facilitate visual analytics. High-speed search capabilities and real-time analytics enable efficient data manipulation and querying. Its multi-tenant architecture supports effective data segregation and customization tailored to distinct business needs, enhancing its value for handling complex log integrations. With extended data retention of 400 days and a cloud-native architecture, Devo is a robust platform for long-term analysis and compliance requirements. Though opportunities exist to improve browser stability on large searches, SOAR integrations, and its parser capabilities, Devo remains essential for incident response and security monitoring, offering centralized data storage and analysis.

What are Devo's most important features?

Activeboards: Facilitate visual analytics and data exploration.
High-Speed Search: Enables fast data querying and manipulation.
Real-Time Analytics: Supports instant insights and decision-making.
Multi-Tenant Architecture: Allows effective data segregation and customization.
Extended Data Retention: Offers 400-day log retention for compliance and analysis.
Complex Log Integration: Handles intricate data sources effortlessly.

What benefits and ROI should organizations look for in reviews?

Visual Insights: Enhance understanding through interactive dashboards.
Performance Efficiency: Saves time with high-speed data search and real-time results.
Customization Flexibility: Fits specific business requirements with multi-tenant architecture.
Long-Term Compliance: Ensures alignment with extended data retention needs.
Centralized Monitoring: Enables comprehensive incident response and security monitoring.

Devo is extensively used in industries focused on incident response and digital forensics, centralizing data for security monitoring across hybrid environments. Organizations benefit from its ability to store and analyze aggregated logs, creating alerts and dashboards to enhance visibility for network and endpoint activities in multi-domain settings.

Devo

NNT Log Tracker Enterprise offers a comprehensive approach to log and event management, providing real-time monitoring and alerting while ensuring compliance and security across networks.

It efficiently manages log data, delivering valuable insights and improving security and compliance protocols. With robust features tailored for seamless integration, it aids organizations in maintaining a secure network environment. Its flexibility allows it to be adapted to varied IT infrastructures, enhancing reliability and performance while reducing risk.

What are the key features of NNT Log Tracker Enterprise?

Real-Time Monitoring: Provides continuous monitoring of network activity for timely threat detection and response.
Compliance Support: Assists in meeting compliance standards through detailed logging and reporting functions.
Scalability: Capable of scaling with business growth to handle increasing data volume effortlessly.
Customizable Alerts: Allows setting of specific thresholds and conditions to receive immediate alerts on critical events.
Integration Capabilities: Easily integrates with existing infrastructure to enhance current IT security measures.

What benefits should users expect when assessing NNT Log Tracker Enterprise?

Increased Efficiency: Streamlines log management processes, saving time and resources on manual tasks.
Enhanced Security: Proactively identifies risks and vulnerabilities, contributing to a strong security posture.
Cost Savings: Reduces expenditures on compliance and crisis management through efficient threat detection.
Improved Decision Making: Offers actionable insights for better strategic planning and risk management.

In industries like finance and healthcare, NNT Log Tracker Enterprise is implemented to protect sensitive data while ensuring compliance with stringent regulations. Its capability to monitor and analyze data in real time is particularly valued in dynamic sectors, providing the agility necessary to respond to emerging threats swiftly.

Netwrix

Sample Customers

United States Air Force, Rubrik, SentinelOne, Critical Start, NHL, Panda Security, Telefonica, CaixaBank, OpenText, IGT, OneMain Financial, SurveyMonkey, FanDuel, H&R Block, Ulta Beauty, Manulife, Moneylion, Chime Bank, Magna International, American Express Global Business Travel

Wonga, WHSmith

Buyer's Guide

Devo vs. NNT Log Tracker Enterprise

August 2026

Free Report: Devo vs. NNT Log Tracker Enterprise

Find out what your peers are saying about Devo vs. NNT Log Tracker Enterprise and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Devo vs. NNT Log Tracker Enterprise report.

See our list of best Log Management vendors and best Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) vendors.

We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.