Devo vs NNT Log Tracker Enterprise comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Devo and Netwrix are both solutions in the Log Management category. Devo is ranked #21 with an average rating of 7.9, while Netwrix is ranked #53. Devo holds a 1.4% mindshare in Log Management, compared to Netwrix’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Devo users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Netwrix users who would recommend it.

Devo

Read 30 Devo reviews

8,527 Views
4,349 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

NNT Log Tracker Enterprise

Read 4 NNT Log Tracker Enterprise reviews

3,502 Views
2,206 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Devo

NNT Log Tracker Enterprise

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

NNT Log Tracker Enterprise and Devo compete in the log management solutions category, each with distinct highlights. Devo tends to have the upper hand due to its advanced analytics and scalability, while NNT is preferred for its strong security features.

Features: NNT Log Tracker Enterprise focuses on robust security, regulatory compliance, and operational efficiency. Devo emphasizes real-time data analytics, scalability, and advanced user insights.

Room for Improvement: NNT Log Tracker Enterprise could improve in reporting capabilities, integration flexibility, and user interface. Devo needs enhancements in documentation, search functionality, and user experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: NNT Log Tracker Enterprise deployment is complex but is supported by responsive customer service. Devo offers a smoother deployment process, though its customer service is considered less proactive.

Pricing and ROI: NNT Log Tracker Enterprise is viewed as cost-effective with a good return on investment in security contexts. Devo, though more expensive, is seen as justifying the higher cost with its powerful features and data analytics ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Devo vs. NNT Log Tracker Enterprise Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Devo vs. NNT Log Tracker Enterprise

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,929 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Devo

Ranking in Log Management

21st

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

16th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Operations Analytics (7th), AIOps (17th)

NNT Log Tracker Enterprise

Ranking in Log Management

53rd

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

52nd

Average Rating

8.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Log Management category, the mindshare of Devo is 1.4%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NNT Log Tracker Enterprise is 0.9%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Log Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Devo	1.4%
NNT Log Tracker Enterprise	0.9%
Other	97.7%

Log Management

Featured Reviews

Usama Khan

Team Lead Soc at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Advanced threat hunting has improved SOC visibility and now supports faster incident response

Devo can improve in how its connectors enhance integration with third-party tools. Devo's architecture works by having you deploy a relay server in the data center of the client side and Devo SIEM is basically on the AWS cloud. There are specific ports which are enabled on the relay server, which are 514 and 13000, 13151, 152. However, when we talk about databases and custom integrations, there are not default ports in the relay server. No default ports are defined. For JDBC drivers, the port number is 1433, but it is not in the relay server. You have to add it manually. For Oracle RDBMS, the port is 1521, and it is also not there by default. I would appreciate more third-party integrations including Fortinet and others. Machine learning models can also be improved. Playbooks in the SOAR can also be improved. Regarding playbooks for automation, we utilize playbooks for automation in SOAR for automated IOC blocking on a firewall, on a web application firewall, on DNS security, etc. The only option for us to run the playbook is to schedule the job for it. However, if I want to manually run the playbook, there is no option for doing so. This needs improvement.

Read full review

Jagganath Tendle

Senior Infra Manager at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Great for PCI compliance but issues with stability and large amounts of data

I mainly use this solution to meet PCI compliance The automation of compliance reports and the correlation of the log have been major improvements. The most valuable feature is the predefined reports for PCI compliance. The correlation suite needs to be improved. I also think they need to…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Having one integrated tool helped us by removing the multiple teams, multiple pieces of equipment, and multiple software solutions from the equation."

"Devo saves us hours in every investigation."

"The real-time analytics of security-related data are super. There are a lot of data feeds going into it and it's very quick at pulling up and correlating the data and showing you what's going on in your infrastructure. It's fast. The way that their architecture and technology works, they've really focused on the speed of query results and making sure that we can do what we need to do quickly. Devo is pulling back information in a fast fashion, based on real-time events."

"The most useful feature for us, because of some of the issues we had previously, was the simplicity of log integrations. It's much easier with this platform to integrate log sources that might not have standard logging and things like that."

"Scalability is one of Devo's strengths."

"Because of the way Devo works, our onboarding time has shrunk by 50 percent at least."

"But from a SaaS standpoint, if not best-in-breed, Devo is certainly in the top-two or top-three."

"One of the immediate improvements that come to mind is the amount of hot, searchable data, as in the SIEM we had before we were only able to search back 90 days of hot, searchable data, whereas here we have 400 days worth, which has definitely improved our threat hunting capabilities."

More Devo pros

"The FIM features in the Change Tracker and the Log Tracker are the most valuable."

"If you want to deploy a SIEM and you want it to be simple, and not deal with much maintenance or help from the OEM, then I would say that NNT is the one."

"File integrity monitoring is a very important function."

"Customer Service: The service we've seen from NNT to date has been extraordinarily good."

"The Change Tracker tool is very good and will reduce your overall workload."

"The automation of compliance reports and the correlation of the log have been major improvements."

"This is a very easy-to-use interface with a quick ramp-up time."

"The most valuable feature is the predefined reports for PCI compliance."

Cons

"Devo has a lot of cloud connectors, but they need to do a little bit of work there. They've got good integrations with the public cloud, but there are a lot of cloud SaaS systems that they still need to work with on integrations, such as Salesforce and other SaaS providers where we need to get access logs."

"Some basic reporting mechanisms have room for improvement. Customers can do analysis by building Activeboards, Devo’s name for interactive dashboards. This capability is quite nice, but it is not a reporting engine. Devo does provide mechanisms to allow third-party tools to query data via their API, which is great. However, a lot of folks like or want a reporting engine, per se, and Devo simply doesn't have that. This may or may not be by design."

"The customer service is average. Technical support from Devo is helpful, but they can improve on the support model."

"They can improve their AI capabilities"

"It's stable but it's not extremely stable."

"The overall performance of extraction could be a lot faster, but that's a common problem in this space in general. Also, the stock or default alerting and detecting options could definitely be broader and more all-encompassing. The fact that they're not is why we had to write all our own alerts."

"Technical support needs to be more direct. For example, when we submit a ticket, the support team will delegate a task to the operations team, for example, or various other teams."

"Where Devo has room for improvement is the data ingestion and parsing. We tend to have to work with the Devo support team to bring on and ingest new sources of data."

More Devo cons

"For the NNT Log Tracker and Change Tracker, they have to make their knowledge base available online because there is very little information available on the internet."

"Only one minor deployment issue came up and it was resolved quickly. No other areas of improvement come to mind yet."

"I would like to see the integration of AI technology, so rather than manually monitoring the logs, the tool will understand it and take care of it."

"The correlation suite needs to be improved."

"There are some issues with the stability - the correlation engine has failed multiple times, and the reports sometimes take too long, so we have to involve the tech team to get them."

"It is able to identify the vulnerability, however, they need an option to auto-mitigate."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I'm not involved in the financial aspect, but I think the licensing costs are similar to other solutions. If all the solutions have a similar cost, Devo provides more for the money."

"I like the pricing very much. They keep it simple. It is a single price based on data ingested, and they do it on an average. If you get a spike of data that flows in, they will not stick it to you or charge you for that. They are very fair about that."

"Our licensing fees are billed annually and per terabyte."

"It's very competitive. That was also a primary draw for us. Some of the licensing models with solutions like Splunk and Sentinel were attractive upfront, but there were so many micro-charges and services we would've had to add on to make them what we wanted. We had to include things like SOAR and extended capabilities, whereas all those capabilities are completely included with the Devo platform. I haven't seen any additional fee."

"Devo is a hosted or subscription-based solution, whereas before, we purchased QRadar, so we owned it and just had to pay a maintenance fee. We've encountered this with some other products, too, where we went over to subscription-based. Our thought process is that with subscription based, the provider hosts and maintains the tool, and it's offsite. That comes with some additional fees, but we were able to convince our upper management it was worth the price. We used to pay under 10k a year for maintenance, and now we're paying ten times that. It was a relatively tough sell to our management, but I wonder if we have a choice anymore; this is where the market is."

"The way Devo prices things is based on the amount of data, and I wish the tiers had more granularity. Maybe at this point they do, but when we first negotiated with them, there were only three or four tiers."

"Be cautious of metadata inclusion for log types in pricing, as there are some "gotchas" with that."

"Pricing is based on the number of gigabytes of ingestion by volume, and it's on a 30-day average. If you go over one day, that's not a big deal as long as the average is what you expected it to be."

More Devo pricing and cost advice

"NNT's pricing is moderate - I would rate their pricing two-and-a-half out of ten."

"Consider both their on-premises solution and their hosted solution. Both are reasonably priced."

"We have selected a perpetual license along with support."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,929 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Outsourcing Company

11%

Construction Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

19%

Comms Service Provider

14%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	15

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Devo?

The price is considered okay.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Devo?

In terms of improvements, I think Devo falls short with their support model, as they rely mainly on their support team in Spain. Although they do have a support team in North America, they lack kno...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Devo?

Devo is the bank's centralized log management platform that my team and I rely on the most. For centralized log management in our day-to-day work, one of the biggest data users would be our Red Hat...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Devo

Compared 7% of the time

LogRhythm SIEM vs Devo

Compared 6% of the time

New Relic vs Devo

Compared 4% of the time

Datadog vs Devo

Compared 3% of the time

Palantir Foundry vs Devo

Compared 2% of the time

More Devo Competitors

IBM Security QRadar vs NNT Log Tracker Enterprise

Compared 14% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs NNT Log Tracker Enterprise

Compared 13% of the time

BMC AMI Command Center for Security vs NNT Log Tracker Enterprise

Compared 6% of the time

Graylog Enterprise vs NNT Log Tracker Enterprise

Compared 5% of the time

Venusense USM vs NNT Log Tracker Enterprise

Compared 3% of the time

More NNT Log Tracker Enterprise Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Devo

October 2026

Download Devo product report

Buyer's Guide

Log Management

October 2026

Download NNT Log Tracker Enterprise product report

Overview

Devo offers powerful visual analytics, real-time data querying, and log integration capabilities within a cloud-native, multi-tenant architecture, supporting extended data retention ideal for long-term analysis and compliance.

Devo is recognized for its Activeboards, which facilitate visual analytics. High-speed search capabilities and real-time analytics enable efficient data manipulation and querying. Its multi-tenant architecture supports effective data segregation and customization tailored to distinct business needs, enhancing its value for handling complex log integrations. With extended data retention of 400 days and a cloud-native architecture, Devo is a robust platform for long-term analysis and compliance requirements. Though opportunities exist to improve browser stability on large searches, SOAR integrations, and its parser capabilities, Devo remains essential for incident response and security monitoring, offering centralized data storage and analysis.

What are Devo's most important features?

Activeboards: Facilitate visual analytics and data exploration.
High-Speed Search: Enables fast data querying and manipulation.
Real-Time Analytics: Supports instant insights and decision-making.
Multi-Tenant Architecture: Allows effective data segregation and customization.
Extended Data Retention: Offers 400-day log retention for compliance and analysis.
Complex Log Integration: Handles intricate data sources effortlessly.

What benefits and ROI should organizations look for in reviews?

Visual Insights: Enhance understanding through interactive dashboards.
Performance Efficiency: Saves time with high-speed data search and real-time results.
Customization Flexibility: Fits specific business requirements with multi-tenant architecture.
Long-Term Compliance: Ensures alignment with extended data retention needs.
Centralized Monitoring: Enables comprehensive incident response and security monitoring.

Devo is extensively used in industries focused on incident response and digital forensics, centralizing data for security monitoring across hybrid environments. Organizations benefit from its ability to store and analyze aggregated logs, creating alerts and dashboards to enhance visibility for network and endpoint activities in multi-domain settings.

Devo

NNT Log Tracker Enterprise offers a comprehensive approach to log and event management, providing real-time monitoring and alerting while ensuring compliance and security across networks.

It efficiently manages log data, delivering valuable insights and improving security and compliance protocols. With robust features tailored for seamless integration, it aids organizations in maintaining a secure network environment. Its flexibility allows it to be adapted to varied IT infrastructures, enhancing reliability and performance while reducing risk.

What are the key features of NNT Log Tracker Enterprise?

Real-Time Monitoring: Provides continuous monitoring of network activity for timely threat detection and response.
Compliance Support: Assists in meeting compliance standards through detailed logging and reporting functions.
Scalability: Capable of scaling with business growth to handle increasing data volume effortlessly.
Customizable Alerts: Allows setting of specific thresholds and conditions to receive immediate alerts on critical events.
Integration Capabilities: Easily integrates with existing infrastructure to enhance current IT security measures.

What benefits should users expect when assessing NNT Log Tracker Enterprise?

Increased Efficiency: Streamlines log management processes, saving time and resources on manual tasks.
Enhanced Security: Proactively identifies risks and vulnerabilities, contributing to a strong security posture.
Cost Savings: Reduces expenditures on compliance and crisis management through efficient threat detection.
Improved Decision Making: Offers actionable insights for better strategic planning and risk management.

In industries like finance and healthcare, NNT Log Tracker Enterprise is implemented to protect sensitive data while ensuring compliance with stringent regulations. Its capability to monitor and analyze data in real time is particularly valued in dynamic sectors, providing the agility necessary to respond to emerging threats swiftly.

Netwrix

Sample Customers

United States Air Force, Rubrik, SentinelOne, Critical Start, NHL, Panda Security, Telefonica, CaixaBank, OpenText, IGT, OneMain Financial, SurveyMonkey, FanDuel, H&R Block, Ulta Beauty, Manulife, Moneylion, Chime Bank, Magna International, American Express Global Business Travel

Wonga, WHSmith

Buyer's Guide

Devo vs. NNT Log Tracker Enterprise

September 2026

Free Report: Devo vs. NNT Log Tracker Enterprise

Find out what your peers are saying about Devo vs. NNT Log Tracker Enterprise and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,929 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Devo vs. NNT Log Tracker Enterprise report.

See our list of best Log Management vendors and best Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) vendors.

We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.