We performed a comparison between Datadog and DX NetOps based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Network Monitoring Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points."
"We have hundreds of microservices, and knowing how top-level requests weave throughout all of them is invaluable."
"Straightforward to integrate and automate."
"The seamless integration between Datadog and hundreds of apps makes onboarding new products and teams a breeze."
"The visibility into our network has allowed for quick diagnosis of failures, identification of underutilized or over-utilized resources, and allowed for cloud cost optimization opportunities."
"If we have a large load for users using our basic Datadog, it will immediately fire off an alert notifying us either something's wrong or not."
"I find the greatest feature is being able to search across logs from various microservices."
"Excellent autocomplete for everything in the UI."
"The most valuable aspects of the product include the APM and profiler."
"The AI is the best feature in this solution."
"It is straightforward to configure, and you can quickly gather data from your infrastructure."
"I like that it provides an overall view of our network. From the topology view to every event, we can view it. We can also see the interface utilization for future capacity planning. It fits our use case and environment."
"It's good for root cause analysis for network problems and network link problems."
"The solution is stable."
"The Wi-Fi side needs improvement."
"Graph filters for logs need to be set manually which works well for JSON but not for unstructured logs."
"I find the training great. That said, it is set for the LCD (lowest common denominator). Of course, this is very helpful to sell the product, yet, to really utilize the product, you need to get more detailed."
"The product needs to have more enterprise approach to configuration."
"We need to learn more about the session reply feature inside of DD."
"I would like testing for data in the future."
"The solution should provide alerts for cloud outages."
"The ease of implementation needs improvement."
"At times, it can be hard to generate metrics out of logs."
"It would be better if they had an NFA network analysis feature. We appreciate features like extended network security for bucket flows, but it would be better to have some IDs, IPS functionalities, DDoS, or something like that."
"Technical support needs to be better. They need to be more knowledgeable and responsive."
"Technical support could be more responsive."
"Lacks dashboards and better integration with other solutions."
"One improvement that could make the product better is to streamline its modules into a more cohesive solution."
Datadog is ranked 2nd in Network Monitoring Software with 137 reviews while DX NetOps is ranked 30th in Network Monitoring Software with 5 reviews. Datadog is rated 8.6, while DX NetOps is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Datadog writes "Very good RUM, synthetics, and infrastructure host maps". On the other hand, the top reviewer of DX NetOps writes "Good performance, simple setup, and helpful for root cause analysis". Datadog is most compared with Dynatrace, Azure Monitor, New Relic, AWS X-Ray and Elastic Observability, whereas DX NetOps is most compared with DX Spectrum, SolarWinds NPM, AppNeta by Broadcom, PRTG Network Monitor and IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM). See our DX NetOps vs. Datadog report.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors and best AIOps vendors.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.