We performed a comparison between DarwinBox and PeopleSoft based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Talent Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable features of the solution are organogram and position-based mapping."
"The solution that we used previously was very complex. As a result, without referring to the manuals and consulting an expert, it was difficult for a newly hired employee to navigate the platform. However, this is not the case with Darwinbox. It has a very intuitive user interface, and anyone can use it and implement it without having to use a guide or a walk through process. It's very simple."
"In our company, we use DarwinBox to maintain the data of our employees and for recruitment purposes."
"Scales up very well."
"Stability-wise, it is a good tool."
"Peoplesoft is the best payroll software in the market."
"This solution integrates very well with other products which is helpful."
"It's a mature product."
"Its user interface is impressive."
"PeopleSoft is resilient and has the flexibility for us to customize it."
"The most valuable feature is ERP application information."
"DarwinBox is not a stable solution...DarwinBox is not a scalable solution."
"Like most software, it has a base version, the vanilla, out-of-the-box version, and customization is required to match it to the unique processes of each company. The Darwinbox team seems to be having difficulty with the customization process. They have to be a little more mature to customize it as per every company's need."
"The solution's API integration with third-party applications should be improved."
"The product was too complicated when it came to navigating through multiple places and the search filters weren't great."
"Areas that need improvement are the add-ons to the fluid pages and additional features in SCM and finance, both functionally and technically."
"The solution needs to work on its mobile technology. We're hoping in the next version we're working on implementing, 9.2, will have more of this."
"The product is not intuitive, and finding the right candidate can be arduous."
"Tools and UI could be enhanced."
"The solution could improve by offering PeopleSoft site licenses. Currently, Oracle is pushing for everyone to transition to the cloud, but clients are discontent with this approach. Offering new PeopleSoft site licenses would be the most beneficial for our clients."
"PeopleSoft should be more flexible with the configuration. There should be less coding and more configuration."
"I would like for the initial rollout process to be completed faster so that it can be implemented in a more efficient manner."
DarwinBox is ranked 21st in Talent Management with 3 reviews while PeopleSoft is ranked 5th in Talent Management with 80 reviews. DarwinBox is rated 6.4, while PeopleSoft is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of DarwinBox writes "Has a very intuitive user interface and a fairly smooth implementation process". On the other hand, the top reviewer of PeopleSoft writes "Comprehensive solution for SCM but requires add-ons for fluid pages". DarwinBox is most compared with SAP SuccessFactors, ZingHR, PeopleStrong , Workday and Ramco HCM, whereas PeopleSoft is most compared with Oracle HCM Cloud, Workday, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, SAP SuccessFactors and SAP ERP. See our DarwinBox vs. PeopleSoft report.
See our list of best Talent Management vendors and best Talent Acquisition vendors.
We monitor all Talent Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.