BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs Deep Instinct Prevention Platform comparison

BlackBerry and Deep Instinct are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. BlackBerry is ranked #24 with an average rating of 8.2, while Deep Instinct is ranked #36 with an average rating of 9.0. BlackBerry holds a 1.3% mindshare in EPP, compared to Deep Instinct’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of BlackBerry users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Deep Instinct users who would recommend it.

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersec...

Read 44 BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity reviews

3,171 Views
2,886 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Deep Instinct Prevention Pl...

Read 20 Deep Instinct Prevention Platform reviews

2,297 Views
1,677 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersec...

Deep Instinct Prevention Pl...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 2, 2025

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity and Deep Instinct Prevention Platform are competitors in the cybersecurity space. Deep Instinct has the edge due to its high detection rates and compatibility across devices, combined with comprehensive prevention capabilities.

Features: BlackBerry Cylance utilizes lightweight design with AI-powered zero-day protection, a centralized dashboard, and strong endpoint protection. Deep Instinct offers advanced static and dynamic analysis, high accuracy, a prevention-first approach, and broad platform compatibility.

Room for Improvement: BlackBerry Cylance could enhance its user interface, scripting support, and reporting features. Feature separation and pricing issues also need addressing. Deep Instinct should improve its user interface for better reporting details, expand technical documentation and SLAs, and add more integrations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: BlackBerry Cylance is flexible for deployment across various cloud environments but has mixed technical support reviews. Deep Instinct ensures straightforward deployment and receives high satisfaction in customer support, though deployment issues in clustered environments exist.

Pricing and ROI: BlackBerry Cylance is perceived as costly but justifiable with its protection efficiency, despite licensing complexities. Deep Instinct is competitively priced with a high ROI, offering reduced administrative overhead and effective endpoint security.

To learn more, read our detailed BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. Deep Instinct Prevention Platform Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. Deep Instinct Prevention Platform

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,515 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersec...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

24th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

4.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Deep Instinct Prevention Pl...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

36th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Anti-Malware Tools (17th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity is 1.3%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Deep Instinct Prevention Platform is 0.9%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity	1.3%
Deep Instinct Prevention Platform	0.9%
Other	97.8%

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

Sooraj Makkancherrry

Security Operations Manager at Philips

Doesn't have daily updates, which is important for healthcare IT

I face challenges with the exclusion policy - it still scans folders we told it not to, causing issues. When we contact support, they tell us to update the latest agent, but we can't do that immediately due to medical device protocols and validation testing. I wish support would try to understand our issues better instead of giving this standard response. The machine learning feature they use often tells us to upgrade the agent or add things to the exclusion list, which isn't unacceptable. It's a very good and new technology as a tool and antivirus. But sometimes, it doesn't work properly with our medical devices and products, quarantining files it shouldn't even after we add them to exclusions. This is tricky for us.

Read full review

Tom Foal

CTO at Klaatu IT Security Ltd

Stops ransomware before it executes and reduces response time for the team

A potential area of improvement for Deep Instinct Prevention Platform is their focus on file uploads and large data storage, backups, and other related areas. It is difficult to think of what they could improve, but low information provided by the system when it detects something is one area, particularly in scripting. Deep Instinct Prevention Platform detects malicious scripts but it needs better measures, perhaps signing scripts, so we can be sure that a script is created by a client, not by some malware. It is really about helping us triage incidents effectively, so a bit more help with the analysis of incidents, particularly what the Deep Instinct Prevention Platform agent has discovered, would be beneficial. We need to know what it has spotted that makes it suspect malware.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We chose the solution because it doesn't have daily updates, which is important for us in healthcare IT, where network usage and connectivity to hospitals matter."

"The solution’s AI is its most valuable feature."

"CylancePROTECT works on AI technology, is always up to date, and uses very few resources on your devices."

"Blackberry Protect offers endpoint protection. It's easy to deploy. It's scalable and stable."

"We are quite security-focused. Blackberry Protect as an endpoint solution for our service really delivers what we are expecting."

"A user can continue to add endpoints and the solution will continue to perform well."

"Does malware analysis. Blocks WannaCry and other attacks that have come out."

"It actively monitors the behavior and activity of processes and will, without hesitation, terminate at root anything it determines to be suspect."

More BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity pros

"No valuable quote available from the provided review sections."

"It has a very low false-positive ratio. That is important because it means we're not wasting time... We're able to run that entire 20,000-endpoint base with just a handful of engineers."

"The CPU consumption is low compared to what I have been using in my current environment, which is Sophos. The footprint is a lot smaller, about a quarter of Sophos. It is very small."

"I like the dashboard. It looks very simple."

"The most valuable features are the static/dynamic analyses. Deep Instinct's predictive model has very high accuracy and provides threat information for unknown malware, such as malware classification, static analysis information, and sandbox information."

"Deep Instinct Prevention Platform stops all malware, including zero-days in 20 milliseconds, and I have never managed to get anything past it, which means I do not have to get out of bed whenever something happens at the client because we know anything bad has been stopped."

"Deep Instinct complements the solutions we already have. You don't need to rip and replace any antivirus or endpoint that you have. It's easy to use and it's easy to have it side-by-side with other solutions. That makes it really easy to have an additional level of protection, rather than to hassle with doing solution migration."

"The support is very good. They reply and respond very quickly."

More Deep Instinct Prevention Platform pros

Cons

"It should have better support for Windows and Mac."

"If they can add more features on top of their Persona feature that would be ideal."

"Making the dashboards a bit modern to make them easier to search would also be helpful."

"I'd like them to do software distribution too, but they said that that's architecturally not at the product line."

"Additionally, their channel management has been lacking, with a notable disregard for small and medium-sized businesses, focusing primarily on large enterprises and very large MSPs."

"The product does not do a lot of reporting on what it is taking care of. Enhanced reporting would be a welcome improvement."

"It's a good solution but some features just need to be updated."

"While you are working, you are finding these things that were supposed to be waived have come back to being blocked. That's frustrating."

More BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity cons

"I would like to see improvement in the user interface so that the user has more control. For example, it would be good if a user could change their grouping if they want to be part of another group. Or if I want to right-click and scan a specific file that I just imported, that would be helpful. Sometimes you just want to do an extra scan to make sure you're safe."

"If they can bring some additional, complementary solutions, like network scanning and the like, that will help. If they had some sort of a firewall which could help detect DDoS attacks and other things, it would be an improvement"

"They have a manual, but it is not excessive."

"I think it's probably the administration, especially the administration platform, which could be improved in the solution. It's clunky and hard to navigate, especially for inexperienced technicians."

"The Deep Instinct client stops working when you have two servers and you add high availability or Windows Failover Cluster mode. It doesn't work in a clustered mode. I haven't yet had time to go back and talk with their support and get it fixed. It would be good if they can make the installation independent of an actual user. Currently, its installation is dependent on the actual user being logged in. For example, a computer has to be logged in for the installation to happen. If it is not logged in, then on the cloud platform, it is going to show that the client is offline. On the management side of the cloud platform, we would like to have the administrators segregated by logical entities. We have told them that on their cloud management platform, we would like to be able to segregate clients into different logical entities or organizations so that the administrators are able to manage only those entities that are within their designated organization."

"If the client is working remotely and doesn't have a VPN then the deployment is difficult to do."

"Its support for Linux and Unix operating systems can be improved. Currently, they cover macOS and Windows, but they don't cover Linux and some of the Unix products. Pricing is also an issue. Its pricing is not as aggressive as it could be, and its price makes it difficult to sell. Customers feel that they can get an antivirus for a lower price, even though it is not a similar product. It is technically different. Their SLAs can be better. They have to give you 24/7 support, but their SLAs are not very good. They should be better documented, and the offerings should also be a little bit better. What happens is that the SLAs end up in the hands of the intermediary, seller, or the local partner of Deep Instinct in a country. The customers want very fast SLAs in a very short time, but Deep Instinct doesn't give them at the same speed. Having said that, SLAs are important when you have a lot of issues, but this product doesn't have too many issues, so it is not a big concern. However, for a customer who doesn't know the product, it could be a concern."

"When things get done automatically, I would appreciate more logging of what's happening in the background... we should be able to backtrack from the log that gets uploaded to our cloud instance and see, forensically, what the root cause was."

More Deep Instinct Prevention Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We pay our license on a yearly basis and have just renewed for two years."

"CylancePROTECT's pricing is reasonable, at about €18 per user, per year."

"I think that the price we are paying is good for what it is."

"Shop around for sure and be assured the price you pay will be close to other solutions available, but even at a slight mark-up from the other solutions, you are getting real endpoint protection versus nothing more than a cheap security blanket that might keep you warm at night."

"The monthly fee is $55 USD per user."

"It is expensive, but not unreasonable."

"The licensing part of the product is too expensive compared to other solutions in the market."

"This cost of the license is approximately $5 USD monthly per user."

More BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity pricing and cost advice

"Its pricing is too high, but that is not because of the product. It is expensive because of the cost of the console. You need a console to control the whole thing, but the console is expensive. You have to split this cost among all possible users. Normally, to be able to make it economically attractive, you need at least 1,000 agents, PCs, or users. If you have a customer with 300 to 500 agents, PCs, or users, it becomes too pricey."

"In comparison to the other products out there, it's exceptionally competitively priced. When you consider the lower administrative overhead that it facilitates, it's an absolute value."

"We are a nonprofit. The MSP had provides pretty decent nonprofit rates for us. This was one of the key factors that made us choose Deep Instinct over its competitors who were significantly more expensive."

"There is a need for customers of the product to pay towards the licensing costs of the tool."

"The pricing is a little bit expensive but we are satisfied with DI's performance."

"Their pricing is very competitive. It is good, fair, and a lot cheaper than what we were doing with Cylance."

"If I include the false positive rate and the detection rate in the comparison, Deep Instinct is worth its price."

"One thing about their licensing program that I like is that just one covers the server as well as on the endpoint as well as mobile devices. There is no complexity in calculating how many SKUs I need for mobile, for laptop, for desktop, and for servers. It's very simple and that makes it much easier to budget."

More Deep Instinct Prevention Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,515 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Government

Computer Software Company

16%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	33
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	13

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Blackberry Protect?

It is a good endpoint solution. It is very easy to manage and detect the threat immediately. It will take the necessary actions.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Blackberry Protect?

The price is reasonable for us at the moment. I rate the overall solution an eight out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Blackberry Protect?

See all answers

What do you like most about Deep Instinct?

The product offers integration capabilities and is also easy to use.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Deep Instinct?

The price for Deep Instinct Prevention Platform is reasonable. It is about the same price as any other antivirus.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Deep Instinct?

See all answers

Comparisons

CrowdStrike Falcon vs BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity

Compared 7% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity

Compared 6% of the time

VMware Carbon Black Endpoint vs BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity

Compared 6% of the time

Fortinet FortiEDR vs BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity

Compared 3% of the time

More BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Deep Instinct Prevention Platform

Compared 7% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Deep Instinct Prevention Platform

Compared 7% of the time

Morphisec vs Deep Instinct Prevention Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Huntress Managed EDR vs Deep Instinct Prevention Platform

Compared 5% of the time

VMware Carbon Black Endpoint vs Deep Instinct Prevention Platform

Compared 4% of the time

More Deep Instinct Prevention Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity

January 2026

Download BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity product report

Buyer's Guide

Deep Instinct Prevention Platform

January 2026

Deep Instinct Prevention Platform report

Download Deep Instinct Prevention Platform product report

Also Known As

Blackberry Protect

No data available

Overview

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity leverages AI and machine learning for efficient malware detection and zero-day threat protection, offering robust endpoint security with high detection accuracy and low false positive rates.

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity delivers advanced threat protection with AI-driven algorithms and machine learning. Its lightweight design ensures low system resource usage, making it both efficient and effective. It's recognized for centralized management, easy deployment, and a clean interface, providing comprehensive endpoint protection against diverse threats. The integration of features like CylanceOPTICS and behavioral monitoring enhances security insights. While the system excels in malware detection, enhancements are needed in areas like user interface design, reporting, deeper threat analysis, and integration with third-party systems. Support and pricing improvements could also increase competitiveness.

What are the key features of BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity?

AI and Machine Learning: Utilizes cutting-edge technology for malware and threat detection.
Zero-Day Protection: Safeguards against emerging threats without the need for constant updates.
Centralized Management: Simplifies deployment and management across devices.
CylanceOPTICS: Provides advanced security insights and behavioral monitoring.
Low Resource Usage: Ensures efficient operation with minimal system impact.

What benefits should users expect from BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity?

High Detection Accuracy: Reduces risk with minimal false positives.
Efficient Resource Management: Enhances performance with its lightweight design.
Proactive Threat Defense: Protects against a wide range of threats with centralized management.
Advanced Insights: Offers unique features for detailed security analysis.

Organizations deploy BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity for threat analytics, log management, and endpoint protection. As an antivirus replacement, it protects against zero-day malware, ransomware, and various threats. Its AI algorithms detect anomalies, minimizing risks in both internet-connected and isolated environments. Many businesses incorporate it into wider security strategies, appreciating its centralized management and proactive defense capabilities.

BlackBerry

Deep Instinct PREVENTS >99% of UNKNOWN threats like ransomware and zero-days before they land inside your environment – not after. With both an agentless and agent-based approach, we ensure file-based and fileless attacks are prevented. To achieve this, Deep Instinct is pioneering the use of deep learning AI to prevent threats in <20ms, without requiring calls to the cloud for threat intelligence. Our ability to scale to the needs of the enterprise is unprecedented as is our delivery of the industry’s lowest false positive rate of <0.1%.

The Deep Instinct Prevention Platform combines industry-leading static analysis based on the only deep learning framework dedicated to cybersecurity and includes two solutions:

Deep Instinct Prevention for Applications is a flexible, containerized and highly scalable solution, deployed via API or ICAP, to scan million so files per day and prevent malicious files from entering storage environments.

Deep Instinct for Endpoints complements EDR solutions by preventing threats pre-execution, minimizing false positives, improving the productivity of SOC teams, and increasing the efficiency of the security stack.

To learn more, visit: https://www.deepinstinct.com.

Deep Instinct

Sample Customers

Panasonic, Noble Energy, Apria Healthcare Group Inc., Charles River Laboratories, Rovi Corporation, Toyota, Kiewit

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. Deep Instinct Prevention Platform

December 2025

Free Report: BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. Deep Instinct Prevention Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. Deep Instinct Prevention Platform and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,515 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. Deep Instinct Prevention Platform report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.