CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs Keeper vs Oracle Identity Governance comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Market share comparison

As of June 2024, in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category, the market share of CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is 22.3% and it decreased by 1.1% compared to the previous year. The market share of Keeper is 0.7% and it decreased by 71.1% compared to the previous year. The market share of Oracle Identity Governance is 0.5% and it decreased by 62.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Privileged Access Management (PAM)
Unique Categories:
User Activity Monitoring
22.2%
Enterprise Password Managers
2.4%
User Provisioning Software
4.0%
Identity Management (IM)
2.2%
 

Featured Reviews

Korneliusz Lis - PeerSpot reviewer
Aug 22, 2023
Good password management with good integrations and security capabilities
The primary use case and the most used functionality of CyberArk PAM is managing privileged access (an easy way to pass permissions to specific servers to specific users granularly) and password management (an automated solution that manages password validity, expiration, etc.). PSM gives a…
Parwiz ElmJo - PeerSpot reviewer
May 26, 2023
It's an inexpensive, scalable solution that has improved our security
We use Keeper to store passwords We previously kept our passwords in an Excel file. Using Keeper makes us more secure.  Keeper has strong security features.  The password rotation feature could be improved. I have used Keeper for three years. I rate Keeper eight out of 10 for stability.  I…
ICTdelivery567 - PeerSpot reviewer
Aug 22, 2022
Highly scalable, and useful for identity and access management
The company is a healthcare insurance company.. Oracle Identity Governance is used for the Oracle products. The healthcare sector in Belgium will start collaborating in ICT.  The first projects are coming for other healthcare companies to use own build solutions Single Sign On & identity…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Within the solution, I love the fact that everything is recorded. The configuration capabilities are great, too."
"It is a central repository. Therefore, if someone needs to access a server, then they go through CyberArk PAM. It provides a secure way to do this and CyberArk PAM records everything. For example, if you are connecting to a Linux server, then once you get into the Linux server and if it is integrated with CyberArk, it will automatically start recording everything that is being done. In most banks, seeing the recordings is very useful. If there are any gaps or something has happened which shouldn't have happened, then we can check the logs and videos. So, it gives security, in a robust manner, to the organization."
"It enables us to secure accounts and make sure they are compliant."
"I appreciate the ease of use for support analysts."
"Password rotation is the most valuable feature"
"The integrations are the most valuable aspect of CyberArk Privileged Access Manager. The software offers pre-built integrations, and our team can also create custom connectors. This flexibility allows us to integrate with systems that we previously didn't consider integrating with, making it a significant advantage for us."
"The most valuable feature is Special Monitoring."
"It provides an accountability to the individuals who are using it, knowing that it is audited and tracked."
"I like the tool's keyword editor and SSO."
"The possibility of assigning information to different groups and individuals has been the most valuable."
"It saves us from duplicating passwords for different accounts."
"I like Keeper's mobility and its accessibility."
"It is nice to be able to use my Touch ID and have access to all my passwords in one place."
"Auto login across platforms allows for no copying and pasting."
"It is very easy to use, intuitive, and cost effective."
"The ability to autofill the login credentials has saved me a lot of time in my day to day computing."
"The most valuable feature is the set of out-of-the-box connectors."
"Identifying connector framework for unifying provisioning capabilities from OIM."
"Scalability-wise, I rate this solution a nine out of ten. Oracle Identity Governance is a scalable solution, without a doubt."
"I have found the OIM Connector framework, based on ICF, to be the most valuable feature."
"This solution has improved the organization in several ways, including saving many help-desk password-reset calls, IT staff productivity, and quicker user on-boarding."
"Role-based access control (RBAC) has been crucial for role-based management in my current company. Granular access restrictions based on role-based policies were beneficial."
"Understanding what a customer is using, what they are looking for, and allowing permissions is a challenge. We use the information we get in order to understand the behavior of the customer beyond the security and to understand what they have been doing in the last month. It's a nice way to understand what is attracting the customer and what they are clicking. That could be implemented by using this kind of application."
"The most valuable feature is the user manager certification that approves or removes user access."
 

Cons

"The support services could act faster when people reach out to resolve issues."
"Initial setup is complex. Lots of architecture, lots of planning, and lots of education and training are needed."
"Online help needs to be looked into with live agent support."
"Report creation could be improved. The policies could be more customized."
"The major pain point that we have is the capacity of CyberArk due to the sheer volume of NPAs that we are managing. We are a large organization and we have hundreds of thousands of non-personal accounts to manage. We have already found out that there are certain capacity limitations within CyberArk that might introduce performance issues. From my perspective, something that would be valuable would be if the vault could hold more passwords and be more scalable."
"it manages creds based on Organizational Units. That is, a "safe" is limited to specific OUs. That makes for very elaborate OU structure, or you risk exposing too many devices by putting most of them in fewer OUs."
"If we could have some kind of out-of-the box feature that you can simply say "no" so they don't have to go into a development mode, that would a really helpful feature."
"CyberArk has to continue to evolve with that threat landscape to make sure that they're still protecting those credentials that are owned by those that have privileged accounts in the firms."
"Keeper does not provide password management for mobile apps."
"They could possibly add a pre-designed contact feature that would work similar to a cell phone contact feature."
"The password rotation feature could be improved."
"Ability to set up password profiles that can predefine custom fields and password complexity."
"Needs to improve KeeperFill on iOS."
"I would like to see a way to store files and photos in the next update​. If it already does this, I have yet to explore it."
"I would add a category for personal documents or photos of ID cards."
"Needs to provide an API to be integrated with the information systems and offer secure file hosting service with sharing and editing capabilities."
"t is too complex, has too many bugs, and is an immature product, even the best case, beta version."
"The platform could be enhanced with additional features."
"Oracle Identity Governance, particularly version 12c, can handle multiple scenarios, but for a regular user, I found the use cases not that extensive, so this is an area for improvement. The implementation process for Oracle Identity Governance is also a bit more complex than how you implement competitor products, and this is another area for improvement in the solution. Technical support for Oracle Identity Governance also needs some improvement. Another area for improvement in Oracle Identity Governance is its documentation. Currently, it's lacking when compared to SailPoint. What I'd like to see in the next release of Oracle Identity Governance is a bit more scope for AI-based Identity governance. If the solution has built-in intelligence, that will give it more leverage. Another feature I'd like to see in Oracle Identity Governance in the future is the option for managers to provide access to others via mobile devices or phones."
"I would like to see more segregation managed through Oracle Identity Manager."
"Pricing for Oracle Identity Governance could be improved. The setup process for the tool could also be faster."
"It would be great if the Oracle Fusion Middleware team worked on making it compatible with other application servers, as it exists in OIM9.x."
"It responds fast but because of the bugs we have already had some major incidents and complete unavailability."
"Oracle Identity Governance can capture a lot of loads, it's stable. However, we once had a problem two years ago, but it is now resolved. There are some issues still present, but they're operational. They don't impact the customers. There are some improvements that can be done."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"CyberArk is one of the best PAM solutions and one of the most expensive, but it works better than the others, so the pricing is fair."
"Our risk is definitely significantly lower. Also, our resources are low."
"Cost efficiency is the number one thing that can be improved in my mind. This would change lots of companies minds on purchasing the product."
"It is not a cheap solution. It is expensive as compared with other solutions. However, it is one of the best solutions in their domain."
"The solution is costly but we get what we pay for."
"It is in line with its competitors, but all such solutions cost too much money."
"The solution is available at a high price"
"The price of CyberArk Privileged Access Manager could be less expensive."
"ROI is hard to know, but it has to be several times the expense of the product."
"Just buy the yearly subscription."
"It's definitely worth it and affordable. Their sales team can definitely help scale your needs on licensing and provide pricing options."
"The more users, the better the price. Always opt for the live support."
"The pricing is available on the vendor's website."
"We chose their optional annual subscription; I believe we paid monthly — I thought it was a good deal."
"Its price is reasonable."
"Free works unless the paid is absolutely necessary."
"The price is based on the number of users per year."
"The licensing is expensive."
"The price of the implementation of Oracle Identity Governance is more of a concern than the cost of the solution. The effort that you have to do to put the solution in place is higher than the license cost."
"The licensing cost for Oracle Identity Governance is very high, so I'd rate it two out of five."
"Oracle Identity Governance is expensive."
"I can't say much about the pricing for Oracle Identity Governance because it's different from one geography to another. In India, the license price costs less than in other geographies."
"I do not know specific pricing but the product is expensive when compared to other OIM products."
"The cost of support and upgrading to the next release are both expensive."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions are best for your needs.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
31%
Computer Software Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
5%
Computer Software Company
20%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Government
6%
Educational Organization
73%
Computer Software Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
5%
Retailer
2%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

How does Sailpoint IdentityIQ compare with CyberArk PAM?
We evaluated Sailpoint IdentityIQ before ultimately choosing CyberArk. Sailpoint Identity Platform is a solution to m...
What do you like most about CyberArk Privileged Access Manager?
The most valuable features of the solution are control and analytics.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CyberArk Privileged Access Manager?
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager comes at a high cost. But the solution is worth its price.
What do you like most about Keeper?
I like the tool's keyword editor and SSO.
What needs improvement with Keeper?
Keeper does not provide password management for mobile apps.
What do you like most about Oracle Identity Governance?
Role-based access control (RBAC) has been crucial for role-based management in my current company. Granular access re...
What needs improvement with Oracle Identity Governance?
Oracle has the older version of Identity and Access Management (IAM), while SailPoint and Saviynt have come up with e...
 

Also Known As

CyberArk Privileged Access Security
Keeper Security
Oracle Identity Manager, Oracle IAM, Oracle Identity and Access Management Suite
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Rockwell Automation
At&t, Wells Fargo, Disney, GM, Chase, Honeywell, Samsung, Dow
Werkbank, Oshkosh, PeerPay, Boingo, Kellogg's, Pella, Slanska, Avaya, D+M
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, Delinea, BeyondTrust and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM). Updated: June 2024.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.