Oracle Identity Governance and Microsoft Identity Manager are both strong contenders in the identity management sector. Oracle is preferred for its governance and compliance strengths, while Microsoft is favored for its integration with Microsoft services and cost-effectiveness.
Features: Oracle Identity Governance focuses on automating user lifecycle management, integrating with Oracle products, and providing identity analytics and single sign-on capabilities. It supports a wide array of connectors. Microsoft Identity Manager is highly integrated with Microsoft environments, offers seamless interoperability, and is cost-effective, particularly in Azure ecosystems.
Room for Improvement: Oracle Identity Governance needs a simpler setup process, lower pricing, and improved performance. Its user interface lacks easy customization and customer support is seen as needing improvements. Microsoft Identity Manager could better its advanced connectors, enhance its integration features, and improve behavior monitoring as well as customer support responsiveness.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Deploying Oracle Identity Governance is complex, requiring substantial configurations for on-premise systems, with varying customer service quality. Microsoft Identity Manager benefits from hybrid cloud support, though it suffers from inconsistent support and requires better documentation.
Pricing and ROI: Oracle Identity Governance is expensive, with a complex pricing structure that negatively impacts ROI despite its customization benefits. Microsoft Identity Manager is more budget-friendly, often included with Azure licenses, offering better ROI through lower costs and solid integration within the Microsoft network.
It is able to save time and money as everything is automated: user access provisioning, password policy management, and reporting.
It is important to get to the right engineer quickly, but the process sometimes involves multiple levels before reaching the best support.
I rate the technical support nine out of ten.
The technical support is of good quality
The technical support from Oracle is excellent.
While they are familiar with me, the team is not large enough, which impacts their availability.
The team is not very knowledgeable and takes too long to respond.
In terms of scalability, Microsoft Identity Manager allows management of up to 400,000 objects with a standard configuration.
Not all conditions can be satisfied at all times, leading to some employee or user accounts experiencing deviations and syncing issues.
The current policy management features are limited, and custom, flexible policies would be ideal.
While the initial setup of Microsoft Identity Manager is not completely complex, migrating or upgrading to a new version can be complex and requires multiple backups to ensure it goes smoothly.
Incorporating AI to reduce manual work would be beneficial.
Oracle Identity Governance is a thick, heavy application and has fewer application connectors compared to SailPoint, which offers a large number of out-of-box connectors, making integration easier.
The scope of the identity management or Oracle IDM is vast, and while we've implemented about 30, 40, or 50% of its capabilities, it's not done at full scale.
Microsoft's licenses are bundled, allowing access to multiple services, which is beneficial.
The pricing of Microsoft Identity Manager is expensive.
Regarding pricing, setup costs, and licensing of Microsoft Identity Manager, it has a couple of cloud connectors that can sync directly with the O365 admin center, which is good enough.
If you want to implement it at full scale, it's not an entry-level product; it's an enterprise-class product and it is expensive.
They sell the solution cheaply, but setting up and maintaining it becomes very expensive.
For a large-scale enterprise, it's beneficial because it covers many functionalities such as self-service, automated access provisioning, de-provisioning, and reporting.
The features of Microsoft Identity Manager that have been most impactful in improving security and compliance include the granular policies, report, and the ability to gain end-to-end visibility for each user.
These features have been impactful in improving our security and compliance.
The best features of Microsoft Identity Manager are its 100% compatibility with Active Directory.
The reporting function and Identity Audit function help with compliance, as they provide access review certification, segregation of duties, and a reporting feature.
The best features in Oracle Identity Governance product include comprehensive reporting, as we can track exactly what person did what because of the auditing policies that can be enforced in it, and at what time what was done.
The solution's capabilities in provisioning, de-provisioning, terminations, and transfers are excellent.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Microsoft Identity Manager | 2.3% |
| Oracle Identity Governance | 2.1% |
| Other | 95.6% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 13 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 10 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 22 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 11 |
| Large Enterprise | 46 |
Microsoft Identity Manager (MIM) builds on the identity and access management capabilities of Forefront Identity Manager. MIM helps you manage the users, credentials, policies, and access within your organization. Additionally, MIM adds a hybrid experience, privileged access management capabilities, and support for new platforms.
Oracle Identity Governance (OIG) is a very versatile and robust enterprise identity management solution that offers functional and business performance competence by supplying centralized administration and total automation of identity and client provisioning events throughout the organization and user applications. Oracle Identity Governance monitors the complete identity and role process to satisfy rapidly changing business and complex compliance regulations and quickly delivers critical reporting and compliance capabilities.
Oracle Identity Governance is designed to easily identify which users have approved access to specific applications and other resources. It does this by using processes such as segregation of duties (SOD), role-based access control (RBAC), certifications, and access requests.
Oracle Identity Governance Features
Reviews from Real Users
“The one thing that stands out was the automatic sign-out when an employee goes on vacation. Identity Governance can monitor when an employee goes on vacation and returns. We use this feature to automatically disable all the employee's accounts when they go on vacation, and they're automatically enabled when they come back. We can also automatically delete the employee's accounts when they're dismissed. Oracle has a model that gives you precise reports. It's called Crystal, and it's similar to JasperReports, so we can derive reports from this database. “ - Fabio L., Partner at a tech services company.
“We are using Oracle Identity Manager for the management of the identity cycle. We have a human resources system as a source, and we have some custom-made applications as a destination of the changes in the identities. - A PeerSpot user who is a Project Manager at a government “
We monitor all Identity Management (IM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
