Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

CyberArk Identity vs Logpoint comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 4, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.7
Users praised CyberArk Identity for its long-term value, cost savings, and contribution to a secure environment.
Sentiment score
8.1
Logpoint ensures compliance, offers cost-effectiveness and predictable pricing, and boosts ROI, providing value in security operations.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.3
CyberArk Identity support is praised for resolution speed but criticized for slow responses and limited staff product knowledge.
Sentiment score
7.4
Logpoint's customer service experiences response delays and varied technical support, with language barriers and stretched local representatives noted.
They resolved the problem immediately after I reported it, on the same day, within one hour.
They charge reasonable money for the features they provide.
There are times when there is a delay in handling my inquiries via email.
The technical support for Logpoint is very good, and I would rate it as nine out of ten.
Logpoint's customer support is not sufficient with only one engineer in the US.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.6
CyberArk Identity offers strong scalability for diverse enterprises, with successful implementations; some users experience performance issues at higher scales.
Sentiment score
7.6
Logpoint offers exceptional scalability, adaptability, and modularity, supporting growth for small to medium enterprises with robust architecture.
We can use it on different phones and computers, demonstrating its scalability.
It is web-based and accommodates the expansion of our organization.
Logpoint is scalable and capable of expanding.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.9
CyberArk Identity is praised for high stability and reliability, with a 99.9% SLA ensuring minimal disruptions and strong support.
Sentiment score
6.6
Logpoint generally maintains stability but can face issues due to hardware dependency and resource allocation, improving with newer versions.
In the time I have been here, I have not experienced a fall in the service of CyberArk.
With respect to stability, I find that stability is very good.
I have received reports indicating glitches and downtimes with Logpoint.
 

Room For Improvement

CyberArk Identity requires enhancements in mobile management, scalability, integration, usability, governance, translation, multifactor authentication, support, and reporting.
Logpoint requires better integration, usability, performance, documentation, installation processes, cloud capabilities, support, and threat management features.
Integration or deployment is extremely difficult for CyberArk Identity.
There's a need to enhance network performance.
Something they could improve is the management of multifactor authentication.
Dealing with foreign entities for support was a challenge, leading us to switch providers due to lack of adequate support.
Logpoint needs to be cloud-native, as currently, it is not.
 

Setup Cost

CyberArk Identity is costly but offers value with flexible licensing, appealing to enterprises despite potential setup costs.
Logpoint offers a cost-effective subscription model with fixed pricing, though advanced consulting fees could increase overall costs.
If I am not going fully cloud, there are additional resources I will need to purchase, such as spinning more VMs or acquiring an HSM device to encrypt the vault.
The pricing is acceptable.
Regarding pricing, it can be quite a lot for small companies.
I rate the pricing at eight, suggesting it's relatively good or affordable.
 

Valuable Features

CyberArk Identity integrates diverse IDs with Active Directory, enhancing security with features like MFA, SSO, and compliance tracking.
Logpoint offers cost-effective log management with advanced analytics, seamless integrations, and user-friendly SIEM and SOAR features.
It impacts zero trust security strategies. It prevents lateral movements in the organization.
CyberArk Identity provides an easy identity portal, single console, log capture for GRC compliance, and efficiently rotates passwords unknown to users, enhancing security.
It is the most powerful access management system.
The UEBA enables us to monitor at the device level, and SOAR provides playbooks and templates that we can modify and incorporate into the platform.
It effectively facilitates logging and log storage and assists in security event management by ingesting security events.
 

Categories and Ranking

CyberArk Identity
Ranking in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)
9th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
23
Ranking in other categories
Authentication Systems (9th), Identity Management (IM) (10th), Authorization Software (3rd), Enterprise Password Managers (8th), Access Management (6th), Active Directory Management (8th), Cloud Resource Access Management (2nd), Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) (8th)
Logpoint
Ranking in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)
12th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
23
Ranking in other categories
Log Management (39th), Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (30th), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (43rd), Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (18th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) category, the mindshare of CyberArk Identity is 0.7%. The mindshare of Logpoint is 3.0%, down from 3.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)
 

Featured Reviews

Julio Montero - PeerSpot reviewer
Access management system provides strong security and effortless user authentication
The solution can be deployed on cloud or on-premises. CyberArk is more on the cloud than on local hardware. The deployment is initially quite difficult. That said, when you are doing the implementation of CyberArk, there are so many tutorials that make the learning process very easy. The only complaint could be the language barrier. It's difficult if you don't have a very good level of English. Otherwise, it is very easy. You can have it set up within three months without much difficulty. It's hard to get started, however, once you get going, it gets easier. A full deployment takes half a year or less. There is some maintenance necessary. A company is constantly hiring and letting go of employees. The access is always changing, so access must always be adjusted. Or, if we need another law of filter, we would need to add those, or even take them away. That's another aspect of maintenance.
Abdullah Secca - PeerSpot reviewer
Valuable monitoring and integration features boost compliance
They are not in the US market, and the quality of support has declined. They migrated operations from Boston to Denmark, and we cannot use a tool hosted outside the country. Additionally, dealing with foreign entities for support was a challenge, leading us to switch providers due to lack of adequate support.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) solutions are best for your needs.
859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
17%
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Healthcare Company
6%
Educational Organization
35%
Computer Software Company
18%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Manufacturing Company
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about CyberArk Identity?
The integration capabilities, ability to integrate CyberArk into the overall IBB strategy of our current clients.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CyberArk Identity?
The pricing is acceptable. It is worth considering what we are protecting with the amount charged.
What needs improvement with CyberArk Identity?
Some areas experience slowness based on the workload. There's a need to enhance network performance despite the good user experience with access management.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for LogPoint?
I rate the pricing at eight, suggesting it's relatively good or affordable.
What needs improvement with LogPoint?
Logpoint needs to be cloud-native, as currently, it is not. Additionally, there should be compliance mapping, where the features and actions within Logpoint map to security compliance standards.
 

Also Known As

Idaptive
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

MLB, Citi, Pfizer, SulAmerica, GE Capital, Shiseido
AP Pension, Copenhagen Airports, KMD, Terma, DISA, Danish Crown, Durham City Council, Game, TopDanmark, Lahti Energia, Energi Midt, Synoptik, Eissmann Group Automotive, Aligro, CG50...
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk Identity vs. Logpoint and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.