ConnectWise Automate vs N-able N-central comparison

ConnectWise and N-able are both solutions in the Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) category. ConnectWise is ranked #10, while N-able is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.3. ConnectWise holds a 6.1% mindshare in RMM, compared to N-able’s 6.0% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of ConnectWise users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of N-able users who would recommend it.

ConnectWise Automate

Read 15 ConnectWise Automate reviews

2,503 Views
1,752 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

N-able N-central

Read 10 N-able N-central reviews

2,467 Views
2,072 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

ConnectWise Automate

N-able N-central

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 2, 2025

ConnectWise Automate and N-able N-central compete in the remote monitoring and management space. ConnectWise Automate excels with lower pricing and automation features, while N-able N-central is favored for its security and value proposition.

Features: ConnectWise Automate offers extensive automation capabilities, integrating various tools for seamless IT processes. Its scripting capabilities are vital and the integration with ScreenConnect facilitates efficient remote control. N-able N-central shines in asset tracking, robust security integrations, and a comprehensive patch management module, targeting large-scale environments with its scalable solutions.

Room for Improvement: ConnectWise Automate could enhance its interface usability and simplify initial setup procedures. Additional improvements in documentation and support for newer integrations would be beneficial. N-able N-central would gain from further refining its complexity in navigation, enhancing real-time monitoring capabilities, and expanding flexibility in custom reporting options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ConnectWise Automate offers various deployment options but can involve a complex setup requiring substantial resources. It features supportive customer service to assist users during deployment. N-able N-central facilitates a more streamlined deployment process, paired with reliable customer service that supports quick and smooth implementations.

Pricing and ROI: ConnectWise Automate is often more budget-friendly with impactful ROI, especially for automation-focused businesses. N-able N-central may have higher initial costs but delivers value through its advanced security features and management capabilities, potentially justifying the investment for security-concerned organizations.

To learn more, read our detailed ConnectWise Automate vs. N-able N-central Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

ConnectWise Automate vs. N-able N-central

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 902,417 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ConnectWise Automate

Ranking in Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM)

10th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

N-able N-central

Ranking in Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM)

6th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) category, the mindshare of ConnectWise Automate is 6.1%, up from 6.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of N-able N-central is 6.0%, down from 10.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
N-able N-central	6.0%
ConnectWise Automate	6.1%
Other	87.9%

Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM)

Featured Reviews

Sean Saeb

Partner and CIO at Caspian IT Group

Responsive, integrates well with other applications, and the technical support is helpful

There is always room for improvement. I haven't had any problems, and they're doing a great job, in my opinion. They're doing quite well. In most cases, when we discover an issue, we report it to their engineers, who then schedule a fix. Normally, when we request something, I can see it happening within three to four months. This is a raw system. Of course, it has some flaws that could be improved. But, it's something that we will have to work with to get to the point where we need this, we request it and they do their best to make it happen. There is a lot of integration with other applications through Automate, and I believe they are working with all of the industry leaders to get the integration going. I am very pleased to be working with them.

Read full review

Dimitri V G

Team Manager Fiber & Backhaul Solutions Center & South at Telenet BVBA

Maximizing operational efficiency with comprehensive monitoring and automation capabilities

There are areas in N-able N-central that could be improved. We always started it from the basic purpose of monitoring hardware, where vendors such as HP and Dell try to sell their own services which monitor and provide a dashboard, which is their logic. They want to make their own recurring revenue on that. We notice that SNMP has had a good run and still sometimes is used, but it's becoming an issue to maintain the same capabilities because HP makes it unreliable or even removes certain features that we used to be able to validate redundant array of independent disks. Our service that has been running for 15-20 years suddenly is not working anymore because HP decided in generation 10 plus and above, or generation 10 hardware in servers, storage controllers particularly, they just didn't put the SNMP OIDs anymore. We are now following that market change or business change in hardware monitoring and the future is Redfish, REST API, IPMI type of monitoring with the REST API and Redfish being most common. We have to do the effort ourselves because Enable is not really strategically going there because I assume there's not much money to make to improve that or to convince customers to start with their product. That issue could be better if they would be more prepared for that change and give us customers more tools, preconfigured, pre-available custom services for Redfish, REST API, where we just have to put a few items username, password and address and some dots and commas, but that we don't have to reinvent the wheel, which we are doing at the moment. We are using HP iLO commandlets and REST APIs for Aruba. Dell is making it very hard to monitor their hardware. If it has an iDRAC, I can manage it and monitor it, but if it's something that's less common or due to the portfolio, they have done a good job at not exposing information about health. We would just want to have a red or a green dot that indicates if this device is healthy or not healthy. Since nobody's investing in SNMP because it's a liability in security, they should invest in making a REST API and preferably also do the work on making it easy to pull or push information. That's something that the industry in general and Enable in particular could do a significant job to help us monitor.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most value we get from this solution is that everything is on a patch cycle, so all my team has to do is go through patches, whereas previously, they were doing all the patches manually."

"Their premium support is great."

"We use monitors to keep track of our machines. We use a pretty good portion of information from Automate."

"Technical support has been good. Everyone we have been in contact with has responded to our queries in a reasonable amount of time."

"A good automated scripts feature."

"Technical support is really good; they are helpful and responsive."

"The initial setup is easy and the deployment is quick."

"I was very happy with how they handled me as a client and am quite satisfied with the level of support we get."

More ConnectWise Automate pros

"The most valuable features of N-central are its ease of deployment and ease of use."

"N-able N-central is very scalable."

"The most valuable feature of N-able N-central is the many options it has."

"N-able N-central is an easy tool to implement with customers."

"The solution's service is good."

"I like the remote connectivity, reporting suite, and patch management module."

"The transition to N-able N-central was very smooth; we were confident that our migration would not affect any operations, and it was easy to migrate our clients into the new solutions."

"It's a very robust product. They're continuing to invest and put new enhancements into the product. They're very open about what their roadmap is, which is very good for us because then as a business, we can plan."

More N-able N-central pros

Cons

"Technical support was helpful."

"I have found the solution to be not very scalable."

"This is a raw system. Of course, it has some flaws that could be improved. But, it's something that we will have to work with to get to the point where we need this, we request it and they do their best to make it happen."

"The wait time for a support ticket to be addressed needs to be reduced. They take a couple of days to get back. It is a little frustrating when we have to wait for a couple of days. A lot of times, the issue is critical for us. If we're reaching out to their support team and submitting a ticket, it is because we need it handled quickly."

"The fixed client for Automate is slow. The web client is not very intuitive."

"I have a problem with the reports available on the solution. I don't understand how to work with the reporting functionality. For example, when I want to give a report for a specific machine, ConnectWise doesn't seem to have this as an option. I'm not sure if I'm missing something, or if the reporting functionality is just poorly conceived."

"They always change the GUI to some dumb-down version of tiles which are more "user-friendly", but slows my team down in the end."

"The menu doesn't always load properly."

More ConnectWise Automate cons

"N-central has limited mobile device management (MDM) support, specifically for Android devices. This limitation affected a deal with a client who had numerous Android devices to manage. It would be beneficial if N-central could expand its MDM support to include Android devices."

"There is room for improvement in the development of custom monitoring services."

"The support from our direct team is very good, but the support from their day-to-day ongoing help desk isn't that good. They have still got some work to do on that, but they have been focusing on that a lot over the last number of years. So, it has gotten a lot better than it was."

"We have to do the effort ourselves because Enable is not really strategically going there because I assume there's not much money to make to improve that or to convince customers to start with their product."

"The industry has moved towards Redfish for out-of-band and in-band monitoring, yet N-able N-central still relies on older protocols like SNMP."

"The integration with other applications could be better."

"The solution's overall integration should be improved."

"N-able N-central could improve the remote access, my technicians have complained about it. They have used other free tools instead to compensate, such as TeamViewer. Additionally, when using remote access on the web, it is lacking reports."

More N-able N-central cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"From what I've overheard, it is pretty comparable to other solutions in terms of price."

"Pricing and licensing are reasonable."

"I pay $85 a month per user for a ConnectWise package that contains multiple solutions."

"I believe Automate is available for around $2."

"N-able N-central is not an expensive solution."

"The pricing and licensing are average, almost six out of ten."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

902,417 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Performing Arts

Outsourcing Company

Construction Company

Healthcare Company

Comms Service Provider

14%

Computer Software Company

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	1

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	1

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What needs improvement with N-able N-central?

The MSP part of N-able N-central has evolved over the years. They have been trying to move from professional or network server and desktop licensing to make it more comprehensive. With professional...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for N-able N-central?

We have been dealing with Enable EDR and N-able N-central, which is a management center. It's the NOC solution that we are currently running our asset management on. We are managing tasks in that e...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering N-able N-central?

There's a new node for N-able N-central which they have addressed. Our outstanding items include reviewing our pricing and partnership level, which can provide additional benefits when we exceed 10...

See all answers

Comparisons

Kaseya VSA vs ConnectWise Automate

Compared 12% of the time

N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management vs ConnectWise Automate

Compared 10% of the time

Datto Remote Monitoring and Management vs ConnectWise Automate

Compared 9% of the time

Atera vs ConnectWise Automate

Compared 6% of the time

Azure Bastion vs ConnectWise Automate

Compared 3% of the time

More ConnectWise Automate Competitors

NinjaOne vs N-able N-central

Compared 24% of the time

Kaseya VSA vs N-able N-central

Compared 10% of the time

Atera vs N-able N-central

Compared 10% of the time

N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management vs N-able N-central

Compared 8% of the time

TeamViewer ONE vs N-able N-central

Compared 3% of the time

More N-able N-central Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ConnectWise Automate

June 2026

Download ConnectWise Automate product report

Buyer's Guide

N-able N-central

June 2026

Download N-able N-central product report

Also Known As

LabTech for IT Service Providers, ConnectWise Automate for Corporate IT Departments, ConnectWise Automate for IT Service Providers

SolarWinds N-central, SolarWinds MSP N-central

Overview

ConnectWise Automate transforms IT management with automation, remote desktop integration, and an intuitive interface. Essential tools like patch management and remote access are crucial for efficient operations.

ConnectWise Automate offers powerful features for IT management, emphasizing automation to eliminate repetitive tasks and streamline operations. It integrates seamlessly with remote desktop solutions, making remote management straightforward. The platform supports robust patch management, ticketing, and remote access, enhancing productivity and resource allocation. While its scalability and deployment are top-tier, users find room for improvement in areas like reporting, visibility, and ease of navigation. Some users experience slow support response times, and complex scripting can be cumbersome. Despite these challenges, it remains a valuable asset for managed service providers.

What are the key features of ConnectWise Automate?

Automation: Reduces repetitive tasks, boosting efficiency.
Remote Desktop Integration: Smooth remote access for managing IT environments effortlessly.
Patch Management: Essential for maintaining system updates and security.
Ticketing System: Streamlines workflow for incident management.
Scalability: Supports business growth with scalable infrastructure.

What benefits and ROI can users expect from ConnectWise Automate?

Time Savings: Automation capabilities free up time for strategic tasks.
Increased Efficiency: Streamlined processes lead to better resource allocation.
Improved Support: Reliable technical support enhances stability.
Cost-Effective Operations: Efficient management reduces unnecessary expenses.

Organizations in networking, managed service providers, and client administration use ConnectWise Automate for patch management, desktop oversight, and incident resolution. It's crucial for inventory tracking, system management, and remote support, enhancing professional services and integrating with ticket systems for effective troubleshooting and workflow management. Its adaptability supports diverse customer environments and facilitates task automation, maintaining efficient operation across IT networks.

ConnectWise

N-able N-central is an all-encompassing IT management platform geared towards efficient network oversight. It offers comprehensive tools for monitoring and automation, which are crucial for managed services providers managing complex network environments.

N-able N-central provides solutions tailored to IT management, offering remote connectivity, asset tracking, and integration with systems like CrowdStrike. Its single-pane interface supports extensive device monitoring, script execution, and automation for task scheduling. The platform emphasizes robust patch management and reliable support, making it suitable for client integration and compliance audits. However, improvements are needed in remote access, application integration, and mobile device support. Users suggest investing in Redfish and REST API monitoring due to unreliable SNMP and an increased focus on AI to enhance maintenance recommendations.

What are the key features of N-able N-central?

Intuitive Remote Connectivity: Facilitates seamless access and management from anywhere.
Asset Tracking: Offers robust tracking of hardware and software assets within a network.
Automation: Streamlines task scheduling and resolution processes.
Patch Management: Ensures systems are updated and secure efficiently.
Integration Support: Seamlessly works with systems like CrowdStrike for enhanced security.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Comprehensive Monitoring: Helps manage diverse network environments with ease.
Scalability: Supports expansion in IT management capabilities as businesses grow.
Security Enhancement: Strengthens organizational security through integrated patch management and antivirus capabilities.
Efficient IT Management: Simplifies tasks through automation, reducing manual effort and increasing productivity.

N-able N-central is embraced in industries requiring robust IT management solutions, particularly managed services providers. It's widely used for monitoring systems, remote access, and asset tracking. Industries leverage its automation and integration capabilities to maintain system stability and security, addressing threats without heavy IT infrastructure on clients' premises.

N-able

Sample Customers

I-M Technology, Mainstay Technologies, PC Works Plus, Integrity IT, Kerkhoff Technologies Inc., Marathon Consulting, Christenberry Sales Company, EDTS, Secom Technology, Ready to View, ARRC Technology, DaVinci Digital, JNR Networks, Quinn Technology Solutions, PCIT, Liberty Technology, Capital Computers & Networks, Atlanta Technology Force, Doberman Technologies, First Column Enterprises, CisCom Solutions

Premier Technology Solutions

Buyer's Guide

ConnectWise Automate vs. N-able N-central

June 2026

Free Report: ConnectWise Automate vs. N-able N-central

Find out what your peers are saying about ConnectWise Automate vs. N-able N-central and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

902,417 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ConnectWise Automate vs. N-able N-central report.

See our list of best Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) vendors.

We monitor all Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.