Jira and Codebeamer both compete in the project management solutions category, offering flexibility and integration capabilities. While Jira leads with customization options and vast integration possibilities, Codebeamer has an edge with its built-in traceability and regulatory compliance, particularly for industries requiring stringent standards.
Features: Jira is recognized for its extensive customization options, seamless integration with various tools, and a wide array of plugins, making it ideal for agile methodologies. It offers effective workflow management and ease of use. On the other hand, Codebeamer provides comprehensive traceability, strong regulatory compliance, and a holistic approach encompassing the entire project lifecycle.
Room for Improvement: Jira users often seek better reporting capabilities, enhanced user interface customization, and more native features like test management without needing plugins. Meanwhile, Codebeamer users note the need for improvements in user interface intuitiveness and better integration with other software solutions, even though it excels in standard alignment.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Jira presents flexible deployment options across on-premises and various cloud environments, catering to different business needs. Codebeamer, emphasizing private and hybrid cloud setups, is suitable for companies with heightened privacy needs. In terms of customer service, Jira benefits from a broad community and excellent documentation, though its direct support can be slow, whereas Codebeamer provides adequate assistance, enhanced by collaborations with resellers.
Pricing and ROI: Jira is perceived as affordably priced, although there are concerns regarding extra plugin and tier costs. Its value lies in flexibility and comprehensive features, appealing to a broad range of teams. Codebeamer is viewed as moderately priced with a solid ROI, especially admired in industries like automotive for its compliance capabilities. Both solutions offer scalable options based on user count and industry needs, with users recognizing the benefits and returns on their investment.
ROI can manifest through cost savings and increased development speed.
Codebeamer saves time and money for certain use cases, such as AUTOSPICE implementations.
The solution has produced a return on investment.
A return on investment has been seen with Jira, as a lot of time has been saved in arranging tasks, converting software features into epics, tasks, and milestones, making it easy to track progress and plan future roadmaps.
It's always hard to measure ROI precisely, but overall, the development time usually pays off within a year through efficiency gains.
If I raise an issue as high priority, I receive responses in six to eight hours.
For out-of-the-box support, the customer service from PTC is satisfactory.
Jira's customer support is one of the best I have ever dealt with because they respond quickly.
I did not face any issues with stability or upgrades.
Whenever there are issues, the internal Jira enterprise team is contacted directly.
In a project, I have experienced up to 180 licenses running during peak times and as low as ten licenses during downtime without facing upgrade or downgrade issues.
It should come with documentation that is accessible for users, especially for newcomers who might not have any prior knowledge.
On a scale from one to ten, I would rate the scalability of Codebeamer as eight or nine because it is a highly scalable solution.
Scalability for Jira is great, and it handles growth easily from 100 to thousands.
Running it independently or with a bigger server generally doesn't cause any issues.
From a scale of one to ten, I would rate the stability of Codebeamer as eight to nine because the solution is highly stable.
There were stability issues due to version compatibility.
In my experience, Jira is stable, with around 99% uptime.
Beyond standards management for specific industries, Codebeamer should develop standards for areas where software code management and hardware-software integration are needed.
For a client with a medium configuration server, Codebeamer did not work initially until the system was upgraded.
Codebeamer is a very powerful tool, but the experienced user who knows the business model defined and implemented in Codebeamer might find it less overwhelming compared to the normal user, who doesn't know what to do with it all or how to find the right downstream elements, so it would be really useful to have a more customizable interface.
Focus more on improving API integration and automation tools, not just the design.
It would be appreciated to have more reporting capabilities in Jira, such as easily exporting capabilities to show how tasks are in progress and how the team is performing well or poorly.
To improve Jira, maybe some AI features could be added.
Codebeamer is on the expensive side, but it provides ready-made modules for standards like ASPICE and ISO 26262, which might justify the cost for customers looking for those solutions.
Codebeamer is fairly priced against competition.
Even if only five people from your team use a financial plugin, you still pay for all 100 seats.
Its integration capability is very high, with almost eighty to eighty-five percent of integrations available readily out of the box, minimizing the need for specific integration-related work.
Codebeamer saves on time and resources with its web-based client, eliminating the need to install it on every system.
The requirements management aspect of Codebeamer is critical because it helps various industries, such as automotive or medical devices, to capture requirements based on industry-specific standards and processes.
You can build your own workflows and make it work exactly the way your team needs and integrate it with almost every third-party software.
The main feature is the hierarchy, as features can be converted into epics and topics, allowing bigger tasks to be partitioned into smaller ones.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Jira | 13.3% |
| Codebeamer | 7.7% |
| Other | 79.0% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 4 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 9 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 105 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 56 |
| Large Enterprise | 150 |
codeBeamer ALM is a market-leading Application Lifecycle Management platform. It is holistically integrated, and is packed with features that help you develop better products faster. Scale, monitor, control, and report on your entire development lifecycle conveniently, and comply with safety-critical regulations. Cut development time and costs.
Jira is a powerful cloud- and subscription-based application lifecycle and issue management solution. It is designed to aid users both in project management and in resolving any issues that arise at any point in the software development process. It is especially concerned with easing the ability of developers to collaborate.
Jira Benefits
Some of the ways that organizations can benefit by choosing to deploy Jira include:
Jira Features
Real-time notification feature. Users can set Jira so that it offers them notifications that contain critical information in real time. It can send users email notifications when pressing issues have been updated. They can also set it to notify them about tasks that may be due, or other similar events.
Reviews from Real Users
Jira is a powerful solution that stands out when compared to many of its competitors. Two major advantages it offers are its workflow engine and its highly customizable dashboard.
Bharath R., the tool implementation and project management lead at a financial services firm, writes, “I feel the strongest feature of Jira is its workflow engine. It empowers us to automate our workflows within our organization. It's the one characteristic of Jira which I think can help any organization, be it in any domain.”
Uday J., a staff engineer at a computer company, says, “Another thing that I like a lot about Jira is that in the dashboard, you can plug the modules that you want. You can enable certain sections. For example, you can show trend history, open Jira tickets, etc. Some of the managers have created a dashboard for each engineer.”
We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
