Codebeamer vs PTC Integrity comparison

Codebeamer and PTC Integrity are both solutions in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category. Codebeamer is ranked #6 with an average rating of 7.5, while PTC Integrity is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.7. Codebeamer holds a 7.7% mindshare in ALM, compared to PTC Integrity’s 4.2% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Codebeamer users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 68% of PTC Integrity users who would recommend it.

Codebeamer

Read 17 Codebeamer reviews

3,290 Views
3,224 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

PTC Integrity

Read 13 PTC Integrity reviews

1,808 Views
1,808 Comparison Views

68% willing to recommend

Codebeamer

PTC Integrity

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

PTC Integrity and Codebeamer are competing in the application lifecycle management domain. Codebeamer appears to have the upper hand due to its robust features and adaptability in various workflows.

Features: PTC Integrity provides robust requirements management, strong internal control, and effective version control, beneficial for high compliance workflows. Codebeamer delivers extensive API integrations, customizable workflows, and excellent connectivity from inception to end, enhancing flexibility and collaboration.

Room for Improvement: PTC Integrity could benefit from improved user interface experience, better traceability capabilities, and simplified customization options. Codebeamer would improve with enhanced usability, better template options, and a smoother migration process for on-prem to cloud services.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Codebeamer offers streamlined cloud-based deployment with swift setup and comprehensive support, making it ideal for quick scenarios. PTC Integrity requires more setup time, offering both on-premises and cloud options, appealing to organizations needing strong internal control.

Pricing and ROI: PTC Integrity has moderate setup costs and offers positive ROI through reliable functionalities. Codebeamer may have higher upfront costs but promises strong long-term ROI due to its flexibility and scalability, ideal for dynamic project environments.

To learn more, read our detailed Codebeamer vs. PTC Integrity Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Codebeamer vs. PTC Integrity

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,346 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Codebeamer

Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

6th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

PTC Integrity

Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

12th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category, the mindshare of Codebeamer is 7.7%, up from 7.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PTC Integrity is 4.2%, up from 3.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Codebeamer	7.7%
PTC Integrity	4.2%
Other	88.1%

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

Featured Reviews

SHRINIVAS ALAGERI

Architect at itcinfotech

Built-in project management modules simplify processes while compatibility improvements are needed

Codebeamer could improve its customization capabilities and integration options. For instance, older versions of PDM Windchill face compatibility issues with newer versions of Codebeamer, requiring users to downgrade Codebeamer to establish integration. The installation on Linux can be tricky, and backward compatibility needs enhancement. Also, Codebeamer struggles with some DevOps integrations and lacks AI features for enhanced user assistance.

Read full review

Srikumar Aravinda Krishnan

Lead Engineer at a transportation company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Unified platform streamlines workflows though user interface needs improvement

The most valuable feature of PTC Integrity is its integration with our existing PTC tools, especially for drawing release activities. By using PTC Integrity, we have a unified platform that eliminates the need to switch between different systems for hardware and software tasks. This integration fosters real-time collaboration, allowing vendors to efficiently transfer details and share data through PTC Integrity. The platform also enables us to raise reports that other team members can access and utilize. Furthermore, the stable nature of the solution enhances its value, contributing to seamless operations.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The key features of Codebeamer include templates and basic structures, most of which are created and readily available for deployment out of the box, reducing deployment time."

"One of the most valuable features of Codebeamer is its strong performance."

"You can track the metrics in the Agile dashboard very easily."

"There is a lot of complexity involved, meaning it can do many things, which can be quite useful."

"CodeBeamer provides full traceability, excellent collaboration, regulatory compliance, and instant reporting with its holistic approach from requirement management to testing."

"Codebeamer is user-friendly"

"Codebeamer's API-based integration and many other integration aspects with other solutions are very powerful."

"Other benefits observed from using Codebeamer include its excellent release management and access management features."

More Codebeamer pros

"We found the requirement management and the version control features to be the most useful for our client."

"I personally like PTC Integrity because it provides everything within the software. You can store and access your data and perform various tasks. Compared to other products, I find it user-friendly, which can sometimes feel complex. I think PTC Integrity is user-friendly, making it nice to use. The tool is easier to learn."

"The solution is flexible in terms of customization. You can bend and reformat it in many ways. You can also customize the APIs and public functions."

"The most valuable feature is traceability starting from the requirements until the end of a project."

"Complete traceability as per process requirements."

"It's a good tool to manage software versions, update the status, and manage tasks."

"We have been using it because it gives certain abilities in the automotive industry, such as auditing or keeping track of information."

"The most valuable feature of PTC Integrity is its integration with our existing PTC tools, especially for drawing release activities."

More PTC Integrity pros

Cons

"The primary challenge is adapting the standard product to our workflows and specific needs."

"Codebeamer is not completely compatible with our internal network setup."

"It would be helpful if Codebeamer's overall processing and integration with software like Jira could be improved."

"Usability needs to be improved."

"One improvement could be to reduce the system or server requirements. For a client with a medium configuration server, Codebeamer did not work initially until the system was upgraded."

"The product's UI is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"Codebeamer's UI is somewhat boring, while Jira's is more exciting and user-friendly."

"The solution has a very small market share in China. It's almost like a startup."

More Codebeamer cons

"The tool's web-based UI needs improvement. Some functionalities don't work yet, and querying items is slow. Also, it's not in the cloud yet. I don't know if they'll do it in the future because they already have core agreements with customers. If they offer these functionalities, customers will likely buy their product."

"I would like to see better integration from the architectural side."

"The user-friendliness of PTC Integrity can be improved. The interface is not intuitive for first-time users and takes time to get accustomed to."

"There are not enough reports. People would like to see something similar to what is available in JIRA."

"It's not so customizable. Compared to other tools, defining user stories is a slightly more cumbersome process as an ALM engineer."

"The web version does not have all the functionalities of the non-web version. Administration and adding/removing fields, etc. cannot be done on the web version. People want solutions that are compatible with Android. I also want to have a version by which I can bulk edit all the fields."

"We are unhappy because everything that we needed required customization and this is not a plug-and-play type of solution at all."

"It's not easy to plan on this solution and it's not user-friendly. The interface should be more like a web interface. It's not easy to use."

More PTC Integrity cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pricing is good when compared to similar ALM solutions."

"Codebeamer is not a cheap solution."

"They're not the most expensive product on the market, but they're not the cheapest either — I'd say codeBeamer ALM is moderately priced."

"It is reasonably priced and in accordance with the industry standards."

"The product is expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,346 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

32%

Computer Software Company

13%

Healthcare Company

Retailer

Manufacturing Company

25%

Computer Software Company

14%

Healthcare Company

10%

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	9

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	12

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about codeBeamer ALM?

The platform provided the flexibility to expand our business processes, accommodating or altering them to suit the requirements of a changing environment.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for codeBeamer ALM?

Codebeamer is fairly priced against competition. Customers prefer it due to its pricing, scalability, features, functionality, and integration with multiple tools. On a scale of one to ten, I would...

See all answers

What needs improvement with codeBeamer ALM?

I would like to improve the speed of Codebeamer, and what I believe is lacking is a way to define or set up role-specific user interfaces. Codebeamer is a very powerful tool, but the experienced us...

See all answers

What do you like most about PTC Integrity?

I have found that previously, the OEM sector was managing everything, possibly manually. However, with the introduction of the product, it has become much easier for customers to handle their produ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PTC Integrity?

PTC Integrity is expensive, but it is cheaper compared to IBM Rational. The comparative affordability in pricing is an advantage.

See all answers

What needs improvement with PTC Integrity?

The user-friendliness of PTC Integrity can be improved. The interface is not intuitive for first-time users and takes time to get accustomed to. A more straightforward and intuitive interface would...

See all answers

Comparisons

Polarion ALM vs Codebeamer

Compared 24% of the time

Jira vs Codebeamer

Compared 12% of the time

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs Codebeamer

Compared 12% of the time

IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) vs Codebeamer

Compared 7% of the time

Jama Connect vs Codebeamer

Compared 7% of the time

More Codebeamer Competitors

Jira vs PTC Integrity

Compared 12% of the time

Polarion ALM vs PTC Integrity

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs PTC Integrity

Compared 6% of the time

OpenText Application Quality Management vs PTC Integrity

Compared 5% of the time

IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) vs PTC Integrity

Compared 4% of the time

More PTC Integrity Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Codebeamer

January 2026

Download Codebeamer product report

Buyer's Guide

PTC Integrity

January 2026

Download PTC Integrity product report

Also Known As

codeBeamer ALM

MKS

Overview

codeBeamer ALM is a market-leading Application Lifecycle Management platform. It is holistically integrated, and is packed with features that help you develop better products faster. Scale, monitor, control, and report on your entire development lifecycle conveniently, and comply with safety-critical regulations. Cut development time and costs.

PTC

The PTC Integrity Software Suite provides a comprehensive set of Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) and Systems Engineering capabilities that enable cross-discipline collaboration, improve time-to-market, streamline compliance, and reduce product risk. Simplify the complexity involved in developing today's complex engineered and smart, connected products.

PTC

Sample Customers

Medtronic, Align Technology, Daimler, Samsung, Harman, Dassault

TRW Automotive

Buyer's Guide

Codebeamer vs. PTC Integrity

December 2025

Free Report: Codebeamer vs. PTC Integrity

Find out what your peers are saying about Codebeamer vs. PTC Integrity and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,346 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Codebeamer vs. PTC Integrity report.

See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.

We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.