Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Cisco Enterprise Routers vs Juniper MX Series Routers vs MikroTik Routers and Switches comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Routers category, the mindshare of Cisco Enterprise Routers is 19.5%, down from 25.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Juniper MX Series Routers is 13.0%, up from 11.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of MikroTik Routers and Switches is 24.3%, down from 31.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Routers
 

Featured Reviews

Hafiz Umar Farooq - PeerSpot reviewer
Allows us to configure NAS through Cisco activities and to create GRE channels with different sites
You cannot configure internet policies or other options on Cisco routers. If you have a very limited budget, you can't afford two different pieces of equipment, and you can't afford yearly licensing. I would like Cisco to launch a small business router that has firewall capabilities as well. It would be a great initiative for small businesses. I would like to see two additional features: a remote access VPN with the MFA, multifactor authentication capabilities. At the moment, the ISR series only supports MFA, but not every company likes to use that tool. I think Cisco needs to consider MFA for the remote access VPN and should incorporate other MFA solutions as well. I would also like there to be some firewall features included in the routers. I'm not talking about a full-fledged firewall feature, but a limited set of features that can be used on the small and medium-sized enterprise level. These two features would be a great initiative. I would also like to recommend the licensing feature. Previously, the Cisco licensing model was either a perpetual or annual smart license. Now, Cisco has totally shifted over to the smart licensing feature, and perpetual licenses are about to be eliminated from Cisco. The licensing feature is a bit costly if we compare it to other vendors. The licensing features of the F5 are perpetual, but the support has periodic renewal. The license to use Cisco features like a firewall or the routers are actually yearly based and not perpetual. The lead times are extremely high. Normally, it's six to eight months initially, and they prolong it to up to one year for new device delivery by Cisco. If you say you need a brand new router, switch, or fiber from Cisco within one month, you will never get it, unless some stock is readily available with your vendor. Otherwise, it will initially take six to eight months, and then that will be prolonged to one year. This is what we're experiencing with our clients right now.
Kushtrim Arifi - PeerSpot reviewer
Highly scalable, especially suitable for complex and large-scale network deployments
The "Commit" feature stands out. When you try to commit commands, you have some options like sandbox config, leaving those temporary for 60 seconds. This feature allows you to commit configuration changes to the candidate configuration, and then review them for errors before committing them to the active configuration. Another feature that I like is the integration with Cisco routers. This allows you to connect Juniper MX routers to Cisco routers and have them work together seamlessly. We never have interoperability issues.
AnikIslam - PeerSpot reviewer
Cost-effective protocol support and a straightforward setup with room for login enhancements
In the network operations center, I manage our client's bandwidth. We connect with our clients through BGP and OSPF based on client demands. We also manage routing protocols, policies, internal firewalls, and other details like QE bandwidth, client manage bandwidth management, PoE, PPPoE, and DNS…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The operating system is good and well-made."
"The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that the product's overall look and feel is good, making it a user-friendly tool."
"We like that this solution is suitable for all organization sizes and levels."
"This product is easy to use."
"The stability of the solution's router is its most valuable feature."
"The most valuable features are that it is easy to use, it is easy to configure, and manage."
"The valuable feature is CLI."
"These routers are stable and I don't know of any problems with them."
"I have found the most useful features to be layered VPNs, IPsec, VPLS, and firewall filters."
"The solution is stable."
"I would rate the stability a ten out of ten. We never had any issues."
"The full Internet DGP is a valuable feature."
"The performance is good."
"It offers high protection and I like it."
"The stability of Juniper is better than Cisco's."
"The solution is pretty easy to set up after a bit of training."
"I think the tool's most valuable is its firewall. Cisco assisted them in developing it, making it easy to use. They expose a lot of background features, so you can go deep into integration, similar to Cisco switches. You can choose to use the command line interface or user interface."
"The radius and wireless features are the most valuable aspects of the solution."
"The MikroTik Hotspot is great."
"This is a good solution."
"The most valuable feature is its bandwidth management ability."
"The initial setup is very straightforward. You can typically set them up in about 30 minutes."
"The solution is stable."
"I have seen a return on investment since we didn't have to pay a licensing fee."
 

Cons

"The solution's cloud management capabilities could be better."
"Cisco routers are an expensive product."
"There have been multiple issues when updating iOS to Cisco routers."
"We need better pricing and support."
"Some of our customers have asked that this solution have a 10G connection."
"Other products are coming to the market that are not as expensive, Cisco should reduce their price to be more comparable."
"The product would be more scalable if it could operate with other brands."
"The main area for improvement with this product is with the price, which is currently very high compared to the rest of the market."
"While it is challenging to pinpoint specific areas for enhancement, there is room for better support and updates for Ansible."
"The security features could be better."
"Finding market expertise is hard."
"The setup was a bit complex."
"The solution could improve by providing better training to allow more sales of the solution in the market."
"Better documentation to assist with implementation would be helpful."
"It is not scalable, unfortunately."
"The solution could improve reliability and it needs more functions."
"The tool needs to add more tutorials and documentation for new functions."
"They could improve their product if they set, for instance, a controller for wireless LAN. That would allow them to really have something more than an access point."
"They lack the extended warranty for the equipment. They only provide a warranty for one year as compared to the other vendors who offer a warranty for three years, five years, and lifetime, etc."
"The biggest thing that needs improvement is the support."
"I would like to have the option of having multiple logins."
"MikroTik Routers and Switches needs to improve stability."
"If the client wants bigger capacity, there may be some issues. That is, there may be issues with scalability."
"Troubleshooting can be complex."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's expensive and the pricing could be improved."
"Cisco is more expensive than other architecture solutions."
"Cisco is way too expensive for small and medium businesses. They must lower their prices in the lower range equipment."
"The licensing fee is okay and matches industry standards, which is the benchmark."
"There is a license required for the use of this solution."
"Cisco is mid-tier in terms of pricing and quite affordable by most enterprises."
"This solution is expensive compared to competitors. There are additional costs if you want to have their support."
"There is a router-only, perpetual license available for this product, but additional features will mean additional charges."
"The prices for Juniper MX Series Routers are reasonable."
"$300 to $400 is the hardware cost and for licensing cost, it may be around, for support and all, $100 per year."
"I would rate the pricing model a seven out of ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive. It is not cheap."
"There is a license for this solution and the price is very competitive. The cost is less expensive than some competitors, such as Cisco. There are additional costs for support licenses."
"We have to pay for the device and licensing. The support service requires additional costs."
"The pricing of Juniper MX Series Routers is okay compared to other technologies."
"An additional license can be purchased for support of a next-generation firewall."
"I would rate it around a three. While I'm not deeply involved in pricing discussions, I believe it is comparatively more affordable than Cisco."
"Here in Bangladesh, MikroTik Routers and Switches cost 90,000 Taka, or converting that figure to dollars is $1,000."
"MikroTik is very cost-effective and quite good for the price. It performs very well. For one of our customers, the existing setup comprises Cisco Catalyst switches, and it is about 10 to 15 years old. We're looking into upgrading in a cost-effective way to get the performance and yet still be at par with the quality and expectations that customers have from Cisco. Price-wise, Cisco is really expensive, and customers are expecting something different than Cisco so that they can save on IT costs. They don't have the same budget that they had before when they installed Cisco products. That's why they're looking for a solution that can provide performance and features without too much money or investment. We're looking at some alternative brands, such as NETGEAR and MikroTik, to support our proposal."
"This product is a one-time purchase."
"They are very cheap and not at all expensive."
"When I compare the price of this solution to competitors it is priced a little high. There is not a license required for this solution."
"There is a one-time license fee for the use of this solution and it is less expensive than Cisco products."
"The tool has a low price."
"It's definitely worth the investment."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Routers solutions are best for your needs.
861,803 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Educational Organization
7%
Computer Software Company
14%
Comms Service Provider
13%
Financial Services Firm
9%
University
8%
Comms Service Provider
15%
Computer Software Company
14%
Hospitality Company
6%
Financial Services Firm
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

How do Cisco Enterprise routers compare with Mikrotik routers and switches?
Cisco Enterprise Routers are very stable and easy to use. They offer a very solid performance and are very secure. Th...
What do you like most about Cisco Enterprise Routers?
The most valuable feature of the solution is that it makes it possible for users to use encryption and decryption sin...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco Enterprise Routers?
I rate the product's price a six on a scale of one to ten, where one is low price and ten is high price.
What do you like most about Juniper MX Series Routers?
For the Juniper MX Series Routers, it plays a crucial role in our network. They offer numerous features, enabling mu...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Juniper MX Series Routers?
I would rate it around a three. While I'm not deeply involved in pricing discussions, I believe it is comparatively m...
What needs improvement with Juniper MX Series Routers?
Currently, I don't have specific concerns or ideas for improvement. Regarding functionalities, I appreciate the user ...
Which are better - Ubiquiti UniFi switches or MikroTik routers and switches?
Ubiquiti Unifi is a great solution. For starters, it is easy to configure and implement, and doesn’t require a learni...
What do you like most about MikroTik Routers and Switches?
The price is a big factor. They are very affordable, and the quality is high.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for MikroTik Routers and Switches?
MikroTik Routers and Switches are expensive, but they are the best products in terms of quality. From my knowledge, t...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Juniper Enterprise Routers, MX Series
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Aegean Motorway, Boingo, Chartwell School, Children's Hospital of Orange County , Department of Justice, Explorer Pipeline, Linz AG, National Rugby League, New South Wales Rural Fire Service, Telecom Italia, Transwestern
AARNet Pty Ltd, Allegro Networks, Atlantech Online, Availity, Baloise Insurance, Black Lotus, CATV, Blue Box
ABB, Boingo Wireless, JPL, HP, Allied Telesis, iPass, Mips Technologies, MicroAge, Matsushita, Telia, undp, WFP, NASA
Find out what your peers are saying about MikroTik, Cisco, Juniper and others in Routers. Updated: July 2025.
861,803 professionals have used our research since 2012.