We performed a comparison between Juniper MX Series Routers and MikroTik Cloud Router Switch based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Routers solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's an ideal gateway solution for small and medium businesses, i.e., around 300 devices can be easily handled."
"The solution has good performance."
"The solution's main features are its security and ease of use."
"The most valuable feature of Juniper MX Series Routers is its exceptional policy management capabilities."
"I would say it is very user-friendly."
"The solution is stable."
"We are able to easily build chassis with Juniper MX Series Routers."
"It is a very stable product."
"The solution is quite stable. We've found it to be very good. There aren't bugs, glitches, or crashes."
"I have found the most useful features to be layered VPNs, IPsec, VPLS, and firewall filters."
"The GUI is easy to use."
"It is user-friendly, reliable, and cheap."
"The beauty of MikroTik is that you have flexibility with the routing parts."
"It is easy to set up the solution."
"The performance has been good."
"It's a well-rounded solution for routing."
"The wiki page that describes the scripting and other features is very good."
"The interface management and the user access management is pretty good."
"There must be a more easy-to-use GUI."
"The pricing is a bit too high."
"In terms of what could be improved, they could extend the software warranty to be for its lifetime, as well. At the moment, the software warranty is limited, I think to one year."
"The solution needs to offer SDN features."
"Juniper have addressed issues with the MX204, but it still has a limited number of interfaces. Ideally, it should support up to twenty or twenty-four interfaces to better serve smaller service providers. Additionally, the MX304 doesn't support subscriber management, also known as BNG, which I believe should be included."
"The third-level customer support coming from Juniper itself could be much better. To get assistance from Juniper, we sometimes have to wait for weeks and months. I don't really appreciate that. Their support should be faster."
"The security features could be better."
"Automation can also be improved."
"The documentation needs to be updated to reflect the changes made in the latest update."
"The port isolation and VLAN need to be improved."
"The bulk efficiencies and the control of traffic could be a bit better."
"If MikroTik had a marketing team and support team in India then it would be much easier for us to get the product, as well as support."
"In medium to large sectors, there's a necessity for managing aspects like proxy firewalls."
"The packet filtering, user log data, and user access log could all be improved."
"The initial setup is complex."
"The solution does not yet offer a SaaS version."
"It would be even better with a centralized management platform."
Juniper MX Series Routers is ranked 3rd in Routers with 33 reviews while MikroTik Cloud Router Switch is ranked 5th in Routers with 17 reviews. Juniper MX Series Routers is rated 8.8, while MikroTik Cloud Router Switch is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Juniper MX Series Routers writes "Good performance, long life span, and easy to set up". On the other hand, the top reviewer of MikroTik Cloud Router Switch writes "Easy to set up, user-friendly, and reliable". Juniper MX Series Routers is most compared with MikroTik Routers and Switches, Cisco Enterprise Routers, Huawei Enterprise Routers, HPE Enterprise Routers and ExtremeRouting, whereas MikroTik Cloud Router Switch is most compared with MikroTik Routers and Switches, Huawei Enterprise Routers, Cisco Enterprise Routers, Meraki MS Switches and Aruba Switches. See our Juniper MX Series Routers vs. MikroTik Cloud Router Switch report.
See our list of best Routers vendors.
We monitor all Routers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
