We performed a comparison between Cisco Enterprise Routers and HPE Enterprise Routers based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Routers solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's an ideal gateway solution for small and medium businesses, i.e., around 300 devices can be easily handled."
"The solution has good performance."
"Its routers are versatile, reliable, and capable."
"Flexibility is the most valuable feature of this solution."
"When you set up Cisco, you can forget you have a router. Everything just works."
"The solution is easy to install."
"We hardly have issues with Cisco equipment and I believe that reliability is the best part of Cisco."
"The most valuable features are that it is easy to use, it is easy to configure, and manage."
"The feature that I have found most valuable is its ability to implement layer three protocols and layer two protocols like OSPS in BSS and BSC environments, with the Nexus Cisco 7000."
"The solution has great performance."
"These routers help us to provide high availability to our clusters."
"Extensive support for cellular range for Wi-Fi technologies"
"The solution's initial setup is straightforward."
"HPE routers are easier to manage than any other router I've used."
"It has good scalability."
"It is more durable than other products in the market."
"It makes it easy to update the network technology and manage multiple deals, all without needing technical knowledge."
"There must be a more easy-to-use GUI."
"The main area for improvement with this product is with the price, which is currently very high compared to the rest of the market."
"When compared to PEPLink, Cisco Enterprise Routers are less flexible, and you cannot have more than one user."
"Compared to equipment by other vendors, such as Check Point, the physical size of the units is bigger."
"Tends to have a short life cycle."
"The security could improve for Cisco Enterprise Routers. I understand there's a security appliance that is separate, but in terms of the router, there can be improvements made to prevent unwanted users from accessing the router or trying to manipulate the traffic that is passing through it."
"The initial setup can be a little bit difficult."
"This solution is scalable but it does need some improvements."
"While scalability is available, it must be paid for."
"Its customer service could be better for older equipment models."
"Compatibility with other platforms could be improved."
"I'd like to see more security features, like support for different types of encryptions."
"They should work on lowering their prices in Brazil to stay competitive with rivals and offer customers more affordable options."
"Better management tools are needed."
"The solution is expensive."
"Technical support could be better."
Cisco Enterprise Routers is ranked 2nd in Routers with 101 reviews while HPE Enterprise Routers is ranked 7th in Routers with 7 reviews. Cisco Enterprise Routers is rated 8.6, while HPE Enterprise Routers is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Cisco Enterprise Routers writes "Allows us to configure NAS through Cisco activities and to create GRE channels with different sites". On the other hand, the top reviewer of HPE Enterprise Routers writes "Has excellent scalability and is cost-effective compared to its competitors". Cisco Enterprise Routers is most compared with MikroTik Routers and Switches, Huawei Enterprise Routers, Juniper MX Series Routers, OneAccess Enterprise Routers and MikroTik Cloud Router Switch, whereas HPE Enterprise Routers is most compared with Huawei Enterprise Routers, MikroTik Routers and Switches, Juniper MX Series Routers and Cisco Cloud Services Router. See our Cisco Enterprise Routers vs. HPE Enterprise Routers report.
See our list of best Routers vendors.
We monitor all Routers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
