ExtremeRouting vs Juniper MX Series Routers comparison

Extreme Networks and Juniper are both solutions in the Routers category. Extreme Networks is ranked #6 with an average rating of 7.5, while Juniper is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.6. Extreme Networks holds a 1.8% mindshare in R, compared to Juniper’s 13.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Extreme Networks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Juniper users who would recommend it.

ExtremeRouting

Read 6 ExtremeRouting reviews

218 Views
187 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Juniper MX Series Routers

Read 34 Juniper MX Series Routers reviews

1,621 Views
1,345 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

ExtremeRouting

Juniper MX Series Routers

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 7, 2025

ExtremeRouting and Juniper MX Series Routers compete in the network infrastructure space. Data comparisons indicate that Juniper MX Series Routers shine with superior features, appealing to those prioritizing high-performance capabilities.

Features: ExtremeRouting stands out with its intuitive configuration tools, comprehensive monitoring capabilities, and stable performance during demonstrations. Juniper MX Series Routers offer advanced scalability, robust security features, and exceptional policy management capabilities, making them suitable for complex network requirements.

Room for Improvement: ExtremeRouting could enhance its feature set to better compete with larger infrastructure demands and improve integration with third-party systems. General software stability and device interoperability are other areas for potential growth. Juniper MX Series Routers may benefit from simplified initial deployment, better cost management strategies, and streamlined configuration processes to reduce setup complexity.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ExtremeRouting provides a straightforward deployment model and reliable customer assistance, allowing organizations to integrate rapidly. Juniper MX Series Routers, while more intricate during initial deployment, offer a comprehensive support model that enhances customer satisfaction through improved performance and reliability.

Pricing and ROI: ExtremeRouting is favored for its lower setup costs and quicker ROI, appealing to budget-conscious buyers. Juniper MX Series Routers require a higher initial investment, but promise significant long-term value through performance improvements, potentially offering a better ROI for those willing to invest initially.

To learn more, read our detailed ExtremeRouting vs. Juniper MX Series Routers Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

ExtremeRouting vs. Juniper MX Series Routers

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 872,778 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ExtremeRouting

Ranking in Routers

6th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Juniper MX Series Routers

Ranking in Routers

3rd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Carrier Grade Network Address Translation (CGNAT) (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Routers category, the mindshare of ExtremeRouting is 1.8%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Juniper MX Series Routers is 13.0%, up from 12.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Routers Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Juniper MX Series Routers	13.0%
ExtremeRouting	1.8%
Other	85.2%

Routers

Featured Reviews

Imran Taiyeb Ali

Senior Solutions Specialist at a comms service provider with 201-500 employees

A scalable tool that needs to improve its support, software resiliency, and software stability

The support team is not technically that strong. The previous company that owned the product, Nortel, went bankrupt, after which the transition phase of the product didn't go smoothly. Avaya did not do well with the product's design and engineering after taking the product over from Nortel, after which Avaya decided to outsource the tool to my company, meaning we have worked as a vendor with third-party access to the tool in the name of Avaya. The support was very bad initially, but my company could fix the problems of the customers on time since we had better communication skills than technical-solving skills due to our limitations related to the area of device engineering. When it comes to a feature of the product, my company could enable it for the customers or users of the product. If, by any chance, my company found a bug in the tool, then it was a hectic task for our support team to deal with it since it took months to fix it. Currently, Extreme Networks takes care of the support part, and it might have improved. I rate the technical support a four out of ten.

Read full review

Patrick Anaku

Senior Network Engineer at Roke Telkom

Performance excels with reliable uptime and robust features

The best features of Juniper MX Series Routers include their performance, which is quite good for us in terms of hardware performance. The Junos OS, the software, is stable, and we don't have many issues with the Juniper system itself. They have numerous features that allow us to deliver services, be it Layer 2 connectivity to customers, Layer 3 connectivity, data center connectivity, or even security features. Hardware performance has been a top-notch reason why we chose Juniper in the beginning, especially the MX series, which performs well in terms of network uptime and we don't encounter many failures. We have had a bad experience here and there with the ACX series, and their network performance is not so great compared to MX, so we have mostly done away with the ACX and only use MX at some of the core sites. I have seen a return on investment from the solution. Initially, we deployed MX80s on the network, and since our company has been in operation since 2006, from that point we used MX80s until around 2016 when we upgraded most of them to MX204s. From our experience, once we buy an MX204, we don't have issues with it; we have never had to replace an MX204 on the network. Once we deploy it, it works until we decide to upgrade the capacity. The return on investment is significant, as once we buy it, we have no worries about performance.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Provides a good redundancy technique."

"It is very easy to set up."

"What I like about Extreme Routing is its impressive performance."

"The routing protocol is the solution's most valuable aspect."

"Looking at the robustness, I do not know whether it would be carrier grade – let's say for hundreds of thousands of users – but it certainly doesn't balk at 10,000 users or less."

"It is a very scalable solution. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"The full Internet DGP is a valuable feature."

"On the SRX, the firewall is very easy to configure, especially when you want to filter out traffic."

"The solution is pretty easy to set up after a bit of training."

"The most valuable feature is reliability."

"The product is easy to use."

"The most valuable feature of Juniper MX Series Routers is its exceptional policy management capabilities."

"The solution is quite stable. We've found it to be very good. There aren't bugs, glitches, or crashes."

"Juniper Enterprise Routers has a CLR and it's more reliable and faster than others."

More Juniper MX Series Routers pros

Cons

"Some of the latest protocols are unavailable."

"The support, software resiliency, and software stability are areas of concern where improvements are required."

"It's not evolving as quickly as we would like it to."

"My advice for those looking into ExtremeRouting is: right now all switch manufacturers are backed up for months. If you're looking to implement quickly, I would say shop around a bit because it might be difficult."

"The solution is far too unstable. It's completely unreliable."

"One area for improvement with Extreme Routing is the need for more accessible and comprehensive training."

"While it is challenging to pinpoint specific areas for enhancement, there is room for better support and updates for Ansible."

"The only thing that might need improvement would be the occasional downtime."

"Currently, I don't have specific concerns or ideas for improvement. Regarding functionalities, I appreciate the user interface of Juniper Elite. Additionally, I'm exploring the use of Juniper Routers in a Parliament environment, particularly with Baragon, and so far, I find it to be a valuable feature. We're currently facing an issue as we're in the process of building and dealing with the software, specifically transitioning from R2 to RC. It's like when there is an update in the routers, and in the process, there are chances to end up losing some of your settings. The challenge arises because the recommended configurations for RC do not align with our features, necessitating a reevaluation of many features. It would have been more efficient if the initial recommendation had been for RC, avoiding the need to redo our research. This has resulted in a loss of time for us, and we've encountered this situation multiple times."

"The solution could improve by providing better training to allow more sales of the solution in the market."

"The solution could improve reliability and it needs more functions."

"Juniper Enterprise Routers could improve by adding a graphical user interface(GUI). They do not have one. Most of our team has to have a background or expertise in Juniper. When compared to other solutions, they have a GUI. It will be easier for new team members to get familiar with, configure, or set up the router. Additionally, adding some monitoring tools would help us."

"The security features could be better."

"One thing that the product can do better is clustering. Rather than just having two of them, it would help if there was one cluster to extend to more notes in the cluster itself."

More Juniper MX Series Routers cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We have no issues with the price."

"The prices for Juniper MX Series Routers are reasonable."

"$300 to $400 is the hardware cost and for licensing cost, it may be around, for support and all, $100 per year."

"I would rate it around a three. While I'm not deeply involved in pricing discussions, I believe it is comparatively more affordable than Cisco."

"The pricing of Juniper MX Series Routers is okay compared to other technologies."

"The price of this solution is better than other competitors, such as Cisco. We receive a lot of discounts which make the price less expensive and attractive."

"I would rate the pricing model a seven out of ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive. It is not cheap."

"There is a license for this solution and the price is very competitive. The cost is less expensive than some competitors, such as Cisco. There are additional costs for support licenses."

"We have to pay for the device and licensing. The support service requires additional costs."

More Juniper MX Series Routers pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Routers solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

872,778 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

University

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	19
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	8

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ExtremeRouting?

It is a very scalable solution. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ExtremeRouting?

I think that all the devices included in Avaya fall under Extreme Networks currently. I am not sure how much Extreme Networks has changed ExtremeRouting, but I think it is in a better condition tha...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for ExtremeRouting?

My company uses ExtremeRouting for a big LAN environment, where there is a need for ERS switches, including Extreme Networks Core Switches and chassis, so the product is like a big cabinet to reduc...

See all answers

What do you like most about Juniper MX Series Routers?

For the Juniper MX Series Routers, it plays a crucial role in our network. They offer numerous features, enabling multiple connections and handling various reports. The routers efficiently manage ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Juniper MX Series Routers?

I would rate it around a three. While I'm not deeply involved in pricing discussions, I believe it is comparatively more affordable than Cisco.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Juniper MX Series Routers?

The areas of Juniper MX Series Routers that have room for improvement include the port count; for instance, the MX204 has only four 40G or 100G ports, which is quite limited. While I know there are...

See all answers

Comparisons

MikroTik Routers and Switches vs ExtremeRouting

Compared 36% of the time

MikroTik Cloud Router Switch vs ExtremeRouting

Compared 30% of the time

More ExtremeRouting Competitors

ACX Series Routers vs Juniper MX Series Routers

Compared 26% of the time

MikroTik Routers and Switches vs Juniper MX Series Routers

Compared 18% of the time

Huawei Enterprise Routers vs Juniper MX Series Routers

Compared 14% of the time

A10 Networks Thunder CGN vs Juniper MX Series Routers

Compared 13% of the time

HPE Enterprise Routers vs Juniper MX Series Routers

Compared 3% of the time

More Juniper MX Series Routers Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Routers

October 2025

Download ExtremeRouting product report

Buyer's Guide

Juniper MX Series Routers

October 2025

Download Juniper MX Series Routers product report

Also Known As

Avaya Enterprise Routers

Juniper Enterprise Routers, MX Series, Junos Address Aware

Overview

Avaya Enterprise Routers Ethernet Routing Switch 4000 Series is a Stackable Chassis system providing high-performance, convergence-ready and resilient Ethernet switching connectivity. Available as a range of models supporting 10/100/1000 switching and routing, Power-overEthernet, Powerover-Ethernet+ and 10 Gigabit Ethernet uplink options, the Ethernet Routing Switch 4000 Series is ideally suited for mainstream Wiring Closet and other network Edge deployments.

Extreme Networks

Juniper MX Series Routers are designed for high throughput with flexible MPLS configuration and robust policy management, offering reliability and scalability for enterprise needs. They feature seamless Cisco integration, strong performance driven by the Trio chipset, and user-friendly management.

Known for their exceptional performance, Juniper MX Series Routers enable enterprises and ISPs to expand network connectivity and efficiency. Their reliable hardware supports tasks like border routing and internet connectivity, catering to high-performance networking and automation. Trio chipset technology ensures stability, while interchangeable line cards maintain top-level performance. These routers are favored for their easy configuration and robust support, though improvements in pricing, VPN compatibility, and stronger DDoS protection are needed. Users seek additional cloud integration, enhanced security features, and expanded port options on models like the MX204.

What are the key features of Juniper MX Series Routers?

High Throughput: Ensures fast and efficient network data transfer.
Flexible MPLS Configuration: Adapts seamlessly to varied network environments.
Robust Policy Management: Provides extensive control over network traffic policies.
Seamless Cisco Integration: Simplifies operations for mixed equipment environments.
Trio Chipset Technology: Boosts performance and ensures network stability.
User-Friendly Interface: Facilitates easy configuration and management.

What benefits should users evaluate?

Scalability: Supports growing network needs without compromising performance.
Reliability: Offers consistent and dependable network operations.
Support and Documentation: Access to comprehensive resources for efficient management.
Performance: Maintains high levels of throughput and stability for enterprise needs.
Automation Support: Streamlines network operations for greater efficiency.

In industries like telecommunications and data centers, Juniper MX Series Routers are widely implemented to manage complex networking tasks such as VPNs, MPLS, and BGP deployments. Service providers often rely on these routers for backbone roles, benefitting from their performance and scalability to maintain robust and efficient network infrastructures.

Juniper

Sample Customers

Breakthrough Urban Ministries, Black Oak Casino, Glamorgan County Cricket Club, University of San Carlos, Holland Hall School, South Euclid Lyndhurst Schools, Prairie View Networking Academy, City of Troy, Ryerson University, Linamar, City of Redondo Beach, York Region District School Board

AARNet Pty Ltd, Allegro Networks, Atlantech Online, Availity, Baloise Insurance, Black Lotus, CATV, Blue Box

Buyer's Guide

ExtremeRouting vs. Juniper MX Series Routers

September 2025

Free Report: ExtremeRouting vs. Juniper MX Series Routers

Find out what your peers are saying about ExtremeRouting vs. Juniper MX Series Routers and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

872,778 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ExtremeRouting vs. Juniper MX Series Routers report.

See our list of best Routers vendors.

We monitor all Routers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.