Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs CylanceOPTICS comparison

Check Point Software Technologies and BlackBerry are both solutions in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category. Check Point Software Technologies is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.7, while BlackBerry is ranked #42 with an average rating of 7.8. Check Point Software Technologies holds a 2.3% mindshare in EDR, compared to BlackBerry’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Check Point Software Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of BlackBerry users who would recommend it.

Check Point Harmony Endpoint

Read 122 Check Point Harmony Endpoint reviews

8,926 Views
6,159 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

CylanceOPTICS

Read 11 CylanceOPTICS reviews

475 Views
456 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Check Point Harmony Endpoint

CylanceOPTICS

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

Check Point Harmony Endpoint and CylanceOPTICS are comprehensive endpoint protection solutions. Check Point Harmony Endpoint has the upper hand in support and deployment, while CylanceOPTICS excels in advanced features and user satisfaction.

Features: Check Point Harmony Endpoint users value its robust threat detection capabilities, ease of integration with security frameworks, and superior support. CylanceOPTICS users benefit from AI-driven predictive threat analysis, advanced threat detection, and automation features.

Room for Improvement: Check Point Harmony Endpoint needs a more intuitive management console, faster response times for support, and enhanced performance scalability. CylanceOPTICS requires improved reporting tools, better system resource usage, and a more streamlined user interface.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers a straightforward deployment process and responsive customer service. CylanceOPTICS, while providing comprehensive support, has a more complex deployment process.

Pricing and ROI: Check Point Harmony Endpoint is seen as cost-effective with satisfactory ROI, whereas CylanceOPTICS, being more expensive, justifies the higher cost through its advanced capabilities and longer ROI period.

To learn more, read our detailed Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. CylanceOPTICS Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. CylanceOPTICS

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 862,499 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Check Point Harmony Endpoint

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

8th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

122

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (6th)

CylanceOPTICS

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

42nd

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

4.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category, the mindshare of Check Point Harmony Endpoint is 2.3%, down from 3.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of CylanceOPTICS is 0.3%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Featured Reviews

Nasseer Qureshi

Pre Sales Consultant at Redington Group

Comprehensive defensive features boost daily protection and efficiency

I see a need for improvement especially in policy management and policy customization with Check Point Harmony Endpoint. As a new user, I find it somewhat difficult to customize and apply policies due to the various options available. I would appreciate improvement in fine-tuning those policies and integrating with other tools, such as being able to send logs from Check Point to our SIM or syslog solution. The user interface is good, and I really appreciate it, but improvements are needed in policy customization and integration with third-party products. Additionally, I would prefer to see a mechanism to send agents directly from the console to an endpoint during installation.

Read full review

HERNAN RODRIGUEZ

IT Security Engineer at Cybolt

Easy to use

CylanceOPTICS is easy to use. The product's technical support is slow. I have been using the product for three years. CylanceOPTICS is easy to use. I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Resource overheads have been reduced and we are overall more secure as a business."

"Its ability to rollback anti-ransomware once an attack has started is the most valuable feature."

"It's pretty complete for preventing threats to endpoints. Its capabilities are great."

"The real-time threat prevention capabilities stand out as a fortress against malware, ransomware, and evolving cyber threats, offering a proactive defense that safeguards our organization's critical assets."

"The forensics allows us to search retrospectively for an URL or file opened by users, for example, when you need to quickly check who else has clicked on a phishing link."

"Its most valuable feature is being able to integrate cloud services and centralize the protection policy from a single administration dashboard."

"A unique feature with this product is that it will detect if the user is entering their password on a website, and then block it."

"It is a stable solution. My company has not received any complaints regarding the product's stability from our customers who use the solution."

More Check Point Harmony Endpoint pros

"CylanceOPTICS is pretty stable."

"It is a bit early in our evaluation process to give proper feedback, although so far, the overall feedback is good."

"It's pretty unintrusive"

"It automatically blocks the threats, helping us investigate if they harm the environment."

"I would rate the stability a nine out of ten. I would give it a close ten as possible because, like SentinelOne, I've seen incompatibility. Whereas Cylance, I've seen none."

"CylanceOPTICS is easy to use."

"The solution has a high level of trust in the industry."

"You can use the solution to query certain things."

More CylanceOPTICS pros

Cons

"It's not easy to investigate an incident that you find in the company. Users often face trouble when downloading files, so it is very slow in terms of how it works."

"There should be some way of managing this solution outside the organization's network, possibly with some type of remote access. For example, if I'm the admin of Check Point who manages the entire network, I would like to have access on my home device or maybe a mobile app to get reports, etc."

"They need to focus on more scalability (as much as possible) so that the solution can run across all supported OS."

"Sometimes the Check Point Harmony Endpoint performance slows down when we use scanning and update sessions."

"The services of EDR consumption should be reduced and the support needs to be improved."

"Improvements are required in two key areas: notifications and setup simplification."

"There was a learning curve for our general population of employees (the user)."

"Check Point Harmony Endpoint could improve by allowing it to work on older systems by reducing the system requirements. Since our systems are dated we can only use the antivirus module features."

More Check Point Harmony Endpoint cons

"One minor issue that somebody mentioned was that they didn't like their management console."

"It takes more time to investigate or dig up and understand what's going on."

"The tools are ineffective. It flags a lot of things. To give you an example, it detected Google Chrome and blocked the user's access to it. That it mistook for malicious, which turned out to be a false positive."

"Too many false positives are reported."

"The reporting is very weak and not very good at all."

"The product's initial setup process could be easy."

"The detection component is something that they have to work on."

"The product's technical support is slow."

More CylanceOPTICS cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost is huge compared to other products that are available on market."

"Initial monies replacing all AVs with a single product is about £10k."

"I rate the solution's pricing a five out of ten. It costs around ₱2,200 per endpoint."

"The solution is reasonable, but there are cheaper solutions out there."

"I bought them for 12 months and I genuinely cannot remember what I paid for them. I think it's about 100 pounds per user per year, so about 10 pounds a month per person."

"I rate the product price a four on a scale of one to ten, where one is low, and ten is high."

"In terms of licensing, have a buffer zone around your projects in terms of the amount of endpoints that you want to have. You can always have more, but it is best to leave room for a little increase or growth."

"The licensing cost for Check Point is $3 USD or $4 USD per end-user."

More Check Point Harmony Endpoint pricing and cost advice

"I would rate the pricing a three out of five."

"The pricing for CylanceOPTICS is very good; I would rate it around a nine on a scale of one to ten, with ten being the lowest. It's one of the most affordable options I've seen."

"We pay for the number of endpoints we have and that is about it. On a monthly basis, the licensing cost is $55 per user."

"CylanceOPTICS is probably priced equal to other EDRs in the market."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

862,499 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

19%

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Check Point Harmony Endpoint?

The platform's most valuable features are the ability to build API, which meets our business requirements, and the VPN client, which provides VPN access from a single client.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Check Point Harmony Endpoint?

For licensing, the pricing is a little bit higher, and the initial setup cost is also higher.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Check Point Harmony Endpoint?

Check Point Harmony Endpoint can be improved performance-wise. Sometimes the Check Point Harmony Endpoint performance slows down when we use scanning and update sessions. During these activities, t...

See all answers

What do you like most about Blackberry Optics?

I would rate the stability a nine out of ten. I would give it a close ten as possible because, like SentinelOne, I've seen incompatibility. Whereas Cylance, I've seen none.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Blackberry Optics?

CylanceOPTICS is probably priced equal to other EDRs in the market. Price-wise, considering what it has to offer, you could probably get a better product.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Blackberry Optics?

The solution's contextual analysis is sometimes not very clear compared to some modern EDRs like CrowdStrike. Compared to other EDR tools, CylanceOPTICS lacks some information. It takes more time t...

See all answers

Comparisons

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Check Point Harmony Endpoint

Compared 9% of the time

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs Check Point Harmony Endpoint

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Check Point Harmony Endpoint

Compared 7% of the time

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs Check Point Harmony Endpoint

Compared 7% of the time

Huntress Managed EDR vs Check Point Harmony Endpoint

Compared 5% of the time

More Check Point Harmony Endpoint Competitors

CrowdStrike Falcon vs CylanceOPTICS

Compared 50% of the time

Rapid7 InsightIDR vs CylanceOPTICS

Compared 50% of the time

More CylanceOPTICS Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Check Point Harmony Endpoint

July 2025

Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint product report

Buyer's Guide

CylanceOPTICS

July 2025

Download CylanceOPTICS product report

Also Known As

Check Point Endpoint Security, Endpoint Security, Check Point SandBlast Agent

No data available

Overview

Check Point Harmony Endpoint integrates security solutions, allowing comprehensive protection against cyber threats. It's designed to suit enterprise-scale operations with robust features for threat prevention and management.

Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers advanced security capabilities that prioritize threat analysis, detection, and prevention. Tailored for professional environments, it provides tools to handle endpoint vulnerabilities effectively. Its user-centric design ensures that IT teams can manage network security with streamlined operations. Continuous updates and threat intelligence are offered to counter emerging threats, and its deployment is optimized for ease of use.

What are the key features of Check Point Harmony Endpoint?

Threat Intelligence: Delivers real-time insights into new and existing threats.
Forensics: Offers detailed analysis of incidents to understand and mitigate risks.
Endpoint Threat Hunting: Empowers proactive search for advanced threats.
Automated Response: Integrates response mechanisms to reduce incident impact.
Zero Trust Architecture: Implements controls for verified access at every endpoint.

What benefits and ROI should be considered?

Cost Efficiency: Reduces operational costs by minimizing security breaches.
Enhanced Security: Protects data integrity and privacy across endpoints.
User Productivity: Limits interruptions and maintains business continuity.
Scalability: Grows with organizational needs without compromising on performance.
Compliance Assurance: Aids in meeting regulatory and security compliance standards.

In specific industries like finance and healthcare, Check Point Harmony Endpoint is deployed to secure sensitive data and protect against sector-specific threats. Its flexibility allows adaptation to meet industry standards, ensuring critical infrastructures maintain operational security without hindrance.

Check Point Software Technologies

Our cloud-native BlackBerry® Optics provide visibility, on-device threat detection and remediation across your organization. In milliseconds. And our EDR approach effectively and efficiently hunts threats while eliminating response latency. It’s the difference between a minor security event—and one that’s widespread and uncontrolled.

BlackBerry

Sample Customers

Boston Properties, Independence Care System, Melbourne Convention and Exhibition Centre (MCEC), Courtagen Life Sciences, Carmel Partners

Cerdant, Washoe County School District

Buyer's Guide

Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. CylanceOPTICS

June 2025

Free Report: Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. CylanceOPTICS

Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. CylanceOPTICS and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

862,499 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. CylanceOPTICS report.

See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.