The pricing is reasonable. It is very good for security. We are focused on security. If the security is strong, we do not mind the price. The customers blindly trust the product.
Chief Information Security Officer at a consultancy with 1-10 employees
Real User
Top 10
2024-01-05T09:50:45Z
Jan 5, 2024
I rate the product price a four on a scale of one to ten, where one is low, and ten is high. The problem with the product is that Check Point tries to push it to the market. FortiGate, a firewall solution I purchased for the first time around twelve years ago, was very cheap because Fortinet had to push the product into the market. Users can get it for good prices only during the beginning phase of the tool. Our company has to make yearly payments towards the licensing charges attached to the solution. There are no additional charges attached to the product apart from the licensing costs attached to the solution.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint is an expensive solution. My company's clients pay INR 1,000 for each user of the product, while Check Point also provides an option to pay INR 2,300 for three years.
The management of the solution is very simple and the deployment tools are diverse, which greatly reduces the workload. Licensing is also quite simple with three main options and some add-ons. It is licensed per device (whether it is a desktop, laptop, server, etc.), and the price is very attractive and competitive.
Cyber Security Specialist at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Reseller
Top 5
2023-09-07T09:50:00Z
Sep 7, 2023
Check Point Harmony Endpoint is a subscription-based solution and the pricing is quite reasonable when compared to other solutions on the market. I would give it a nine out of ten in terms of affordability.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint's pricing is more competitive than any other vendor. Since it is growing, the solution gives better prices than any other in the market.
Cloud Engineer at IT Quest Solutions|interglobalmsp
User
Top 5
2023-02-28T17:21:00Z
Feb 28, 2023
It is important to evaluate the total cost with those of the market and see if the tool meets all the requirements of the company and thus find that it is more adapted to the company.
At the time we purchased it, the licensing was separated into some modules. There were antivirus modules, data protection modules, and full modules if I'm not mistaken. You should make sure that the module you choose fits your requirement.
The costs are per user. It is a good option for covering company equipment. I recommend finding a partner that can help you with the costs for this and any other Check Point solution.
The costs depend on the company size. In my case, I was able to have all the features, including email protection, remote access, mobile protection, and endpoint protection, for a great price.
The issue of licensing is something that I don't like. The licenses are per package, not per unit, and that in some cases affects the acquisition of the solution.
But they are a leader in detecting threat, therefore, it's reasonable that they are a little more expensive than some other competitors. However, customers always want to pay a bit less.
Chief Technology Officer at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Real User
2021-06-11T14:03:38Z
Jun 11, 2021
Compared to the cost of other solutions, Check Point Harmony Endpoint is cost effective. The cost is not very cheap, but it's fair. The licensing process is not smooth and can take one to two weeks.
Senior Manager at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Real User
2021-05-14T13:24:00Z
May 14, 2021
There are three different licensing models including basic, advanced, and complete, and it needs to be selected according to the endpoint. For example, it matters whether it is only required for a Windows endpoint as opposed to providing support for BYOD/Mobile devices.
Licensing comes free in that first year or is included in the base package. From a commercial point of view, it really just is the renewal cost, rather than a one-time fixed cost or buy-in. That's for new firewalls. For existing firewalls, we haven't even gotten to that point yet. They don't even want us to look at the pricing. First, we need to think about what the product does. Does it do what it says on the tin? And if it does, then it's a commercial thing. We have quite a good commercial model with Check Point, so we don't really need to worry about that too much. The pricing should be good. The licensing, the way they've changed it, is a positive and a negative. Ultimately, Check Point has changed how it operates and now we have to go back and retrofit.
One of the key factors that made us go with this solution was the pricing. On the licensing part, there was an initial complementary set of licenses offered in the initial onboarding package, either 15 or 20. Then, we had some complementary licenses in the initial purchase of the package. That was pretty useful.
Business Analyst / Developer at a tech services company
Real User
2020-08-04T07:26:00Z
Aug 4, 2020
As we grow, we've been given room to add additional licenses in terms of all our endpoints. In terms of licensing, have a buffer zone around your projects in terms of the amount of endpoints that you want to have. You can always have more, but it is best to leave room for a little increase or growth. The solution is too pricey.
Head of IT at a real estate/law firm with 11-50 employees
Real User
2019-10-28T06:33:00Z
Oct 28, 2019
I bought them for 12 months and I genuinely cannot remember what I paid for them. I think it's about 100 pounds per user per year, so about 10 pounds a month per person.
CIO / CTO at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees
Real User
2019-09-05T05:37:00Z
Sep 5, 2019
We pay roughly 80,000 Swedish krona per year. When it comes to the firewall, it's roughly 150,000 Swedish krona yearly. There's also maintenance, of course, which is roughly 10,000 krona per month.
Check Point offered very good pricing through negotiation. The licensing is done yearly. We have a three-year subscription, including premium, direct support; the Next Generation and SandBlast are for two years. Our cost, including everything, is 18 lakh rupees.
With Check Point Endpoint Security, you can go with the Suite license or you can go with the individual Blade license. I recommend the Full Suite license. Check Point Endpoint Security is not 100% compatible with Kaspersky and Symantec products. You can go only with Endpoint, i.e. you cannot mix with a competitor's solution. It could be a good solution because they have multiple ways to handle the licensing model. If someone requires an encryption license, it is extra and not included in the base license. If you have any intellectual property, then the financial investment will be worth it. If you compare Check Point Endpoint Security to Kaspersky, Kaspersky has two types of suites. One is the Select plan and one is the Advanced plan. If you go with their Advanced plan, then that will collect all of the web confidence reports, many of which vary. Check Point Endpoint Security is easier for the administrator compared to Kaspersky, in terms of alerts and reporting. The admin receives regular reports and each report says how many total Windows versions are there, how many Office instances there are, etc. Each product will have a unique set of advantages and different backgrounds, but when it comes to security, we are happy to go with Check Point Endpoint Security.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint is a robust security solution that enables users to use a single piece of software to accomplish tasks that often require the use of multiple pieces of software. It prevents impending threats from doing harm while at the same time enabling users to identify and deal with any harm that results from breaches.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint provides users with an excellent total cost of ownership. It combines six security solutions into a single powerful...
The pricing is reasonable. It is very good for security. We are focused on security. If the security is strong, we do not mind the price. The customers blindly trust the product.
The pricing is reasonable.
I rate the product price a four on a scale of one to ten, where one is low, and ten is high. The problem with the product is that Check Point tries to push it to the market. FortiGate, a firewall solution I purchased for the first time around twelve years ago, was very cheap because Fortinet had to push the product into the market. Users can get it for good prices only during the beginning phase of the tool. Our company has to make yearly payments towards the licensing charges attached to the solution. There are no additional charges attached to the product apart from the licensing costs attached to the solution.
Its price is competitive.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint is an expensive solution. My company's clients pay INR 1,000 for each user of the product, while Check Point also provides an option to pay INR 2,300 for three years.
The management of the solution is very simple and the deployment tools are diverse, which greatly reduces the workload. Licensing is also quite simple with three main options and some add-ons. It is licensed per device (whether it is a desktop, laptop, server, etc.), and the price is very attractive and competitive.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint is a subscription-based solution and the pricing is quite reasonable when compared to other solutions on the market. I would give it a nine out of ten in terms of affordability.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint's pricing is more competitive than any other vendor. Since it is growing, the solution gives better prices than any other in the market.
It is a great cost with high-end Check Point features within reasonable cost brackets. You must try it.
It is important to evaluate the total cost with those of the market and see if the tool meets all the requirements of the company and thus find that it is more adapted to the company.
The setup cost and licensing terms vary according to enterprise size.
The setup and cost depend on the number of devices that have to be secured.
The setup and pricing are flexible depending on company size and security demands.
At the time we purchased it, the licensing was separated into some modules. There were antivirus modules, data protection modules, and full modules if I'm not mistaken. You should make sure that the module you choose fits your requirement.
The costs are per user. It is a good option for covering company equipment. I recommend finding a partner that can help you with the costs for this and any other Check Point solution.
The costs depend on the company size. In my case, I was able to have all the features, including email protection, remote access, mobile protection, and endpoint protection, for a great price.
The issue of licensing is something that I don't like. The licenses are per package, not per unit, and that in some cases affects the acquisition of the solution.
Licensing is per endpoint, which is why we think is good. The cost is competitive, and its features are very good.
We implement this solution with a yearly subscription and there are no extra costs.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint is a tool that I highly recommend. Its implementation is very easy, as is its configuration.
If you need the on-premise management console, you have to pay an additional cost. It's not much, however, it's good to ask for a quote.
The product is reasonably priced. It's not overly expensive.
I'd advise new users to work with a technical account manager and follow the steps in the documentation.
I'd advise users to talk to your Check Point partners or find a good one.
The setup cost is nothing. The licensing is costly due to the fact that, in return, it's giving the best security.
But they are a leader in detecting threat, therefore, it's reasonable that they are a little more expensive than some other competitors. However, customers always want to pay a bit less.
Check Point Harmony is definitely pricier compared to other endpoints.
The solution meets our business needs.
The price is good.
I strongly advise others use Harmony Endpoint as the deployment, integration, and setup cost less than others.
Compared to the cost of other solutions, Check Point Harmony Endpoint is cost effective. The cost is not very cheap, but it's fair. The licensing process is not smooth and can take one to two weeks.
There are three different licensing models including basic, advanced, and complete, and it needs to be selected according to the endpoint. For example, it matters whether it is only required for a Windows endpoint as opposed to providing support for BYOD/Mobile devices.
Initial monies replacing all AVs with a single product is about £10k.
The cost is huge compared to other products that are available on market.
Licensing comes free in that first year or is included in the base package. From a commercial point of view, it really just is the renewal cost, rather than a one-time fixed cost or buy-in. That's for new firewalls. For existing firewalls, we haven't even gotten to that point yet. They don't even want us to look at the pricing. First, we need to think about what the product does. Does it do what it says on the tin? And if it does, then it's a commercial thing. We have quite a good commercial model with Check Point, so we don't really need to worry about that too much. The pricing should be good. The licensing, the way they've changed it, is a positive and a negative. Ultimately, Check Point has changed how it operates and now we have to go back and retrofit.
One of the key factors that made us go with this solution was the pricing. On the licensing part, there was an initial complementary set of licenses offered in the initial onboarding package, either 15 or 20. Then, we had some complementary licenses in the initial purchase of the package. That was pretty useful.
The cost of the solution is similar to other products on the market.
As we grow, we've been given room to add additional licenses in terms of all our endpoints. In terms of licensing, have a buffer zone around your projects in terms of the amount of endpoints that you want to have. You can always have more, but it is best to leave room for a little increase or growth. The solution is too pricey.
Setup costs can be kept to a minimum as Check Point offers Cloud Management which eliminates the need for on-premise hardware cost.
The licensing cost for Check Point is $3 USD or $4 USD per end-user.
I bought them for 12 months and I genuinely cannot remember what I paid for them. I think it's about 100 pounds per user per year, so about 10 pounds a month per person.
We pay roughly 80,000 Swedish krona per year. When it comes to the firewall, it's roughly 150,000 Swedish krona yearly. There's also maintenance, of course, which is roughly 10,000 krona per month.
Our license is on a yearly basis. It just includes the licensing fee.
We pay on an annual basis. There are no additional fees, they mostly tell us what we have to pay. We have budgeted for it.
Check Point offered very good pricing through negotiation. The licensing is done yearly. We have a three-year subscription, including premium, direct support; the Next Generation and SandBlast are for two years. Our cost, including everything, is 18 lakh rupees.
With Check Point Endpoint Security, you can go with the Suite license or you can go with the individual Blade license. I recommend the Full Suite license. Check Point Endpoint Security is not 100% compatible with Kaspersky and Symantec products. You can go only with Endpoint, i.e. you cannot mix with a competitor's solution. It could be a good solution because they have multiple ways to handle the licensing model. If someone requires an encryption license, it is extra and not included in the base license. If you have any intellectual property, then the financial investment will be worth it. If you compare Check Point Endpoint Security to Kaspersky, Kaspersky has two types of suites. One is the Select plan and one is the Advanced plan. If you go with their Advanced plan, then that will collect all of the web confidence reports, many of which vary. Check Point Endpoint Security is easier for the administrator compared to Kaspersky, in terms of alerts and reporting. The admin receives regular reports and each report says how many total Windows versions are there, how many Office instances there are, etc. Each product will have a unique set of advantages and different backgrounds, but when it comes to security, we are happy to go with Check Point Endpoint Security.