"I like the reporting engine, IBM Cognos, especially the analytics. That's a good tool. It's quite strong on the ideation and capacity-planning side, which is a huge plus."
"The timekeeping features are great and very helpful."
"Changepoint gives us a view of the project status and needs very clearly, which are things that we used to miss with MS Project and Excel."
"The feature that we like the most is that JIRA enables modules. Atlassian provides a lot of products around JIRA, such as compliance for the documentation, BitBucket for the Git version. We are new to these products developed by Atlassian, but they can integrate very easily. Generally, when an editor is developing a solution, they think about integrating with JIRA. When we are looking for any other solution, they plan to easily integrate with JIRA."
"The solution is very stable."
"The way to manage cards as a KANBAN, is really easy but when you need to track hundreds of projects, you need to be very clear in which way the things must be completed."
"The most valuable feature is that it fits very well into an agile framework, and it is especially helpful with the planning aspects."
"The documentation is very well done."
"This solution needs more standard connectors to other solutions."
"It would also be nice to see some improvements on the IBM Cognos Analytics. There's still work to be done on the analytics side of things, like your condition formality."
"I find the solution has an excessive amount of features. Many aren't even kept current. Some aren't useful at all. There's an overall lack of coherence within the solution. It can make the execution difficult. Many features can easily be eliminated and it would help streamline the solution. They should get rid of 80% of the features and then really focus on the leftover 20% to make it a really great product."
"n the next version I would like to see better reporting and safer plugins, as well as easier scalability."
"Another thing could be to have an easy way to manage the Portfolio and have more ways to share and to show graphics and reports"
"Converting a task into an epic is very troublesome."
"JIra is very poor at reporting."
"We would love to be able to have direct contact with Atlassian. Currently, they are not working directly with West African countries. We are considering using JIRA Align, but when we contact them, they say that as we are in West Africa, they don't directly work with West Africa."
Earn 20 points
Changepoint Daptiv is ranked 6th in Project Portfolio Management with 6 reviews while JIRA Portfolio is ranked 6th in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools with 5 reviews. Changepoint Daptiv is rated 8.8, while JIRA Portfolio is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Changepoint Daptiv writes "Strong analytics and capacity-planning". On the other hand, the top reviewer of JIRA Portfolio writes "Good documentation, good visualization of tickets, and relatively stable". Changepoint Daptiv is most compared with Broadcom Clarity PPM, Microsoft Project Server, Planview PPM Pro, Planview Enterprise One and SAP Portfolio and Project Management, whereas JIRA Portfolio is most compared with Microsoft Project Server, Planview Enterprise One, Smartsheet, Microsoft Azure DevOps and Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management.
See our list of best Project Management Software vendors.
We monitor all Project Management Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
