Planview Daptiv vs Planview Portfolios comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Planview Daptiv and Planview Portfolios are both solutions in the Project Portfolio Management category. Planview Daptiv is ranked #10 with an average rating of 10.0, while Planview Portfolios is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.5. Planview Daptiv holds a 3.2% mindshare in PPM, compared to Planview Portfolios’s 6.5% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of Planview Daptiv users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Planview Portfolios users who would recommend it.

Planview Daptiv

Read 12 Planview Daptiv reviews

3,322 Views
1,528 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Planview Portfolios

Read 71 Planview Portfolios reviews

9,492 Views
4,082 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Planview Daptiv

Planview Portfolios

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 8, 2026

Planview Portfolios and Planview Daptiv compete in the project management category. Planview Portfolios seems to have the upper hand due to its robust resource management and financial planning features, which are particularly beneficial for large-scale operations.

Features: Planview Portfolios offers comprehensive resource management, financial planning capabilities, and global collaboration tools that enhance organizational efficiency. Data visibility is a key feature, supporting informed decision-making. Planview Daptiv provides flexibility and ease of use with strong customization, a user-friendly platform, and adaptable workflows that integrate smoothly with existing systems.

Room for Improvement: Planview Portfolios could improve its agile features, enhance integration with external tools, and make its interface more intuitive for non-technical users. Planview Daptiv needs better capacity planning and resource allocation features, and users suggest more sophisticated analytics and consistent user interface improvements.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Planview Portfolios offers diverse deployment options such as public, private, on-premises, and hybrid cloud, along with responsive customer support. Some users mention slow response times. Planview Daptiv mainly offers public and private cloud deployments, with positive feedback on its prompt technical support and direct communication with users during deployment.

Pricing and ROI: Planview Portfolios’ pricing is justified by its features, suiting medium to large enterprises. It offers flexible licensing like the FLEX model, contributing to positive ROI through efficient resource management. Planview Daptiv presents competitive pricing with complex structures, offering licensing based on user roles and discounts, achieving ROI through lower setup costs. Both products’ licensing models are flexible, with Planview Portfolios being ideal for organizations seeking robust financial solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed Planview Daptiv vs. Planview Portfolios Report (Updated: November 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Planview Daptiv vs. Planview Portfolios

November 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 921,148 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Planview Daptiv

Ranking in Project Portfolio Management

10th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Planview Portfolios

Ranking in Project Portfolio Management

2nd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Architecture Management (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Project Portfolio Management category, the mindshare of Planview Daptiv is 3.2%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Planview Portfolios is 6.5%, down from 6.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Project Portfolio Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Planview Portfolios	6.5%
Planview Daptiv	3.2%
Other	90.3%

Project Portfolio Management

Featured Reviews

reviewer2068344

Director of Operations at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Useful project management capabilities, beneficial dashboards, but project planning could improve

The areas that should be improved in Planview Daptiv are a subject that can be viewed differently depending on who you ask. I feel they should focus on excelling in one specific area rather than providing average capabilities in many areas. For example, their project planning software is satisfactory but not as advanced as Microsoft Projects. The same goes for the capacity planning tool and reporting capabilities, which can be improved upon by using custom Excel spreadsheets or by hiring a business analyst for additional support. In short, the biggest weakness of Daptiv is that it does not excel in any one area and only provides average performance. In a future release, it would be beneficial to have a undo button.

Read full review

Monabi Kingsley

Project Manager at 3M

Centralized planning has improved resource visibility and supports data‑driven financial decisions

The best features Planview Portfolios offers are visibility enhancement, robust system performance, and comprehensive resource management. This enhanced visibility in Planview Portfolios ensures that all users can easily track progress, identify bottlenecks, and make informed decisions to optimize workflow efficiency. When discussing robust system performance, the system's robust performance in meeting our various work requirements effectively and efficiently stands out. It is very stable and reliable, contributing to a seamless user experience, which enables users to focus on their tasks without disruptions. I also love the financial breakdown, planning and prioritization, and attribute collection on projects in Planview Portfolios. Planview Portfolios has positively impacted my organization since I started using it. It has enabled me to gain insights into the full scope of work consuming resources. I am able to know where the resources are being consumed more, especially which resources are consuming the most. I have been able to leverage resources management and resource time reporting, which enabled the generation of $90 million in annual revenue through labor billing to customers.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Reporting of IT capacity available for first time, time sheets available for first time."

"I like the reporting engine, IBM Cognos, especially the analytics. That's a good tool. It's quite strong on the ideation and capacity-planning side, which is a huge plus."

"It's difficult to pinpoint just one most valuable feature, as there are many features that can be beneficial. For the specific use case of my client's project management office, they found the project management features of the application to be particularly valuable, such as project boards, reporting, and the ability to customize views. Additionally, task management and project scheduling were also highly utilized. However, capacity planning was not used as much as the others, as there was a lack of support from executives to invest in training and implementing it due to a lack of processes in place. The project planning features, dashboard, and reporting capabilities were considered the most valuable."

"Consequently, it is the single point of truth for both our project managers and our senior leadership."

"Daptiv templates give you a world of possibilities, no matter the PMI maturity level the company has."

"Changepoint gives us a view of the project status and needs very clearly, which are things that we used to miss with MS Project and Excel."

"The powerful collaboration is definitely the most valuable and the fact that you can adjust flexibility to almost any methodology, and the easy creation of complete new functionalities without programming code."

"The timekeeping features are great and very helpful."

More Planview Daptiv pros

"Planview Management integrates seamlessly with other tools and systems used within the organization, such as enterprise resource planning (ERP) software, customer relationship management (CRM) systems, and collaboration platforms."

"I have used other PPM tools before, but I found Planview Enterprise to really be the best-in-class for project and portfolio management practices."

"I like that the data that we store is available for everybody. We're not trying to hide anything. Being an administrator, I know a lot about the tool. It is very easy to show somebody how to use the tool and get used to it. Hopefully that user doesn't come back and ask the same question twice is really what it is about. It's a very intuitive product as well. For what we use the tool for today, it's easy to learn and pick up."

"The tool does have the potential to impact our organizational delivery."

"Planview Portfolios has positively impacted my organization since we started using this tool as a project management solution."

"We can easily see which functions are overcapacity. Before, we did not have visibility into that."

"In my opinion, the financial planning feature is the most valuable feature of Planview Enterprise One."

"When it comes to managing project plans, Enterprise One is awesome at enabling us to see what stage work is at."

More Planview Portfolios pros

Cons

"I find the solution has an excessive amount of features. Many aren't even kept current."

"This solution needs more standard connectors to other solutions i.e. to Infor ERP, Confluence, ..."

"Limited unless you purchase additional support hours."

"The areas that should be improved in Planview Daptiv are a subject that can be viewed differently depending on who you ask. I feel they should focus on excelling in one specific area rather than providing average capabilities in many areas. For example, their project planning software is satisfactory but not as advanced as Microsoft Projects. The same goes for the capacity planning tool and reporting capabilities, which can be improved upon by using custom Excel spreadsheets or by hiring a business analyst for additional support. In short, the biggest weakness of Daptiv is that it does not excel in any one area and only provides average performance."

"I would say there is too much work that has to go into the configuration up front and for the first 6 months to 1 year after, which costs time, money, and resources, and it is not a very advanced tool and seems interface-wise to be behind the times."

"Expense management, simulation scenarios, and budget control could be great and useful features to include."

"The user interface is quirky and does not always conform to the expected Microsoft UI standards."

"The previous solution that we were using was Projector PSA; it was overall a superior product."

More Planview Daptiv cons

"The outcome management and work resource management in terms of teams needs improvement. Team handling, how team requirements are generated, and how the resource managers can work with teams needs to be improved."

"Customer service is hit and miss. Most of their support team will not respond to requests for real-time conversations and the gap in email responses drags what turn out to be simple solutions into days-long aggravations."

"The financial piece of the tool could be better. While it may have to do with the complexity of the work that we do, it seems that the tool should be able to drill down a bit deeper into the financial area."

"Its view into RCCP and availability does not at all help us to manage resources; it is one of the worst features of Enterprise One where everybody in our company hates the tool and are sort of forced to use it for RCCP, some teams have moved to use other tools for the same and use E1 as recording tool only."

"Its ability to create summary reports across multiple projects is very limited."

"Its support to legacy paying customers is something PlanView is not handling well. We were unable to implement due to lack of professional support by PlanView. "

"It would be great to see Planview incorporate agile interfacing/methods in it. Like CA Clarity and other leading PPM tools – Planview should enhance or develop the interfaces to ingrate with other market leading Agile tools."

"The technical support is a little overworked. At least, they have been in the past year. We need them to focus on somethings from time to time. You can tell that they're really focusing on many things. It has gotten better, but I think they could still use some relief."

More Planview Portfolios cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's a yearly license, but it's not an open license. It's based on users and their roles. So your administrator is priced differently from your timesheet user."

"The licensing is pretty complex. Each kind of user is a different price. It's approximately $300 per year. They charge additional fees for technical support and other additional services."

"We have several hundred licenses. It costs us several hundred thousand dollars a year."

"We have unlimited licenses for all of our functionalities. Since we went global, we went with that model."

"Our licensing fees are approximately $50,000 USD annually."

"Our licensing costs are about a quarter of a million dollars per year."

"With the costs, they were very understanding. Knowing that we were an existing customer, they were very much willing to work with us to make sure that we were able to transition to Enterprise One from PPM Pro."

"Our licensing costs are probably $150,000 to $180,000 a year with 270 licenses total."

"The licensing part is a bit costly in comparison with the other available PPM tools."

"We are on the Flex licenses."

More Planview Portfolios pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Portfolio Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

921,148 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

18%

Construction Company

13%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Construction Company

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	66

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Planview Portfolios?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing has been that Planview Portfolios is one of the best and a very cost-effective tool.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Planview Portfolios?

Planview Portfolios can be improved as the user interface defaults to the last opened portfolio, which can waste a lot of time loading a large portfolio if that is not what I need at that moment. J...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Planview Portfolios?

My main use case for Planview Portfolios is to ensure governance and decision auditability by incorporating embedded workflows, approval management, and key document retention supporting a single c...

See all answers

Comparisons

Broadcom Clarity vs Planview Daptiv

Compared 10% of the time

Jira vs Planview Daptiv

Compared 9% of the time

Wrike vs Planview Daptiv

Compared 8% of the time

Planview PPM Pro vs Planview Daptiv

Compared 5% of the time

Microsoft Project Server vs Planview Daptiv

Compared 3% of the time

More Planview Daptiv Competitors

Broadcom Clarity vs Planview Portfolios

Compared 8% of the time

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management vs Planview Portfolios

Compared 5% of the time

Microsoft Project Server vs Planview Portfolios

Compared 5% of the time

Planview PPM Pro vs Planview Portfolios

Compared 3% of the time

MEGA HOPEX vs Planview Portfolios

Compared 3% of the time

More Planview Portfolios Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Planview Daptiv

October 2026

Download Planview Daptiv product report

Buyer's Guide

Planview Portfolios

October 2026

Download Planview Portfolios product report

Also Known As

No data available

Planview Enterprise One, Troux

Overview

Planview Daptiv offers robust project management capabilities with a focus on resource allocation, capacity planning, and collaboration.

Planview Daptiv is known for its excellent reporting, flexibility, and no-code functionalities. It includes beneficial portfolio views and comprehensive dashboards while integrating with IBM Cognos for enhanced analytics. The platform's timekeeping feature efficiently records billable hours, and its project boards and task management add significant value. However, improvements are needed in areas like expense management and resource allocation. Some users encounter complex and outdated features. Enhanced security measures, better integrations with tools like ITFM, and improved analytics would boost its utility.

What are the standout features of Planview Daptiv?

Resource Allocation: Efficiently manage and allocate resources across projects.
Capacity Planning: Support project planning and execution with effective capacity planning tools.
Collaboration: Enhance team collaboration through powerful integrated tools.
Reporting: Utilize excellent reporting capabilities for comprehensive insights.
No-code Functionality: Easily create features without special coding skills.

What benefits should users focus on in reviews?

Improved Project Oversight: Centralize project management across multiple scenarios.
Increased Productivity: Streamlined timekeeping and task management processes.
Enhanced Analytics: Benefit from advanced analytics with IBM Cognos integration.
Optimized Resource Use: Make informed decisions with resource allocation and capacity planning.

Organizations use Planview Daptiv in IT and construction projects, multi-project oversight, and comprehensive tracking. Consultancy firms employ it for PSA activities, aiding in the implementation process. It supports new project management offices post-merger for technical tasks, similar to Jira.

Planview

Planview Portfolios empowers executives, finance, and portfolio leaders by enhancing strategic investments, improving market responsiveness, and connecting strategy and execution for optimal visibility.

Planview Portfolios offers comprehensive strategic and project portfolio management to organizations. Automating and scaling these processes, it enhances speed-to-value, aligns strategic objectives with execution, and connects business and technology planning for optimal funding and resource capacity. Users gain end-to-end visibility, track progress, and improve decision-making by utilizing integrated financial and capacity planning.

What key features does Planview Portfolios offer?

Strategic Alignment: Aligns objectives and OKRs with execution to ensure strategic goals are met.
End-to-End Visibility: Tracks performance across the organization to support timely decision-making.
Dynamic Planning and Funding: Utilizes scenario modeling for flexible strategic investment funding.
Flexible Capacity Planning: Balances programs and staffing levels against available capacity.
Connected Technology Strategy: Aligns technology investments with strategic digital initiatives.
Adaptive Program Management: Manages dependencies, risk, and progress through integrated planning.

What benefits can users find in reviews of Planview Portfolios?

Workflow Efficiency: Enhances efficiency by minimizing bottlenecks and optimizing execution.
Improved Decision-Making: Provides comprehensive insights for better informed strategic decisions.
Financial Insights: Offers detailed financial tracking across projects for greater transparency.
Organizational Agility: Increases productivity and adaptability through a unified platform.

Planview Portfolios is implemented across projects in industries requiring strategic planning, resource allocation, and financial tracking. Organizations manage project lifecycle and integration with ERP systems on a centralized platform, utilizing customizable workflows and reporting tools to enhance efficiency and streamline team processes.

Planview

Sample Customers

AOS Studley, Austrian Airlines, bpost bank, Employees Provident Fund, Stena Metall, VitalityHealth, Precor

UPS, NatWest, Ingram Micro, Canadian Tire, Viessmann, Volvo, NASCO, UNESCO

Buyer's Guide

Planview Daptiv vs. Planview Portfolios

November 2026

Free Report: Planview Daptiv vs. Planview Portfolios

Find out what your peers are saying about Planview Daptiv vs. Planview Portfolios and other solutions. Updated: November 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

921,148 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Planview Daptiv vs. Planview Portfolios report.

See our list of best Project Portfolio Management vendors and best Project Portfolio Management vendors.

We monitor all Project Portfolio Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.