

Catchpoint and InfluxDB are competing products in the monitoring and database solutions category. Catchpoint has the upper hand in extensive analytics for broader monitoring needs, while InfluxDB stands out with its scalability and ease of use for time-series data.
Features: Catchpoint's standout features include synthetic and real-user monitoring, advanced analytics, and extensive integrations with existing systems. InfluxDB's features involve high-performance analytics, scalability for handling extensive data, and simplified time-series database management.
Room for Improvement: Catchpoint could improve by reducing its learning curve, simplifying initial setup processes, and offering better cost management for startups. InfluxDB could enhance its analytics suite, expand integration possibilities, and offer more specialized support services for enterprise-level needs.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Catchpoint's deployment involves versatile integration options but may require complex configurations, while InfluxDB is simpler to deploy with robust community support, focusing effectively on time-series data.
Pricing and ROI: Catchpoint's initial setup cost can be higher due to its comprehensive features, but it offers significant ROI for performance-centric businesses. InfluxDB provides an affordable entry point, particularly beneficial for startups or smaller enterprises seeking scalable time-series data solutions, with potentially high ROI.
There have been fewer outages, and it is very easy to identify the issue of performance bottleneck through root cause analysis and insights.
Real-time monitoring of networks, websites, and apps gives insightful information which helps to make data-driven decisions.
We have seen a return on investment as we have fewer outages.
These improvements translated into both cost savings and better service reliability, directly impacting business outcomes.
It simplifies processes and reduces the need for additional employees.
InfluxDB reduced my time to show data without any interruption, also reducing the number of people needed to manage the project; it is very good to have InfluxDB in my project.
Catchpoint customer support is very helpful and proactive.
The customer support is always very friendly and responsive and always available twenty-four hours per day, seven days a week.
Customer support is available 24/7 and very proactive and responsive.
They get on a call, resolve issues, and handle everything efficiently.
The InfluxDB support team was knowledgeable and helped us troubleshoot complex problems efficiently.
Obtaining that quantity of data directly from InfluxDB is quite challenging, and that is why we ask for help from the InfluxDB team to retrieve the data to avoid timeouts and those kinds of issues.
Catchpoint's scalability is great as it grows with my organization's needs and can handle those needs very well.
The main challenge with InfluxDB, which is common with all databases, was handling very high throughput systems and high throughput message flow.
It can handle large volumes of time-series data and with high ingestion rates, making it suitable for enterprise-scale deployments.
We’ve scaled on volume with seven years of continuous data without performance degradation.
Catchpoint is stable as I have not experienced any lagging.
It serves as the backbone of our application, and its stability is crucial.
We have used it to support mission-critical systems with continuous data ingestion and real-time analytics.
It is very stable, with no reliability or downtime in InfluxDB.
If we could receive similar data for the China market as we do for North America and Asia Pacific, this would be helpful.
Dashboard customization and UX should be improved.
I would also add that the script recorder needs some work due to an update by Google, deprecating the use of the current solution.
InfluxDB deprecated FluxQL, which was intuitive since developers are already familiar with standard querying.
Having a SQL abstraction in InfluxDB could be beneficial, making it more accessible for teams that prefer querying with SQL-style syntax.
It could include automated backup and a monitoring solution for InfluxDB or a script developed by a REST API.
The cost is very effective and relatively competitive.
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that the cost was very cost-effective and affordable.
Catchpoint's price is very cost-effective, but I don't know if it might be out of budget for a smaller organization working on a tight budget.
We use the open-source version of InfluxDB, so it is free.
I find the cloud version pricing of InfluxDB reasonable, and for the on-premises solution we use in our service, we need to purchase licenses.
Pricing is based on data volume, retention, and features, which really makes it scalable but requires careful planning to avoid unexpected costs.
Synthetic monitoring and root cause analysis have helped my team by allowing root cause monitoring to help us understand where the threat is coming from, enabling us to catch the threat before it impacts our users.
The reduction in outages is notable, with a 60 to 70% increase in outages reduction.
With the help of Catchpoint, we are able to address issues before our customers. Our triage time has reduced. We are able to reduce outages and unwanted user incidents.
The most important feature for us is low latency, which is crucial in building a high-performance engine for day trading.
InfluxDB’s core functionality is crucial as it allows us to store our data and execute queries with excellent response times.
It helps me maintain my solution easily because it is very reliable, so we didn't face any performance issues or crashes regarding our queries; we can get the results very fast.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| InfluxDB | 0.3% |
| Catchpoint | 0.5% |
| Other | 99.2% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 5 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 12 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 8 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 8 |
Catchpoint is the Internet Resilience Company™. The top online retailers, Global2000, CDNs, cloud service providers, and xSPs in the world rely on Catchpoint to increase their resilience by catching any issues in the Internet Stack before they impact their business. Catchpoint’s Internet Performance Monitoring (IPM) suite offers synthetics, RUM, performance optimization, high fidelity data and flexible visualizations with advanced analytics. It leverages thousands of global vantage points (including inside wireless networks, BGP, backbone, last mile, endpoint, enterprise, ISPs, and more) to provide unparalleled observability into anything that impacts your customers, workforce, networks, website performance, applications, and APIs.
Learn more at: https://www.catchpoint.com/
InfluxDB is open-source software that helps developers and enterprises alike to collect, store, process, and visualize time series data and to build next-generation applications. InfluxDB provides monitoring and insight on IoT, application, system, container, and infrastructure quickly and easily without complexities or compromises in scale, speed, or productivity.
InfluxDB has become a popular insight system for unified metrics and events enabling the most demanding SLAs. InfluxDB is used in just about every type of industry across a wide range of use cases, including network monitoring, IoT monitoring, industrial IoT, and infrastructure and application monitoring.
InfluxDB offers its users:
InfluxDB Benefits
There are several benefits to using InfluxDB . Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:
Reviews from Real Users
InfluxDB stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Two major ones are its flexible integration options and its data aggregation feature.
Shalauddin Ahamad S., a software engineer at a tech services company, notes, “The most valuable features are aggregating the data and the integration with Grafana for monitoring.”
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.