BrowserStack vs Parasoft SOAtest comparison

BrowserStack and Parasoft are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. BrowserStack is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.0, while Parasoft is ranked #19 with an average rating of 9.0. BrowserStack holds a 10.7% mindshare in FT, compared to Parasoft’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of BrowserStack users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of Parasoft users who would recommend it.

BrowserStack

Read 26 BrowserStack reviews

5,517 Views
5,131 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Parasoft SOAtest

Read 32 Parasoft SOAtest reviews

1,955 Views
489 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

BrowserStack

Parasoft SOAtest

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Parasoft SOAtest and BrowserStack compete in the testing tools category. Parasoft SOAtest seems to have the upper hand for API and web services testing, while BrowserStack leads in cross-browser testing capabilities.

Features: Parasoft SOAtest provides robust end-to-end testing tools for API and web services, extensive scripting support in multiple languages, and comprehensive regression controls. BrowserStack offers unparalleled device and platform variety, cross-browser compatibility testing, and parallel testing capabilities that include geographical and bandwidth simulation features.

Room for Improvement: Parasoft SOAtest could improve its XML scripting processes, memory management, and make reports more descriptive. BrowserStack users suggest enhancements in connectivity, platform integration, and pricing adjustments to enhance competitiveness.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Parasoft SOAtest supports on-premises and hybrid deployment models with reliable customer support, despite some regional variations. BrowserStack is predominantly cloud-based with flexible deployment options and is generally well-supported, though some issues with connectivity and support responsiveness are noted.

Pricing and ROI: Parasoft SOAtest's high pricing is often seen as justified by its advanced features and ROI, though it could benefit from simpler licensing. BrowserStack, though costly, is considered cost-effective compared to competitors and could benefit from more competitive pricing models.

To learn more, read our detailed BrowserStack vs. Parasoft SOAtest Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

BrowserStack vs. Parasoft SOAtest

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BrowserStack

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AI-Augmented Software-Testing Tools (1st)

Parasoft SOAtest

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

19th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (19th), API Testing Tools (10th), Test Automation Tools (16th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of BrowserStack is 10.7%, down from 11.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Parasoft SOAtest is 0.8%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

ANand Kale

Sr Practice Lead - Business and Experience Transformation at Peristent Systems

Good in the area of automation and offers a high test coverage to users

I integrated BrowserStack into our company's web and application test workflows because it has plugins that work with browsers and applications, allowing for cross-browser testing. BrowserStack was really helpful for cross-browser testing in areas involving mobiles, web applications, or tablets. The tool can help with the testing across all applications. I have not experienced any time-saving feature from the use of the tool. My company uses the product for real-device testing since it has a bunch of devices in our library. My company has a repository where we do manual testing. BrowserStack improved the quality of our company's applications. Improvements I have seen with the testing part revolve around the fact that it is able to do testing at a fast pace. The quality of the product is better since it can go through all the parts of the applications, meaning it can provide high test coverage. The tool is also good in the area of automation. The test coverage is higher, and the time taken during the testing phase is less due to automation. I have not used the product's integration capabilities since my company doesn't have the option to look at other QA testing tools like Selenium, which can be used for the automation capabilities provided. The product should offer more support for cross-browser testing, device testing, and testing across multiple devices. I rate the tool an eight out of ten.

Read full review

Nghiêm Phương

CEO at SMOne

Quality and security improvements drive user satisfaction

We have many customers, but with Parasoft SOAtest, we just focus on .NET, Java, and PHP protocols and message formats. For deployment, it runs on-premise with Parasoft SOAtest. The transition from manual testing can be challenging, and it's the first time they're using automation testing with Parasoft SOAtest. For the tool itself, Parasoft SOAtest, I would rate it as great with an overall rating of 10 out of 10.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product's initial setup phase was not very difficult."

"We like the model device factory for iOS and Android devices."

"The most valuable feature is the variety the solution offers around the different types of devices, especially mobile devices."

"The setup was quite simple. The website easily explains how to set it up and if you want to integrate it with BMP tools there are online simple step tutorials."

"Local testing for products with no public exposure is an advantage in development."

"The main core concept behind this product is, it takes the overhead of maintaining all of your devices or particular computers. It continuously adds the latest devices that are coming into the market."

"I like that it offers full device capability."

"The integration is very good."

More BrowserStack pros

"We do a lot of web services testing and REST services testing. That is the focus of this product."

"We can automate our scenarios in a data driven format, which shows there is no rework on scripts. We only need to update the test data and run for a number of scenarios."

"Generating new messages, based on the existing .EDN and .XML messages, is a crucial part or the testing project that I’m currently in."

"Every imaginable source in the entire world of information technology can be accessed and used."

"The testing time is shortened because we generate test data automatically with SOAtest."

"Technical support is helpful."

"Automatic testing is the most valuable feature."

"We have seen a return on investment."

More Parasoft SOAtest pros

Cons

"I would like for there to be more integration with BrowserStack and other platforms."

"We are having difficulty with the payment system for the BrowserStack team, as they only accept credit cards and we are encountering some issues."

"BrowserStack should work on its Internet connectivity although issues only occur occasionally."

"BrowserStack is very expensive and they keep increasing their cost, which is absolutely ridiculous, especially when someone like LambdaTest is coming through for literal thousands of dollars less, with the same services."

"Sometimes BrowserStack is really slow and devices are not loading. it is really annoying and that's why we bought several newer devices because sometimes it's affecting us a lot."

"Adding better integration with frameworks, particularly testing frameworks like Robot, would be of more value to customers and make their jobs easier."

"We are struggling to do local testing."

"I haven't seen AI in BrowserStack, making it in an area where improvements are required in the product."

More BrowserStack cons

"In terms of improvements for Parasoft SOAtest, some features could be added or perhaps existing areas could be improved, such as lowering prices."

"Compatibility with HTTP 1.1 and TLS 1.2 needs to be improved."

"One area that could use improvement is the cryptography capabilities in Parasoft SOAtest. It did not support enough of the protocols or cryptography formats we needed, which led us to create our own solutions."

"The summary reports could be improved."

"From an automation point of view, it should have better clarity and be more user friendly."

"Enabling/disabling an optional element of an XML request is only possible if a data source (e.g., Excel sheet) is connected to the test. Otherwise, the option is not available at all in the drop-down menu."

"UI testing should be more in-depth."

"Reports could be customized and more descriptive according to the user's or company's requirements."

More Parasoft SOAtest cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of BrowserStack is high."

"This solution costs less than competing products."

"As for pricing, I can't provide a clear evaluation as I'm not directly involved in those discussions."

"BrowserStack could have a better price, but good things have a price."

"Compared to other solutions, BrowserStack is one of the cheapest."

"My company found the product's license to be very compatible with our budget, and we pay 5,000 to 10,000 per year for licenses."

"There are different licenses available that can be customized. You can select the features that you want only to use which can be a cost-benefit."

"The price is fine."

"We are completed satisfied with Parasoft SOAtest. The ROI is more than 95%."

"I think it would be a great step to decrease the price of the licenses."

"The cost of Parasoft seems to have gotten higher with a projection that wasn't really stipulated for our company. They've done a tremendous job at negotiating those deals."

"The price is around $5,000 USD."

"From what I understand, Parasoft SOAtest isn't the cheapest option. But it has a lot to offer."

"The license price is a little expensive, but it provides a better outcome in terms of the end-to-end automation process."

"They do have a confusing licensing structure."

"It is an expensive product, so think carefully about whether it fits your purposes and is the right tool for you."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

University

Financial Services Firm

21%

Manufacturing Company

17%

Computer Software Company

10%

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about BrowserStack?

The product's initial setup phase was not very difficult.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for BrowserStack?

My company found the product's license to be very compatible with our budget, and we pay 5,000 to 10,000 per year for licenses.

See all answers

What needs improvement with BrowserStack?

In terms of improvements, they can make it snappier. Everything kind of works. They have locked down the phones, which is problematic because there are some test cases that require access to things...

See all answers

What do you like most about Parasoft SOAtest?

Since the solution has both command line and automation options, it generates good reports.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Parasoft SOAtest?

Parasoft SOAtest is expensive, but it was acquired because the company was dissatisfied with Quick Test Pro. The new management does not want subscription tools around, aiming for scripted tests us...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Parasoft SOAtest?

In terms of improvements for Parasoft SOAtest, some features could be added or perhaps existing areas could be improved, such as lowering prices.

See all answers

Comparisons

LambdaTest vs BrowserStack

Compared 34% of the time

Sauce Labs vs BrowserStack

Compared 23% of the time

Perfecto vs BrowserStack

Compared 16% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs BrowserStack

Compared 4% of the time

CrossBrowserTesting vs BrowserStack

Compared 4% of the time

More BrowserStack Competitors

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 21% of the time

Postman Enterprise vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 20% of the time

Coverity vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 12% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 11% of the time

Polyspace Code Prover vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 8% of the time

More Parasoft SOAtest Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

BrowserStack

August 2025

Download BrowserStack product report

Buyer's Guide

Parasoft SOAtest

August 2025

Download Parasoft SOAtest product report

Also Known As

No data available

SOAtest

Overview

BrowserStack is a cloud-based cross-browser testing tool that enables developers to test their websites across various browserson different operating systems and mobile devices, without requiring users to install virtual machines, devices or emulators.

BrowserStack

Parasoft SOAtest delivers fully integrated API and web service testing capabilities that automate end-to-end functional API testing. Streamline automated testing with advanced codeless test creation for applications with multiple interfaces (REST & SOAP APIs, microservices, databases, and more).

SOAtest reduces the risk of security breaches and performance outages by transforming functional testing artifacts into security and load equivalents. Such reuse, along with continuous monitoring of APIs for change, allows faster and more efficient testing.

Parasoft

Sample Customers

Microsoft, RBS, jQuery, Expedia, Citrix, AIG

Charter Communications, Sabre, Caesars Entertainment, Charles Schwab, ING, Intel, Northbridge Financial, Capital Services, WoodmenLife

Buyer's Guide

BrowserStack vs. Parasoft SOAtest

July 2025

Free Report: BrowserStack vs. Parasoft SOAtest

Find out what your peers are saying about BrowserStack vs. Parasoft SOAtest and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our BrowserStack vs. Parasoft SOAtest report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.