BrowserStack vs Parasoft SOAtest comparison

BrowserStack and Parasoft are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. BrowserStack is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.3, while Parasoft is ranked #20 with an average rating of 8.0. BrowserStack holds a 10.4% mindshare in FT, compared to Parasoft’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of BrowserStack users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of Parasoft users who would recommend it.

BrowserStack

Read 25 BrowserStack reviews

5,813 Views
4,866 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Parasoft SOAtest

Read 31 Parasoft SOAtest reviews

540 Views
336 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

BrowserStack

Parasoft SOAtest

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Parasoft SOAtest and BrowserStack compete in the testing tools category. Parasoft SOAtest seems to have the upper hand for API and web services testing, while BrowserStack leads in cross-browser testing capabilities.

Features: Parasoft SOAtest provides robust end-to-end testing tools for API and web services, extensive scripting support in multiple languages, and comprehensive regression controls. BrowserStack offers unparalleled device and platform variety, cross-browser compatibility testing, and parallel testing capabilities that include geographical and bandwidth simulation features.

Room for Improvement: Parasoft SOAtest could improve its XML scripting processes, memory management, and make reports more descriptive. BrowserStack users suggest enhancements in connectivity, platform integration, and pricing adjustments to enhance competitiveness.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Parasoft SOAtest supports on-premises and hybrid deployment models with reliable customer support, despite some regional variations. BrowserStack is predominantly cloud-based with flexible deployment options and is generally well-supported, though some issues with connectivity and support responsiveness are noted.

Pricing and ROI: Parasoft SOAtest's high pricing is often seen as justified by its advanced features and ROI, though it could benefit from simpler licensing. BrowserStack, though costly, is considered cost-effective compared to competitors and could benefit from more competitive pricing models.

To learn more, read our detailed BrowserStack vs. Parasoft SOAtest Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

BrowserStack vs. Parasoft SOAtest

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BrowserStack

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AI-Augmented Software-Testing Tools (1st)

Parasoft SOAtest

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

20th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (28th), API Testing Tools (11th), Test Automation Tools (21st)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of BrowserStack is 10.4%, down from 10.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Parasoft SOAtest is 0.7%, down from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

ANand Kale

Sr Practice Lead - Business and Experience Transformation at Peristent Systems

Good in the area of automation and offers a high test coverage to users

I integrated BrowserStack into our company's web and application test workflows because it has plugins that work with browsers and applications, allowing for cross-browser testing. BrowserStack was really helpful for cross-browser testing in areas involving mobiles, web applications, or tablets. The tool can help with the testing across all applications. I have not experienced any time-saving feature from the use of the tool. My company uses the product for real-device testing since it has a bunch of devices in our library. My company has a repository where we do manual testing. BrowserStack improved the quality of our company's applications. Improvements I have seen with the testing part revolve around the fact that it is able to do testing at a fast pace. The quality of the product is better since it can go through all the parts of the applications, meaning it can provide high test coverage. The tool is also good in the area of automation. The test coverage is higher, and the time taken during the testing phase is less due to automation. I have not used the product's integration capabilities since my company doesn't have the option to look at other QA testing tools like Selenium, which can be used for the automation capabilities provided. The product should offer more support for cross-browser testing, device testing, and testing across multiple devices. I rate the tool an eight out of ten.

Read full review

Ajit Kumar Rout

Sr Quality Assurance Engineer at Wabtec Industrial

Good API testing and RIT feature; clarity could be improved

In general, this is a hassle free, user friendly tool and it doesn't require much knowledge if you're using the manual testing. Automated testing is also good but requires some knowledge in that field. It has some great features. It's a good tool compared to some of the other paid tools; input and output can be stored before extension and there is also a verification assessment that can be implemented by using some different methodologies inside the tool. If the licensing cost is suitable then I recommend this solution. If you have automation people with in-depth knowledge in coding that will be helpful. I rate this solution a seven out of 10.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I've worked on testing integrations with BrowserStack, particularly with a platform called IT. This involves testing the registration process, including receiving verification codes on devices and phones. BrowserStack has been excellent for testing these integrations, providing a seamless workflow development experience."

"BrowserStack has lots of devices to choose from."

"The speed of the solution and its performance are valuable."

"The setup was quite simple. The website easily explains how to set it up and if you want to integrate it with BMP tools there are online simple step tutorials."

"The integration is very good."

"We like the model device factory for iOS and Android devices."

"Local testing for products with no public exposure is an advantage in development."

"BrowserStack's best feature is browser testing across different platforms, including mobile."

More BrowserStack pros

"Every imaginable source in the entire world of information technology can be accessed and used."

"Good write and read files which save execution inputs and outputs and can be stored locally."

"Generating new messages, based on the existing .EDN and .XML messages, is a crucial part or the testing project that I’m currently in."

"One of the most valuable features I found in Parasoft SOAtest is its ability to extend the product."

"If you want something that’s not provided out of the box, then you can write it yourself and integrate it with SOAtest."

"We can automate our scenarios in a data driven format, which shows there is no rework on scripts. We only need to update the test data and run for a number of scenarios."

"Since the solution has both command line and automation options, it generates good reports."

"The testing time is shortened because we generate test data automatically with SOAtest."

More Parasoft SOAtest pros

Cons

"We had some execution issues."

"Sometimes BrowserStack is really slow and devices are not loading. it is really annoying and that's why we bought several newer devices because sometimes it's affecting us a lot."

"If you are inactive for 30 minutes, the solution will close."

"Adding better integration with frameworks, particularly testing frameworks like Robot, would be of more value to customers and make their jobs easier."

"I would like for there to be more integration with BrowserStack and other platforms."

"There is room for improvement in pricing."

"It is difficult to use for someone who has little to no experience."

"I haven't seen AI in BrowserStack, making it in an area where improvements are required in the product."

More BrowserStack cons

"UI testing should be more in-depth."

"Reports could be customized and more descriptive according to the user's or company's requirements."

"The performance could be a bit better."

"Compatibility with HTTP 1.1 and TLS 1.2 needs to be improved."

"Enabling/disabling an optional element of an XML request is only possible if a data source (e.g., Excel sheet) is connected to the test. Otherwise, the option is not available at all in the drop-down menu."

"During the process of working with SOAtest and building test cases, the .TST files will grow. A negative side effect is that saving your changes takes more time."

"Reporting facilities can be better."

"Parasoft SOAtest has an internal refresh function where you can refresh the software to show the changes you’ve made in your projects. Unfortunately this function does not work properly, because it often does not show the changes after you’ve hit te refresh button a few times."

More Parasoft SOAtest cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"BrowserStack could have a better price, but good things have a price."

"The price is fine."

"Compared to other solutions, BrowserStack is one of the cheapest."

"As for pricing, I can't provide a clear evaluation as I'm not directly involved in those discussions."

"My company found the product's license to be very compatible with our budget, and we pay 5,000 to 10,000 per year for licenses."

"The price of BrowserStack is high."

"This solution costs less than competing products."

"There are different licenses available that can be customized. You can select the features that you want only to use which can be a cost-benefit."

"The cost of Parasoft seems to have gotten higher with a projection that wasn't really stipulated for our company. They've done a tremendous job at negotiating those deals."

"From what I understand, Parasoft SOAtest isn't the cheapest option. But it has a lot to offer."

"I think it would be a great step to decrease the price of the licenses."

"The license price is a little expensive, but it provides a better outcome in terms of the end-to-end automation process."

"They do have a confusing licensing structure."

"We are completed satisfied with Parasoft SOAtest. The ROI is more than 95%."

"It is an expensive product, so think carefully about whether it fits your purposes and is the right tool for you."

"The price is around $5,000 USD."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

Financial Services Firm

24%

Manufacturing Company

16%

Computer Software Company

11%

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about BrowserStack?

The product's initial setup phase was not very difficult.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for BrowserStack?

My company found the product's license to be very compatible with our budget, and we pay 5,000 to 10,000 per year for licenses.

See all answers

What needs improvement with BrowserStack?

I haven't seen AI in BrowserStack, making it in an area where improvements are required in the product. Accessibility testing is an area of concern where improvements are required.

See all answers

What do you like most about Parasoft SOAtest?

Since the solution has both command line and automation options, it generates good reports.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Parasoft SOAtest?

Parasoft SOAtest is expensive, but it was acquired because the company was dissatisfied with Quick Test Pro. The new management does not want subscription tools around, aiming for scripted tests us...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Parasoft SOAtest?

One area that could use improvement is the cryptography capabilities in Parasoft SOAtest. It did not support enough of the protocols or cryptography formats we needed, which led us to create our ow...

See all answers

Comparisons

LambdaTest vs BrowserStack

Compared 33% of the time

Sauce Labs vs BrowserStack

Compared 23% of the time

Perfecto vs BrowserStack

Compared 18% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs BrowserStack

Compared 5% of the time

CrossBrowserTesting vs BrowserStack

Compared 4% of the time

More BrowserStack Competitors

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 23% of the time

Postman vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 21% of the time

Coverity vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 13% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 8% of the time

ReadyAPI vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 8% of the time

More Parasoft SOAtest Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

BrowserStack

April 2025

Download BrowserStack product report

Buyer's Guide

Parasoft SOAtest

April 2025

Download Parasoft SOAtest product report

Also Known As

No data available

SOAtest

Overview

BrowserStack is a cloud-based cross-browser testing tool that enables developers to test their websites across various browserson different operating systems and mobile devices, without requiring users to install virtual machines, devices or emulators.

BrowserStack

Parasoft SOAtest delivers fully integrated API and web service testing capabilities that automate end-to-end functional API testing. Streamline automated testing with advanced codeless test creation for applications with multiple interfaces (REST & SOAP APIs, microservices, databases, and more).

SOAtest reduces the risk of security breaches and performance outages by transforming functional testing artifacts into security and load equivalents. Such reuse, along with continuous monitoring of APIs for change, allows faster and more efficient testing.

Parasoft

Sample Customers

Microsoft, RBS, jQuery, Expedia, Citrix, AIG

Charter Communications, Sabre, Caesars Entertainment, Charles Schwab, ING, Intel, Northbridge Financial, Capital Services, WoodmenLife

Buyer's Guide

BrowserStack vs. Parasoft SOAtest

April 2025

Free Report: BrowserStack vs. Parasoft SOAtest

Find out what your peers are saying about BrowserStack vs. Parasoft SOAtest and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our BrowserStack vs. Parasoft SOAtest report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.