Parasoft SOAtest and Postman Enterprise are both leaders in the API testing solutions category. Parasoft SOAtest holds an advantage in comprehensive testing capabilities suitable for complex scenarios, while Postman excels in ease of use and accessibility.
Features: Parasoft SOAtest is recognized for automated and data-driven testing, robust scripting capabilities, and extensive protocol support, making it ideal for handling complex workflows. It provides versatile language support and a wide array of data sources. Postman is lauded for its straightforward API testing process, intuitive interface, and extensive collection and environment management features, allowing seamless team collaboration and easy execution of tests.
Room for Improvement: Parasoft SOAtest users have highlighted the need for a more user-friendly interface, less clutter, and improved integration with test management tools, as well as enhanced report customization. Postman could improve in simplifying its user interface further, expand documentation, and offer richer API testing capabilities. Besides better integration with other tools, users also desire comprehensive tutorials for onboarding new users effectively.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Parasoft SOAtest primarily focuses on on-premises deployment and experiences variable customer service ratings based on the region. Postman offers versatile deployment in public and private clouds and is appreciated for its open-source model and community support. Both tools have generally well-received customer service, with Postman benefiting significantly from a strong user community for additional support.
Pricing and ROI: Parasoft SOAtest is considered an expensive tool with complex licensing, offering high return on investment when fully utilized, though budget concerns are notable. Postman, with its free version and cost-effective enterprise offerings, provides excellent value for businesses requiring robust API testing solutions. It presents a viable option for enterprises seeking a balance between affordability and functionality.
We found Parasoft SOAtest to be quick in building up test patterns, allowing us to create complex tests efficiently.
A minimum of 50% time is saved when comparing manual to automation.
I appreciate the ease of using Postman, especially its desktop version, due to the features it offers such as cookie management and environment synchronization.
There is a lot of support available through forums and user groups, which has been sufficient for me.
Postman does not have database validation available, which affects its scalability.
This solution is scalable.
I rate it ten out of ten for stability.
I have not experienced any issues or downtimes.
The tool is generally stable.
It did not support enough of the protocols or cryptography formats we needed, which led us to create our own solutions.
In terms of improvements for Parasoft SOAtest, some features could be added or perhaps existing areas could be improved, such as lowering prices.
Maybe Postman can be a good contender and replicate some features such as more scripting and control over API calls.
One of the primary challenges with Postman is handling authentication issues, especially relating to tokens and passwords.
These limitations are less restrictive compared to Swagger, which has more severe limitations when used with web navigation.
Parasoft SOAtest is expensive, but it was acquired because the company was dissatisfied with Quick Test Pro.
Postman is much cheaper than the other tools.
Postman is open-source, so the cost is minimal compared to commercial platforms.
Postman's pricing model includes a basic free version, which is favorable given the Professional enterprise options offered.
Parasoft SOAtest is very good at ensuring tests don't pass or fail until they genuinely pass or fail.
Parasoft SOAtest improves the quality of the application, increases security and security compliance, and it is a cost-effective tool.
It's easy to navigate because tons of documentation and examples are available.
Postman's collaboration tools, such as version control and team workspaces, are particularly useful when working with teams of three to four people.
The desktop version's features like cookie management, environment compatibility, security settings, proxy integration, and data synchronization add significant value.
Parasoft SOAtest delivers fully integrated API and web service testing capabilities that automate end-to-end functional API testing. Streamline automated testing with advanced codeless test creation for applications with multiple interfaces (REST & SOAP APIs, microservices, databases, and more).
SOAtest reduces the risk of security breaches and performance outages by transforming functional testing artifacts into security and load equivalents. Such reuse, along with continuous monitoring of APIs for change, allows faster and more efficient testing.
Postman Enterprise provides API testing capabilities with features like automation, integration, and shared environments, enhancing efficiency for REST and SOAP APIs. Teams benefit from its intuitive interface and support for automation and scripting.
Postman Enterprise is designed for API testing, supporting REST and SOAP APIs to enhance manual and automated testing. It offers endpoint validation, unit and integration testing, and data-driven testing. This platform is valued for its easy setup, flexibility in automation, and scripting, enabling collaborations through shared collections and generating reports. However, users find room for improvement in automation, integration with platforms, SOAP API testing, and collection management.
What are the key features of Postman Enterprise?In industries relying on API development, Postman Enterprise aids in creating robust testing environments. Whether technology, finance, or healthcare, teams leverage its data-driven testing capability and collaboration features for comprehensive and accurate testing outcomes.
We monitor all API Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
