Sr Quality Assurance Engineer at Wabtec Industrial
Real User
Top 20
2021-08-06T18:03:51Z
Aug 6, 2021
We are a large company based in India. The primary use case of this solution is for our REST architecture. Parasoft uses different languages like JSON, XML and SORBS. It's like an API testing tool and can be used for both automation and manual testing. We are customers of Parasoft and I'm a senior software engineer.
The primary use case for adopting Parasoft SOAtest is to test web services/middleware testing (SOAP/REST/MQ/SAP RFC/EDI/FTP). Inbuilt support: * REST: WADL and JSON. * SOAP: WSDL. * SAP RFC * Message queuing supported: JMS, MQ, and NET WCF. * Protocols supported: TCP/IP, FTP, EDI, WSDL, WADL, WS-*, UDDI, RMI, EJB, webMethods, TIBCO, SMTP, and custom. * Languages Supported: Java, JavaScript, Groovy, Jython * Virtualization * Third-party tool integration (plug and play) * Stored procedure testing and DB validation * UI recording through Selenium WebDriver. * I've used this solution for more than 6.7 years.
Please share with the community what you think needs improvement with Parasoft SOAtest. What are its weaknesses? What would you like to see changed in a future version?
Test Automation Developer at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Jul 1, 2019
The product is very slow to start up, and that is a bit of a problem, actually. It is not as fast and it's a bit clunky, especially if you use it for the whole day or for a long time, it doesn't save the data, for example. So, it's a bit clunky and slow.
Test Automation Developer at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Jul 1, 2019
They do have a confusing licensing structure. Their licensing structure is really complex and being able to find out the right product for you, for an organization specifically, is a bit harder, but once you find the thing, their scalability and stability is pretty good. It's not a simple licensing model. It's not a licensing model that just, "do this and you get this", it's a bit more complicated and quite complex. For a person who is not used to this at all, it's a bit complex.
Download our free Application Security Testing (AST) Report and find out what your peers are saying about Parasoft, Sonar, Synopsys, and more! Updated: September 2023.
We primarily use the solution for API testing for banking clients.
Our primary use case is for Driver and Firmware SQA. This is a pre-requirement for ASIL-certified SW component.
We are a large company based in India. The primary use case of this solution is for our REST architecture. Parasoft uses different languages like JSON, XML and SORBS. It's like an API testing tool and can be used for both automation and manual testing. We are customers of Parasoft and I'm a senior software engineer.
We use a lot of tools from Parasoft toolset, but with SOAtest specifically, we use it for creating and running integration tests.
The primary use case for adopting Parasoft SOAtest is to test web services/middleware testing (SOAP/REST/MQ/SAP RFC/EDI/FTP). Inbuilt support: * REST: WADL and JSON. * SOAP: WSDL. * SAP RFC * Message queuing supported: JMS, MQ, and NET WCF. * Protocols supported: TCP/IP, FTP, EDI, WSDL, WADL, WS-*, UDDI, RMI, EJB, webMethods, TIBCO, SMTP, and custom. * Languages Supported: Java, JavaScript, Groovy, Jython * Virtualization * Third-party tool integration (plug and play) * Stored procedure testing and DB validation * UI recording through Selenium WebDriver. * I've used this solution for more than 6.7 years.