BMC TrueSight vs IBM Application Performance Management comparison

BMC Helix and IBM are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. BMC Helix is ranked #30 with an average rating of 8.3, while IBM is ranked #52 with an average rating of 7.0. BMC Helix holds a 0.8% mindshare in APM, compared to IBM’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 86% of BMC Helix users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 62% of IBM users who would recommend it.

BMC TrueSight

Read 50 BMC TrueSight reviews

3,120 Views
1,560 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

IBM Application Performance...

Read 7 IBM Application Performance Management reviews

833 Views
808 Comparison Views

62% willing to recommend

BMC TrueSight

IBM Application Performance...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 3, 2025

BMC TrueSight and IBM Application Performance Management both compete in IT operations management. BMC TrueSight offers a stronger focus on event management and system health visibility, while IBM APM stands out with cognitive analytics and detailed transaction tracking.

Features: BMC TrueSight is known for its event management capabilities, seamless integration with several technologies, and extensive knowledge modules. It effectively monitors a wide range of assets, including servers and cloud services. IBM APM excels in transaction tracking, offers deep visibility into process information, and integrates data using cognitive analytics, enhancing its monitoring capabilities.

Room for Improvement: BMC TrueSight requires substantial resources and multiple agents, making deployment and administration complex. Cost can be high, and improvements are needed in cloud monitoring and AI features. IBM APM faces performance impacts due to agents, lacks comprehensive historical data, and its technical support can be slow, affecting issue resolution.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: BMC TrueSight's reliance on on-premises infrastructure complicates deployment due to high resource needs. Technical support effectiveness varies, with occasional delays. IBM APM offers more flexible deployment options with cloud and on-premise choices, though its support could be improved to prevent repeated issues.

Pricing and ROI: BMC TrueSight entails higher upfront costs, influenced by extensive monitoring and endpoint licensing, though it offers significant ROI through labor and maintenance savings. IBM APM is more cost-effective with straightforward licensing, potentially reducing IT costs while offering a comprehensive starting package.

To learn more, read our detailed BMC TrueSight vs. IBM Application Performance Management Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

BMC TrueSight vs. IBM Application Performance Management

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,760 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BMC TrueSight

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

30th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Event Monitoring (7th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (34th), Cloud Monitoring Software (26th), AIOps (5th)

IBM Application Performance...

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

52nd

Average Rating

6.4

Reviews Sentiment

5.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of BMC TrueSight is 0.8%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Application Performance Management is 0.5%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
BMC TrueSight	0.8%
IBM Application Performance Management	0.5%
Other	98.7%

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Srri G

Senior Project Manager - Head of Application Performance Management at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

The product is reasonably priced, but the solution is a little obsolete because it is deployed on-premise

If I want custom monitoring across a very large estate of more than 50,000 units, the on-premise deployment gets quite slow. The on-premise product’s performance must be improved. The solution is a little obsolete. That is why the solution moved to Helix, a SaaS operating system. The SaaS platform has the features I like. There is no point in BMC expanding TrueSight Operations’ console. It's high time that BMC starts a demise path for the product and is associated only with Helix. If we need any additional function, we must switch to Helix. Since TrueSight is deployed on-premise, the scalability and usage of the product are mainly focused on providing basic features and not enhanced features like analytics or cost analysis. People should move to a SaaS platform because on-premise products have limited storage and capacity.

Read full review

Daniel Tamiru

Manager, Database & System Administration at Awash International Bank

A multi-functional solution but has poor stability and performance-related issues

We are using version 4 of IBM Application Performance Management, and it is deployed on-premises. We use it for internet banking and mainly for application performance on-site. For example, if we face performance-related issues in one of our software or managed services, we use this solution to…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"BMC TrueSight Operations Management is easily scalable."

"The most valuable features of the solution are alert management, alert generation, and event management."

"I use the solution to monitor servers, databases, Windows, Linux, and web services."

"The tailoring of the knowledge modules has been particularly useful as I can streamline the agents to only report on critical events."

"The most beneficial part of the product in terms of IT monitoring revolves around the areas involving automation, and it also serves as an end-to-end event management and incident management tool."

"We have one application, which is fairly large. In the past, we had Level 1 and 2 NOC support teams who were responsible for watching dashboards. When they saw an issue in the application, they would call Level 2 or 3 support and escalate the call, if necessary. Now, through the use of this product, we have been able to reduce the headcount by five people, as we are able to eliminate the eyes on the glass. We no longer have people watching the dashboard. We have events which are processed automatically through the system and get to the right people. We had six people in L1s, and now have one. So, we reduced five out of six headcount, which is pretty significant."

"The noise reduction for ticketing works much better than we have seen in a lot of other companies."

"From an administrative standpoint, what stands out in TrueSight is the ability to implement quickly. When they have a requirement to monitor something, we're able to turn that on quickly in their environment. We're able to set up new apps within a day."

More BMC TrueSight pros

"It's easy to use."

"The most valuable feature is the breakdown that it provides, such as a description of the fields for a particular transaction."

"IBM Application Performance Management helped us increased our response time by 80% and cost 60% less."

"Because we have partnerships with other partners, I can share a bit about what I've noticed with IBM APM compared to other vendor solutions. Specifically, with IBM, the visibility into detailed process information is more tangible. On the OS level, APM displays all processes (or the top 10 processes) that are consuming CPU or resident memory. This is the most important thing that is not always available with other vendors."

"The transaction tracking feature from IBM is the most important feature for us. It is something that provides a terrific value for us and our clients. It has a lot of data sources and agents that are collectors. It is also stable."

"I would rate the scalability an eight out of ten."

"The initial setup was straightforward and took minimal effort."

Cons

"The UI for the end users could be improved and more flexible than it is now."

"The dashboard and performance graphs should include a way to automatically schedule and export reports."

"Specifically around application performance monitoring, BMC is definitely not the market leader. The Dynatraces, the New Relics and the like are more of the market leaders in that space. I would like to see them grow that space a little bit more aggressively. It has not really been their bread and butter."

"One of the things that the TrueSight environment is missing is some of the HA abilities. The data collection server called the ISM doesn't really have the HA functionality or workload balancing. It was missing from the previous product as well. It's missing redundancy."

"I would like them to improve the deep-dive details, tracing, and data agents in this product. We have EUEM, an end-user experience monitoring appliance. This one's quicker than the current one, and reporting side and filtration side are very bad. There are many details we look at and explain what we receive information in the current one, but we cannot have historical data like we do with EUEM. We cannot have a powerful point to look for specific traffic from a specific application and a specific browser. We don't have it in the new one. The current BMC also needs to add the thing that control versions."

"BMC's online documentation is often incorrect or incomplete."

"This solution is lacking in application monitoring features. Technical support for this solution also needs improvement, particularly in product knowledge and response time."

"The dashboards are not good. We have a limited dashboard, and if we want better dashboards, we need to use other solutions like Grafana because the TrueSight dashboards are not good."

More BMC TrueSight cons

"It's still missing some platforms. For example, if you look to applications itself, it is missing the interface."

"Its web user interface is a little bit old in comparison to other solutions, such as New Relic, and it should be improved. Its scalability and technical support should also be improved. Currently, it is scalable, but only in a vertical way. They provide good technical support, but the initial steps for a new case can be improved to fasten the resolution process."

"The stability is not great and should be better."

"With APM, we noticed that the agent can cause a lot of issues for the application, making the agent very unreliable. Many issues are happening, and we've had to discuss it with support to try and get a fix. It affects application availability, and sometimes actions fail because of the agent, degrading the performance of the application."

"Technical support can be slow and needs improvement."

"They should focus on potentially enhancing the dashboard to make it more contemporary and adding some customization options. Furthermore, there might be room for improvement in the pricing policy."

"The demo that was provided to us is not working very well. At times, there are errors."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is a large, complex product. So, there is a commitment of manpower to deploy it, as it is not a cheap product."

"Other products are more expensive than BMC TrueSight."

"Pricing is all volume-driven. I think we were paying between $80 and $85 per license. That's per unit, for a perpetual license. You pay it one time and then, every year, you pay 20 percent of that for annual maintenance and support. But now that we've grown, we've purchased tens of thousands of licenses and the cost per license has gone down to something like less than $30..."

"The cost depends on the usage."

"It is a relatively inexpensive solution."

"The price of BMC TrueSight Operations Management is very high. If there was more flexibility with the sizing of the licensing it would be helpful, especially during the pandemic. We have wanted to expend but the licensing cost is too high."

"Annual licensing amount depends on the customers requirements. Support is an additional fee and there are options for three and five year support."

"Pricing is very high."

More BMC TrueSight pricing and cost advice

"The licensing fees can be paid every six months or on a yearly basis."

"As I previously indicated, I initiated the IBM and uncovered all its elements. Consequently, I'm not inclined towards a licensing approach."

"IBM APM is one of the cheaper products on the market, while everything necessary to get started is included in the license."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

26%

Computer Software Company

12%

Retailer

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

25%

Retailer

14%

University

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	23
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	24

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about BMC TrueSight Operations Management?

The solution provides visibility to our infrastructure, how it is, the resources we are monitoring, and quick updates when it has any problems. We have integrated it with ServiceNow to open instances.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for BMC TrueSight Operations Management?

Though I have no clue about the tool's actual price, I know that it is astronomical.

See all answers

What needs improvement with BMC TrueSight Operations Management?

Cost is an issue with BMC TrueSight Operations Management. Though I am not responsible for the budget, I know that it is an expensive tool set when used only for event management. The tool's issue ...

See all answers

What do you like most about IBM Application Performance Management?

I would rate the scalability an eight out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM Application Performance Management?

They should focus on potentially enhancing the dashboard to make it more contemporary and adding some customization options. Furthermore, there might be room for improvement in the pricing policy. ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for IBM Application Performance Management?

I monitor business applications for more than four end users.

See all answers

Comparisons

Dynatrace vs BMC TrueSight

Compared 16% of the time

BMC Helix Operations Management with AIOps vs BMC TrueSight

Compared 10% of the time

Centreon vs BMC TrueSight

Compared 6% of the time

Zabbix vs BMC TrueSight

Compared 6% of the time

ServiceNow IT Operations Management vs BMC TrueSight

Compared 6% of the time

More BMC TrueSight Competitors

BMC AMI Strobe vs IBM Application Performance Management

Compared 24% of the time

Instana Dynamic APM vs IBM Application Performance Management

Compared 17% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs IBM Application Performance Management

Compared 16% of the time

IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager vs IBM Application Performance Management

Compared 13% of the time

Datadog vs IBM Application Performance Management

Compared 11% of the time

More IBM Application Performance Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

BMC TrueSight

October 2025

Download BMC TrueSight product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

September 2025

IBM Application Performance Management report

Download IBM Application Performance Management product report

Also Known As

ProactiveNet, TrueSight Operations Management

IBM APM

Overview

BMC TrueSight offers extensive event management and seamless integration, providing comprehensive monitoring across varied infrastructures through its centralized console and Knowledge Modules.

BMC TrueSight delivers robust event management capabilities with seamless integration and comprehensive monitoring of diverse infrastructures. Its single console simplifies management, offering automated triage for standardized alerts, enhancing efficiency. Knowledge Modules support services from hardware to cloud, while proactive monitoring and capacity optimization enhance customization. It efficiently supports mixed environments by providing detailed insights and intelligently routing alerts to reduce noise. While improvements are needed in deployment, integration, AI, automation, reporting, and complexity reduction, it still meets diverse operational needs effectively.

What are BMC TrueSight's key features?

Robust Event Management: Offers efficient handling of events.
Seamless Integration: Integrates easily with existing systems.
Comprehensive Monitoring: Supports hardware to cloud infrastructure.
Centralized Console: Simplifies management processes.
Automated Triage: Standardizes alerts for better efficiency.
Proactive Monitoring: Improves forecasting and issue prevention.
Capacity Optimization: Efficiently manages resources.
Customizability: Tailors to specific service needs.

What benefits and ROI should users seek in BMC TrueSight?

Enhanced Proactive Management: Reduces downtime through efficient monitoring.
Improved Troubleshooting: Provides visibility into systems for quick issue resolution.
Effective Integration: Blends well with other tools and platforms.
Resource Efficiency: Optimizes use of infrastructure and servers.
Global Support: Facilitates operations across sectors worldwide.

BMC TrueSight is widely used in performance and availability monitoring for infrastructure and applications, supporting the monitoring of servers, databases, networks, and IT environments. It is implemented to improve management and reduce downtime, serving needs in data centers and cloud services. Organizations leverage it for event management, comprehensive data center monitoring, and cloud services, using its capabilities for alerting, ticket creation, troubleshooting, and compliance, enhancing operational efficiency globally.

BMC Helix

The IBM Application Performance Management portfolio provides visibility, control and automation of your mission-critical applications. It helps pinpoint the root cause of application's issue more quickly and resolve the problem. The integrated capabilities cover the five key areas: discovery, end-use experience, transaction tracking, enterprise diagnostics and analytics. It also easily monitors applications to ensure optimal performance to extend your hybrid management environment capabilities, to measure the customer experience from multiple locations and to further eliminate blind spots in your application environment.

IBM

Sample Customers

Ensono, Transamerica, Boston Scientific, Park Place Technologies, inContact, TD Ameritrade, PNC Bank

Mibtree, EatDrinkDeals.com, IT Performance Advisor

Buyer's Guide

BMC TrueSight vs. IBM Application Performance Management

September 2025

Free Report: BMC TrueSight vs. IBM Application Performance Management

Find out what your peers are saying about BMC TrueSight vs. IBM Application Performance Management and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our BMC TrueSight vs. IBM Application Performance Management report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.