BMC AMI Strobe vs IBM Application Performance Management comparison

BMC and IBM are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. BMC is ranked #71, while IBM is ranked #54. BMC holds a 0.4% mindshare in APM, compared to IBM’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of BMC users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 62% of IBM users who would recommend it.

BMC AMI Strobe

Read 1 BMC AMI Strobe review

837 Views
536 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

IBM Application Performance...

Read 7 IBM Application Performance Management reviews

979 Views
959 Comparison Views

62% willing to recommend

BMC AMI Strobe

IBM Application Performance...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 7, 2025

BMC AMI Strobe and IBM Application Performance Management are competitive tools in the realm of application performance solutions. IBM Application Performance Management has an edge with its comprehensive capabilities, although BMC AMI Strobe is recognized for affordability and effective support.

Features: BMC AMI Strobe is known for detail-oriented performance tuning, pinpointing application inefficiencies, and mainframe optimization. IBM Application Performance Management provides diverse monitoring options, versatile application monitoring, and accommodates various environments efficiently.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: BMC AMI Strobe's deployment is streamlined for mainframe environments, with responsive support channels. IBM Application Performance Management has a sophisticated deployment model suitable for varied platforms but may have more complex initial setup procedures.

Pricing and ROI: BMC AMI Strobe offers a cost-effective solution with compelling ROI due to its targeted performance enhancements and lower upfront costs. IBM Application Performance Management requires a more substantial investment but promises higher ROI with its extensive feature set and broad applicability.

To learn more, read our detailed Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Report (Updated: November 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

November 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,259 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BMC AMI Strobe

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

71st

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

IBM Application Performance...

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

54th

Average Rating

6.4

Reviews Sentiment

5.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2025, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of BMC AMI Strobe is 0.4%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Application Performance Management is 0.6%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
IBM Application Performance Management	0.6%
BMC AMI Strobe	0.4%
Other	99.0%

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

reviewer1272504

IT Analyst at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees

Stable with a good database and a good interface

We primarily use the solution to deal with problems in the production environment For us, the database is the most useful feature. The interface is great. We don't find the pricing to be too bad. The initial setup was fairly easy. I'm not sure how to improve the solution. It currently has all of…

Read full review

Daniel Tamiru

Manager, Database & System Administration at Awash International Bank

A multi-functional solution but has poor stability and performance-related issues

We are using version 4 of IBM Application Performance Management, and it is deployed on-premises. We use it for internet banking and mainly for application performance on-site. For example, if we face performance-related issues in one of our software or managed services, we use this solution to…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The initial setup was fairly easy."

"It's easy to use."

"The most valuable feature is the breakdown that it provides, such as a description of the fields for a particular transaction."

"The initial setup was straightforward and took minimal effort."

"I would rate the scalability an eight out of ten."

"Because we have partnerships with other partners, I can share a bit about what I've noticed with IBM APM compared to other vendor solutions. Specifically, with IBM, the visibility into detailed process information is more tangible. On the OS level, APM displays all processes (or the top 10 processes) that are consuming CPU or resident memory. This is the most important thing that is not always available with other vendors."

"IBM Application Performance Management helped us increased our response time by 80% and cost 60% less."

"The transaction tracking feature from IBM is the most important feature for us. It is something that provides a terrific value for us and our clients. It has a lot of data sources and agents that are collectors. It is also stable."

Cons

"There are certain aspects of the configuration that could be simplified a bit."

"With APM, we noticed that the agent can cause a lot of issues for the application, making the agent very unreliable. Many issues are happening, and we've had to discuss it with support to try and get a fix. It affects application availability, and sometimes actions fail because of the agent, degrading the performance of the application."

"The stability is not great and should be better."

"The demo that was provided to us is not working very well. At times, there are errors."

"They should focus on potentially enhancing the dashboard to make it more contemporary and adding some customization options. Furthermore, there might be room for improvement in the pricing policy."

"It's still missing some platforms. For example, if you look to applications itself, it is missing the interface."

"Technical support can be slow and needs improvement."

"Its web user interface is a little bit old in comparison to other solutions, such as New Relic, and it should be improved. Its scalability and technical support should also be improved. Currently, it is scalable, but only in a vertical way. They provide good technical support, but the initial steps for a new case can be improved to fasten the resolution process."

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"IBM APM is one of the cheaper products on the market, while everything necessary to get started is included in the license."

"As I previously indicated, I initiated the IBM and uncovered all its elements. Consequently, I'm not inclined towards a licensing approach."

"The licensing fees can be paid every six months or on a yearly basis."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

37%

Retailer

10%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

20%

Retailer

15%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	2

Comparisons

IBM Application Performance Analyzer for zOS vs BMC AMI Strobe

Compared 37% of the time

Mainframe Application Tuner vs BMC AMI Strobe

Compared 15% of the time

Broadcom DX Application Performance Management vs BMC AMI Strobe

Compared 13% of the time

Dynatrace vs BMC AMI Strobe

Compared 13% of the time

More BMC AMI Strobe Competitors

Instana Dynamic APM vs IBM Application Performance Management

Compared 17% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs IBM Application Performance Management

Compared 12% of the time

IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager vs IBM Application Performance Management

Compared 12% of the time

Dynatrace vs IBM Application Performance Management

Compared 10% of the time

Datadog vs IBM Application Performance Management

Compared 10% of the time

More IBM Application Performance Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

November 2025

Download BMC AMI Strobe product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

November 2025

IBM Application Performance Management report

Download IBM Application Performance Management product report

Also Known As

No data available

IBM APM

Overview

BMC AMI Strobe offers advanced application performance analysis for mainframe environments, helping businesses optimize resource usage and reduce costs while maintaining high system efficiency.

With BMC AMI Strobe, organizations gain precise insights into application behavior within mainframes. This tool provides detailed performance metrics and actionable recommendations for tuning applications, enhancing operational efficiency and reducing CPU utilization costs. By integrating seamlessly into existing systems, it supports proactive performance management and ensures consistent service quality.

What are the key features of BMC AMI Strobe?

Comprehensive Analysis: Delivers in-depth analysis of application performance on mainframes.
Resource Optimization: Identifies areas to improve application efficiency and resource usage.
Detailed Reporting: Provides clear, actionable insights through comprehensive reports.
User-friendly Interface: Ensures easy navigation and efficient use by technical teams.

What benefits or ROI can users expect?

Cost Reduction: Effective identification and correction of performance bottlenecks reduce CPU costs.
Improved Efficiency: Optimizations lead to faster application processing times.
Consistent Performance: Maintains high levels of system reliability and availability.
Increased Productivity: Allows technical teams to focus on strategic tasks with less manual intervention.

BMC AMI Strobe is widely used across industries like finance and retail to ensure optimal mainframe performance. By enabling detailed application analysis, it supports businesses in meeting high operational standards and regulatory compliance while efficiently managing resources.

BMC

The IBM Application Performance Management portfolio provides visibility, control and automation of your mission-critical applications. It helps pinpoint the root cause of application's issue more quickly and resolve the problem. The integrated capabilities cover the five key areas: discovery, end-use experience, transaction tracking, enterprise diagnostics and analytics. It also easily monitors applications to ensure optimal performance to extend your hybrid management environment capabilities, to measure the customer experience from multiple locations and to further eliminate blind spots in your application environment.

IBM

Sample Customers

Chunghwa Telecom, Helvetia, Comerica Bank, Erste Group, Bank of Ireland, Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company (SFBCIC)

Mibtree, EatDrinkDeals.com, IT Performance Advisor

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

November 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, Splunk and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: November 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.