BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum comparison

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum

Download the complete report

Helped 879,422 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersec...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

26th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

4.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Kaspersky Endpoint Detectio...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

29th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity is 1.2%, down from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum is 0.9%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity	1.2%
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum	0.9%
Other	97.9%

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

Sooraj Makkancherrry

Security Operations Manager at Philips

Doesn't have daily updates, which is important for healthcare IT

I face challenges with the exclusion policy - it still scans folders we told it not to, causing issues. When we contact support, they tell us to update the latest agent, but we can't do that immediately due to medical device protocols and validation testing. I wish support would try to understand our issues better instead of giving this standard response. The machine learning feature they use often tells us to upgrade the agent or add things to the exclusion list, which isn't unacceptable. It's a very good and new technology as a tool and antivirus. But sometimes, it doesn't work properly with our medical devices and products, quarantining files it shouldn't even after we add them to exclusions. This is tricky for us.

Read full review

Nadeem Syed

CEO at Haniya Technologies

Continuous protection has improved automated threat response and reporting for our endpoints

We did work with one of our clients who required mobile security solutions. In my opinion, Trend Micro, when we went through the POCs and other components, we did not find it very strong as far as mobile security is concerned. I think Kaspersky is much better than Trend Micro when it comes to mobile security solutions. From an outside perspective, Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum looks pretty strong and comprehensive. The main improvement would be if they could decrease the cost, as it would be great for clients since it is quite expensive now compared to when it used to be cheaper. The key competitor for Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum is Trend Micro. Trend Micro is the only competitor in the market right now. I would say both Trend Micro Endpoint Detection and Response and Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum are quite similar; I cannot say that one is better than the other. The difference is mainly in cost; Trend Micro has mostly moved all their products to the cloud, offering no on-premises products now, whereas Kaspersky is still in a transition phase providing both on-premises and cloud solutions. Many clients prefer on-premises as it is less expensive compared to cloud.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is a good endpoint solution. It is very easy to manage and detect the threat immediately. It will take the necessary actions."

"The most valuable feature of CylancePROTECT is the support."

"On the management side, we liked the way it displays things."

"CylancePROTECT works on AI technology, is always up to date, and uses very few resources on your devices."

"The platform's most valuable features are the malware detection capabilities."

"The most valuable features are script blocking and macros within Word documents for stopping unwanted applications from running in the background."

"What I like best about CylancePROTECT is its accuracy, as it doesn't give many false positives."

"Specifically for a Windows domain environment, the product can be customized and pushed via GPO or SCCM without issue."

More BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity pros

"The initial setup was easy."

"I mostly like how they capture particular files and submit them to other files, and they have the solution console. And for example, we are using the one in for an application, like, on the RansomFree, if there are any vulnerabilities in patches coming, in the future, they fix these."

"The solution is very user friendly, which we appreciate."

"Overall, I would rate Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum an eight out of ten."

"Instead of having to wait for alerts, the IT security team can actively hunt for threats by proactively scanning endpoints to spot anomalies and security breaches."

"They provide integrated protections and prevention with multi-layered anti-malware, which makes clients want to go for it."

"The most advantageous aspect is tracking and taking action automatically."

"It offers features like system hardening, vulnerability management, patch management, and device control, which are not present in other solutions."

More Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum pros

Cons

"Making the dashboards a bit modern to make them easier to search would also be helpful."

"Additionally, their channel management has been lacking, with a notable disregard for small and medium-sized businesses, focusing primarily on large enterprises and very large MSPs."

"The process of whitelisting a script that you want to be able to run can be a little bit difficult, or awkward."

"It should provide more details about the events that they have detected."

"The product must make the interface a little more user-friendly."

"An area for improvement in CylancePROTECT is its pricing, as it's a bit costly."

"I would like to see them fix the alerting system so that the endpoint reporting is a bit more streamlined."

"It could have integration with industrial base HMIS or Human Machine Interfaces Solutions. This is the industrial environment where you have a control center for all the automation that's happening, whether it is oil, gas, or chemical manufacturing. They often have to set up a computer at the back and watch the other stuff to get alerts. In these autonomous or on-premises environments, they often don't have access to email readily. Integration with other industrial solutions, such as HMIS, will allow them to communicate and get an alert that something has been found. This way, they can react to it sooner than having somebody watch the screen and keep checking the screen. Rockwell has its own suite. Similarly, Honeywell has its own suite. There's also an independent HMI/historian solution provider out there called VTSCADA. We actually get asked if we can get it to show up on a screen, which is difficult. Getting those alerts to work within an industrial environment would be a huge plus."

More BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity cons

"They should provide more notifications for incidents and more clarification or information about malicious activity."

"The technology grows day by day, so we need to check for updates and do the updates daily. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum is still improving over time and quality-wise, there are still things that need to be changed in the product, so that's why I rated it nine out of ten. Compatibility could also be improved in the product."

"EDR Optimum's scalability could be improved."

"The central management needs improvement. The ease of use for updating and managing through the web console is difficult and lacks features."

"The initial setup is a bit difficult."

"An area for improvement in Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum would be to provide the cloud console platform to all users, regardless of the number of licenses a company has purchased. For example, a company with 50 employees should have access to the cloud console platform even if they have only purchased a certain number of licenses for the solution."

"The product could be improved by resolving the problem with uninstalling devices. The uninstallation needs better handling, specifically with automatic license deletions."

"Occasionally, I encounter connection problems, and the signal is not very good."

More Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We would just add more if there are new users, but right now you just need one license for per user."

"It's not so heavily priced; rather, it's average and decent."

"This cost of the license is approximately $5 USD monthly per user."

"Our licensing cost for the solution is around $4,000 for six months. There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."

"The license price for this solution could be better. It's on the expensive side."

"We pay our license on a yearly basis and have just renewed for two years."

"CylancePROTECT is worth the money, but I'm not sure of its exact price. I can't remember off the top of my head."

"The price is reasonable for us at the moment. I rate the overall solution an eight out of ten."

More BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity pricing and cost advice

"The solution could be made a bit cheaper."

"Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum is affordability, even for companies with limited budgets, such as those in the Pakistani market. It is a subscription-based license."

"The price is good, not too high."

"The pricing is totally reasonable."

"I would rate the product's pricing a nine out of ten. You need to pay about 80,000 rupees yearly for the tool. There are no additional costs associated with the product."

"Kaspersky gives a consolidated price with a good solution. If we choose something else, we need to add other options on our own."

"Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum is more affordable than the endpoint security product of Fortinet. Whether it's worth the money depends on your security strategy."

"The tool’s pricing is yearly. The solution’s pricing is expensive."

More Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,422 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

10%

Government

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	33
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	13

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	15
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Blackberry Protect?

It is a good endpoint solution. It is very easy to manage and detect the threat immediately. It will take the necessary actions.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Blackberry Protect?

The price is reasonable for us at the moment. I rate the overall solution an eight out of ten.

What needs improvement with Blackberry Protect?

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum?

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum is reasonably priced for the market. I do not know the exact cost of the license per endpoint or annually.

What needs improvement with Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum?

The reporting system is good, but it can be quite tricky for customers to get the reports. Unfortunately, Kaspersky UI is something they need to work upon. It's not as simplistic or user-friendly a...

What is your primary use case for Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum?

The main use case is attractive for customers because the endpoint detection and response system helps with patch management and remote software. It has many ITSM feature sets, which has been an at...

CrowdStrike Falcon vs BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity

Comparisons

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity

Compared 8% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity

Compared 7% of the time

VMware Carbon Black Endpoint vs BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity

Compared 7% of the time

Cisco Secure Endpoint vs BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity

Compared 6% of the time

More BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity Competitors

ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum

Compared 11% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum

Compared 10% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security Complete vs Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum

Compared 9% of the time

Trend Micro Worry-Free Services Suites vs Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Business vs Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum

Compared 7% of the time

More Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum Competitors

Product Reports

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity

Download BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity product report

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum

Download Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum product report

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum report

Also Known As

Blackberry Protect

No data available

Overview

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity leverages AI and machine learning for efficient malware detection and zero-day threat protection, offering robust endpoint security with high detection accuracy and low false positive rates.

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity delivers advanced threat protection with AI-driven algorithms and machine learning. Its lightweight design ensures low system resource usage, making it both efficient and effective. It's recognized for centralized management, easy deployment, and a clean interface, providing comprehensive endpoint protection against diverse threats. The integration of features like CylanceOPTICS and behavioral monitoring enhances security insights. While the system excels in malware detection, enhancements are needed in areas like user interface design, reporting, deeper threat analysis, and integration with third-party systems. Support and pricing improvements could also increase competitiveness.

What are the key features of BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity?

AI and Machine Learning: Utilizes cutting-edge technology for malware and threat detection.
Zero-Day Protection: Safeguards against emerging threats without the need for constant updates.
Centralized Management: Simplifies deployment and management across devices.
CylanceOPTICS: Provides advanced security insights and behavioral monitoring.
Low Resource Usage: Ensures efficient operation with minimal system impact.

What benefits should users expect from BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity?

High Detection Accuracy: Reduces risk with minimal false positives.
Efficient Resource Management: Enhances performance with its lightweight design.
Proactive Threat Defense: Protects against a wide range of threats with centralized management.
Advanced Insights: Offers unique features for detailed security analysis.

Organizations deploy BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity for threat analytics, log management, and endpoint protection. As an antivirus replacement, it protects against zero-day malware, ransomware, and various threats. Its AI algorithms detect anomalies, minimizing risks in both internet-connected and isolated environments. Many businesses incorporate it into wider security strategies, appreciating its centralized management and proactive defense capabilities.

BlackBerry

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Optimum delivers straightforward defense-in-depth against complex and advanced threats with no additional overheads. Use automated and 'single-click' responses so you can ensure every last piece of the threat is rooted out of your system.

Kaspersky

Sample Customers

Panasonic, Noble Energy, Apria Healthcare Group Inc., Charles River Laboratories, Rovi Corporation, Toyota, Kiewit

Information Not Available

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum