BizTalk Server vs WorkflowGen comparison

Microsoft and WorkflowGen are both solutions in the Process Automation category. Microsoft is ranked #14 with an average rating of 6.8, while WorkflowGen is ranked #44. Microsoft holds a 0.8% mindshare in PA, compared to WorkflowGen’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 75% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of WorkflowGen users who would recommend it.

BizTalk Server

Read 16 BizTalk Server reviews

1,168 Views
526 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

WorkflowGen

Read 3 WorkflowGen reviews

605 Views
139 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

BizTalk Server

WorkflowGen

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

BizTalk Server and WorkflowGen are competing in workflow automation and business process management. BizTalk Server takes the upper hand in integration capabilities, while WorkflowGen offers a faster implementation due to its customizable settings.

Features: BizTalk Server provides robust enterprise application integration, message transformation, and comprehensive reporting. It supports various communication protocols and offers extensive integration support. WorkflowGen focuses on form-based workflows, drag-and-drop process modeling, and customization.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: WorkflowGen is known for straightforward deployment via cloud or on-premise options, resulting in quicker implementation. It provides comprehensive customer support with quick response times. BizTalk Server usually requires longer deployment periods and is handled by experienced IT teams, with more traditional customer service often needing expert consults.

Pricing and ROI: BizTalk Server's setup cost is higher, reflecting its enterprise-level features and scalability. ROI can be significant for organizations with complex integrations. WorkflowGen has a lower initial cost and quicker ROI due to simpler configurability and quicker deployment.

To learn more, read our detailed BizTalk Server vs. WorkflowGen Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

BizTalk Server vs. WorkflowGen

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,566 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BizTalk Server

Ranking in Process Automation

14th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business-to-Business Middleware (8th)

WorkflowGen

Ranking in Process Automation

44th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Design (29th), Business Process Management (BPM) (45th), Rapid Application Development Software (36th), Low-Code Development Platforms (43rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Process Automation category, the mindshare of BizTalk Server is 0.8%, down from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WorkflowGen is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Process Automation Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
BizTalk Server	0.8%
WorkflowGen	0.3%
Other	98.9%

Process Automation

Featured Reviews

Vignesh Kumar Sekar

Senior Analyst at Sword Group

Enables message routing and provides a secure way to communicate between two systems

The AS2 communication protocol is one of the most advanced processes. It enables a handshake with the source and target systems using certificates. It is the most secure way of communicating between two systems. It is an advantage. We can do a lot of message routing. If we want to handle large data, we can put the data into different patterns to process it. We can do it through sequential convoy or parallel convoy orchestration. BizTalk comes with SQL Server. We can load temporary data in the database and use the batch process from BizTalk. It is an added advantage. Creating agreements is a manual job, but it's quite easy in BizTalk. Even a fresh college graduate can configure AS2 certificates and partner profiles and communicate with other systems. It is easy.

Read full review

Christopher Odonoghue

SAP Solution Lead at Johnson & Johnson

Good for automatically triggering workflows, but needs to be more customizable

We use this product for many different reasons related to our business We use it a lot for creating workflows to transfer materials between plants, which is a signature part of what we do. The most valuable feature is the ability to automatically trigger the workflow. This solution needs to be…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Compared to the current solutions I use, like Azure Logic Apps and other cloud services, BizTalk was far better and more reliable."

"I rate the tool's stability a nine out of ten."

"The most valuable feature of BizTalk Server is that it will turn XML into flexible transactions."

"Boomi has advantages over BizTalk Server because it is more flexible, low-code, no-code, easy to implement, and has a fast go-to-market."

"The tool's most valuable feature is its integration with the banks. Its messaging and routing capabilities are good."

"The BizTalk Server business rule engine was very useful for us and has helped us for the last 12 years."

"We can handle a large number of messages without any issues, ensuring that everything runs smoothly."

"The most valuable feature is its reliability and stability. The first version of BizTalk was released in 2000, and many companies still use it. It was stable until 2013 when we had support."

More BizTalk Server pros

"We use it a lot for creating workflows to transfer materials between plants, which is a signature part of what we do."

Cons

"BizTalk lacks native cloud support. BizTalk doesn't offer in-built support for cloud. We need to use third-party adapters to connect it to cloud services."

"The product's deployment can be quicker"

"It's an on-premises system, requiring physical servers for deployment. This is different from Azure; you don't need any servers with Azure. If you have a subscription, you can do whatever you want. There are unit restrictions based on the environment (like non-production vs. production) in BizTalk. You need physical servers and databases. In Azure, those are not required – it's all in the cloud."

"We want to get rid of BizTalk Server, as there is unnecessary license cost, and there are some limitations, so we might go for Azure Integration Services."

"I didn't find anything particularly valuable in BizTalk Server. It didn't help me, and we are moving away from BizTalk Server to a new platform."

"The product could be improved in monitoring, managing, and support functionalities."

"BizTalk is in the past, Microsoft is not going to evolve it any further or add any new features."

"BizTalk Server is an outdated legacy system that does not support messaging."

More BizTalk Server cons

"This solution needs to be more customizable."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It was not cheap, but it was affordable."

"BizTalk Server is not freeware. There's a significant licensing cost involved. Be sure you will actually utilize its features fully."

"The solution is expensive."

"The cost will depend on the client's requirements."

"BizTalk Server is cheap. I would rate its pricing a two out of five."

"Based on the knowledge, it is relatively cheaper than Azure Identity Services and cloud services in general."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Computer Software Company

10%

Healthcare Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Large Enterprise	9

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about BizTalk Server?

The tool's most valuable feature is its integration with the banks. Its messaging and routing capabilities are good.

See all answers

What needs improvement with BizTalk Server?

Biztalk server doesn't have API management so that our exposed can be protected against the SQL injection, DOS attacks. However, this is available in IBM WebMethods. The positive impact of BizTalk ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering BizTalk Server?

For BizTalk Server's monitoring and alerting tools, we are using a BizTalk 360 monitoring tool. BizTalk 360 is a product that helps us in getting the insight of API response and number of API calls...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs BizTalk Server

Compared 17% of the time

SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite vs BizTalk Server

Compared 17% of the time

Camunda vs BizTalk Server

Compared 12% of the time

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs BizTalk Server

Compared 11% of the time

Pega Platform vs BizTalk Server

Compared 8% of the time

More BizTalk Server Competitors

Microsoft Power Apps vs WorkflowGen

Compared 58% of the time

TIBCO Cloud Live Apps vs WorkflowGen

Compared 42% of the time

More WorkflowGen Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

BizTalk Server

October 2025

Download BizTalk Server product report

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Design

October 2025

Download WorkflowGen product report

Overview

Connects systems both inside and across organizations, exchange data and orchestrate business processes across multiple systems.

Microsoft

Immediately accelerate business process adaptability with fluid workflow automation. Use the WorkflowGen .NET workflow software's low code environment to maximize the efficiency of process designers and developers.

Automate any type of human and system-based enterprise process within a battle-tested infrastructure.

Customize and integrate your workflow apps to meet your requirements in a highly configurable environment.

Engage process participants with a full-featured workflow portal, native mobile apps, and email approvals, or through seamless integration with your own web apps.

Leverage a solution used by Fortune 500 companies for worldwide business-critical applications.

WorkflowGen

Sample Customers

Centrebet, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, QualCare, Wªrth Handelsges.m.b.H, DTEK, Allscripts, United BioSource, Hogg Robinson

Comcast, Deloitte, Mitsui & Co Ltd, Sanofi Pasteur, Textron, XL Group. WorkflowGen accelerates business process adaptability in 70 countries for 500+ organizations and 1,000,000 users.

Buyer's Guide

BizTalk Server vs. WorkflowGen

September 2025

Free Report: BizTalk Server vs. WorkflowGen

Find out what your peers are saying about BizTalk Server vs. WorkflowGen and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our BizTalk Server vs. WorkflowGen report.

See our list of best Process Automation vendors.

We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.