BizTalk Server vs Camunda comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Microsoft Logo
662 views|284 comparisons
80% willing to recommend
Camunda Logo
19,156 views|11,568 comparisons
88% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between BizTalk Server and Camunda based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Process Automation solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed BizTalk Server vs. Camunda Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"We can handle a large number of messages without any issues, ensuring that everything runs smoothly.""BIzTalk's integration with Visual Studio is the most valuable feature of this product.""The most valuable feature of BizTalk Server is that it will turn XML into flexible transactions.""I rate the tool's stability a nine out of ten.""Essentially, you can do whatever you like with these systems, and you do not have to take care about the scaling because if one server is overloaded, it just forwards the message to the next server, even if it were designated to a specific server. It weeds out the messages according to the load. If you want to scale it, you just add new servers.""The tool's most valuable feature is its integration with the banks. Its messaging and routing capabilities are good."

More BizTalk Server Pros →

"The best feature is the automation.""The most valuable features are that it's lightweight, can be embedded in existing Java code, and keeps track of the workflow state and the instances that we need.""Provides an easy way to integrate with the architectural environment.""The interface and the number of connectors that they provide are the most valuable features. The support here, it's kind of okay. But the main thing is with the number of connectors and the UI, the user interface.""One valuable feature of the solution is its flexibility.""The modeler is useful for creating the flow. The way to access the data through their REST API is also valuable. This is what we're using right now.""For an internal project, this is a solution that you can install and have up and running quite quickly.""The headless nature of the Camunda Platform is something that has helped us to build our own logic and platforms on it."

More Camunda Pros →

Cons
"BizTalk is in the past, Microsoft is not going to evolve it any further or add any new features.""It's a complex product because you have many degrees of freedom to connect different parts together. Whether it's sensible or not, is up to you, but the machine does allow it. But because of the vast degrees of freedom, it's complex.""The product's deployment can be quicker""The product could be improved in monitoring, managing, and support functionalities.""BizTalk Server is an outdated legacy system that does not support messaging.""The deployment could be simplified."

More BizTalk Server Cons →

"The only drawback is the time that it takes to have a complete set of workflows implemented on the Camunda platform.""When you search for Camunda BPM resources or books on how to utilize Camunda BPM, it is lacking. When it comes to Alfresco, there are thousands of resources that can help you to utilize within AWS and its Group Services. I would like to see the usage of Camunda BPM on Amazon Web Services be improved.""The user interface needs some polishing because it is too technical for end-users to use it.""It would be helpful to have more readily available use cases on the internet. Camunda's documentation feels less comprehensive.""While it's very scalable, it would be great if auto-scaling capabilities were added to it... one area that really could help out would be to have dynamic resizing of the cluster. Right now, you have to do capacity planning.""We have faced problems with the performance.""I would like to see the forms engine available in the open-source version of this solution.""They could provide more documentation regarding the integration of different programming languages."

More Camunda Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The cost will depend on the client's requirements."
  • "BizTalk Server is cheap. I would rate its pricing a two out of five."
  • "Based on the knowledge, it is relatively cheaper than Azure Identity Services and cloud services in general."
  • More BizTalk Server Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "It is less cost-prohibitive than other solutions on the market. This solution was in our price range."
  • "We are using the open-source version of this solution."
  • "Camunda is much cheaper."
  • "I use the open-source free version."
  • "The open-source version of the product is free to use."
  • "The cost of this solution is better than some competing products."
  • "Licensing costs are anywhere from $80,000 to $100,000 USD per year."
  • "We use the open-source version, which can be used at no cost."
  • More Camunda Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.
    768,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:I rate the tool's stability a nine out of ten.
    Top Answer:BizTalk Server is an outdated legacy system that does not support messaging.
    Top Answer:You need to consider a modern system instead of BizTalk Server. I rate it a two out of ten.
    Top Answer:One of the things we like best about Bonita is that you can create without coding - it is a low-code platform. With Bonita, you can build the entire mechanism using the GUI, it’s that simple. You can… more »
    Top Answer:Appian is fast when building simple to medium solutions. This solution offers simple drag-and-drop functionality with easy plug-and-play options. The initial setup was seamless and very easy to… more »
    Top Answer:Camunda Platform allows for visual demonstration and presentation of business process flows. The flexible Java-based option was a big win for us and allows for the integration of microservices very… more »
    Ranking
    25th
    out of 66 in Process Automation
    Views
    662
    Comparisons
    284
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    653
    Rating
    4.7
    1st
    out of 66 in Process Automation
    Views
    19,156
    Comparisons
    11,568
    Reviews
    23
    Average Words per Review
    911
    Rating
    8.2
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Camunda BPM
    Learn More
    Camunda
    Video Not Available
    Overview
    Connects systems both inside and across organizations, exchange data and orchestrate business processes across multiple systems.

    Camunda enables organizations to orchestrate processes across people, systems, and devices to continuously overcome complexity and increase efficiency. A common visual language enables seamless collaboration between business and IT teams to design, automate, and improve end-to-end processes with the required speed, scale, and resilience to remain competitive. Hundreds of enterprises such as Atlassian, ING, and Vodafone orchestrate business-critical processes with Camunda to accelerate digital transformation. To learn more visit camunda.com.

    Sample Customers
    Centrebet, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, QualCare, Wªrth Handelsges.m.b.H, DTEK, Allscripts, United BioSource, Hogg Robinson
    24 Hour Fitness, Accruent, AT&T Inc., Atlassian, CSS Insurance, Deutsche Telekom, Generali, Provinzial NordWest Insurance Services, Swisscom AG, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, VHV Group, Zalando
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company12%
    Financial Services Firm12%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Retailer7%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company23%
    Financial Services Firm19%
    Comms Service Provider13%
    Government13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm26%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    Insurance Company6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business43%
    Large Enterprise57%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise68%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business46%
    Midsize Enterprise21%
    Large Enterprise33%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise70%
    Buyer's Guide
    BizTalk Server vs. Camunda
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about BizTalk Server vs. Camunda and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    768,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    BizTalk Server is ranked 25th in Process Automation with 10 reviews while Camunda is ranked 1st in Process Automation with 69 reviews. BizTalk Server is rated 7.2, while Camunda is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of BizTalk Server writes "Helps us implement complex mapping and integration, but deployment could be simplified". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". BizTalk Server is most compared with IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services, SAP Process Orchestration, SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite, Bizagi and Control-M, whereas Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bizagi, Pega BPM, IBM BPM and Appian. See our BizTalk Server vs. Camunda report.

    See our list of best Process Automation vendors.

    We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.