Bizagi and Control-M are two prominent tools in business process automation and job scheduling, respectively. Bizagi excels in process modeling and integration, whereas Control-M is superior in handling complex scheduling across platforms.
Features: Bizagi excels in business process modeling and fast process automation, offering user-friendly modeling and integration with various platforms using connectors like SAP. It provides out-of-the-box integration features that are beneficial. Control-M is effective in managing complex scheduling, offering strong customization, cross-platform support, and integration capabilities. It is known for its extensive application interface support.
Room for Improvement: Bizagi needs to improve error detection during integration and faces challenges with performance on larger processes along with high pricing issues. Control-M is criticized for its high pricing and licensing complexity, with additional concerns on reporting and update features, seeking improved cloud functionalities and audit capabilities.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Bizagi supports a variety of deployment options, including on-premises and cloud, with available free and enterprise versions. It is noted for being accessible with community-driven resources, although technical support can be slow. Control-M offers robust customer service and extensive deployment options across hybrid and cloud environments, although its technical support speed has room for improvement.
Pricing and ROI: Bizagi offers a free version which is initially attractive, but price hikes have led to criticism despite good potential ROI from process automation. Control-M is often seen as costly, deterring smaller companies, but praised for its robust features that justify the investment for larger setups, showing efficiency in job scheduling and tracking for greater ROI.
The main return on investment with Helix Control-M has been a reduction in downtime and minimization of manual interventions, which has improved our operational efficiency.
You can run a million batch jobs or tasks at night when all of your highly skilled people are at home sleeping.
By implementing automation tools, you can minimize human errors and improve efficiency.
It is a community product, there is not much support we can expect.
The toolset is very intuitive, so we didn’t need to contact their support much.
They quickly evolve with changing technology trends, easily adopt new features, and incorporate them into the product.
The support is accurate, and BMC is always ready to help with queries and complex incidents.
The technical support is very polite, helpful, and available 24/7.
There is no direct scalability option.
If I rate scalability from one to ten, I would probably give it a six.
Our license doesn't limit our ability to configure Control-M as needed, allowing us to easily create new agents or environments.
I am paying for a top-end tool which rarely experiences issues, with most problems stemming from the applications being managed rather than the tooling itself.
It can absorb more workload wherever needed.
Control-M itself is robust, and it would receive a rating of 10.
The downtime is higher compared to AWS.
The testing and development phases need to be more rigorous before releasing patches.
Reporting capabilities can be improved more, and community support should be increased.
For more mature environments, the integration to live systems is lacking, which affects its applicability.
The decision map could be improved to allow more than three options at a decision point.
They could provide more documentation and tutorials to make the initial setup easier to understand.
We've experienced main problems with MFTE where having one setup means when an error occurs, the entire service goes down.
Documentation should be maintained for all versions since they provided the application.
Bizagi's pricing is very aggressive, and it was one of the reasons we chose it.
The licensing cost is very high, and they often consider switching to IBM Workload Scheduler or other options.
Control-M tends to be more expensive compared to other solutions, but users get great value from it.
Control-M is among the highest-priced solutions in the market.
It is open source.
The user interface is very good, making it easy for business people to understand.
Bizagi has rich functionalities; compared to other BPMN tools, it has more features.
Automation is more advanced, deployment is fast, and version control has been simplified.
The user interface is comprehensive and lets me view all my jobs on one page, monitor everything, and access the job history.
If I have a staff that operates Control-M on Windows Server, they will easily pick it up if they need to run it on Unix or mainframes. It's the same interface, saving time and improving efficiency.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Control-M | 3.7% |
| Bizagi | 4.3% |
| Other | 92.0% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 42 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 16 |
| Large Enterprise | 36 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 37 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 23 |
| Large Enterprise | 140 |
Bizagi’s industry-leading low-code process automation platform connects people, applications, robots, and information. As the most business-friendly and flexible solution on the market, Bizagi enables true collaboration between business and IT, delivering faster adoption and success. Fuelled by a community of 1 million users, Bizagi powers over 1,000 organizations worldwide including Adidas, BAE Systems, and Old Mutual. For more information visit www.bizagi.com
Control-M SaaS by BMC is tailored for growing teams, offering essential orchestration for managing hybrid cloud workflows starting at $29,000 annually.
Control-M integrates automation, orchestration, and a user-friendly interface to streamline workflows across banking, DevOps, and cloud environments. Key modules like Managed File Transfer and cross-platform support simplify job monitoring, while Batch Impact Manager enhances scheduling. Despite its capabilities, improvements in output analysis, reporting customization, offline access, and API integration are desired by users.
What are Control-M's key features?Control-M is implemented in industries such as finance and enterprise operations, aiding in automating batch processing across platforms like SAP and Teradata. It integrates with secure file transfers, ERP systems, and databases, whether deployed on-premises or cloud, ensuring seamless operation optimization.
We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
