Barracuda Email Protection vs KerioConnect comparison

Barracuda Networks and GFI are both solutions in the Email Archiving category. Barracuda Networks is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.5, while GFI is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.8. Barracuda Networks holds a 17.8% mindshare in EA, compared to GFI’s 3.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Barracuda Networks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 62% of GFI users who would recommend it.

Barracuda Email Protection

Read 19 Barracuda Email Protection reviews

2,722 Views
626 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

KerioConnect

Read 11 KerioConnect reviews

1,612 Views
129 Comparison Views

62% willing to recommend

Barracuda Email Protection

KerioConnect

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 19, 2026

KerioConnect and Barracuda Email Protection compete in email management and security. KerioConnect has an advantage in cost-effectiveness and customer support, while Barracuda excels with comprehensive security features valuable for threat protection.

Features: KerioConnect provides email, calendar, and collaboration tools with integrated spam and virus protection, making it affordable and reliable. Barracuda offers advanced threat detection with AI-based filtering and impersonation protection suitable for businesses needing high-level security.

Room for Improvement: KerioConnect could benefit from enhanced security features and more robust collaboration tools. It might also improve scalability and integration options. Barracuda could enhance user interface flexibility and improve integration with security platforms. Its reporting functionality could be made more comprehensive, and ease of deployment might be simplified.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: KerioConnect is straightforward to deploy with strong customer support, ensuring a seamless implementation. Barracuda's deployment is more complex due to its extensive security features but is supported by extensive documentation and responsive technical support, vital for complex environments.

Pricing and ROI: KerioConnect has a lower initial cost and provides an excellent ROI for small to medium businesses. Its competitive pricing makes it appealing for those seeking basic email management. Barracuda, priced higher, offers enhanced ROI through its extensive security capabilities, making it a preferred choice for enterprises requiring premium email protection.

To learn more, read our detailed Barracuda Email Protection vs. KerioConnect Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Barracuda Email Protection vs. KerioConnect

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Barracuda Email Protection

Ranking in Email Archiving

2nd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Email Security (13th), Security Incident Response (7th), Office 365 Protection (4th)

KerioConnect

Ranking in Email Archiving

6th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Email Applications (9th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Email Archiving category, the mindshare of Barracuda Email Protection is 17.8%, down from 25.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of KerioConnect is 3.3%, up from 2.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Email Archiving Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Barracuda Email Protection	17.8%
KerioConnect	3.3%
Other	78.9%

Email Archiving

Featured Reviews

Sherif Fouad

Group ICT Manager at a mining and metals company with 501-1,000 employees

Have raised concerns about scanning engines and automation while continuing to rely on layered protection strategies

Incident response is something that requires more development from Barracuda's side. Regarding room for improvement for Barracuda Forensics and Incident Response, for the product, developing or improving the scanning engine is important, but it's a bit tricky. I know that they are working on it heavily. The difference between Barracuda and Sophos is Sophos focused heavily on cybersecurity while Barracuda tried to increase their product portfolio. Sometimes, in some cases, this might end up with their teams being unfocused or a bit thin and stretched and super busy. However, there is room for improvement. The product is great. The teams that are supporting are great. But there is always room for improvement. Even if you have a product that you would give a rating of 10 out of 10, there is always room for improvement. The day we stop improving is the day we die. Regarding the scanning engine, Barracuda Forensics and Incident Response has a very good feature where you can create automated flows for how to handle specific emails that are detected as incidents. This needs a bit of an improvement. That's the only component of Barracuda Forensics and Incident Response that I believe requires improvement.

Read full review

Marcelino Mongcal

Senior Systems Tech/Admin at Samco Software Inc.

A seamless setup ensures smooth communication with comprehensive support

We remain a partner with Sophos and use XG S Firewalls without AWS implementation. We only use Sophos endpoint and Sophos Central. We host some clients on-premise while others we host remotely. The VPN connection is easy and proprietary, so it's not open to any other VPN clients. Communication with other mail servers is seamless. It can communicate with Gmail and Outlook without issues, provided the DNS settings are correct. We monitor our servers and security logs, implementing GeoIP blocking. We frequently block China and India IPs due to brute force attacks on our servers. We have extensive experience with KerioConnect. Backing up and maintaining it is straightforward compared to Microsoft Exchange, making it administrator-friendly. On a scale of 1-10, this solution rates an 8.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The archiving and search features are very good."

"The most helpful aspect for me is the out-of-the-box configuration, which is fairly good."

"The solution is straightforward to set up."

"When we got the service, it included the email archiver with unlimited storage."

"The beauty of Barracuda Email Protection is that it is easy to manage and simple to deploy."

"I would rate the solution nine out of ten."

"The most valuable features of Barracuda Essentials are it's a trusted name and is rated very high on review sites. It blocks high percentages of spam and junk email and it's in the cloud. They have hardware appliances, but this is in the cloud. The solution is very effective at blocking malware and blocking spam and this is what we are looking for. There's not a whole lot of complexity, you want a solution that is very good at blocking out all of the unwanted emails."

"The best feature of Barracuda Email Protection is that it provides protection for Microsoft 365."

More Barracuda Email Protection pros

"We use the solution as a mail server. It connects with Outlook and is used for calendaring and similar tasks."

"The most valuable features are its ease of use, excellent pricing, and it is platform agnostic."

"What I like most about Kerio Connect is that it supports ActiveSync, and that is its most critical feature. The solution is also a nice, simple, robust, and stable mail server."

"The most valuable features are security and privacy because you installed it on your server, within your company premises, not in the cloud."

"We have contacted technical support a handful of times and received some assistance."

"It's relatively simple to use."

"KerioConnect has integration with 365. We can use Outlook, which has its client and can be used with Apple devices. It integrates with the App Store and Microsoft Office. It has a smart router. The spam filtering and antivirus are good."

"The user interface is good."

More KerioConnect pros

Cons

"The customer service and support could be improved if the support were available directly in Europe. Currently, the support is often managed from India, so we sometimes need to wait due to the time zone difference. It would be quicker and better if the support were provided by European staff."

"The product must enable bulk user management."

"Barracuda Email Protection needs better reporting and more robust integration with security awareness training platforms and third-party solutions."

"Considering it integrates with Azure, I would like to be able to effectively set up policies where people are by default included in certain settings."

"Sometimes, in some cases, this might end up with their teams being unfocused or a bit thin and stretched and super busy."

"The platform's pricing needs improvement."

"Considering it integrates with Azure, I would like to be able to effectively set up policies where people are by default included in certain settings."

"The policies are set up in Barracuda by default; we don't have any control over them."

More Barracuda Email Protection cons

"I would like to see better support from their support team."

"KerioConnect continues to improve with regular updates throughout the year. They must be added to the roadmap, which requires approval."

"KerioConnect is stable as long as you use a strong password."

"Having a native Outlook map integration would make Kerio Connect better."

"It could be simpler to use and install, but I still wouldn't use it because there isn't a compelling use case."

"The solution could improve the redundancy because we only have one copy of the Kerio Connect server on our hardware. The next step for us is to move to the cloud and if Kerio does not have a cloud version available they should release one"

"The search and archiving documentation capabilities need to be stronger."

"We cannot compete with them because they're fully integrated with their applications."

More KerioConnect cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Price-wise, this product is middle-of-the-road."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a seven out of ten."

"The product is expensive."

"The solution's pricing is moderate, where it is neither cheap nor expensive."

"Despite a list price possibly around $40 per user, their market price allows customers to easily buy the solution."

"Barracuda licensing model is good."

"We pay annually. They never charged us for anything else. And they were quite a bit under that $20,000 mark. It was $19,074. And they've been pretty good about not skyrocketing the price or anything like that. It has gone up. It's gone up to $24,000 in 2020."

"We didn't have to pay a lot for the solution because we got it from a good vendor with a good user volume."

More Barracuda Email Protection pricing and cost advice

"KerioConnect has a first-time cost and yearly subscription. It is not expensive."

"The pricing is about $3 per mailbox per month."

"The price of Kerio Connect is better when comparing it to others solutions."

"The solution's pricing depends on how long you plan to keep it because you pay on a per-year basis. You might have a one-time setup cost for something like Microsoft Exchange or a Linux mail server. I'd say this solution is expensive on a per-year basis, almost 2000-3000 dollars annually. It doesn't seem to pay off yet, so we're considering switching to another product."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Email Archiving solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Construction Company

Comms Service Provider

13%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Performing Arts

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Barracuda Email Protection?

Barracuda Email Protection is easy to deploy and maintain. It doesn't require a specialized resource to manage this tool.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Barracuda Email Protection?

Their list price is too high, but in India, the selling price is affordable at around $10 per user per year. Despite a list price possibly around $40 per user, their market price allows customers t...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Barracuda Email Protection?

Considering it integrates with Azure, I would like to be able to effectively set up policies where people are by default included in certain settings. For instance, for email quarantine, I can't se...

See all answers

What do you like most about KerioConnect?

The most valuable features are security and privacy because you installed it on your server, within your company premises, not in the cloud.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for KerioConnect?

The pricing is very easy to understand. As a partner, we have a monitoring system that informs us when subscriptions expire, allowing us to handle renewals. The pricing is very competitive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with KerioConnect?

Since KerioConnect is a setup and go solution, everything works on its own. The only administrative tasks required are keeping it up to date, monitoring security logs, and ensuring protection from ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration vs Barracuda Email Protection

Compared 23% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Office 365 vs Barracuda Email Protection

Compared 20% of the time

Mimecast Email Security vs Barracuda Email Protection

Compared 11% of the time

Proofpoint Email Protection vs Barracuda Email Protection

Compared 8% of the time

Abnormal Security vs Barracuda Email Protection

Compared 4% of the time

More Barracuda Email Protection Competitors

Microsoft Exchange vs KerioConnect

Compared 43% of the time

Zimbra Collaboration vs KerioConnect

Compared 21% of the time

IceWarp vs KerioConnect

Compared 10% of the time

Microsoft Exchange Online vs KerioConnect

Compared 9% of the time

Google Workspace vs KerioConnect

Compared 6% of the time

More KerioConnect Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Barracuda Email Protection

January 2026

Download Barracuda Email Protection product report

Buyer's Guide

KerioConnect

January 2026

Download KerioConnect product report

Also Known As

Barracuda Essentials, Barracuda Forensics and Incident Response

No data available

Overview

Barracuda Email Protection provides advanced security with features like AI protection and cloud-based spam blocking, making it essential for managing email risks effectively.

Barracuda Email Protection stands out with its robust malware detection, ease of use, and seamless integration with Microsoft 365, serving enterprises by simplifying email threat management. Despite its efficient spam filtering and straightforward setup, users seek improvements in email encryption, third-party vendor integration, report details, and more streamlined performance. Organizations leverage its AI capabilities for phishing detection and employee training, allowing for automated operations and comprehensive threat protection. Its archiving, search, and hands-off management are crucial for companies lacking extensive security resources, ensuring persistent email access and secure practices.

What are the key features of Barracuda Email Protection?

Cloud-Based Spam Blocking: Reduces unwanted emails effectively.
Impersonation Detection: Identifies phishing attempts seamlessly.
Malware Detection: Protects against malicious threats.
AI Protection: Enhances security with intelligent analysis.
Microsoft 365 Integration: Ensures smooth operation within existing systems.
Customizable Rules: Allows tailored security protocols.

What are the main benefits and ROI of Barracuda Email Protection?

Time Savings: Automates and streamlines email management processes.
Email Security: Maintains domain reputation by reducing spam and threats.
Comprehensive Protection: Provides a unified approach to email threats.
Central Management: Simplifies oversight with a unified console.
Reliable Support: Offers technical assistance and guidance.

In finance, healthcare, and large enterprises, Barracuda Email Protection is deployed for its reliable email archiving and retrieval, supporting compliance and data integrity. Industries benefit from its AI-powered phishing detection and employee training tools, enhancing operational security and reducing risk exposure.

Barracuda Networks

Kerio Connect, a messaging and collaboration solution, meets the needs of small and mid-sized businesses while offering a robust feature lineup. Business users enjoy support for their favorite email client and easy web-based access. Kerio Connect is highly stable—so you can focus on business rather than unexpected downtime and recovery.

GFI

Sample Customers

ACT Government, Acumen Group, AGIP, Delta Dental Plans Association, Desai/Nasr Consulting Engineers, Inc., Equinox Information Systems

Southern Tier Brewing Company, Innotta, Baustoff + Metall, Hamifleurs, Chanson TV, Ryman Stationery

Buyer's Guide

Barracuda Email Protection vs. KerioConnect

December 2025

Free Report: Barracuda Email Protection vs. KerioConnect

Find out what your peers are saying about Barracuda Email Protection vs. KerioConnect and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Barracuda Email Protection vs. KerioConnect report.

See our list of best Email Archiving vendors.

We monitor all Email Archiving reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.