KerioConnect vs Zimbra Collaboration comparison

GFI and Zimbra are both solutions in the Email Applications category. GFI is ranked #9 with an average rating of 7.5, while Zimbra is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.0. GFI holds a 4.8% mindshare in EA, compared to Zimbra’s 8.6% mindshare. Additionally, 57% of GFI users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Zimbra users who would recommend it.

KerioConnect

Read 10 KerioConnect reviews

1,798 Views
954 Comparison Views

57% willing to recommend

Zimbra Collaboration

Read 29 Zimbra Collaboration reviews

2,646 Views
1,809 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

KerioConnect

Zimbra Collaboration

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on May 21, 2025

Zimbra Collaboration and KerioConnect are competing products in the realm of email and collaboration solutions. While KerioConnect may have a robust feature set that appeals to many, Zimbra Collaboration garners positive attention for its cost-effectiveness and customer service.

Features: Zimbra Collaboration stands out for integrated collaboration tools such as calendar management, file sharing, and robust security features. KerioConnect offers advanced filtering and email protection and flexible deployment options. Zimbra's strength lies in its seamless integration, while KerioConnect is praised for its comprehensive groupware setup.

Room for Improvement: Zimbra Collaboration could enhance its mobile app functionalities and offer more robust anti-spam solutions. The Zimbra interface could be more intuitive under high load. KerioConnect can improve by offering more integration capabilities with third-party services and simplifying its initial setup process. Also, KerioConnect's customer service response time could be quicker.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Zimbra Collaboration offers swift cloud-based deployment minimizing downtime and reliable support services enhancing user experience. KerioConnect provides both cloud and on-premise options, giving businesses flexibility in infrastructure choices. Zimbra's customer service is noted for responsiveness, contrasting with KerioConnect's traditional support model.

Pricing and ROI: Zimbra Collaboration is noted for its affordable setup costs, offering substantial ROI through reduced maintenance expenses. Although KerioConnect has a higher initial cost, it potentially justifies this with customization capabilities catering to particular organizational needs, promising greater long-term value.

To learn more, read our detailed KerioConnect vs. Zimbra Collaboration Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

KerioConnect vs. Zimbra Collaboration

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 856,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

KerioConnect

Ranking in Email Applications

9th

Average Rating

6.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Email Archiving (8th)

Zimbra Collaboration

Ranking in Email Applications

5th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Email Applications category, the mindshare of KerioConnect is 4.8%, up from 3.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Zimbra Collaboration is 8.6%, down from 9.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Email Applications

Featured Reviews

David Bloomer

Senior Technician at Computers At Work

Lightweight, simple, and robust; easy to maintain and doesn't require a lot of system resources to run

Kerio Connect does as advertised, so there are no real issues with the product itself. It's developed regularly, so there are constant updates. Possibly, the support and development have lessened since they've sold the company, but as far as the product itself is concerned, there isn't anything that I would suggest needs improvement. If I'm being picky, Kerio Connect uses a proprietary, mappy atom for Outlook, and it would be nice if they used a native mappy connection instead, but that's the only additional feature that I would like to see in its next release. If they have native Outlook map integration, that would be great, but other than that, it's got all the functions that I think a mail server should have.

Read full review

Vidya Shree

CTO at Molecular Connections Private Limited

Deploys quickly and has a good web interface

Zimbra Collaboration has a good web interface When it comes to administration tasks like configuring specific filters or group signatures, I have to dig into the configuration since there's nothing in the graphical or web interface. The solution’s forums don't have much information or…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We use the solution as a mail server. It connects with Outlook and is used for calendaring and similar tasks."

"The user interface is good."

"KerioConnect has integration with 365. We can use Outlook, which has its client and can be used with Apple devices. It integrates with the App Store and Microsoft Office. It has a smart router. The spam filtering and antivirus are good."

"It's relatively simple to use."

"What I like most about Kerio Connect is that it supports ActiveSync, and that is its most critical feature. The solution is also a nice, simple, robust, and stable mail server."

"The solution is easy to maintain, unlike Exchange. It's easy to create multiple domains and back up and restore if needed. It also has good security features like anti-spam and antivirus."

"The most valuable features are security and privacy because you installed it on your server, within your company premises, not in the cloud."

"The most valuable features are its ease of use, excellent pricing, and it is platform agnostic."

More KerioConnect pros

"One of the most valuable features involves the solution's automatic backup, which I find to be pretty simple and straightforward, and obviates the need for additional software."

"Zimbra Collaboration is light to manage. It works on the Linux operating system, which is far better to manage than Microsoft Windows. Microsoft Exchange works only on the Windows server. We prefer working on the Linux server for security reasons and ease of management. Zimbra Collaboration also has some integrated tools for security. It some modules to fight malware. These modules are not very powerful but are still doing a great job. Microsoft Exchange doesn't have a basic module. You have to purchase a security solution and add it to the solution. The cost of Zimbra Collaboration is one more reason for liking it. It is also very simple to migrate from Zimbra Collaboration to another email solution."

"The most valuable feature of Zimbra Collaboration is email functionality."

"Zimbra Collaboration has integrated a lot of their party tools and they have good documentation available."

"One of the premium features was customized rooms tailored to the collaboration needs. Many of the clients customize features such as organization logos and scanners."

"The most valuable feature of Zimbra Collaboration is the cost."

"We can control all the data in my IT infrastructure."

"The most valuable feature is sending messages as well as text and documents. It's a big solution for us since internal communication is a must in our organization."

More Zimbra Collaboration pros

Cons

"KerioConnect continues to improve with regular updates throughout the year. They must be added to the roadmap, which requires approval."

"The search and archiving documentation capabilities need to be stronger."

"We are considering switching to Microsoft Exchange. One reason is that it doesn't improve our workflow and doesn't integrate well with Microsoft 365 applications."

"KerioConnect is stable as long as you use a strong password."

"It could be simpler to use and install, but I still wouldn't use it because there isn't a compelling use case."

"Having a native Outlook map integration would make Kerio Connect better."

"You cannot integrate with other services like Google Docs, Google Assistant, Google Calendar, etc."

"I would like to see better support from their support team."

More KerioConnect cons

"Zimbra Collaboration's video conferencing could be improved."

"The solution’s forums don't have much information or documentation on administration tasks."

"The support was lacking in my experience. However, recently the support I received was good. Perhaps they have improved."

"File sharing permissions with Nextcloud integration need improvement."

"Zimbra should provide a desktop client. Right now, we are using a web browser for accessing our emails. There should also be a desktop client."

"It does have a few bugs."

"The product must be more customizable."

"I can confidently say that Zimbra is good enough for 2,000 client users. But, at the same time, if my client needs more than that and we have two options—Zimbra or Microsoft—I'm going with Microsoft because many admins will speak to Microsoft's ability to handle that many."

More Zimbra Collaboration cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"KerioConnect has a first-time cost and yearly subscription. It is not expensive."

"The price of Kerio Connect is better when comparing it to others solutions."

"The solution's pricing depends on how long you plan to keep it because you pay on a per-year basis. You might have a one-time setup cost for something like Microsoft Exchange or a Linux mail server. I'd say this solution is expensive on a per-year basis, almost 2000-3000 dollars annually. It doesn't seem to pay off yet, so we're considering switching to another product."

"The pricing is about $3 per mailbox per month."

"We do not pay for licenses to use this solution."

"I use Zimbra Collaboration's community version. We may move to the enterprise version since prices are affordable."

"We are using perpetual licenses. We have deployed it in our local data center, and we buy perpetual licenses on a per-user basis."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate the price a four"

"The solution is competitively priced."

"Zimbra Collaboration is expensive, and there is no perpetual license option."

"The solution is not expensive compared to other products."

"The price of the solution is low."

More Zimbra Collaboration pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Email Applications solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Comms Service Provider

13%

Government

Retailer

Computer Software Company

19%

Comms Service Provider

Government

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about KerioConnect?

The most valuable features are security and privacy because you installed it on your server, within your company premises, not in the cloud.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for KerioConnect?

KerioConnect has a first-time cost and yearly subscription. It is not expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with KerioConnect?

KerioConnect continues to improve with regular updates throughout the year. They must be added to the roadmap, which requires approval. In larger organizations, the server's capabilities and the da...

See all answers

How does Zimbra Collaboration compare with Microsoft Exchange?

Zimbra is a free, open source collaborative software suite. The features I like best are the ease of integration and the email, calendar, and collaboration server with web interface. In addition, I...

See all answers

What do you like most about Zimbra Collaboration?

The most valuable feature of Zimbra for our team's productivity is its efficiency in handling email communication.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zimbra Collaboration?

The solution is competitively priced.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Exchange vs KerioConnect

Compared 51% of the time

IceWarp vs KerioConnect

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Exchange Online vs KerioConnect

Compared 7% of the time

Google Workspace vs KerioConnect

Compared 4% of the time

More KerioConnect Competitors

Microsoft Exchange vs Zimbra Collaboration

Compared 28% of the time

Open-Xchange vs Zimbra Collaboration

Compared 21% of the time

IceWarp vs Zimbra Collaboration

Compared 10% of the time

Google Workspace vs Zimbra Collaboration

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Exchange Online vs Zimbra Collaboration

Compared 6% of the time

More Zimbra Collaboration Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

KerioConnect

June 2025

Download KerioConnect product report

Buyer's Guide

Zimbra Collaboration

May 2025

Download Zimbra Collaboration product report

Overview

Kerio Connect, a messaging and collaboration solution, meets the needs of small and mid-sized businesses while offering a robust feature lineup. Business users enjoy support for their favorite email client and easy web-based access. Kerio Connect is highly stable—so you can focus on business rather than unexpected downtime and recovery.

GFI

Zimbra Collaboration provides administrators and their end users innovative features that solve the challenges faced by organizations using today's legacy communications infrastructure.

Zimbra

Sample Customers

Southern Tier Brewing Company, Innotta, Baustoff + Metall, Hamifleurs, Chanson TV, Ryman Stationery

NEC Biglobe, City of Ventura, Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute, Hola Publishing, BIG, Sleepwell, LaFayette College, Xmission, DNA, Ring Line, Future Group, TIGC

Buyer's Guide

KerioConnect vs. Zimbra Collaboration

June 2025

Free Report: KerioConnect vs. Zimbra Collaboration

Find out what your peers are saying about KerioConnect vs. Zimbra Collaboration and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our KerioConnect vs. Zimbra Collaboration report.

See our list of best Email Applications vendors.

We monitor all Email Applications reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.