KerioConnect vs Zimbra Collaboration comparison

Why PeerSpot?

GFI and Zimbra are both solutions in the Email Applications category. GFI is ranked #9 with an average rating of 10.0, while Zimbra is ranked #10. GFI holds a 3.3% mindshare in EA, compared to Zimbra’s 5.9% mindshare. Additionally, 62% of GFI users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Zimbra users who would recommend it.

KerioConnect

Read 11 KerioConnect reviews

2,286 Views
1,760 Comparison Views

62% willing to recommend

Zimbra Collaboration

Read 28 Zimbra Collaboration reviews

3,136 Views
2,948 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

KerioConnect

Zimbra Collaboration

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on May 21, 2025

Zimbra Collaboration and KerioConnect are competing products in the realm of email and collaboration solutions. While KerioConnect may have a robust feature set that appeals to many, Zimbra Collaboration garners positive attention for its cost-effectiveness and customer service.

Features: Zimbra Collaboration stands out for integrated collaboration tools such as calendar management, file sharing, and robust security features. KerioConnect offers advanced filtering and email protection and flexible deployment options. Zimbra's strength lies in its seamless integration, while KerioConnect is praised for its comprehensive groupware setup.

Room for Improvement: Zimbra Collaboration could enhance its mobile app functionalities and offer more robust anti-spam solutions. The Zimbra interface could be more intuitive under high load. KerioConnect can improve by offering more integration capabilities with third-party services and simplifying its initial setup process. Also, KerioConnect's customer service response time could be quicker.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Zimbra Collaboration offers swift cloud-based deployment minimizing downtime and reliable support services enhancing user experience. KerioConnect provides both cloud and on-premise options, giving businesses flexibility in infrastructure choices. Zimbra's customer service is noted for responsiveness, contrasting with KerioConnect's traditional support model.

Pricing and ROI: Zimbra Collaboration is noted for its affordable setup costs, offering substantial ROI through reduced maintenance expenses. Although KerioConnect has a higher initial cost, it potentially justifies this with customization capabilities catering to particular organizational needs, promising greater long-term value.

To learn more, read our detailed KerioConnect vs. Zimbra Collaboration Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

KerioConnect vs. Zimbra Collaboration

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 912,565 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

KerioConnect

Ranking in Email Applications

9th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Email Archiving (7th)

Zimbra Collaboration

Ranking in Email Applications

10th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Email Applications category, the mindshare of KerioConnect is 3.3%, down from 4.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Zimbra Collaboration is 5.9%, down from 8.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Email Applications Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
KerioConnect	3.3%
Zimbra Collaboration	5.9%
Other	90.8%

Email Applications

Featured Reviews

Marcelino Mongcal

Senior Systems Tech/Admin at Samco Software Inc.

A seamless setup ensures smooth communication with comprehensive support

We remain a partner with Sophos and use XG S Firewalls without AWS implementation. We only use Sophos endpoint and Sophos Central. We host some clients on-premise while others we host remotely. The VPN connection is easy and proprietary, so it's not open to any other VPN clients. Communication with other mail servers is seamless. It can communicate with Gmail and Outlook without issues, provided the DNS settings are correct. We monitor our servers and security logs, implementing GeoIP blocking. We frequently block China and India IPs due to brute force attacks on our servers. We have extensive experience with KerioConnect. Backing up and maintaining it is straightforward compared to Microsoft Exchange, making it administrator-friendly. On a scale of 1-10, this solution rates an 8.

Read full review

Muhammad Talha Baig

Business Analyst and Associate Project Manager at SAMI Pharmaceuticals

One of the premium features was customized rooms tailored to the collaboration needs

Zimbra's strength lies in its individuality, and it should focus on leveraging its unique features rather than trying to emulate competitors. My organization has certified Zimbra technicians, so we believe we can utilize Zimbra certification. However, I was recently informed by Zimbra that no such certification exists. I have recently completed the test kit, and after the training, I will gain access to tickets. Therefore, if any clients are experiencing issues, we have a certified technical team available to provide support 24/7. This is how we can cater to our client's needs. I recommend Zimbra to small-scale and enterprise customers. Anyone, even those with 5 users, can opt for Zimbra. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We have contacted technical support a handful of times and received some assistance."

"The most valuable features are security and privacy because you installed it on your server, within your company premises, not in the cloud."

"What I like most about Kerio Connect is that it supports ActiveSync, and that is its most critical feature. The solution is also a nice, simple, robust, and stable mail server."

"The most valuable features are its ease of use, excellent pricing, and it is platform agnostic."

"Backing up and maintaining it is straightforward compared to Microsoft Exchange, making it administrator-friendly."

"Kerio Connect is secure, flexible, and easy to control from the user interface."

"As long as the operating is stable, the Kerio connect will be very stable as well, so we don't have any problem with it."

"It's relatively simple to use."

More KerioConnect pros

"One of the premium features was customized rooms tailored to the collaboration needs. Many of the clients customize features such as organization logos and scanners."

"Good email solution and it's open-source."

"The most valuable feature of Zimbra Collaboration is the cost."

"This is a good email solution and it's open-source which is great and the most important feature for us."

"Zimbra Collaboration's best feature is its compatibility with Microsoft's ActiveSync protocol, which allows users to use Outlook on Windows or MacOS."

"The product is easy to set up."

"We can control all the data in my IT infrastructure."

"The pricing of the solution is excellent; it's a newer solution with a modern interface and dashboard, the interface itself is very responsive and easy to navigate, the initial setup is very simple and straightforward, the stability is good and keeps getting better with each new update, and the solution really does scale very easily."

More Zimbra Collaboration pros

Cons

"You cannot integrate with other services like Google Docs, Google Assistant, Google Calendar, etc."

"KerioConnect continues to improve with regular updates throughout the year. They must be added to the roadmap, which requires approval."

"The search and archiving documentation capabilities need to be stronger."

"Most of our clients use Outlook and Kerio Connect. Occasionally, Kerio can be a bit slow. They could make it faster to get onto the web interface without so much load time. It's just slow with Outlook, however, for some reason."

"This is just a cost, it's not something that's driving our business forward; it's just foundational."

"The solution could improve the redundancy because we only have one copy of the Kerio Connect server on our hardware. The next step for us is to move to the cloud and if Kerio does not have a cloud version available they should release one"

"KerioConnect is stable as long as you use a strong password."

"We are considering switching to Microsoft Exchange. One reason is that it doesn't improve our workflow and doesn't integrate well with Microsoft 365 applications."

More KerioConnect cons

"The solution could improve by making it easier to use."

"The log files need to be improved; they need to show us more information because a lot of detail is lacking and that's not very helpful or insightful."

"Zimbra Collaboration does not have a solution roadmap as aggressive as the new collaboration mail solutions. Additionally, they can have a better interface and integration with single sign-on."

"Zimbra Collaboration's video conferencing could be improved."

"Zimbra must improve its solution to make it easy so that the users don't have to use webmail to connect to their accounts and log in to webmail every time. This is something that is lacking in Zimbra Collaboration. They should provide a better way to easily connect email applications on the desktop to the Zimbra server. They should also try to have more functionality for storage management, like Microsoft Exchange. Currently, the management of the email data must be done manually in Zimbra Collaboration, which we are finding very difficult. They should provide a way to save emails so that you can have more space on the server and storage. Because of the lack of this functionality, we are planning to migrate to Microsoft Exchange. Microsoft Exchange provides a better way to manage storage than Zimbra Collaboration. You cannot have a mail solution without storage management because emails will always increase. Zimbra Collaboration also needs tools for management. More back-office tools are required to manage the whole mailbox and space. You don't only manage emails but also the documents attached to the emails. Therefore, you require tools to select and decide what do you want to save or how do you want to free up space in your infrastructure."

"I can confidently say that Zimbra is good enough for 2,000 client users. But, at the same time, if my client needs more than that and we have two options—Zimbra or Microsoft—I'm going with Microsoft because many admins will speak to Microsoft's ability to handle that many."

"Zimbra Collaboration could improve the migration from a basic solution to a more containerized solution. For example, the installation should be able to extend to the containers and manage them with some solution, such as OpenShift or Kubernetes."

"The antispam and antivirus features are hard to understand on mobile devices."

More Zimbra Collaboration cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of Kerio Connect is better when comparing it to others solutions."

"The pricing is about $3 per mailbox per month."

"The solution's pricing depends on how long you plan to keep it because you pay on a per-year basis. You might have a one-time setup cost for something like Microsoft Exchange or a Linux mail server. I'd say this solution is expensive on a per-year basis, almost 2000-3000 dollars annually. It doesn't seem to pay off yet, so we're considering switching to another product."

"KerioConnect has a first-time cost and yearly subscription. It is not expensive."

"If you choose the network edition, it is a little pricier. They have the open-source edition too which is only community supported."

"The price of the solution is low."

"When it comes to the licensing of Zimbra Collaboration, my license covers the servers and I find its terms to be much simpler than those of Microsoft Exchange."

"We are using perpetual licenses. We have deployed it in our local data center, and we buy perpetual licenses on a per-user basis."

"We pay yearly licenses for Zimbra Collaboration."

"We do not pay for licenses to use this solution."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate the price a four"

"I use Zimbra Collaboration's community version. We may move to the enterprise version since prices are affordable."

More Zimbra Collaboration pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Email Applications solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

912,565 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

Construction Company

Outsourcing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	19
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for KerioConnect?

The pricing is very easy to understand. As a partner, we have a monitoring system that informs us when subscriptions expire, allowing us to handle renewals. The pricing is very competitive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with KerioConnect?

Since KerioConnect is a setup and go solution, everything works on its own. The only administrative tasks required are keeping it up to date, monitoring security logs, and ensuring protection from ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for KerioConnect?

Small medium-sized businesses are our primary focus, particularly in warehouse distribution and retail sectors. We are a reseller and purchase directly from Sophos.

See all answers

How does Zimbra Collaboration compare with Microsoft Exchange?

Zimbra is a free, open source collaborative software suite. The features I like best are the ease of integration and the email, calendar, and collaboration server with web interface. In addition, I...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Exchange vs KerioConnect

Compared 14% of the time

Open-Xchange vs KerioConnect

Compared 9% of the time

IceWarp vs KerioConnect

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Exchange Online vs KerioConnect

Compared 7% of the time

Proofpoint Intelligent Compliance Platform vs KerioConnect

Compared 7% of the time

More KerioConnect Competitors

Microsoft Exchange vs Zimbra Collaboration

Compared 15% of the time

Open-Xchange vs Zimbra Collaboration

Compared 14% of the time

Google Workspace vs Zimbra Collaboration

Compared 12% of the time

Microsoft Exchange Online vs Zimbra Collaboration

Compared 9% of the time

Zarafa vs Zimbra Collaboration

Compared 4% of the time

More Zimbra Collaboration Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

KerioConnect

August 2026

Download KerioConnect product report

Buyer's Guide

Zimbra Collaboration

August 2026

Download Zimbra Collaboration product report

Overview

KerioConnect delivers easy-to-use and secure email, calendar, and collaboration tools compatible with Office, Apple, and ActiveSync. Cost-effective and flexible, it suits on-premise installations, especially for SMBs seeking privacy and security.

KerioConnect offers a comprehensive email server experience with minimal resource needs and effective spam filtering. Compatible across platforms, it supports Outlook, enabling organizations to manage corporate communications efficiently. Its ability to host multiple domains makes it suitable for sectors like warehouse distribution and retail, with installation options that enhance security and privacy. However, faster Outlook integration, improved MS Teams and CRM system integration, and AI functionalities are sought after by users. Some demand a cloud version, Linux support, and better documentation. Still, KerioConnect remains a reliable choice for those needing on-premise capabilities.

What are KerioConnect's Key Features?

Ease of Use: Simplified interface for seamless navigation.
Robust Security: Advanced protection measures to safeguard data.
Spam Filtering: Efficiently reduces unwanted emails.
Platform Compatibility: Integrates with Office, Apple, and ActiveSync.
Log Analysis: Offers detailed insights for server management.
Multiple Domain Support: Manages diverse domains with ease.

What Benefits Should Users Expect?

Cost Efficiency: Lowers operational costs compared to alternatives.
Resource Minimization: Requires minimal system resources.
Deployment Flexibility: Allows tailored on-premise installations.
Enhanced Security: Provides privacy through internal hosting options.
Reliable Support: Access to reseller services from Sophos.

KerioConnect is widely utilized in SMBs across sectors like retail and warehouse distribution for its capability to handle multiple domains and integrate with Outlook for communication management. Resellers offer it as a dependable on-site email management solution, letting businesses maintain oversight and security control.

GFI

Zimbra Collaboration is a comprehensive tool for communication and collaboration, featuring easy account management and seamless integration capabilities with open-source customization. It's valued for premium functionalities like auto discovery and mobile synchronization, catering to small and medium-sized organizations.

Zimbra Collaboration provides essential features for business communication, including efficient account management via a centralized console and intuitive web interface. Designed for scalability and stability, it supports a range of functionalities from document sharing to video conferencing. Users benefit from its competitive pricing and open-source affordability. However, there's room for improvement in areas like backup, anti-spam, and mobile access, with a demand for better GUI, documentation, and language support. Zimbra's integration with third-party tools and strengthening video conferencing and storage management could enhance its appeal in various sectors.

What Are the Key Features of Zimbra Collaboration?

Centralized Console: Simplifies account management with an easy-to-use interface.
Open-Source Customization: Offers flexibility in adapting the platform to specific needs.
Seamless Integration: Allows smooth collaboration with existing tools and platforms.
Mobile Synchronization: Ensures access across devices for continuous productivity.
Anti-Spam Modules: Provides enhanced email security with built-in protections.

What Benefits Should Be Evaluated in Reviews?

Scalability: Grow with your organization's needs without compromising performance.
Affordability: Benefit from cost-effective features with competitive pricing.
Stability: Experience reliable and consistent performance across the platform.
Responsive Interface: Navigate effortlessly with a user-friendly design.

In industries like education and healthcare, Zimbra Collaboration implements effective email and collaboration solutions, offering robust security and seamless integration. It facilitates communication for organizations requiring reliable webmail support for numerous accounts, ensuring consistent performance and affordable scalability.

Zimbra

Sample Customers

Southern Tier Brewing Company, Innotta, Baustoff + Metall, Hamifleurs, Chanson TV, Ryman Stationery

NEC Biglobe, City of Ventura, Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute, Hola Publishing, BIG, Sleepwell, LaFayette College, Xmission, DNA, Ring Line, Future Group, TIGC

Buyer's Guide

KerioConnect vs. Zimbra Collaboration

September 2026

Free Report: KerioConnect vs. Zimbra Collaboration

Find out what your peers are saying about KerioConnect vs. Zimbra Collaboration and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

912,565 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our KerioConnect vs. Zimbra Collaboration report.

See our list of best Email Applications vendors.

We monitor all Email Applications reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.