KerioConnect vs Zimbra Collaboration comparison

GFI and Zimbra are both solutions in the Email Applications category. GFI is ranked #9 with an average rating of 10.0, while Zimbra is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.0. GFI holds a 3.8% mindshare in EA, compared to Zimbra’s 6.7% mindshare. Additionally, 62% of GFI users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Zimbra users who would recommend it.

KerioConnect

Read 11 KerioConnect reviews

2,026 Views
1,661 Comparison Views

62% willing to recommend

Zimbra Collaboration

Read 28 Zimbra Collaboration reviews

2,858 Views
2,715 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

KerioConnect

Zimbra Collaboration

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on May 21, 2025

Zimbra Collaboration and KerioConnect are competing products in the realm of email and collaboration solutions. While KerioConnect may have a robust feature set that appeals to many, Zimbra Collaboration garners positive attention for its cost-effectiveness and customer service.

Features: Zimbra Collaboration stands out for integrated collaboration tools such as calendar management, file sharing, and robust security features. KerioConnect offers advanced filtering and email protection and flexible deployment options. Zimbra's strength lies in its seamless integration, while KerioConnect is praised for its comprehensive groupware setup.

Room for Improvement: Zimbra Collaboration could enhance its mobile app functionalities and offer more robust anti-spam solutions. The Zimbra interface could be more intuitive under high load. KerioConnect can improve by offering more integration capabilities with third-party services and simplifying its initial setup process. Also, KerioConnect's customer service response time could be quicker.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Zimbra Collaboration offers swift cloud-based deployment minimizing downtime and reliable support services enhancing user experience. KerioConnect provides both cloud and on-premise options, giving businesses flexibility in infrastructure choices. Zimbra's customer service is noted for responsiveness, contrasting with KerioConnect's traditional support model.

Pricing and ROI: Zimbra Collaboration is noted for its affordable setup costs, offering substantial ROI through reduced maintenance expenses. Although KerioConnect has a higher initial cost, it potentially justifies this with customization capabilities catering to particular organizational needs, promising greater long-term value.

To learn more, read our detailed KerioConnect vs. Zimbra Collaboration Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

KerioConnect vs. Zimbra Collaboration

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,747 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

KerioConnect

Ranking in Email Applications

9th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Email Archiving (7th)

Zimbra Collaboration

Ranking in Email Applications

6th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Email Applications category, the mindshare of KerioConnect is 3.8%, down from 4.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Zimbra Collaboration is 6.7%, down from 8.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Email Applications Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Zimbra Collaboration	6.7%
KerioConnect	3.8%
Other	89.5%

Email Applications

Featured Reviews

Marcelino Mongcal

Senior Systems Tech/Admin at Samco Software Inc.

A seamless setup ensures smooth communication with comprehensive support

We remain a partner with Sophos and use XG S Firewalls without AWS implementation. We only use Sophos endpoint and Sophos Central. We host some clients on-premise while others we host remotely. The VPN connection is easy and proprietary, so it's not open to any other VPN clients. Communication with other mail servers is seamless. It can communicate with Gmail and Outlook without issues, provided the DNS settings are correct. We monitor our servers and security logs, implementing GeoIP blocking. We frequently block China and India IPs due to brute force attacks on our servers. We have extensive experience with KerioConnect. Backing up and maintaining it is straightforward compared to Microsoft Exchange, making it administrator-friendly. On a scale of 1-10, this solution rates an 8.

Read full review

Vidya Shree

CTO at Molecular Connections Private Limited

Deploys quickly and has a good web interface

Zimbra Collaboration has a good web interface When it comes to administration tasks like configuring specific filters or group signatures, I have to dig into the configuration since there's nothing in the graphical or web interface. The solution’s forums don't have much information or…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Backing up and maintaining it is straightforward compared to Microsoft Exchange, making it administrator-friendly."

"We have contacted technical support a handful of times and received some assistance."

"Kerio Connect is secure, flexible, and easy to control from the user interface."

"Kerio Connect is secure, flexible, and easy to control from the user interface. It has many security features able to be controlled from one place, such as anti-spam. I have found it very convenient. Additionally, you can analyze log files and share folders which is helpful."

"We use the solution as a mail server. It connects with Outlook and is used for calendaring and similar tasks."

"The most valuable features are security and privacy because you installed it on your server, within your company premises, not in the cloud."

"KerioConnect has integration with 365. We can use Outlook, which has its client and can be used with Apple devices. It integrates with the App Store and Microsoft Office. It has a smart router. The spam filtering and antivirus are good."

"The user interface is good."

More KerioConnect pros

"The pricing of the solution is excellent; it's a newer solution with a modern interface and dashboard, the interface itself is very responsive and easy to navigate, the initial setup is very simple and straightforward, the stability is good and keeps getting better with each new update, and the solution really does scale very easily."

"The backup and storage management features of Zimbra Collaboration are valuable."

"Premium features, such as auto discovery and archiving, mobile management and HSM, make life much easier."

"This is a good email solution and it's open-source which is great and the most important feature for us."

"The web interface is powerful and easy to use."

"The Zimbra Collaboration's most valuable feature is web access."

"For an SMB, it is a recommendable email solution."

"The product is easy to set up."

More Zimbra Collaboration pros

Cons

"Most of our clients use Outlook and Kerio Connect. Occasionally, Kerio can be a bit slow. They could make it faster to get onto the web interface without so much load time. It's just slow with Outlook, however, for some reason."

"This is just a cost, it's not something that's driving our business forward; it's just foundational."

"KerioConnect is stable as long as you use a strong password."

"I would like to see better support from their support team."

"Having a native Outlook map integration would make Kerio Connect better."

"KerioConnect continues to improve with regular updates throughout the year. They must be added to the roadmap, which requires approval."

"The solution could improve the redundancy because we only have one copy of the Kerio Connect server on our hardware. The next step for us is to move to the cloud and if Kerio does not have a cloud version available they should release one"

"Most of our clients use Outlook and Kerio Connect. Occasionally, Kerio can be a bit slow."

More KerioConnect cons

"The support was lacking in my experience. However, recently the support I received was good. Perhaps they have improved."

"It would be great if a group chat feature were created to allow for a team environment."

"I would like to see a Microsoft schedule function added."

"It does have a few bugs. However, they are small and can be worked around."

"It does have a few bugs."

"Zimbra Collaboration does not have a solution roadmap as aggressive as the new collaboration mail solutions. Additionally, they can have a better interface and integration with single sign-on."

"Zimbra Collaboration is expensive, and there is no perpetual license option."

"Zimbra must improve its solution to make it easy so that the users don't have to use webmail to connect to their accounts and log in to webmail every time. This is something that is lacking in Zimbra Collaboration. They should provide a better way to easily connect email applications on the desktop to the Zimbra server. They should also try to have more functionality for storage management, like Microsoft Exchange. Currently, the management of the email data must be done manually in Zimbra Collaboration, which we are finding very difficult. They should provide a way to save emails so that you can have more space on the server and storage. Because of the lack of this functionality, we are planning to migrate to Microsoft Exchange. Microsoft Exchange provides a better way to manage storage than Zimbra Collaboration. You cannot have a mail solution without storage management because emails will always increase. Zimbra Collaboration also needs tools for management. More back-office tools are required to manage the whole mailbox and space. You don't only manage emails but also the documents attached to the emails. Therefore, you require tools to select and decide what do you want to save or how do you want to free up space in your infrastructure."

More Zimbra Collaboration cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of Kerio Connect is better when comparing it to others solutions."

"The solution's pricing depends on how long you plan to keep it because you pay on a per-year basis. You might have a one-time setup cost for something like Microsoft Exchange or a Linux mail server. I'd say this solution is expensive on a per-year basis, almost 2000-3000 dollars annually. It doesn't seem to pay off yet, so we're considering switching to another product."

"KerioConnect has a first-time cost and yearly subscription. It is not expensive."

"The pricing is about $3 per mailbox per month."

"I use Zimbra Collaboration's community version. We may move to the enterprise version since prices are affordable."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate the price a four"

"The solution is competitively priced."

"We pay yearly licenses for Zimbra Collaboration."

"Zimbra Collaboration is expensive, and there is no perpetual license option."

"There is an annual standard licensing fee to use Zimbra Collaboration and there is no other cost."

"We do not pay for licenses to use this solution."

"Zimbra Collaboration is less expensive than Microsoft Exchange. Zimbra works for small companies because it is not expensive. Zimbra Collaboration has more security tools than Microsoft Exchange. If you are choosing between Zimbra Collaboration and Microsoft Exchange, you have to take into account the cost of security tools with Microsoft Exchange. When you purchase Microsoft Exchange, you will also have to purchase tools for security, which adds to the cost. The migration from Zimbra Collaboration to another email solution is very simple and easy. Migration from Microsoft Exchange to another email solution is very difficult. Microsoft doesn't allow migration that easily. In fact, you have to pay for tools to do that. You have to buy some expensive tools to migrate."

More Zimbra Collaboration pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Email Applications solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Construction Company

Performing Arts

Computer Software Company

Outsourcing Company

Comms Service Provider

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	19
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for KerioConnect?

The pricing is very easy to understand. As a partner, we have a monitoring system that informs us when subscriptions expire, allowing us to handle renewals. The pricing is very competitive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with KerioConnect?

Since KerioConnect is a setup and go solution, everything works on its own. The only administrative tasks required are keeping it up to date, monitoring security logs, and ensuring protection from ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for KerioConnect?

Small medium-sized businesses are our primary focus, particularly in warehouse distribution and retail sectors. We are a reseller and purchase directly from Sophos.

See all answers

How does Zimbra Collaboration compare with Microsoft Exchange?

Zimbra is a free, open source collaborative software suite. The features I like best are the ease of integration and the email, calendar, and collaboration server with web interface. In addition, I...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zimbra Collaboration?

The solution is competitively priced.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Zimbra Collaboration?

When it comes to administration tasks like configuring specific filters or group signatures, I have to dig into the configuration since there's nothing in the graphical or web interface. The soluti...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Exchange vs KerioConnect

Compared 19% of the time

IceWarp vs KerioConnect

Compared 9% of the time

Open-Xchange vs KerioConnect

Compared 9% of the time

Proofpoint Intelligent Compliance Platform vs KerioConnect

Compared 7% of the time

ProtonMail vs KerioConnect

Compared 6% of the time

More KerioConnect Competitors

Microsoft Exchange vs Zimbra Collaboration

Compared 16% of the time

Open-Xchange vs Zimbra Collaboration

Compared 15% of the time

Google Workspace vs Zimbra Collaboration

Compared 12% of the time

Microsoft Exchange Online vs Zimbra Collaboration

Compared 9% of the time

IceWarp vs Zimbra Collaboration

Compared 7% of the time

More Zimbra Collaboration Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

KerioConnect

June 2026

Download KerioConnect product report

Buyer's Guide

Zimbra Collaboration

May 2026

Download Zimbra Collaboration product report

Overview

KerioConnect delivers easy-to-use and secure email, calendar, and collaboration tools compatible with Office, Apple, and ActiveSync. Cost-effective and flexible, it suits on-premise installations, especially for SMBs seeking privacy and security.

KerioConnect offers a comprehensive email server experience with minimal resource needs and effective spam filtering. Compatible across platforms, it supports Outlook, enabling organizations to manage corporate communications efficiently. Its ability to host multiple domains makes it suitable for sectors like warehouse distribution and retail, with installation options that enhance security and privacy. However, faster Outlook integration, improved MS Teams and CRM system integration, and AI functionalities are sought after by users. Some demand a cloud version, Linux support, and better documentation. Still, KerioConnect remains a reliable choice for those needing on-premise capabilities.

What are KerioConnect's Key Features?

Ease of Use: Simplified interface for seamless navigation.
Robust Security: Advanced protection measures to safeguard data.
Spam Filtering: Efficiently reduces unwanted emails.
Platform Compatibility: Integrates with Office, Apple, and ActiveSync.
Log Analysis: Offers detailed insights for server management.
Multiple Domain Support: Manages diverse domains with ease.

What Benefits Should Users Expect?

Cost Efficiency: Lowers operational costs compared to alternatives.
Resource Minimization: Requires minimal system resources.
Deployment Flexibility: Allows tailored on-premise installations.
Enhanced Security: Provides privacy through internal hosting options.
Reliable Support: Access to reseller services from Sophos.

KerioConnect is widely utilized in SMBs across sectors like retail and warehouse distribution for its capability to handle multiple domains and integrate with Outlook for communication management. Resellers offer it as a dependable on-site email management solution, letting businesses maintain oversight and security control.

GFI

Zimbra Collaboration is a comprehensive tool for communication and collaboration, featuring easy account management and seamless integration capabilities with open-source customization. It's valued for premium functionalities like auto discovery and mobile synchronization, catering to small and medium-sized organizations.

Zimbra Collaboration provides essential features for business communication, including efficient account management via a centralized console and intuitive web interface. Designed for scalability and stability, it supports a range of functionalities from document sharing to video conferencing. Users benefit from its competitive pricing and open-source affordability. However, there's room for improvement in areas like backup, anti-spam, and mobile access, with a demand for better GUI, documentation, and language support. Zimbra's integration with third-party tools and strengthening video conferencing and storage management could enhance its appeal in various sectors.

What Are the Key Features of Zimbra Collaboration?

Centralized Console: Simplifies account management with an easy-to-use interface.
Open-Source Customization: Offers flexibility in adapting the platform to specific needs.
Seamless Integration: Allows smooth collaboration with existing tools and platforms.
Mobile Synchronization: Ensures access across devices for continuous productivity.
Anti-Spam Modules: Provides enhanced email security with built-in protections.

What Benefits Should Be Evaluated in Reviews?

Scalability: Grow with your organization's needs without compromising performance.
Affordability: Benefit from cost-effective features with competitive pricing.
Stability: Experience reliable and consistent performance across the platform.
Responsive Interface: Navigate effortlessly with a user-friendly design.

In industries like education and healthcare, Zimbra Collaboration implements effective email and collaboration solutions, offering robust security and seamless integration. It facilitates communication for organizations requiring reliable webmail support for numerous accounts, ensuring consistent performance and affordable scalability.

Zimbra

Sample Customers

Southern Tier Brewing Company, Innotta, Baustoff + Metall, Hamifleurs, Chanson TV, Ryman Stationery

NEC Biglobe, City of Ventura, Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute, Hola Publishing, BIG, Sleepwell, LaFayette College, Xmission, DNA, Ring Line, Future Group, TIGC

Buyer's Guide

KerioConnect vs. Zimbra Collaboration

June 2026

Free Report: KerioConnect vs. Zimbra Collaboration

Find out what your peers are saying about KerioConnect vs. Zimbra Collaboration and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our KerioConnect vs. Zimbra Collaboration report.

See our list of best Email Applications vendors.

We monitor all Email Applications reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.