ScienceLogic and Azure Monitor are leading contenders in the IT infrastructure monitoring field. ScienceLogic stands out due to its customization and multi-tenancy advantages. Azure Monitor benefits from cloud-native integrations and real-time insights.
Features: ScienceLogic provides comprehensive monitoring capabilities with customizable dashboards, supports a multi-tenant environment, and integrates well with external tools to enhance its functionality. Azure Monitor emphasizes robust data visualization and aggregation with a focus on cloud resources, offers real-time insights, and includes alerting mechanisms that complement its cloud-native infrastructure.
Room for Improvement: ScienceLogic users experience complexity in setup and usability, demanding considerable learning curves and customization. Desired enhancements include improved reporting features and more streamlined error resolution processes. Azure Monitor faces high costs due to its data ingest pricing model and requires enhancements in user interface simplification, greater cross-platform integrations, and more out-of-the-box monitoring capabilities, particularly for hybrid environments.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ScienceLogic is mainly deployed on-premises or private clouds, necessitating hands-on setup but offering excellent customer service and responsive technical support. Azure Monitor predominantly supports public cloud deployments, facilitating easier integration with cloud services, though it lacks an extensive support structure compared to ScienceLogic's personalized support for complex issues, relying instead on seamless integration with the Azure ecosystem.
Pricing and ROI: ScienceLogic's pricing is device and tier-based, potentially becoming expensive for large enterprises, but delivers ROI through reduced downtime and enhanced infrastructure visibility. Azure Monitor operates on a pay-as-you-go model that results in unpredictable costs due to data ingest charges, yet is considered affordable within the Azure suite, offering a cost-effective option for companies already using Azure services. Both demonstrate potential for positive ROI, with ScienceLogic providing extensive coverage and Azure Monitor focusing on resource management efficiency.
Azure Monitor helps prevent impacts on their system.
The return on investment is fair but often challenged by medium-sized businesses who may question its adequacy.
Users end up getting no resolution from their team because they're outsourced vendors, and they don't have deeper expertise over any of the products they are referring to.
However, the second-line support is good.
I would rate the support for Azure Monitor as a seven.
I received excellent support from ScienceLogic.
Problems with Skylar may require longer wait times due to limited resource expertise.
We have a lab environment to test solutions before offering them to customers, ensuring everything works correctly.
Azure Monitor is very scalable; there are no issues with scalability for different kinds of businesses.
Azure Monitor is working fine, yet I face a costing issue as if there are a lot of logs collected in the workspace or in the center, it becomes very costly.
The stability rating is nine out of ten, acknowledging some bugs, but indicating these are minor issues.
If Azure Monitor can independently add one gigabyte, two gigabytes, or five gigabytes at least to log storage, I can fix the logs without syncing with Log Analytics Workspace and Sentinel.
The challenges with Azure Monitor are that it's initially complex to set up because you need multiple components.
The cost skyrockets once you start using it, and there are complaints that the actual cost of the Kubernetes cluster was less than the cost they were incurring for Azure Monitor.
While some other companies have easier APIs, using this solution demands significant expertise.
If the knowledge for implementation could be spread through articles, it would reduce this dependency.
Integrating observability and APM monitoring into the overall portfolio would be beneficial.
When I export logs into the application, workspace, log analytic workspace, and into Sentinel to read reports, I need to add storage, which increases the cost.
It could be cheaper.
ScienceLogic is not that expensive and is cost-effective overall.
The alerting features definitely help in reducing operational downtime for my customers by allowing us to get notifications in advance and take active actions.
The ease of access in Azure is significant because it's native to the platform and easy to integrate.
Resource monitoring is essential.
Notably, its automation features, such as Runbook action, enable domain experts like me to execute one-click automation solutions, which contributes significantly to reducing MTTR.
It offers over 500 integrations with a wide range of device types, referred to as PowerPacks, which are prebuilt integrations for hundreds, if not thousands, of integration types.
The CMDB update and the automatic CMDB update are valuable.
Product | Market Share (%) |
---|---|
Azure Monitor | 5.0% |
ScienceLogic | 2.0% |
Other | 93.0% |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 23 |
Midsize Enterprise | 6 |
Large Enterprise | 29 |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 13 |
Midsize Enterprise | 11 |
Large Enterprise | 24 |
Azure Monitor is a comprehensive monitoring solution offered by Microsoft Azure. It provides a centralized platform for monitoring the performance and health of various Azure resources, applications, and infrastructure.
With Azure Monitor, users can gain insights into the availability, performance, and usage of their applications and infrastructure. The key features of Azure Monitor include metrics, logs, alerts, and dashboards. Metrics allow users to collect and analyze performance data from various Azure resources, such as virtual machines, databases, and storage accounts.
Logs enable users to collect and analyze log data from different sources, including Azure resources, applications, and operating systems. Azure Monitor also provides a robust alerting mechanism that allows users to set up alerts based on specific conditions or thresholds. These alerts can be configured to notify users via email, SMS, or other notification channels. Additionally, Azure Monitor offers customizable dashboards that allow users to visualize and analyze their monitoring data in a personalized and intuitive manner.
Azure Monitor integrates seamlessly with other Azure services, such as Azure Automation and Azure Logic Apps, enabling users to automate actions based on monitoring data. It also supports integration with third-party monitoring tools and services, providing flexibility and extensibility.
Overall, Azure Monitor is a powerful and versatile monitoring solution that helps users gain deep insights into the performance and health of their Azure resources and applications. It offers a wide range of features and integrations, making it a comprehensive solution for monitoring and managing Azure environments.
ScienceLogic excels in customizable dashboards, seamless integrations, and real-time data analysis, supporting diverse IT environments with multi-tenant capabilities.
ScienceLogic provides robust infrastructure and network monitoring, catering to cloud, applications, and server environments. It supports hybrid setups, integrating with CMDB and ticketing systems while automating incident management. ScienceLogic's PowerPacks eliminate visibility gaps and its adaptable nature supports modern and legacy systems. Offering agentless monitoring, it ensures efficient operations with scalable infrastructure support and detailed reporting. However, the interface complexity and need for professional support can present usability challenges. Enhancements in reporting, application coverage, API support, and customization are desirable for improved user experience.
What are ScienceLogic's most important features?ScienceLogic is often implemented across industries requiring detailed attention to infrastructure and network monitoring. It finds utility in managing hybrid environments, integrating seamlessly with essential systems like CMDB and ticketing platforms. Its scalability and adaptability are valued in unifying complex, diverse environments under one monitoring platform.
We monitor all Cloud Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.