We performed a comparison between Azure Monitor and Oracle Real User Experience Insight based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution's most valuable features are its ability to focus on delivery and maximizing the performance of applications and services."
"The upside to the solution is if you are working in a Microsoft or Azure environment, it makes things easier."
"It is a move-in powerful feature compared to other market-leading tools."
"It is a robust, stable product."
"The most valuable feature is that it's stable. It hasn't crossed any thresholds."
"A product that is well-integrated for monitoring Microsoft Azure."
"Azure Monitor is very stable."
"In the last company where I worked about a year ago, it looked very simple."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to Drill down to webpage actions."
"The customers requires redundancy work to achieve a 99.999% uptime. To accomplish this, we installed this solution into storage. This setup ensures that if one node goes down, the system remains operational through another node. So that's the core aspect of the setup. Additionally, the schedule and the rental database run on servers, and behind these servers, we have storage. This storage operates as a single storage cluster, although there might be another storage option that costs around $30."
"ORUEI lets you create a dashboard that shows you insight into the user experience."
"The availability of the solution is its most valuable aspect. I can also Google anything I want and upload it on the cloud. I can do that using the mobile app. It is very helpful."
"The solution should have cross-connection or cross-communication between tech partners."
"have used multiple products like Webex and PRTG. Some features could be added. Azure Monitor should add SMS and APIs. We have very limited access to Azure Monitor. I usually get alerts on my phone when they are integrated with Slack. I am not always available, but my team is. Sometimes, I am traveling and don't have access to my email, but I have Slack and other third-party projects that send me instant messages if a sensor goes down."
"This solution could be improved with more out-of-the-box functionalities and artificial intelligence to complete event correlation."
"Although it's not always the case, the price can sometimes get expensive. This depends on a number of factors, such as how many services you are trying to integrate with Azure Monitor and how much storage they're consuming each month (for example, how large are the log files?)."
"The default interface should be improved."
"In my opinion, they should improve the overall user experience, especially when it comes to indexing and searching collective logs."
"I need connectivity with cost management."
"This solution has fewer features than some of its competitors, so adding more features to it would make it better."
"It would be nice if the solution could be integrated with Outlook. If I'm signing any quotation, any proposal, or any of my communications, I should be able to update that Oracle application as well."
"The application resource usage has increased due to using RUEI."
"Currently, it monitors web applications well, but ORUEI doesn't monitor mobile applications yet. It would be nice if they also added the ability to monitor mobile apps."
"There are instances of imitation, like with processors. As customers, we aim to develop this area, particularly focusing on the networking facility and connectivity. The challenge lies in the connection between the DC and MDR, which is quite distant. The link between them needs to be reliable. When direct fiber isn't available, they resort to using dark fiber, which can lead to some limitations. This situation presents another layer of complexity, requiring approximately 11 feet of additional infrastructure. This is essential for ensuring that applications have minimal latency. In the event of any issues, an account is set up for cache memory to ensure that the system remains operational and can recover data from the cache as needed. Additionally, I have a secondary aspect to consider."
Azure Monitor is ranked 4th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 44 reviews while Oracle Real User Experience Insight is ranked 33rd in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 5 reviews. Azure Monitor is rated 7.6, while Oracle Real User Experience Insight is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Azure Monitor writes "A powerful Kusto query language but the alerting mechanism needs improvement". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Real User Experience Insight writes "UX monitoring is helpful but it can't monitor mobile applications". Azure Monitor is most compared with Datadog, Dynatrace, Prometheus, Sentry and Grafana, whereas Oracle Real User Experience Insight is most compared with AWS X-Ray and Dynatrace. See our Azure Monitor vs. Oracle Real User Experience Insight report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
