

Catchpoint and AWS Auto Scaling both serve distinct purposes in IT performance and scalability. Catchpoint excels in performance monitoring, while AWS Auto Scaling focuses on automatic resource management for applications, making it more comprehensive for cloud infrastructure.
Features: Catchpoint offers extensive monitoring, detailed analytics, and real-time alerts. AWS Auto Scaling provides automatic resource scaling, integration with AWS services, and ease of use.
Room for Improvement: Catchpoint could improve visual reporting tools, customer support response times, and the complexity of setup configurations. AWS Auto Scaling users suggest better documentation, more granular control over scaling policies, and enhancements in user control and guidance.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Catchpoint is straightforward to deploy with comprehensive customer service but faces critiques on setup complexity. AWS Auto Scaling integrates seamlessly with AWS environments and has reliable support, though its initial setup documentation could be better.
Pricing and ROI: Catchpoint's setup cost is high but provides significant ROI with detailed insights. AWS Auto Scaling, using AWS's pay-as-you-go model, is seen as cost-efficient with predictable expenses.
There have been fewer outages, and it is very easy to identify the issue of performance bottleneck through root cause analysis and insights.
Real-time monitoring of networks, websites, and apps gives insightful information which helps to make data-driven decisions.
We have seen a return on investment as we have fewer outages.
AWS support is very good.
Catchpoint customer support is very helpful and proactive.
The customer support is always very friendly and responsive and always available twenty-four hours per day, seven days a week.
Customer support is available 24/7 and very proactive and responsive.
Scalability is impressive, as it allowed us to go from 1,000 to 10,000 active users within a week during a traffic spike.
Catchpoint's scalability is great as it grows with my organization's needs and can handle those needs very well.
Catchpoint is stable as I have not experienced any lagging.
This complexity led me to migrate to CloudFormation, which simplifies the deployment process.
If you could add more training on how to use it correctly and on the functions that I haven't used before or some people have not really used before, that would help.
It requires a downtime before deploying the Auto Scaling group.
Dashboard customization and UX should be improved.
I would also add that the script recorder needs some work due to an update by Google, deprecating the use of the current solution.
If we could receive similar data for the China market as we do for North America and Asia Pacific, this would be helpful.
The pricing of Auto Scaling is medium range, neither high nor low.
The cost is very effective and relatively competitive.
Catchpoint's price is very cost-effective, but I don't know if it might be out of budget for a smaller organization working on a tight budget.
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that the cost was very cost-effective and affordable.
During peak traffic times, the Auto Scaling group can be deployed to ensure that the client works well, and the traffic remains average.
The automation aspect where you can automate it to whatever you want is what I value the most about Auto Scaling.
Its automatic scaling capabilities are very useful.
The reduction in outages is notable, with a 60 to 70% increase in outages reduction.
Synthetic monitoring and root cause analysis have helped my team by allowing root cause monitoring to help us understand where the threat is coming from, enabling us to catch the threat before it impacts our users.
With the help of Catchpoint, we are able to address issues before our customers. Our triage time has reduced. We are able to reduce outages and unwanted user incidents.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| AWS Auto Scaling | 0.4% |
| Catchpoint | 0.8% |
| Other | 98.8% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 12 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 11 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 5 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 12 |
AWS Auto Scaling monitors your applications and automatically adjusts capacity to maintain steady, predictable performance at the lowest possible cost. Using AWS Auto Scaling, it’s easy to setup application scaling for multiple resources across multiple services in minutes. The service provides a simple, powerful user interface that lets you build scaling plans for resources including Amazon EC2 instances and Spot Fleets, Amazon ECS tasks, Amazon DynamoDB tables and indexes, and Amazon Aurora Replicas. AWS Auto Scaling makes scaling simple with recommendations that allow you to optimize performance, costs, or balance between them. If you’re already using Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling to dynamically scale your Amazon EC2 instances, you can now combine it with AWS Auto Scaling to scale additional resources for other AWS services. With AWS Auto Scaling, your applications always have the right resources at the right time.
Catchpoint is the Internet Resilience Company™. The top online retailers, Global2000, CDNs, cloud service providers, and xSPs in the world rely on Catchpoint to increase their resilience by catching any issues in the Internet Stack before they impact their business. Catchpoint’s Internet Performance Monitoring (IPM) suite offers synthetics, RUM, performance optimization, high fidelity data and flexible visualizations with advanced analytics. It leverages thousands of global vantage points (including inside wireless networks, BGP, backbone, last mile, endpoint, enterprise, ISPs, and more) to provide unparalleled observability into anything that impacts your customers, workforce, networks, website performance, applications, and APIs.
Learn more at: https://www.catchpoint.com/
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.