AWS Auto Scaling vs Catchpoint comparison

Read 14 Catchpoint reviews

1,967 Views
1,161 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

AWS Auto Scaling

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

Catchpoint and AWS Auto Scaling both serve distinct purposes in IT performance and scalability. Catchpoint excels in performance monitoring, while AWS Auto Scaling focuses on automatic resource management for applications, making it more comprehensive for cloud infrastructure.

Features: Catchpoint offers extensive monitoring, detailed analytics, and real-time alerts. AWS Auto Scaling provides automatic resource scaling, integration with AWS services, and ease of use.

Room for Improvement: Catchpoint could improve visual reporting tools, customer support response times, and the complexity of setup configurations. AWS Auto Scaling users suggest better documentation, more granular control over scaling policies, and enhancements in user control and guidance.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Catchpoint is straightforward to deploy with comprehensive customer service but faces critiques on setup complexity. AWS Auto Scaling integrates seamlessly with AWS environments and has reliable support, though its initial setup documentation could be better.

Pricing and ROI: Catchpoint's setup cost is high but provides significant ROI with detailed insights. AWS Auto Scaling, using AWS's pay-as-you-go model, is seen as cost-efficient with predictable expenses.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS Auto Scaling vs. Catchpoint Report (Updated: December 2025).

AWS Auto Scaling vs. Catchpoint

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,114 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS Auto Scaling

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

14th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Catchpoint

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

38th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (62nd), Cloud Monitoring Software (31st), Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) (12th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of AWS Auto Scaling is 0.4%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Catchpoint is 0.7%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
AWS Auto Scaling	0.4%
Catchpoint	0.7%
Other	98.9%

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Ishaka Michael Efe

DevOps Engineer Intern at HNG Tech

Automation has simplified traffic management and improved workload efficiency

I'm not really sure what improvements I would want to see in AWS Auto Scaling because I haven't really used it extensively or explored most of it. To the extent that I've used it so far, I think it is very good. I can't really say for certain what should be improved because I haven't really explored it a lot. However, what I've been using it for has been very good. If there could be training for AWS Auto Scaling, that would be fine. If you could add more training on how to use it correctly and on the functions that I haven't used before or some people have not really used before, that would help. If there could be more documentation and training on it, that would be beneficial.

Read full review

AnmolRai

Technical Consultant Project Lead at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

Valuable monitoring features enhance ecommerce experience while improvement needed in region-specific insights

As part of the improvement, there are certain categories, like for the China market, where we face issues. We are currently using an external tool, Splunk, for reporting. If we could receive similar data for the China market as we do for North America and Asia Pacific, this would be helpful.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It helps us to reduce the cost."

"The solution's monitoring effectively monitors our application and CPU utilization."

"The good thing about Autoscaling is that it provides the capacity to minimize downtime. So, it gives you the assurance of stability and robustness within your system."

"Our internal business applications are hosted in AWS Auto Scaling."

"AWS Auto Scaling is cost-effective and very useful for businesses."

"Auto Scaling is a cool feature that works well and its automatic scaling capabilities are very useful."

"The tool gives you the flexibility to scale up and grow. The solution is also fast to deploy."

"The various scaling options available, such as step scaling, are particularly useful."

More AWS Auto Scaling pros

"Catchpoint provides a great amount of information."

"The solution offers three different ways of slicing data to look for abnormalities."

"During business hours, it has worked absolutely fine without any issues."

"The product's most valuable feature is the ability to identify and troubleshoot network issues."

"Catchpoint's customer service and support are valuable."

"The best feature in Catchpoint is the alert or the notification my company gets frequently, in particular, every five minutes. It's the notification you get whenever a respective market has an issue. There's also a dashboard in Catchpoint that shows the markets you support, so all the markets will be highlighted graphically in the dashboard whenever there's downtime that could affect you. If there's no issue for a specific market, it will be in green, so in this way, anybody would be able to understand which market has issues and which market has no issues through Catchpoint. The tool is very useful for monitoring activities."

"The most valuable features of Catchpoint are basically the transaction monitors on the API and UI."

"The drill-down feature of this product was very good. It allowed us to identify the exact page or area of the site that was causing our customers an issue."

More Catchpoint pros

Cons

"It has latency issues. It depends on the distribution used, whether it's Amazon Linux, Windows Linux, etc. Occasionally, there are latency issues, which might lead to slower performance."

"The solution must improve automation."

"The product could add more features for managing instances."

"It could be cheaper."

"The tool's stability could be improved."

"The speed of the solution must be improved."

"If there could be training for AWS Auto Scaling, that would be fine. If you could add more training on how to use it correctly and on the functions that I haven't used before or some people have not really used before, that would help."

"The solution's infrastructure scalability and elasticity could be improved."

More AWS Auto Scaling cons

"As part of the improvement, there are certain categories, like for the China market, where we face issues."

"The old user version was better, it was more user-friendly."

"Catchpoint can be improved by focusing solely on network monitoring."

"As part of the improvement, there are certain categories, like for the China market, where we face issues."

"There's still too much manual involvement in getting customized test configurations out there. It's good, but it still takes a lot of effort. In other words, it's when you need to configure it to collect a specific variable and that kind of thing."

"There are essentially a lot of quotas. Nobody wants to sit and manually create monitors for someone who uses synthetic monitoring."

"We would like the script creation feature of this solution to be improved, as it currently requires a complicated manual process to update the scripts."

"if we need to do performance analysis, we have to click too many times. For example, if there is an issue that is caught by Catchpoint, we need to understand what the error is and at which step it failed, or which transaction that is impacted. To drill down, we have to click too many things to get the answer."

More Catchpoint cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"AWS Auto Scaling is a pay-per-use and pay-as-you-use service."

"AWS Auto Scaling's price is high."

"The pricing is good. I have not had any customers that have complained about the price."

"AWS Auto Scaling is an expensive solution."

"The product is expensive."

"The product has moderate pricing."

"AWS Auto Scaling is a cheap solution."

"The pricing is based on consumption and works on a point scale. For example, let's say I want to look at www.google.com, and I'm going to test it to see if it's there. It will bring back all this data that tells me how long it took to connect and how long it took to get the first byte. It will list all the resources on the page, showing that they all work and there are no broken links. It brings that data back. That test has an assigned point value depending on what you decide to extract from that test. If all I do is check to see whether it's available, it might be one point. I don't know the exact point values off-hand. This is just an example."

"In terms of licensing fees, I believe they were slightly higher."

"The solution's pricing varies based on services and licensing models."

"The price and licensing are very, very high. They have to come down on the pricing to match with the industry standard."

"The solution's pricing is comparable to the last tool we were using."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

23%

Retailer

12%

Real Estate/Law Firm

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	11

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	8

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about AWS Auto Scaling?

The tool's most valuable feature is vertical auto-scaling, which is easy to use. However, most companies now prefer horizontal scaling. I set up the health check integration to monitor CPU usage. W...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS Auto Scaling?

I'm not sure about the pricing aspect of AWS Auto Scaling or the cost of it.

What needs improvement with AWS Auto Scaling?

What do you like most about Catchpoint?

Catchpoint is very flexible and also provides logs for troubleshooting purposes. It helps us fix issues within the SLAs signed with the end users. The tool is easy to learn.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Catchpoint?

The solution's pricing varies based on services and licensing models. Clients typically see significant operational and cost efficiencies, with time savings estimated between 30% and 40%.

What needs improvement with Catchpoint?

Akamai mPulse vs AWS Auto Scaling

Comparisons

Compared 30% of the time

VMware Aria Operations for Applications vs AWS Auto Scaling

Compared 30% of the time

Splunk ITSI (IT Service Intelligence) vs AWS Auto Scaling

Compared 22% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs AWS Auto Scaling

Compared 18% of the time

More AWS Auto Scaling Competitors

Dynatrace vs Catchpoint

Compared 16% of the time

Datadog vs Catchpoint

Compared 11% of the time

ThousandEyes vs Catchpoint

Compared 10% of the time

New Relic vs Catchpoint

Compared 6% of the time

Splunk Observability Cloud vs Catchpoint

Compared 5% of the time

More Catchpoint Competitors

Product Reports

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

January 2026

Download AWS Auto Scaling product report

Download Catchpoint product report

January 2026

Also Known As

AWS Auto-Scaling

No data available

Overview

AWS Auto Scaling monitors your applications and automatically adjusts capacity to maintain steady, predictable performance at the lowest possible cost. Using AWS Auto Scaling, it’s easy to setup application scaling for multiple resources across multiple services in minutes. The service provides a simple, powerful user interface that lets you build scaling plans for resources including Amazon EC2 instances and Spot Fleets, Amazon ECS tasks, Amazon DynamoDB tables and indexes, and Amazon Aurora Replicas. AWS Auto Scaling makes scaling simple with recommendations that allow you to optimize performance, costs, or balance between them. If you’re already using Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling to dynamically scale your Amazon EC2 instances, you can now combine it with AWS Auto Scaling to scale additional resources for other AWS services. With AWS Auto Scaling, your applications always have the right resources at the right time.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Catchpoint is the Internet Resilience Company™. The top online retailers, Global2000, CDNs, cloud service providers, and xSPs in the world rely on Catchpoint to increase their resilience by catching any issues in the Internet Stack before they impact their business. Catchpoint’s Internet Performance Monitoring (IPM) suite offers synthetics, RUM, performance optimization, high fidelity data and flexible visualizations with advanced analytics. It leverages thousands of global vantage points (including inside wireless networks, BGP, backbone, last mile, endpoint, enterprise, ISPs, and more) to provide unparalleled observability into anything that impacts your customers, workforce, networks, website performance, applications, and APIs.

Learn more at: https://www.catchpoint.com/

Sample Customers

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers

Information Not Available