"We have seen Workfusion improve on accuracy and compliance... With the Workfusion model, we reduce human error and the need for further QC. We switch more to a QA process where we're testing whether the model is effective."
"Their robots have increased the rate of efficiency by two to five times in our organization. There is still a human element to code out the package running the robots. You can't just click something and have it run. However, once that has been done, you can parallelize it 10 or 100 times in a fairly straightforward manner."
"The cognitive features of this solution are good."
"The most valuable features are the Excel activities. It has a number of Excel activities that are quite reliable."
"The document processing engine is good. We're extracting around 70 data points from a given document, and we have an automated extraction rate of 80 percent for those fields."
"For automating mundane activities, I can recommend WorkFusion."
"We need to analyze documents in order to understand them. We don't need to dedicate much time to this because WorkFusion's machine learning capabilities are very good. We can easily extract information and classify these documents. The document processing engine is very important to our organization because it is the center for many use cases, as we need to control the information contained in documents."
"WorkFusion helps by speeding up processes. The process takes time. It has business costs associated because there are people waiting to take the next steps in the process. The end result of waiting, whether it is an internal or external team, is that they are delayed. Therefore, it helps us in speeding up business processes and improving employee morale, as people don't have to do repetitive work anymore."
"The studio design is fine compared to other similar products. There is nothing extraordinary about it, but at the same time, there are not any negatives."
"It is easy to use and very stable. It is a rugged product, and it doesn't break so easily."
"The most valuable features are the portals for extracting data from PDF files, appending data to SAP, automating the SAP, downloading reports, and mapping and creating the reports accordingly to your requirements."
"The initial setup is pretty straightforward."
"The system is stable and very little maintenance is required, assuming the bots process is perfectly designed."
"BotFarm is an easy solution to use and the interface is better than older versions."
"The dashboards are quite good, especially on the latest versions."
"The solution is very stable. We don't have issues with bugs or glitches."
"The solution is very manageable."
"There could be better version control through their web platform. That is something that could be improved on. Integration from the IDE, e.g., from WorkFusion Studio directly into Control Tower, would be nice to have too."
"It is difficult for non-technical users to use WorkFusion. If we really want to build automation, we definitely need Java developers. Their RPA is not for non-technical people. If I look at competing products, like Automation Anywhere, UiPath, Blue Prism, or even Power Automate, a non-technical person can build basic automations and deploy them. Since non-technical people can easily build basic automations, they can be deployed in no time. With WorkFusion, there isn't a similar feature that works well. One needs to write code from scratch to build automation. That is definitely a deterrent if we really want to do quick, dirty automation. I would not rate WorkFusion very high on their no-code, low-code paradigm. In this area, I would definitely expect them to improve."
"We are having some database issues, but we are addressing them."
"The user experience could be better both from an RPA perspective and from a business perspective."
"So far, we have developed only one automation using machine learning. The results were less than optimal. Part of this could be because of the use case that was selected. Overall, our experience was suboptimal. WorkFusion was an outstanding partner in terms of providing their experts for free to help us on that particular use case, but we still have a lot of things to figure out in terms of how to use its machine learning capability."
"The most common issue we have is with the OCR, but that also depends on the quality of the documents your scanning. Still, I would say the OCR is comparable to other solutions. I wouldn't say it's better or worse than other OCR engines."
"We had some issues in the past, but it is fairly stable now. From what I hear, it is more stable in the later versions. With version 10.1.4, there were some issues relating to load distribution. However, it is good now."
"I would like it if they provided a more detailed roadmap in terms of where they are going with the product. As we are trying to make decisions about the things that we are going to do to try to augment our capabilities, we could know whether they are thinking about the same things or not."
"In the future, they should have a similar version for the cloud and on-premises, and the installation should be flawless within few minutes."
"The deployment could be simplified."
"Its UI could be made better. It should also be more flexible. Currently, it is more rigid, and a little more flexibility is required. Their technical support should also be better. We are not very happy with their technical support. Its price is also quite high as of now. They should improve its price. Its setup should also be made easier. It is quite complex to set it up. Even though we were able to set it up a little fast because we had done something similar earlier, but it has a very complex setup. It is extremely resource-hungry. If they can make it a little light on resources, that would also be useful."
"The CL command poses an issue during the process of data conversion, accuracy, data loss and the assessment of certain data as false."
"Although I like the OCR technology, it could still be further improved."
"When somebody is just learning this product it can be difficult for them to understand, so improvements to the user interface would be helpful."
"The user experience could be made a little better with this solution. I find it difficult to find qualified people to be able to use the solution."
"The OCR tool, the optical character recognition tool, could be more efficient."
"We have connectivity and integration with pretty much every single tech stack across the table that we have in the world, and there are a few areas that they don't do that well yet. I'd be looking for some improvement there, in terms of their integration with certain products."
AutomationEdge is ranked 31st in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 1 review while BotFarm is ranked 7th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 19 reviews. AutomationEdge is rated 6.0, while BotFarm is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of AutomationEdge writes "Speeds up execution times, stable cloud version, but installation complex". On the other hand, the top reviewer of BotFarm writes "Reliable and easy to use with good dashboards". AutomationEdge is most compared with Automation Anywhere (AA), UiPath, Blue Prism, EdgeVerve AssistEdge RPA and Microsoft Power Automate, whereas BotFarm is most compared with Automation Anywhere (AA), UiPath, Blue Prism Cloud, Edgeverve AssistEdge Cloud RPA and ABBYY Vantage.
See our list of best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors.
We monitor all Robotic Process Automation (RPA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
