Asana vs Hive comparison

Asana and Hive Technology are both solutions in the Project Management Software category. Asana is ranked #4 with an average rating of 7.8, while Hive Technology is ranked #39. Asana holds a 2.9% mindshare in PMS, compared to Hive Technology’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 86% of Asana users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Hive Technology users who would recommend it.

Asana

Read 52 Asana reviews

2,554 Views
1,635 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

Hive

Read 2 Hive reviews

454 Views
381 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Asana

Hive

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Asana and Hive compete in the project management software space. Hive has an advantage in team collaboration, while Asana is superior in task management.

Features:Asana offers timelines, workflows, and task dependencies for structured task management. Hive provides in-built chat, email integration, and automated workflows for enhanced team collaboration.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:Asana offers straightforward deployment and responsive customer support for a smooth onboarding process. Hive provides efficient deployment with more customization options, potentially requiring additional setup time, and proactive customer service.

Pricing and ROI:Asana offers a competitive pricing model, delivering strong ROI through improved productivity and time management. Hive may have a higher initial cost but provides significant ROI by enhancing team collaboration and communication.

To learn more, read our detailed Asana vs. Hive Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Asana vs. Hive

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,114 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Asana

Ranking in Project Management Software

4th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AI Sales & Marketing (3rd)

Hive

Ranking in Project Management Software

39th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Project Management Software category, the mindshare of Asana is 2.9%, down from 6.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Hive is 0.6%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Project Management Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Asana	2.9%
Hive	0.6%
Other	96.5%

Project Management Software

Featured Reviews

Rusira Sathnindu

Automations Engineer at Ad Up

Task tracking has streamlined sprint work but complex navigation still needs simplification

Asana's UI is a little bit too complex for me. Sometimes I get confused. Sometimes I mis-navigate. Asana is a very complicated product, but if it could offer a different kind of UI for different types of people, that would be better. This UI is good for a power user, but for a normal user who just comes to see what their tasks are, a simplified UI would be more appropriate. Sometimes the navigation is a little bit clunky. Sometimes I click back on things that I do not want to click back on. Everything else is good, and the UI is the only part that I see could use a little bit of improvement.

Read full review

Sachin Shukre

Sr Manager at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees

Provides efficiency in metadata storage and implementation

Many applications perform similarly to Hive, offering metadata implementations. I'm looking into their advancements, such as aggregated joins and MBT joins. Hive's virtual implementations are evolving, and tools like Snowflake offer specific use case advancements. In future releases, the Bloomfilter function should be a part of Hive. Windowing functions should also be there. I would also like to see AI implementation.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Asana allows you to create your own project with sub sections with subtasks that can be assigned. The feature I really love is that you can tag people to notify them that there has been progress on a project as well as add attachments."

"The solution's user interface is very good."

"The solution appears to be quite stable."

"This solution is easier and faster to use compared to Jira. It's not very structured and you can add sub-tasks and issues easily."

"What I like the most about Asana is its API integrations because we use a lot of cluttered toolsets in our company since we need to cater to different clients, for which its integration gives us a lot of flexibility."

"Asana provides a lot of options and a lot of customization to give the best efficient way for your business to operate. For example, I can customize my tasks, tables, and pipelines the way I want them to fit my business model. It's easy and highly customizable."

"I like how easy it is to use the rules within Asana."

"It's an easy way to communicate."

More Asana pros

"It is a good solution for us when it comes to metadata implementation. It's beneficial to have metadata stored in Hive."

"It excels in handling diverse data formats and is particularly beneficial for constructing a data lake for companies with mixed data types, such as videos and structured data."

Cons

"It would be great if Asana could create a library for each project within the interface."

"A user should be able to identify an assignee for specific tasks or task types while applying the template, or at a minimum, allow for a default assignee. As it is, the template gets created with the just task dates driven by the project start and end dates inputted by the user. In my current situation, I'm assigning myself to many tasks, so I have to do that manually every time. Even if I eventually start adding other people to assign tasks, there won't be more than a handful to do. However, those few people will have multiple tasks. It would be nice to be able to select those individuals during the setup rather than having to do so manually once the project has been created."

"Their workflows and automation could use a big improvement. I don't even know if they have anything in that regard right now. I would really love to see a way where you can send custom alerts based on a task's completion or status change or an approval coming through. I would love to see a way to get some low-code functionality into Asana because right now, that is a big miss."

"On the development side for technical project management, Asana is missing features. We only use it for discussing tasks and strategies, and we use it for customer to-do lists. It doesn't have the source code integration that Jira and Jira Service Desk both have."

"The stability of Asana is good. However, there are some issues with maintenance, when the solution is down. For example, there might be maintained for a few hours where we cannot use the solution."

"Some customizations and functions are still not available, however, so far, they haven't been a deal killer."

"A rating of eight is given because a downside exists in that everyone has access and notifications are often received for projects that are not involved in, leading to quite a few emails daily, sometimes around sixty to eighty."

"We tried, but we haven't been successful with it. If people don't have the training, it is not easy to use. You need to make sure that the people are trained to use the system. They can provide more resources in the form of webcasts and videos that people can use to train themselves and understand how to use it."

More Asana cons

"For smaller datasets, it may not be as suitable, and its performance might not be optimal."

"In future releases, I would also like to see AI implementation."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost is $25 US per unit per month."

"The solution's free version can be used for basic functions."

"This solution is reasonably priced."

"I can describe Asana's pricing as a sweet spot since it is neither very high nor very low, especially regarding the value Asana adds to its products...In our company, we use 50 percent of the features provided by Asana, because of which we only pay 50 percent of Asana's total cost."

"We're on the business tier, which is $25 a month if you're on an annual contract. It's $31 if you're on a month-to-month contract. In my experience, there are no hidden costs with Asana. I know Smartsheet has these add-ons that you can buy, which is an additional cost, but Asana doesn't have any add-ons that I know of. When you're trying to scale the product and want to add users, you have to do it in buckets of five. This is also something to consider."

"Price-wise, I think it's an affordable option for mid to large-sized companies."

"It has a free version."

"There is a free version of Asana, but we use the paid version to receive all the features we want. The overall price is reasonable."

More Asana pricing and cost advice

"It is an open-source solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Management Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Healthcare Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	39
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	7

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Asana?

The solution's user interface is very good.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Asana?

The pricing of Asana is slightly high. To add one user is expensive, which makes me cautious about upgrading or adding more users.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Asana?

A rating of eight is given because a downside exists in that everyone has access and notifications are often received for projects that are not involved in, leading to quite a few emails daily, som...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Jira vs Asana

Compared 17% of the time

monday.com vs Asana

Compared 13% of the time

Wrike vs Asana

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Project vs Asana

Compared 7% of the time

Trello vs Asana

Compared 7% of the time

More Asana Competitors

Planisware vs Hive

Compared 33% of the time

Adobe Workfront vs Hive

Compared 33% of the time

Jira vs Hive

Compared 33% of the time

More Hive Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Asana

January 2026

Download Asana product report

Buyer's Guide

Project Management Software

December 2025

Download Hive product report

Overview

Asana is web-based software-as-a-service that helps teams coordinate and manage their work. It helps companies move faster by making sure everyone knows the team’s plan and process and who is doing what by when.

Each user can create projects using a list, board, calendar, or timeline view. Within each project, users can add tasks, subtasks, sections, comments, attachments, start and due dates, and custom fields. Project and task followers get notifications on changes or comments on the project and/or task in their Inbox. Individual users can see all of the tasks they're responsible for across all of their projects in a view called My Tasks.

Asana is available in English, French, Spanish, German, and Portuguese.

Asana

Hive is a project management tool focused on streamlining team collaboration and enhancing productivity through its unique blend of task tracking, communication, and data visualization capabilities.

Hive addresses the demands of teams with its robust project management features. It brings together task automation, time tracking, and in-app communication to facilitate smoother operations. Its analytics provide insights to optimize team performance, making it ideal for businesses looking to improve efficiency. While it offers a comprehensive set of tools, users suggest enhancing its mobile application and expanding integration options.

What are Hive's most important features?

Task Automation: Automate repetitive tasks to save time and reduce errors.
Time Tracking: Monitor the time spent on tasks for effective resource management.
In-App Messaging: Communicate directly within the platform to minimize email reliance.
Analytics and Reporting: Access detailed insights for informed decision-making.
Gantt Charts: Visualize project timelines to track progress efficiently.

What benefits or ROI should users look for in reviews?

Enhanced Productivity: Streamlined workflows lead to more efficient task completion.
Improved Communication: A centralized platform for all project discussions.
Resource Optimization: Better time management and resource allocation.
Data-Driven Decisions: Comprehensive reports support strategic planning.

Hive has been adopted across industries like marketing, tech development, and consulting. Marketing teams leverage its campaign tracking features, while tech developers use task automation to manage complex projects. Consulting firms benefit from its robust analytics for client reporting.

Hive Technology

Sample Customers

Uber, Vodaphone, NASA, Spotify, Lyft, Baggu, Udacity, Patreon, Flipboard, Dropbox, Intel, Samsung, Airbnb, SFMoma, Hubspot, Trivago

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Asana vs. Hive

December 2025

Free Report: Asana vs. Hive

Find out what your peers are saying about Asana vs. Hive and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Asana vs. Hive report.

See our list of best Project Management Software vendors.

We monitor all Project Management Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.