We compared Asana and Trello based on our users reviews in six parameters. After reading the collected data, you can find our conclusion below:
Users found the setup process for Asana to be straightforward and easy, with it being intuitive and adaptable. Trello was described as simple and quick to set up, with users mentioning that it can be done in a short amount of time.
Asana offers the ability to collaborate on projects and tasks, efficiently manage timelines and work breakdown structures, create subtasks, and customize the interface. On the other hand, Trello provides a user-friendly interface with drag and drop functionality, the ability to add images and tag colleagues, and the option to provide updates within tasks.
Based on the feedback, Asana could improve its scalability for large teams, task dependencies, video communication capabilities, and integration with other workflows. On the other hand, Trello could benefit from quick tutorials, more integrations, customization options, better reporting capabilities, and improved mobile app features.
Users have different experiences with the setup cost of Asana and Trello. Asana is known for being simple to set up, and Trello provides a free version that fulfills users' requirements without any expenses. Asana's pricing is seen as reasonable by some, and Trello's pricing options are highly regarded. In conclusion, users hold varying viewpoints regarding the pricing and setup cost of both platforms.
Asana users have seen a favorable return on investment, with enhancements in time allocation, efficiency, and company expansion. Trello users have also achieved positive ROI, although the specific advantages are not specified.
Asana's customer service has garnered varied feedback, with some users praising its helpfulness and responsiveness, while others perceive it as less comprehensive compared to other tools. Conversely, Trello's customer service has been commended for its strong web and email support.
Comparison Results
In Asana and Trello, both platforms have simple setup processes and are praised for their user-friendly interfaces. Asana stands out for its efficient task management and the ability to easily share projects and tasks among team members. However, it is not as scalable for larger teams and lacks integration with other workflows. On the other hand, Trello is valued for its intuitive navigation and visualization capabilities. Areas for improvement for Trello include the need for tutorials, more integrations, and better reporting capabilities. Pricing and licensing experiences vary, with some finding them reasonable while others suggest they could be lower. Customer service and support experiences are mixed for both platforms.
"Asana has helped me (as an individual contributor) organize my daily work and given me a way to plan for longer term objectives."
"The most valuable feature of Asana is the ease of navigation."
"The ability to build subtasks and break things down off of our major tasks has been very valuable. It is very stable and extremely scalable. The initial setup is very simple."
"It has helped our departments maintain visibility."
"The solution scales well."
"The initial setup is straightforward. It was just a few clicks to get started and to integrate Asana into our existing business system. It took 15 days to fully implement our projects using Asana."
"The initial setup was straightforward."
"Asana is a very simple interface for project managers to figure out, providing all the functions they need."
"The usability of this solution is its most valuable feature. It offers a great flow of creating a business rule that allows you to just add identifiers and qualifiers."
"The product helps with the management of projects."
"The most valuable features of the solution are that it is easy to use and flexible while offering the ease of use of drag-and-drop functionality for each task."
"I like Trello's speed. It is more user-friendly compared to Jira. Jira is technical, whereas the management can use Trello."
"We found that the solution was available on multiple devices, has a great user experience, is simple to use, and it is available on multiple channels."
"The product has a lot of integrations."
"The installation was extremely straightforward."
"It offers a very solid service alongside its innovative features and capabilities."
"We don't get enough notifications."
"The stability of Asana is good. However, there are some issues with maintenance, when the solution is down. For example, there might be maintained for a few hours where we cannot use the solution."
"I rate the support from Asana a four out of five."
"Some customizations and functions are still not available, however, so far, they haven't been a deal killer."
"The mobile application of Asana has to be improved a lot because no one wants to do a complete project management task on mobile."
"We'd like the capability to be able to set up weekly reminders."
"Currently, there are only a few available options, but it would be helpful to have more control over the notifications received."
"On the development side for technical project management, Asana is missing features. We only use it for discussing tasks and strategies, and we use it for customer to-do lists. It doesn't have the source code integration that Jira and Jira Service Desk both have."
"I would appreciate seeing how much time spend on each specific ticket."
"As a team board it did not work well for us."
"Unstructured data cannot be directly used; it needs to be structured first."
"Trello has become complex over the years."
"Although it has many useful features, the one thing I don't like about Trello is that it constantly sends out unimportant notifications."
"We cannot link tasks that are dependent on each other."
"Sometimes, I find it challenging to manage the checklists."
"Sometimes the notifications are not updated on iOS."
Asana is ranked 3rd in Project Management Software with 43 reviews while Trello is ranked 8th in Project Management Software with 36 reviews. Asana is rated 8.4, while Trello is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Asana writes "Stands out with portfolios, easy setup, and real-time information, but needs big improvement when it comes to workflows, automation, and dashboards". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trello writes "The solution is easy to set up, extremely stable, and is available on multiple devices". Asana is most compared with Microsoft Project, Wrike, Microsoft Azure DevOps, monday.com and Adobe Workfront, whereas Trello is most compared with Wrike, Jira, monday.com, Smartsheet and Zoho Projects. See our Asana vs. Trello report.
See our list of best Project Management Software vendors.
We monitor all Project Management Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
This is a good question, but the starting point would be to understand whether your focus is on project management software or portfolio management software because there is a big difference between the two.
In terms of software, project management software is really focused on managing individual projects and can help communicate information about a specific project. Project management software is commonly used by Project Managers and the project team members. Portfolio management software though is focused on the entire portfolio of projects to give senior leaders holistic visibility of those projects. Portfolio management software helps senior leaders to make better strategic decisions. Check out this article for more information on this topic: https://acuityppm.com/project-...
Hi Netanya, for complez projects I recommend Basecamp or Microsoft Project, but for small or low complexity projects I suggest Trello. Best regards.
Hi Netanya,
Trello is a simple and effective project management tool that is easy to use and has a variety of features that can help you manage your projects effectively. Asana is a more comprehensive project management tool that has more features and is more complex to use. Monday.com is a project management tool that is designed to be used by teams, and has features that allow for collaboration and communication within teams.
But, I would recommend Trello, because it is a simple and effective project management tool. It is easy to use and has a variety of features that can help you manage your projects effectively.
Hi Netanya,
If you want to reach a quick-wins at the portfolio level with an intelligent algorithmic and automated approach please look at my favourite tool called Aangine.
It gives you capabilities to run multiple What-if scenarios at the portfolio level, considering various constraints on capacity, budgets, timing and prioritization. It helps PMOs/SPMs very quickly to perform risk & value analysis and run impacts analysis to see what happens if suddenly priorities/capacity/budget will be changed. Visibility on future horizons, possibly bottlenecks and risks gives you the opportunity to compare and run an intelligent algorithm to optimise your future portfolio within a new reality immediately. As an outcome, in the first couple of quarters, you will get significant results on your execution side of the way of working.
Regarding the execution part of the delivery for the corporate customers, I would recommend Micro Focus PPM review.
Kind regards,
I. Bayraktar
I’ve used Trello, Asana, and Monday.com.
My favorite by far is ClickUp due to following reasons:
1. It’s inexpensive.
2. Support is great.
3. Very flexible - we do sprints with points and it’s great for this.
4. They are constantly launching new improvements.
5. Most important - my team loves ClickUp and actually uses it! We particularly like the goals feature.
Jira is what we currently use and I have no complaints about it at all.
Since 1998 I have been using the Planisware project portfolio management solution for multiple pharma organizations.
The application initially had the esoteric name OPX2. For easier international name recognition, its name sensibly became Planisware in 2009 with the release of P5. Subsequent releases of Planisware P5 and Planisware P6 (or V6) and currently Planisware Enterprise (E7) have brought substantive improvements to the stakeholder community in user interface, capabilities, reporting, and performance.
Planisware documentation has evolved markedly with more frequent publishing of detailed functional guides, videos, and release notes, available online for customers and from within the application. For example, the fifth set of release notes for E7, specifically 7.0.4; March 2022, is 133 pages long. Planisware Academy is another tool for gaining proficiency with project and portfolio management.
What I especially enjoy with Planisware is unsurpassed flexibility for managing project activities--not just as list tables and Gantt charts, but also with Kanban cards, roadmaps, stage and gates, deliverables, ideas, etc. Modules for resource management and cost management have similar depth of execution. Another module for tracking risks and opportunities is selectable when needed.
Planisware's implementation of activity types as a discrete breakdown structure facilitates the use of consistent, defined activities across projects and improves the accuracy of planning.
Project templates and activity library features are valuable for creating new projects more efficiently.
Data visualization is another Planisware strongpoint. It's possible to make dynamic slide presentations of working projects.
Given the depth and breadth of Planisware modules and the software's overall capabilities, each corporate organization has to make a long-term commitment to adopting Planisware. Providing stakeholders the opportunity to gain needed proficiencies with Planisware is also essential for reaping the considerable benefits of using this fascinating enterprise solution.
I have experience with Asana. It's an easy-to-use and configure solution, especially for medium and non-complex plans.