ArcSight Analytics vs One Identity Safeguard comparison

OpenText and One Identity are both solutions in the User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) category. OpenText is ranked #13 with an average rating of 9.0, while One Identity is ranked #7 with an average rating of 7.2. OpenText holds a 1.2% mindshare in UBA, compared to One Identity’s 2.3% mindshare. Additionally, 66% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of One Identity users who would recommend it.

ArcSight Analytics

Read 15 ArcSight Analytics reviews

272 Views
106 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

One Identity Safeguard

Read 45 One Identity Safeguard reviews

306 Views
120 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

ArcSight Analytics

One Identity Safeguard

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 4, 2025

One Identity Safeguard and ArcSight Analytics compete in the security monitoring and threat analysis category. One Identity Safeguard seems to have the upper hand in managing privileged access and session authentication, while ArcSight excels in log monitoring and complex threat analysis.

Features: One Identity Safeguard is known for its monitoring and control over privileged access, four-eye authentication, and secure session replays. It offers an extensive audit capability that integrates effectively into existing infrastructure. On the other hand, ArcSight Analytics is favored for its log correlation and comprehensive threat analysis, providing valuable insights into network security events.

Room for Improvement: One Identity Safeguard could improve its user interface and concurrent session management. Enhancements in storage efficiency for session records and broader integration possibilities are also advisable. ArcSight Analytics might focus on refining its visualization tools and improving GUI user-friendliness, along with better integration capabilities for a smoother user experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: One Identity Safeguard offers both on-premises and cloud deployment options with generally reliable technical support, though response times may vary. ArcSight Analytics primarily provides on-premises deployment, with quick and informative technical support that might not always meet user expectations for promptness. Both support teams are appreciated for their responsiveness.

Pricing and ROI: One Identity Safeguard is perceived to have a higher upfront cost but offers straightforward licensing with enhanced compliance and security, leading to an improved ROI through operational efficiency. ArcSight Analytics, while also expensive with cost variability, provides a strong ROI through better security threat visibility and compliance benefits, appealing to enterprises ready to invest in a premium solution.

To learn more, read our detailed ArcSight Analytics vs. One Identity Safeguard Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

ArcSight Analytics vs. One Identity Safeguard

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ArcSight Analytics

Ranking in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)

13th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

One Identity Safeguard

Ranking in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)

7th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Privileged Access Management (PAM) (4th), Non-Human Identity Management (NHIM) (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) category, the mindshare of ArcSight Analytics is 1.2%, down from 1.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of One Identity Safeguard is 2.3%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)

Featured Reviews

Syed Ubaid Ali Jafri

Head of Cyber Defense & Offensive Security at Habib Bank Limited

It has improved our system and network policy monitoring

They should improve on the following: * Timely resolution of issues and proper support once a ticket has been generated. * Systems appearing on the network which are not part of the domain controller. These should be monitored. * Inactive connections from servers, which are upgraded or downgraded within a VM, should be automatically revoked. * Logger monitoring should be separated from ESM monitoring. * Ability to integrate with cloud-based applications and monitor cloud-based events. * Ability to log and notify tailored rules via SMS/email. * Provide more ArcSight training and workshops.

Read full review

Tor Nordhagen

Executive Director at Semaphore

Transparent mode for privileged sessions will greatly simplify our client's administrative situation

We're introducing the solution's transparent mode for privileged sessions. This is part of what the client hasn't used before. It will simplify their administrative situation greatly. So far, the rollout of this feature has been a seamless process, but we're still in the midst of rolling it out. The benefits will be on the risk side. Right now, the way accounts are managed, you don't necessarily know who is using an account. There's a shared admin account, and that's not a good thing. And those accounts are shared in wallets by several people. One of the real benefits of safeguarding here is that the client will have an absolute audit of who is using an administrative interface, whether it's server or network.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This solution makes it easy to create use cases, and it is easy to move queries from use cases to the report to the dashboard."

"The data collection and the integration with different products are valuable features."

"The correlation engine is good."

"The most valuable features are that you get lots of connectors, which make it easy to log in to my ASM, and lots of prebuilt roles from the company."

"ArcSight Analytics has improved our system and network policy monitoring."

"The ability to correlate different logs is the solution's most valuable feature."

"The two most valuable features of this solution are its stability and scalability."

"One of the most valuable features is the alerts."

More ArcSight Analytics pros

"There are numerous valuable data protection features, including the content and information that offer us more scalable protection as needed."

"Being able to use a proxy server is an advantage."

"The technical support is tremendous."

"We use the solution’s “transparent mode” feature for privileged sessions. It is very easy because it is only a simple configuration for our users. We don't have to modify our network. We install it, configure it, and it works. So, it is super easy. The rollout for our users is seamless."

"It's one of the best products we've seen. When you start looking at the functionality and use cases and usability of the product, it's straightforward. They designed this product with the end-user in mind, and they also had the sysadmin who is supporting the product in mind. They really did a nice job. Overall, it's a nice product to work with."

"It is easy to manage. There is a very logical, clear user interface. Also, the integration of scripts is thoughtfully implemented. Overall, it's a nice product to manage."

"The extensible framework for authentication is one of the most valuable features. We use an MFA plug-in and a lot of different factors, depending on what the business use-cases are. And of course, the auditing functionality is also valuable."

"I have found the most useful feature of One Identity Safeguard to be Privileged Sessions."

More One Identity Safeguard pros

Cons

"The interactive dashboard is complicated and you need to have training in order to use it, so I think that it could be made easier to use."

"I would like to see integration with automation products, such as Phantom Automation."

"The customer service could be improved, and additional integrations with other APIs could be added."

"ArcSight's features that can be improved include anything related to its visualization capabilities and user friendliness."

"Network integration is very crucial, and you need to have the knowledge to get it done."

"The reporting and the way it is worded needs to be improved in future releases. The dashboards are quite poorly designed."

"ArcSight is not a user-friendly solution and the interface needs to be improved."

"The GUI interface is not always intuitive and easy for non-technical users to work with."

More ArcSight Analytics cons

"I rate customer support six out of ten. It needs improvement as it can significantly impact customer access."

"From a usability perspective, what we are finding out is that our privileged domain admin users, in particular, want functionality for extending a checkout session. So we are working with One Identity support to see if there's an enhancement that can be made to the product."

"Cost-wise, it is a little bit expensive, which makes it difficult to get management approval. Its price should be reduced."

"On a scale of one to ten, the stability is an eight."

"There is room for improvement in the launch module. They built in a launch button but they don't have effective instructions for configuring it to allow it to launch an RDP session. They're working on that, but the button is in the live product. If they were going to install something that wasn't useful, they should have just disabled it and not rolled it out with the product."

"The main thing that needs improvement is the slowness. Apart from that, the change password check-in feature also needs improvement because it is not working perfectly accurately."

"The high availability function of the box requires a long time to switch over from one appliance to another."

"We would like to have the option of importing assets by using the CSV file. It was available in the earlier versions, but it is not available now."

More One Identity Safeguard cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"In addition to the costs of standard licensing fees, there is the cost of labor for maintenance."

"My customers pay a yearly licensing fee for ArcSight Analytics."

"The monthly licensing fee is around $20,000. There aren't any costs in addition to the standard licensing fee."

"ArcSight Analytics is a bit expensive compared with other tools in terms of licensing costs, training, hardware implementation, and support."

"This solution is expensive."

"It can range between $30,000 and $40,000 USD, and can go up to $500,000 and $600,000 USD."

"Setup cost, pricing and licensing are all very expensive."

"The license is very expensive for us, partly due to inflation and partly because of the exchange rate between the Dollar and the Iranian Rial. We purchased a perpetual license that we've been using up until now, but I believe that we are not going to update it in the future. Instead, we plan to find another third-party to support us with the license, in the sense that we would have access to their license as a shared agreement."

"The pricing is about $80,000 per 100 servers. There are few elective costs."

"The pricing depends on our perspective, our budget, and, of course, the competitors we are taking into account."

"The full license is expensive but if you plan to use it in a big organization then it is the best option because it is more flexible."

"As compared to other products, it is reasonable, but the training sessions are too expensive."

"One Identity Safeguard is expensive and the cost goes up as we scale."

"Our licensing costs are on a yearly basis."

More One Identity Safeguard pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

26%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Government

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What SOC product do you recommend?

For tools I’d recommend: -SIEM- LogRhythm -SOAR- Palo Alto XSOAR Doing commercial w/o both (or at least an XDR) is asking to miss details that are critical, and ending up a statistic. Also, rememb...

See all answers

What do you like most about ArcSight Analytics?

ArcSight Analytics is used to get a deeper insight and threat analysis about the network.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ArcSight Analytics?

My customers pay a yearly licensing fee for ArcSight Analytics.

See all answers

What do you like most about One Identity Safeguard?

The identity discovery is good, and the performance is pretty good value.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for One Identity Safeguard?

The pricing of One Identity Safeguard is fairly priced and cheaper than other solutions of the same enterprise level. It provides a good cost-benefit ratio.

See all answers

What needs improvement with One Identity Safeguard?

There is room for improvement in integration between modules. The native integration between SPP and SPS, which is currently based on a plugin, could be enhanced. Customization for lookup passwords...

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 34% of the time

WALLIX Bastion vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 16% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 9% of the time

Delinea Secret Server vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 9% of the time

Saviynt vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 8% of the time

More One Identity Safeguard Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ArcSight Analytics

April 2025

Download ArcSight Analytics product report

Buyer's Guide

One Identity Safeguard

April 2025

Download One Identity Safeguard product report

Also Known As

ArcSight User Behavior Analytics, ArcSight UBA

No data available

Overview

ArcSight User Behavior Analytics offers enterprises the ability to monitor and detect from internal and external security threats and fraud.

OpenText

One Identity Safeguard manages and monitors privileged access, enhancing security with features like automatic session recording, real-time monitoring, and credential rotation. It integrates seamlessly, supports compliance with audit trails, and improves operational efficiency across organizations. This robust platform significantly bolsters security protocols while controlling sensitive operations.

One Identity

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Cavium

Buyer's Guide

ArcSight Analytics vs. One Identity Safeguard

April 2025

Free Report: ArcSight Analytics vs. One Identity Safeguard

Find out what your peers are saying about ArcSight Analytics vs. One Identity Safeguard and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ArcSight Analytics vs. One Identity Safeguard report.

See our list of best User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) vendors.

We monitor all User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.